Study: Unvaccinated Children Healthier Than Vaccinated Kids – Doctors Agree

Waynish

Member
Joined
Oct 11, 2016
Messages
2,206
O yes very spot on. The body doesn't know ahead of time about these poisons so the antibodies are only in response to the damage they do. Real immunity has very little to do with antibody creation from a poisonous injection!
Yes I haven't seen much immunology work that shows off more legitimate mechanisms like this - do you know of any?
 

encerent

Member
Joined
Sep 16, 2014
Messages
609
I wish doctors around here would agree. They are still trying to vaccinate everyone for everything.
 

SolidSteele

Member
Joined
Jun 1, 2016
Messages
46
Can anyone find the survey that this article is written about? I looked on the Frontiers in Public Health site that the article was supposedly published but it is wasn't there.

So we are left with a blog article from a anti-vaccination biased site quoting a reference that isn't there and we are meant to take this as good information? :banghead:

As a counter point: Vaccination Status and Health in Children and Adolescents: Findings of the German Health Interview and Examination Survey for Children and Adolescents (KiGGS)
Vaccination Status and Health in Children and Adolescents
Findings of the German Health Interview and Examination Survey for Children and Adolescents (KiGGS)

Abstract

Background
Whether unvaccinated children and adolescents differ from those vaccinated in terms of health is subject to some discussion.

Method
We evaluated data on diseases that are preventable by vaccination, infectious and atopic diseases, and vaccinations received that had been collected between 2003 and 2006 in a representative sample of 17 641 subjects aged 0 to 17 years in the framework of the German Health Interview and Examination Survey for Children and Adolescents (Kinder- und Jugendgesundheitssurvey, KiGGS).

Results
Evaluable data on vaccinations were available for 13 453 subjects aged 1–17 years from non-immigrant families. 0.7% of them (95% confidence interval: 0.5%–0.9%) were not vaccinated. The lifetime prevalence of diseases preventable by vaccination was markedly higher in unvaccinated than in vaccinated subjects. Unvaccinated children aged 1–5 years had a median number of 3.3 (2.1–4.6) infectious diseases in the past year, compared to 4.2 (4.1–4.4) in vaccinated children. Among 11- to 17-year-olds, the corresponding figures were 1.9 (1.0–2.8) (unvaccinated) versus 2.2 (2.1–2.3) (vaccinated). The lifetime prevalence of at least one atopic disease among 1- to 5-year-olds was 12.6% (5.0%–28.3%) in unvaccinated children and 15.0% (13.6%–16.4%) in vaccinated children. In older children, atopy was more common, but its prevalence was not found to depend on vaccination status: among 6- to 10-year-olds, the prevalence figures were 30.1% (12.9%–55.8%) for unvaccinated children versus 24.4% (22.8%–26.0%) for vaccinated children, and the corresponding figures for 11- to 17-year-olds were 20.3% (10.1%–36.6%) versus 29.9% (28.4%–31.5%).

Conclusion
The prevalence of allergic diseases and non-specific infections in children and adolescents was not found to depend on vaccination status.
 

yerrag

Member
Joined
Mar 29, 2016
Messages
10,883
Location
Manila
Interesting data on the Philippines... @yerrag

View attachment 4403

Hygiene plays a huge role...

View attachment 4404

And (probably) the greatest health booster of the 20th century was :trophy:...

View attachment 4405

You guys may be interested in reading pages 18,19 and 20 of the quoted book The Survival Factor In Neoplastic And Viral Diseases William Koch : William Frederick Koch : Free Download & Streaming : Internet Archive
Out of a population of 10 million at that time, those are staggering numbers. Probably they weren't able to impose their will on the Muslims in the south of the country.

This was roughly a generation after the Philippines declared independence (1898) from Spain, only for Spain to cede the Philippines to the Americans without a fight. After Filipinos were "pacified," teachers were quickly sent to the Philippines to establish a public school system. How effective it must have been that the general population in so short order became "educated" and acquiesced to a wholesale vaccination program that killed so many.

I'm just glad those days are over. Wikileaks would have saved those people. Still, as in the rest of the world. our doctors still hew to the party line - putting their faith and trust in vaccines that had such a dark history. And that legacy survives to the present. Stronger than ever. Protected by law by congress. And its harm spares no one.
 

PakPik

Member
Joined
Feb 24, 2016
Messages
331
Thanks for the informative bits of history, @yerrag . Yes, it seems the whole medical establishment is sold on that, either in a well-intended, ignorant way or for profit motives (doctors are "compensated" $$$ the more they vaccinate).
I've been watching a docu-series http://www.vaccinesrevealed.com/ that started airing yesterday (very interesting speakers so far), and one of today's speakers, Dr. Suzanne Humphries did say after the 25:00 mark : "The most highly vaccinated populations for smallpox were the populations that developed some of the worst and most devastating and deadly smallpox epidemics." And that this happened in particular in Japan, Germany, England and the United States. Sounds like what happened in the Philippines.
 

x-ray peat

Member
Joined
Dec 8, 2016
Messages
2,343
Can anyone find the survey that this article is written about? I looked on the Frontiers in Public Health site that the article was supposedly published but it is wasn't there.

So we are left with a blog article from a anti-vaccination biased site quoting a reference that isn't there and we are meant to take this as good information? :banghead:

As a counter point: Vaccination Status and Health in Children and Adolescents: Findings of the German Health Interview and Examination Survey for Children and Adolescents (KiGGS)
Vaccination Status and Health in Children and Adolescents
Findings of the German Health Interview and Examination Survey for Children and Adolescents (KiGGS)

Abstract

Background
Whether unvaccinated children and adolescents differ from those vaccinated in terms of health is subject to some discussion.

