Click Here if you want to upgrade your account
If you were able to post but cannot do so now, send an email to admin at raypeatforum dot com and include your username and we will fix that right up for you.
Its tough to know who is really is leading everything but it's obvious to anyone who really looks into this that the usual suspects such as Rothschild, Rockefeller, Soros, etc. are far from the top. If power is to last for generations and generations it must work from the shadows.
The Black Nobility come from throughout Italy, including Venice. I think the focus on Venice by people like Lyndon LaRouche and Webster Tarpley is a smoke screen and was already played out a long time ago.
yes. To clarify though, Leo Lehman was an ex-Catholic priest/Historian who wrote "Behind the Dictators" and in it exposes who wrote the Protocols (you can find its pdf online).
The Venetians were definitely a maritime/trading power for a time but so were Milan, Florence and Rome. Due to constant fighting amongst themselves they gradually lost their military/economic power and were eclipsed by the other European countries.
That's interesting.
Im not so sure banking was invented by the Venetians. The first international Bankers were the Knights Templars and they came out of France. The Jesuits then took up their place as the only Catholic order allowed to engage in banking and commerce. But regardless 1500 was a long time ago and there were a lot of intervening events and changes of power since then. I have no doubt that the Venetian families eventually joined in with the rest of the Black nobility but I don’t see much evidence that they were the ones at the top or that they were the ones to interbreed with the Western royalty. Probably the most successful at this were the Medicis and the Habsburgs, neither is Venetian. Also Britain is a Constitutional Monarchy that grew out of feudalism. The Doge system as I understand it is an oligarchy of aristocratic families with an elected leader, the Doge. You could make the argument that Britain is really an oligarchy as well but that could be said for all governments throughout history.But the Venetians royal families split to start the dutch maritime power, "were eclipsed by the other European countries."
-By the ones they created?
The reason I say this
1) The Venetian Usury is the banking system is the same we use today, and the British Maritime Empire came after the dutch, the Venetian black nobility started London/East India company also.
2) England to this day uses the "Venetian Doge System "of Government. And London is the financial capital of the world.
The black nobility families Fled to the lagoons/swamp of Venice at the "official collapse" of the West Roman Empire, to escape "Attila the Hun". There they ruled, there was alot of in fighting with Roman/Milian/Genose banking but they never defeated them.
Their(French royality, milian(venice biggest enemy)..etc.) only chance was with Cesare Borgia and the league of Cambri. But it failed after the Black nobility families took out a MASSIVE Loan from a extremely rich roman, paid off all sides and hired huge mercenary armies and defeated(never fought) the League of Cambri, and Cesare Borgia Died from the french disease.
All agianst one
We can see here how they slowly paid everyone off/deceived them then sided with France and won.
"Can't beat em join em"
These Financiers(black nobility) Inter-Bred with the "Blue Blood" families of northern/western European royalty and these families still rule to this day. Orsini, sforza, all these your talking about. They joined sides.
Feel free to correct me on any inaccuracy,
Admiralty/maritime law extends back to hammurabi, so our system goes back to at least babylon. Graham hancock says atlantis, 12,000 years, but i am skeptical of anything he says, but the legal systems goes back at least to the code of hammurabi
Maybe formal "bankers," but Phoenician traders relied on loans to finance their voyages across the Mediterranean and elsewhere.
what type of drugs you talking about? natural or synthetic?? alcohol has been a huge problem in white regions for thousands of years. non white regions were users of many psychedelic substances along with the usual drugs for just as long. the big ones that came with colonization were tobacco & coffee. one created havoc in many regions, with many having noses cut off & lips split to try and prevent further consumption. the latter did wonders for the industrial revolution and psyched people up enough to tolerate spending the whole day working. synthetic drugs have only been around the last century or so.
Yes very interesting. I ment the synthetic drugs tho.
first synthetic was in 1901 i believe. it was asprin. the ssri and other brain drugs created starting in the late 70s (possibly early 80s) have been quite detrimental to society by masking the true nature of why people are unbalanced. war chemicals (both during war & after in industry) along with lead were probably the first to screw up the healthy human. there was so much malnutrition b/w the start of the industrial revolution & ww2, that many people probably didn't notice these damaging effects. safe to say all these synthetics fit perfectly into the circle of industry that makes society sicker, and industry richer. what type of synthetics from the 19th century were you referring to?
I made the assumption that synthetic drugs were already in existence in the 19th century but as you stated I think it was all started in the 20th century. I was referring to illegal drugs though, and their effect on society and youth, the outlook on life by young people and those that have grown up to be adults later on in life. The typical party drugs, stoner drugs etc.
