Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Click Here if you want to upgrade your account
If you were able to post but cannot do so now, send an email to admin at raypeatforum dot com and include your username and we will fix that right up for you.
you said:http://www.bmj.com/content/349/bmj.g6015
you said:http://www.bmj.com/content/349/bmj.g6015
tara said:My guess is, not to take the study as terribly conclusive of anything because of the methods used and possible unidentified confounders?
15% of total diet? We'll understand when we no longer see your cheery contributions. Maybe update your pic annually so we can determine the AGEing? 'Course we'll never know exactly when you cut the consumption way down. N=1's are like that (thank goodness). Change is good. Possibly the presidency awaits if you promise it.Such_Saturation said:I've been eating 15% galactose for over two years
EnoreeG said:Possibly the presidency awaits if you promise it.
EnoreeG said:There also is a study showing they can give galactose to a 2 month old puppy and induce cataracts. It's quite amazing.
Effect of galactose worse in 2 month old puppies
The common biochemical factor found to initiate both types of sugar cataract is the formation of sugar alcohols (polyols) from either glucose or galactose by the enzyme aldose reductase (alditol: NADP+ 1-oxidoreductase, EC 1.1.1.21).
pboy said:I didn't read all the studies details...but does this only apply to post weaned animals? I find it hard to believe that D galactose would be harmful if its in the breast milk of mammals, unless perhaps post weaning physical changes take place
beagles fed a 30% galactose diet