nikolabeacon
Member
- Joined
- Jun 18, 2015
- Messages
- 326
Since we are trying to understand consciousness through the fusion of biology of physics and that aether, what do you guys think about this book? https://ia802502.us.archive.org/31/items/magnetism1small/magnetism1small.pdf
It seems that people like Tesla were completely against Einstein and Quantum Physics that was mental illness according to him. I don't know what to think about Eric Dollard as well.
Considering his influnce by Vernadsky(noosphere), magnetobiology , living water, and by people involved in parapsyhology......all of this can be considered Broscience by "normal people" and mainstream scientists......see below qute by Peat on Einstein ....
Yes Tesla thought that Einsten formulations can not be implied in real life .....wrong part was in equotion of Time.....it his vortex of Time or dynamic theory of gravity he explains....mass , space and time....those 3 are parts of "matter" or energy....he concluded that t is only infinity and at the the same time it is only constant ( we divide time on past, present and future) but jn real scenarion because t is constant it is always present....we see past and future also in present as images....this fits very well with Peat quote that I posted in first post on this page...."when we share consciousness through space, and call it "former lives" and "after life" when we share consciousness across time."
Eric Dollard it seems...all those things are taken from Viktor Schauberger( or Tesla) which is the first who talked about Living Water ....now Gerald Pollack only confirmed Schauberger theories...
And Peat talk a lot abot anomalous or polywater or living water....
". To adjust one's interpretive system at that time to rationalize Polanyi's results would have required discarding the basic assumptions that were behind Einstein's explanation of the photoelectric effect, and maybe even his theory of Brownian motion. However, by 2011, fewer people have invested their personal development in those ideas of short-range electrical binding forces that prevailed early in the 20th century, and now, for example, the evidence of "delocalized holes in DNA" can be discussed more openly. Eventually, science textbooks may be rewritten to show a steady progression of understanding from Bose, though Polanyi, Perutz, Szent-Gyorgyi, Ling, and Damadian (inventor of the MRI, holder of the patents infringed by GE, non-winner of the Nobel prize).
The only thing pathological about the polywater episode was the extreme effort that was made to stigmatize a whole category of research, to restore faith in the old doctrine that insisted there are no long range ordering processes anywhere in the universe.
"100 years ago, Albert Einstein was a major influence in popularizing the "only local" dogma of atomic interactions. (His work led directly to "quantum physics," but he never accepted its irrational implications.(1) I don't think he ever considered that the assumptions in his [atomic-quantized] theory of the photoelectric effect were the problem.) One charged atom is completely neutralized by its association with an oppositely charged atom, and the force is described by the inverse square law, that the force decreases with the square of the distance between point charges, meaning that the force is very strong at very small distances. However, a physicalsurface, a plane where one substance ends and another begins, follows different rules. "
1. From Einstein's 1926 letter to Max Born: "Quantum mechanics is very worthy of regard. But an inner voice tells me that this is not yet the right track. The theory yields much, but it hardly brings us closer to the Old One's secrets. I, in any case, am convinced the He does not play dice." Quoted in P. Busch and G. Jaeger, "Unsharp quantum reality," 4 May 2010.
"Everything in biology depends on the internal order of cells, and on the interactions of each cell with its surroundings. All of these orderly interactions involve contacts between biological molecules and water. The forces regulating interactions on that scale must be understood before life can be understood, but the nature of the forces at these interfaces has been controversial for 100 years. "
What is missing, being what Wheeler, Tesla & Einstein was alluding to, the simple explanation that ties it all together. Tesla believed and stated the way to achieve that simplicity:
"the day science begins to study non-physical phenomena, it will make more progress in one decade than in all the previous centuries of its existence. To understand the true nature of the universe, one must think it terms of energy, frequency and vibration."