Tavistock Child Gender Clinic

[Drareg]

Please watch this even if you don’t have kids. Please spread the video also.
The people behind this narrative are almost certainly linked into the Paedo elites and the Epstein ring. This vid doesn’t go this far.

The cancel culture witch hunt on those who spoke about these issues on social media like JK Rowling have gone silent since this came out.
After 3 sessions they can recommend hormone blockers! Someone in powerful positions mainly through NGO’s are driving our world crazy, we need to fight back against elite funded NGO’s.

The parents wanted the child’s gender changed because the child was gay, they figured a gender change would be better.
The uk have now started recommending doctors to explain that hormone blockers are not reversible, the cancel cult have been claiming for years that they can be reversed, social scientists mainly pumping this view rather than endocrinologists.
The reality is many children had suffered child sex abuse or trauma. Are you starting to get it now? Elite paedo rings, elite fund the NGO’s.

The intelligence organizations and paid for shills like mike cernovich try to discredit the elite paedo rings by creating exaggerated theories that have little evidence like pizzagate, as strange as those emails are we have little evidence and it’s important to go with what we have and keep hitting them with that.

We need to cancel NGO’s.



Staff concerns 'shut down' at child gender clinic

 

[Drareg]

Keep in mind also that the prefrontal cortex is still growing in kids and teens, isn’t it strange the pro paedo brigade never acknowledge how important that particular aspect of the brain is.
The more subtle paedo brigade like this tavistock group won’t speak about this hugely important clump of matter/structure we grow.

Prefrontal cortex - Wikipedia
"Many authors have indicated an integral link between a person's will to live, personality, and the functions of the prefrontal cortex.[2]This brain region has been implicated in planning complex cognitive behavior, personality expression, decision making, moderating social behavior, and moderating certain aspects of speech and language.[3][4] The basic activity of this brain region is considered to be orchestration of thoughts and actions in accordance with internal goals.[5]

The most typical psychological term for functions carried out by the prefrontal cortex area is executive function. Executive function relates to abilities to differentiate among conflicting thoughts, determine good and bad, better and best, same and different, future consequences of current activities, working toward a defined goal, prediction of outcomes, expectation based on actions, and social "control" (the ability to suppress urges that, if not suppressed, could lead to socially unacceptable outcomes)"

 

[Drareg]

The British newspaper the guardian has always being pumping pro transgender puff pieces aimed at adults initially and then toward kids, it turns out the former chair of the guardian was Chair of the transgender lobby group stonewall uk.

Did you know Jimmy Saville the notoriously depraved paedophile with connections to the royals and elites had reports ignored by then head of the BBC Danny Cohen, Cohen has the usual elite paedo connections Like rothschilds etc, he was schooled in the city of London which is owned by the banks essentially.
Danny Cohen (television executive) - Wikipedia

"Jimmy Savile and Pollard report[edit]
The Pollard review into Newsnight's decision to drop an investigation into sex abuse claims against Jimmy Savile found that Cohen had not read emails that had been copied to him warning of Savile's "dark side" and which indicated there was knowledge within the BBC of the unsavoury side of Savile's character. Had he done so "it was at least possible that further questions [on the advisability of running the Christmas 2011 tributes] would have followed".

Paedo elite limited hangouts are set up every where around Epstein and maxwell right now, see Vicky Ward as an example , their are more either acting on behalf of private elites or intelligence organizations which arguably work for the the top 1% either way.

The NGO’s are the elites way of bypassing governments by creating information in the hope it forms and changes meaning in the masses, they are currently ramping up and attempt to normalize paedophilia by first controlling what kids get taught in schools under the guise of a transgender humanitarian cause, it’s like the immigration policies justified as humanitarian when it’s really for cheap labor who don’t ask questions and are more malleable to authoritarians.

You getting it yet?
Talk to politicians when you see them ,voice your concerns, speak to work colleagues and friends ,don’t use theories like pizza gate to open the conversation ,and don’t just rant online about it.

 

[Drareg]

More on this tavistock report.
Academia in particular social studies is riddled with psychopathology, they are main promoters of these delusions, no science for the most part is used probably because they believe it’s a social construct, our elected leaders are being lobbied and actively promoting these delusions!
Don’t forget as always under the guise of humanity the folks promoting this "market" are receiving salaries in the hundreds of thousands for these "services" all courtesy of the tax payer, these loons are making it up as they go along based on the concept of "validation".

What the media missed about the Care Quality Commission’s Tavistock report | Keith Jordan | The Critic Magazine

However you dress it up, it’s what’s underneath that matters. Plenty of digital ink has been expended on the Care Quality Commission’s (CQC) inspection of the Gender Identity Development Service…

thecritic.co.uk

Most recently Dr David Bell, a former staff governor at The Tavistock, appeared on Channel 4 News just two days after his retirement warning: “This is a very highly politicized area and leaders of movements with a very powerful ideological commitment have managed to capture policy both medically [and] professionally in the media and in government with no evidence base.”

It is this political dimension which has led to the harms described by Dr Bell and the Trust’s critics.

This is what has driven the values and ethos at GIDS, praised by CQC as known and understood, and reported thus: “the values and ethos of the service focused on promoting non-judgemental acceptance of gender identities.”

This culture is otherwise known as the “gender affirming model of treatment” (GAMT).

