B
Braveheart
Guest
“If freedom of speech is taken away, then dumb and silent we may be led, like sheep to the slaughter.” ― George Washington
Last edited by a moderator:
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Click Here if you want to upgrade your account
If you were able to post but cannot do so now, send an email to admin at raypeatforum dot com and include your username and we will fix that right up for you.
? ? ? ?? ?? ?? ?Welcome to The Great Reset
They have been using it for years, domestic terror is the new jihadi narrative, underlying it all is profit seeking, oil being the main profit in the Middle East and maintaining the dollar reserve currency status.
Controlling public meanings via information is the new gold, you have the capacity to create new markets, lead the peasants to the new "popular" watering hole etc, with tech you can reach the world, taking down middle eastern countries for oil is one profit, controlling their government and allowing propaganda to spread opens up the countries to western information flows, meanings are created and new markets accordingly, this can be achieved in a mid sized office in NYC.
Censorship in the name of "hate speech" is multifaceted, the main one it stifles criticism of the ruling class, they use the minority argument as shield to cover for their own interests.
It also protects big techs monopoly interests, Parler and other social apps could take millions of users from big tech so they are labeled "hate platforms" and destroyed. The mainstream establishment shills(journalists) start the narrative by claiming said alternative platforms are full of hate, said platform is canceled and then the second wave of shill journos claim said platform never had the capacity to be a viable alternative to Twitter, they create the impression it just wouldn’t generate profit, the counters the monopoly competition argument. If it’s not an American or israeli owned tech company they will be even more aggressive toward it.
57 million voted for trump, they didn’t want them on Parler, this could have started huge growth.
They were talking about executing Pence on parlor. Sooo yeah, they took that ***t down. You're ******* crazy.
Show me these posts you speak of and not just your hyperbole. Just because you believe it doesn't make it true.The woke brigade on twitter talk about executing people on twitter on an hourly basis, Twitter is also full of religious extremist and general hate, it’s also full of paedophiles, you name the degeneracy and twitter has users promoting it, the attack on alternative tech is to crush any potential competition, it’s financial and power based motives.
Show me these posts you speak of and not just your hyperbole. Just because you believe it doesn't make it true.
Your corporate overlords thank you for repeating their programming.Show me these posts you speak of and not just your hyperbole. Just because you believe it doesn't make it true.
Did you not read your own definition? Terrorism is to intimidate the people. "Storming" a government building is not the definition of terrorism. Let me help - OKC bombing was NOT an act of terrorism. Back then some experts attempted to set the record straight for the media, but that was so ignored that now we have people like you saying one thing and then saying it means something else entirely.noun: terrorist; plural noun: terrorists
- a person who uses unlawful violence and intimidation, especially against civilians, in the pursuit of political aims.
If you storm the capitol in a mob, trying to interfere with an government process, that is by definition, terrorism.
EDIT: Also, no one is taking away anyones free speech. These people are free to go yell on a street corner or any public place they want to. But because republicans wanted cake makers the ability to deny wedding cakes to gay people if they so choose, facebook can also kick off anyone they want to.
Show me these posts you speak of and not just your hyperbole. Just because you believe it doesn't make it true.
Your corporate overlords thank you for repeating their programming.
Can you figure out what is happening yet?
View attachment 21137View attachment 21138
A single cakemaker doesn't have the monopolistic/oligarchistic power of Twitter, FB, Amazon. You've made a false equivalence.noun: terrorist; plural noun: terrorists
- a person who uses unlawful violence and intimidation, especially against civilians, in the pursuit of political aims.
If you storm the capitol in a mob, trying to interfere with an government process, that is by definition, terrorism.
EDIT: Also, no one is taking away anyones free speech. These people are free to go yell on a street corner or any public place they want to. But because republicans wanted cake makers the ability to deny wedding cakes to gay people if they so choose, facebook can also kick off anyone they want to.
Check out the Parler Wikipedia page-https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Parler
It basically has the antisemitism sign on the page, it’s part of a series on antisemitism on Wikipedia, we know wikipedia is a ruling class propaganda outlet, the same user names edit thousands of pages, it’s only a handful of people, in Germany a court case had to be taken to find the identity of one such editor, he turned out to be an israeli editing any criticism of israel or anybody linked to Israel in general.