OP
visionofstrength
Member
As I was editing above, while you were posting, I think we are in complete agreement here. The substance of claims, for me, should be individually verifiable, especially because it is very unlikely you can control for variables in data samples; there are simply too many known, and unknown variables.aquaman said:visionofstrength said:I look at it as a simple rephrasing of Peat's writings, nothing more.
This disturbs me even more then.
The only way to legitimately write your comments I quoted would be to have it happen to you, and to see it applied in the same way by others and have the same result (ie consciousness "regenerated", feel "reborn", "Like a child" again, and eat what you need when you want).
If it's just you re-writing your interpretation of Peat's words, then you definitely shouldn't be writing things like this, as really there is no evidence for it from your point of view. Only if you've worked with clients over an extended period and seen these results replicate themselves can you make those type of exceptianlly bold statements.
What does "consciousness regenerated" even mean? Or to feel "reborn"?
I'm working to try to make a kind of open source program for everyone, that will allow you to replicate (or not) the results I've achieved.
The way I've come to understand what Peat means by consciousness and regeneration is to search in toxinless.com for the words 'consciousness' and 'regeneration'. And I'm not claiming I do understand it the same way you might. I only know what it feels like for me to come back from near dead, and to be reborn and just as vital and young now as I have ever been, even in childhood.
I really believe we can all do this, all be reborn this way, no matter how sick or old we may seem to be. I'm working to share how I, at least, have done it (but there may be others here who have done it too, milklove, such_saturation, pboy, perhaps in their own way), so that we all may try and discover for ourselves in our own way.