Remdesivir To Become Standard Of Care After Trial

meatbag

Member
Joined
Jan 15, 2016
Messages
1,771
Remdesivir shows success in large COVID-19 trial. Will become 'new standard of care,' Fauci says.
--
"The data shows that remdesivir has a clear-cut, significant, positive effect in diminishing the time to recovery," Dr. Anthony Fauci, director of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID), said in an interview with NBC News today (April 29). Patients treated with remdesivir took an average of 11 days to recover as compared with 15 days for those who received a placebo, he said.


"Although a 31% improvement doesn't seem like a knockout 100%, it is a very important proof of concept," Fauci said. "What it has proven is that a drug can block this virus."

he so-called primary endpoint of the study was patients' time to recovery, and more specifically, their "ability to be discharged" from the hospital, he said. The researchers used different metrics to measure improvement, depending on how sick a given patient was at the start of treatment

In addition to recovering more quickly, on average, fewer people in the remdesivir group than the placebo group died, though the result wasn't statistically significant. The mortality rate "trended toward" 8% in the treatment group as compared with 11% in the placebo, although the data still requires further analysis, Fauci said. Normally, the NIAID would wait several days to announce the results of the study, so that the final analyses could be completed.

But "whenever you have clear-cut evidence that a drug works, you have an ethical obligation to immediately let the people who are in the placebo group know so that they can have access," Fauci said. "And all of the other trials that are taking place now have a new standard of care."


As the research groups continue to finalize the data, "some of the numbers may change a little, but the conclusion will not change," he added.

Prior to Fauci's interview, Gilead Sciences, the company that produces remdesivir, announced it was "aware of positive data emerging" from the trial, according to a statement published April 29.

Gilead originally designed remdesivir to treat patients with Ebola, but the drug proved ineffective when tested for that purpose, Live Science previously reported. When tested in animal models of coronavirus infection, however, remdesivir showed efficacy in treating both severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS) and Middle East respiratory syndrome (MERS).


When SARS-CoV-2 emerged, scientists found the virus stopped replicating in a lab dish when exposed to the drug. Remdesivir also prevented the virus from infecting human cells in a petri dish, according to a letter published in the journal Nature in February. These preliminary data compelled the U.S. Food and Drug Administration to approve remdesivir for "compassionate use" in COVID-19 patients. Another trial showed the drug stopped SARS-CoV-2 infections in monkeys.


Since then, several research groups have launched clinical trials to test the drug's safety and efficacy. Several small studies suggested that remdesivir alleviated COVID-19 symptoms, including fever and breathing difficulties, but these studies did not include a control group that did not receive the drug, Live Science reported. Without a control group, doctors cannot determine that remdesivir actually caused patients to improve, as opposed to a strong placebo effect or some other, unknown factor.


In including a placebo group, the NIAID trial avoided that problem.

Remdesivir works by mimicking a nucleotide, one of the molecular building blocks of RNA, Live Science previously reported. Thus disguised, the drug can infiltrate viral RNA, disrupt its genetic sequence and render whole sections useless. "This drug happens to be blocking an enzyme that the virus uses" known as an RNA polymerase, which enables the virus to make copies of its genetic material, Fauci said.


Looking forward, the NIAID and its collaborators plan to test remdesivir in combination with other drugs, including anti-inflammatory treatments, to see if its positive effects can be amplified. In the meantime, the original remdesivir study will be finalized and submitted to a peer-reviewed journal, Fauci said.

"This will be the standard of care."
--
Antiviral treatments were mentioned in a recent interview with Ray Peat;Pol&Sci. Part 3. Coronavirus, Immunity, & Vaccines. 4/7/2020

RP:"One of the common practices when people come in with respiratory infections, even before they go on a ventilator, they might get aerosolized antiviral, such as Ribavirin, even though there's no published evidence showing that reduces mortality. Since they know it work in vitro it will reduce the virus in cells in a culture dish but there's no proven evidence it protects a person against the virus in the living state. That's still a common practice in hospitals. that and several other viruses and these viruses-

JB: Is that antivirals you mean?

RP: So called, yeah. They're classified. hydroxyquinoline is classified as an antimalarial and anti-inflammatory for rheumatoid arthritis and such, but these, the nucleoside analogues or nucleotide analogues or the hydroxyquinoline categories, these are all recognized as hazardous, mutagenic, possibly carcinogenic drugs. They damage the RNA or DNA of the virus, but they also damage the human DNA and RNA. And so they're known to be very toxic and if they are figuring that the person is beyond reproductive age then they minimize the effects of mutating their DNA. But especially in people who might reproduce its not good to give mutagens."
Pol&Sci. Part 3. Coronavirus, Immunity, & Vaccines. 4/7/2020
 

Regina

Member
Joined
Aug 17, 2016
Messages
6,511
Location
Chicago
Remdesivir shows success in large COVID-19 trial. Will become 'new standard of care,' Fauci says.
--
"The data shows that remdesivir has a clear-cut, significant, positive effect in diminishing the time to recovery," Dr. Anthony Fauci, director of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID), said in an interview with NBC News today (April 29). Patients treated with remdesivir took an average of 11 days to recover as compared with 15 days for those who received a placebo, he said.


