Sitaruîm
Member
- Joined
- Jun 14, 2020
- Messages
- 480
Whoever demands credibility in order to consider an idea is not truly open-minded and it's no loss if many such persons are reluctant to participate in the forum.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Click Here if you want to upgrade your account
If you were able to post but cannot do so now, send an email to admin at raypeatforum dot com and include your username and we will fix that right up for you.
Connecting The Dots: From Conspiracy Theory to Reality
View: https://www.bitchute.com/video/WfNxhRGXj0Wh/
Connecting The Dots: From Conspiracy Theory to Reality
View: https://www.bitchute.com/video/WfNxhRGXj0Wh/
In case you think this is a conspiracy theory this is s Pfizer tweet from 2018“After users fill in a form on Alipay with personal details, the software generates a QR code in one of three colors. A green code enables its holder to move about unrestricted. Someone with a yellow code may be asked to stay home for seven days. Red means a two-week quarantine.
In Hangzhou, it has become nearly impossible to get around without showing your Alipay code. Propaganda-style banners remind everyone of the rules: “Green code, travel freely. Red or yellow, report immediately.”
Pfizer Partnered With China's Vaccine Passport Platform, Admits Being 'Proud To Stand With China Leaders.' - The National Pulse
Pfizer Inc partnered with a Chinese Communist Party payment platform which has been used to implement “vaccine passports” in China since the outbreak of COVID-19. The company said it was “proud to stand with China leaders.”The pharmaceutical giant – whose U.S. lobbying efforts hit an all-time...thenationalpulse.com
In case you think this is a conspiracy theory this is s Pfizer tweet from 2018
View: https://twitter.com/pfizer/status/1004446584107618306
A more interesting question is that why would the PR team of a legitimate corporation opt to use a phrase that has an infamous association with a popular conspiracy theory? Without taking a stand in the debate, I totally understand how it could be seen as flaunting, as if to say "you were right, this is what we do, no one will believe you"In what way is this supposed to be viewed? How does this not make you look like a conspiracy theorist even if the term can be misused. Its not a new term it has been used for centuries and does not automatically imply what you put into it in any way. I think maybe the war in ukraine have a slight effect on world ecomomy, right? Its not my interest to debate the war but its a bit stupid to think norhern trust wouldnt find it a bit relevant for trade, eh?
I am not sure if thats actually true. I am aware of that use of it, but Im lurking around places like ray peat forum (which to be honest is about the only place I encounter it). No family or relatives would have any idea what I was talking about it being a conspiracy. I dont think that association is very clear, or feels relevant for the people engaging in this stuff (you could argue they should, and Im sure theres some variancy in the degree of knowledge about that associtation but in general it seems low, and at least it would not be relevant for the people they want to attract. Which is whom it is ment to be meaningful for). If you google it you mainly get results like this: What is the New World Order? , which until 2 or 3 years ago was the only version I'd ever heard and thats after 10 years peating f.exA more interesting question is that why would the PR team of a legitimate corporation opt to use a phrase that has an infamous association with a popular conspiracy theory? Without taking a stand in the debate, I totally understand how it could be seen as flaunting, as if to say "you were right, this is what we do, no one will believe you"