In recent years, the Tavistock Centre has denied that it promotes GAMT; it has also denied that GAMT is harmful. It seems something very disturbing is going on behind those doors; something GIDS is too ashamed or alarmed to admit.

The CQC also says that, “Staff referred young people to other providers for medical treatments that was in line with good practice.”

However, there is no description in the CQC report as to what they consider to be good practice. Again, a casual observer will notice that young people are being given hormones that disrupt or delay a healthy puberty, and that patients are referred for wholly unnecessary operations which remove healthy, functioning organs. Who decided this practice is “good”? No one knows.

The same goes for the organisational culture, which is often difficult to ascertain. Organisations espouse values (what it says its culture is) and actual values (what it does behind closed doors) and perceived values (how the outside world sees it). For the Tavistock Centre, the espoused values are that they are neutral towards gender ideology (the belief that everyone has a gender identity). Its actual values, as evidenced by whistleblowers’ and the CQC’s reports, show it to be an enthusiastic promoter of this ideology.

Little wonder that the perceived culture is one of avoidance and denial. It’s worth remembering that these were the words used to describe the culture that allowed rogue surgeon Ian Paterson to needlessly amputate more than 1,000 women’s breasts. And while the Tavistock may not perform unnecessary bilateral mastectomies, it refers patients onwards to hospitals that do.

If we want to understand why so many thousands of children have been subjected to controversial, non-peer reviewed treatments, we need to look at what’s going on beneath the surface.

For people pretending to be the opposite sex, validation is like crack cocaine

In September 2020, Liz Truss, Minister for Women and Equalities announced the government’s decision following its review of the Gender Recognition Act. Perhaps to counter the howls from the genderist lobby at the shelving of self-ID, the government reduced the charge for a Gender Recognition Certificate from £140 to a nominal amount (it is now £10) and announced the opening of three new gender clinics.

These “new” gender clinics were in fact already being trialled as part of a pilot scheme, bringing the total number in England to ten. At the time of writing two — one in Dean St London and one in Manchester, Indigo — seem to be fully up and running.

The Indigo Gender Service website sets off more alarms than an earthquake in a Los Angeles car park and is worth quoting in full:

We are a new NHS adult gender service in Greater Manchester, which has been commissioned to provide care that is local, timely and easier to access. Indigo is a partnership between gtd healthcare and LGBT Foundation, delivering a service which has been designed by and for trans communities in Greater Manchester.

Our service is an innovative model of trans healthcare which is based in primary care. This means our clinical services are delivered by experienced GPs in practices across Greater Manchester, with additional services being delivered in community settings.

The website goes on to say: “We know that trans and non-binary people are the experts of their own experience, and that is why this service has been developed by and for trans communities. Our services are trans and non-binary led, with trans and non-binary people guiding and feeding into them at all levels.”

Let’s get one thing straight. If you are in denial about the reality of your sex, if you think that taking opposite sex hormones, and maybe lopping off a body part will solve any problem you might have about who you are, then you are not an expert of your own experience: you are deluded and, frankly, a danger to yourself.

A service “designed by and for trans communities” is like having a drugs rehabilitation clinic “designed by and for junkies and dealers”.

How did we get here? I can answer in a single word: validation.

Validation, in this context, is the confirmation of a person’s deeply held beliefs about themselves. The word pervades and pollutes the whole discourse of gender identity.

Take Lui Asquith, spokesperson for the Mermaids charity, who countered criticism of the Tavistock by saying: “it is all about creating a system in which everyone feels validated.”

Our young people have been sold a lie that they will pay for with their bodies. The taxpayer will be picking up the bill for years to come. The bill from ongoing hormone prescriptions, to dealing with the catastrophic side effects (see the East German women athletes doped with testosterone in the Eighties for a vision of what’s to come), and the cost of trying to repair the physical damage wrought by unnecessary and regretted surgeries.

Parents always knew that GIDS was inadequate; there would have been an outcry had that not been the verdict of the CQC. What we need to understand is that the CQC itself is inadequate, since it has signally failed to question the appropriateness of the practice or culture within GIDS. NHS England is inadequate – it should not accept experimental gender “medicine” with such alarming enthusiasm.

We must look to Keira Bell, victor at the High Court over The Tavistock, for context: “This judgment is not political; it is about the protection of vulnerable children. Please read it carefully: it exposes a complacent and dangerous culture at the heart of the national centre responsible for treating children and young people with gender dysphoria.”

Dr Hilary Cass has been invited to review gender medicine in England. The Cass Review has announced its terms of reference and started a Twitter account.

It’s difficult to see how this review can reach meaningful conclusions while clinicians and politicians cling onto the unscientific, ideological belief in gender identity, and that the best treatment for gender dysphoria is to drug and mutilate young people into a facsimile of the sex they say they want to be.

There is no evidence that opposite-sex imitation is an effective and worthwhile treatment for adolescent feelings of dissatisfaction with one’s sexed body. There is no randomised controlled trial. We do not know if happy transitioners would be happier had they not transitioned.

There needs to be a moratorium on such treatments in the NHS. The next fifteen years can provide the control group for the last fifteen years of uncontrolled experimentation. Only when there is a deep and broad body of quality research should the idea of medicalising gender identity be looked at again. Dress it up as being “by trans, for trans”, but what lies beneath is irreparable harm: something that no society should countenance, let alone validate.