P
Peatness
Guest
This is where they bury all the juicy articles. There is a section on covid 19
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Click Here if you want to upgrade your account
If you were able to post but cannot do so now, send an email to admin at raypeatforum dot com and include your username and we will fix that right up for you.
Thanks again!
This makes me think why now? Which peer reviews? Is this censorship?Exclusive: Hindawi and Wiley to retract over 500 papers linked to peer review rings
After months of investigation that identified networks of reviewers and editors manipulating the peer review process, Hindawi plans to retract 511 papers across 16 journals, Retraction Watch has le…retractionwatch.com
Conclusion No compelling evidence indicates that preprints provide results that are inconsistent with published papers. Preprints remain the only source of findings of many trials for several months—an unsuitable length of time in a health emergency that is not conducive to treating patients with timely evidence. The inclusion of preprints could affect the results of meta-analyses and the certainty of evidence. Evidence users should be encouraged to consider data from preprints.
Retracted
Measles-mumps-rubella vaccination timing and autism among young African American boys: a reanalysis of CDC data - PubMed
The present study provides new epidemiologic evidence showing that African American males receiving the MMR vaccine prior to 24 months of age or 36 months of age are more likely to receive an autism diagnosis.pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov