Retraction Watch

P

Peatness

Guest
This is where they bury all the juicy articles. There is a section on covid 19

 

Grapelander

Member
Joined
Mar 26, 2019
Messages
1,297
Location
Sonoma County
Thanks for sharing Peatness.
Looks like they 'retracted' Jessica Rose & Peter McCullough Myocarditis paper.
We have retractions because the science or methodology is incorrect.
We also have retractions for political institutional biases.

Paper linking COVID-19 vaccines to myocarditis is temporarily removed without explanation

Rose, the corresponding author of the paper, told Retraction Watch that the publisher had “applied the ‘temporary withdrawal’ label to the paper without informing us.” The publisher, Rose said, “claimed that since ‘it wasn’t an invited paper’ that they were reconsidering publishing it and hence the ‘temporary withdrawal.’”

She said the move was “unheard of” and that Elsevier was “breaching the contract we signed – all fees have been paid for gorgeous color graphics.”

Elsevier has temporarily removed more than 100 papers since 2005, by our count. The papers are often reinstated without any mention of why the paper was removed.
 
OP
P

Peatness

Guest
The Jessica Rose & Peter McCullough paper was retracted sometime ago. McCullough was pretty upset about it at the time. There is an interview on the forum where he talks about it. They are destroying science. They are using censorship to control the narrative - it's criminal.
 
Z

Zsazsa

Guest
20220905_215230.jpg
 

joaquin

Member
Joined
May 4, 2022
Messages
699
Location
Shreveport
Why do the globalist pinheads hate meat so much?
 
Z

Zsazsa

Guest
BMJ Medicine


Research
Consistency of covid-19 trial preprints with published reports and impact for decision making: retrospective review

Conclusion No compelling evidence indicates that preprints provide results that are inconsistent with published papers. Preprints remain the only source of findings of many trials for several months—an unsuitable length of time in a health emergency that is not conducive to treating patients with timely evidence. The inclusion of preprints could affect the results of meta-analyses and the certainty of evidence. Evidence users should be encouraged to consider data from preprints.
 

Similar threads

Back
Top Bottom