Method
We evaluated data on diseases that are preventable by vaccination, infectious and atopic diseases, and vaccinations received that had been collected between 2003 and 2006 in a representative sample of 17 641 subjects aged 0 to 17 years in the framework of the German Health Interview and Examination Survey for Children and Adolescents (Kinder- und Jugendgesundheitssurvey, KiGGS).

Results
Evaluable data on vaccinations were available for 13 453 subjects aged 1–17 years from non-immigrant families. 0.7% of them (95% confidence interval: 0.5%–0.9%) were not vaccinated. The lifetime prevalence of diseases preventable by vaccination was markedly higher in unvaccinated than in vaccinated subjects. Unvaccinated children aged 1–5 years had a median number of 3.3 (2.1–4.6) infectious diseases in the past year, compared to 4.2 (4.1–4.4) in vaccinated children. Among 11- to 17-year-olds, the corresponding figures were 1.9 (1.0–2.8) (unvaccinated) versus 2.2 (2.1–2.3) (vaccinated). The lifetime prevalence of at least one atopic disease among 1- to 5-year-olds was 12.6% (5.0%–28.3%) in unvaccinated children and 15.0% (13.6%–16.4%) in vaccinated children. In older children, atopy was more common, but its prevalence was not found to depend on vaccination status: among 6- to 10-year-olds, the prevalence figures were 30.1% (12.9%–55.8%) for unvaccinated children versus 24.4% (22.8%–26.0%) for vaccinated children, and the corresponding figures for 11- to 17-year-olds were 20.3% (10.1%–36.6%) versus 29.9% (28.4%–31.5%).

Conclusion
The prevalence of allergic diseases and non-specific infections in children and adolescents was not found to depend on vaccination status.

Read the results discussion very carefully. They state "The lifetime prevalence of diseases preventable by vaccination was markedly higher in unvaccinated than in vaccinated subjects." But the results show the opposite, that unvaccinated children in just about every age group had a lower rate of disease then the vaccinated ones. Then they contradict not only their own results but also the quote above in their conclusion by saying there is no difference.

I guess if you cant get the data you want just lie about it and hope no one will read the actual data.
 

x-ray peat

Member
Joined
Dec 8, 2016
Messages
2,343
Obvious to most but not all, the study below reports a positive correlation between the number of vaccines given in early childhood and infant mortality rates. Hmm and I thought vaccines wee supposed to save lives.
Infant mortality rates regressed against number of vaccine doses routinely given: Is there a biochemical or synergistic toxicity?
Abstract
The infant mortality rate (IMR) is one of the most important indicators of the socio-economic well-being and public health conditions of a country. The US childhood immunization schedule specifies 26 vaccine doses for infants aged less than 1 year—the most in the world—yet 33 nations have lower IMRs. Using linear regression, the immunization schedules of these 34 nations were examined and a correlation coefficient of r = 0.70 (p < 0.0001) was found between IMRs and the number of vaccine doses routinely given to infants.

upload_2017-1-13_0-3-10.png
 

encerent

Member
Joined
Sep 16, 2014
Messages
609
A new peer-reviewed study comparing health outcomes of vaccinated and unvaccinated children, provisionally published in a journal of public health and assigned a DOI number (a digital object identifier given by publishers to identify content and provide a persistent link on the internet), confirmed what parents like Sarah Carrasco have observed: that completely unvaccinated children have less chronic disease and a lower risk of autism than vaccinated children.

The researchers collected health information on over 660 children from a survey conducted in 2012 of mothers of children between six and twelve years old in four states (Florida, Louisiana, Mississippi, and Oregon). According to the abstract, the team of four scientists found that completely unvaccinated children were significantly more likely to get chickenpox and whooping cough but significantly less likely to suffer from ear infections, pneumonia, allergies, and brain or central nervous system disorders, including autism.

  • Vaccinated children were more than twice as likely to have some chronic illness.
  • Vaccinated children were nearly four times as likely to have learning disabilities, attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, and autism spectrum disorder.
  • Vaccinated children who were born prematurely were more than six times more likely to have brain or central nervous system disorders, including autism.
Ravenel, 78, admits that in his long career practicing medicine he used to dismiss the idea vaccines are connected to autism or other health problems in children. But now, after attending autism conferences, researching the peer-reviewed scientific literature, and paying more attention to parents’ experiences, he has changed his mind.

More at link:
Study: Unvaccinated Children Healthier Than Vaccinated Kids – Doctors Agree

Where's the actual study?
 

InChristAlone

Member
Joined
Sep 13, 2012
Messages
5,955
Location
USA

yerrag

Member
Joined
Mar 29, 2016
Messages
10,883
Location
Manila
Joined
Apr 29, 2018
Messages
7
Wondering the same. Was thinking about writing them asking for the link to the study.
Yeah is there any link to this "study"?

My wife is sadly being forced to have to get Flu, Rubella, and Tetanus shots for her Green Card interview. She has already gotten her Tetanus, and Rubella in her home country, but since she cant find the documentation, they are saying she needs them again...So clearly were very concerned.
 

Waynish

Member
Joined
Oct 11, 2016
Messages
2,206
Yeah is there any link to this "study"?

My wife is sadly being forced to have to get Flu, Rubella, and Tetanus shots for her Green Card interview. She has already gotten her Tetanus, and Rubella in her home country, but since she cant find the documentation, they are saying she needs them again...So clearly were very concerned.

Religious exemption.
 

Similar threads

Back
Top Bottom