Russel Blaylock's Natural Strategies For Cancer Patients

[litespirit]

Russel Blaylock, M.D., is a retired neurosurgeon, currently a visiting professor of biology according to blaylockreport.com. He works with cancer patients and uses both herbs and nutritional advice.

Dr. Blaylock shares lots of opinions with RP, very interesting.


[BBvideo 560,340:bck7wjes]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4i51V6ITdDo[/BBvideo]

[BBvideo 560,340:bck7wjes]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sqfRJpy0q_Y[/BBvideo]

[BBvideo 560,340:bck7wjes]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tnrABeGXM00[/BBvideo]

[BBvideo 560,340:bck7wjes]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OE-2JERAIKc[/BBvideo]

 

[burtlancast]

I would say he's a mixed bag.

On one side, he's helping people to seriously start questioning the medical profession, which Ray pointed out as the first step in getting better.

On the other side, he's just another opportunist who has compromised on his hippocratic oath for the sake of calling himself a doctor , and simply ignores any successful alternative cancer therapy.

What you get in this presentation is what doctors know best, ie GRANDSTANDING, and talking in generalities (as far as the alternative cancer treatments success rates he promotes).

He's FOR chemotherapy and radiation, when in truth, those should be the last line of defense when all natural therapies have been tried and failed.

But good luck having him acknowledging them.

 

[litespirit]

I have to acknowledge that I have seen a certain success rate in some cases of lymphoma and leukemia patients. And when I say success rate, I mean 'remission' not 'cure'. I have seen that myself in a paediatric ward. So, I think that there is some truth in what he says.

That said, I don't think that these forms of 'treatment' have any kind of potential for any type of cancer, they are carcinogenic themselves and immunosuppressive. He knows that full well.