"Although a 31% improvement doesn't seem like a knockout 100%, it is a very important proof of concept," Fauci said. "What it has proven is that a drug can block this virus."

he so-called primary endpoint of the study was patients' time to recovery, and more specifically, their "ability to be discharged" from the hospital, he said. The researchers used different metrics to measure improvement, depending on how sick a given patient was at the start of treatment

In addition to recovering more quickly, on average, fewer people in the remdesivir group than the placebo group died, though the result wasn't statistically significant. The mortality rate "trended toward" 8% in the treatment group as compared with 11% in the placebo, although the data still requires further analysis, Fauci said. Normally, the NIAID would wait several days to announce the results of the study, so that the final analyses could be completed.

But "whenever you have clear-cut evidence that a drug works, you have an ethical obligation to immediately let the people who are in the placebo group know so that they can have access," Fauci said. "And all of the other trials that are taking place now have a new standard of care."


As the research groups continue to finalize the data, "some of the numbers may change a little, but the conclusion will not change," he added.

Prior to Fauci's interview, Gilead Sciences, the company that produces remdesivir, announced it was "aware of positive data emerging" from the trial, according to a statement published April 29.

Gilead originally designed remdesivir to treat patients with Ebola, but the drug proved ineffective when tested for that purpose, Live Science previously reported. When tested in animal models of coronavirus infection, however, remdesivir showed efficacy in treating both severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS) and Middle East respiratory syndrome (MERS).


When SARS-CoV-2 emerged, scientists found the virus stopped replicating in a lab dish when exposed to the drug. Remdesivir also prevented the virus from infecting human cells in a petri dish, according to a letter published in the journal Nature in February. These preliminary data compelled the U.S. Food and Drug Administration to approve remdesivir for "compassionate use" in COVID-19 patients. Another trial showed the drug stopped SARS-CoV-2 infections in monkeys.


Since then, several research groups have launched clinical trials to test the drug's safety and efficacy. Several small studies suggested that remdesivir alleviated COVID-19 symptoms, including fever and breathing difficulties, but these studies did not include a control group that did not receive the drug, Live Science reported. Without a control group, doctors cannot determine that remdesivir actually caused patients to improve, as opposed to a strong placebo effect or some other, unknown factor.


In including a placebo group, the NIAID trial avoided that problem.

Remdesivir works by mimicking a nucleotide, one of the molecular building blocks of RNA, Live Science previously reported. Thus disguised, the drug can infiltrate viral RNA, disrupt its genetic sequence and render whole sections useless. "This drug happens to be blocking an enzyme that the virus uses" known as an RNA polymerase, which enables the virus to make copies of its genetic material, Fauci said.


Looking forward, the NIAID and its collaborators plan to test remdesivir in combination with other drugs, including anti-inflammatory treatments, to see if its positive effects can be amplified. In the meantime, the original remdesivir study will be finalized and submitted to a peer-reviewed journal, Fauci said.

"This will be the standard of care."
--
Antiviral treatments were mentioned in a recent interview with Ray Peat;Pol&Sci. Part 3. Coronavirus, Immunity, & Vaccines. 4/7/2020

RP:"One of the common practices when people come in with respiratory infections, even before they go on a ventilator, they might get aerosolized antiviral, such as Ribavirin, even though there's no published evidence showing that reduces mortality. Since they know it work in vitro it will reduce the virus in cells in a culture dish but there's no proven evidence it protects a person against the virus in the living state. That's still a common practice in hospitals. that and several other viruses and these viruses-

JB: Is that antivirals you mean?

RP: So called, yeah. They're classified. hydroxyquinoline is classified as an antimalarial and anti-inflammatory for rheumatoid arthritis and such, but these, the nucleoside analogues or nucleotide analogues or the hydroxyquinoline categories, these are all recognized as hazardous, mutagenic, possibly carcinogenic drugs. They damage the RNA or DNA of the virus, but they also damage the human DNA and RNA. And so they're known to be very toxic and if they are figuring that the person is beyond reproductive age then they minimize the effects of mutating their DNA. But especially in people who might reproduce its not good to give mutagens."
Pol&Sci. Part 3. Coronavirus, Immunity, & Vaccines. 4/7/2020
But, you know, Dr. Fauci says he has an ethical obligation to.......
So, that makes me feel warm and fuzzy and well cared for.
 

Regina

Member
Joined
Aug 17, 2016
Messages
6,511
Location
Chicago

Attachments

  • fauci_medal.jpeg
    fauci_medal.jpeg
    67.9 KB · Views: 64

yerrag

Member
Joined
Mar 29, 2016
Messages
10,883
Location
Manila
But does it disinfect?
 

jzeno

Member
Joined
Nov 20, 2017
Messages
543
lol this country is a ******* ***t hole (becoming one fast). HCQ works. Ivermectin works. Hell, even Hydrogen Peroxide works to kill viruses if you turn it into a mist and breath it in! But no, REMDESIVIR. The only one under patent. lol what a ******* joke of a medical system.

It's like the whole thing was conjured up for their share holders. Pathetic these stooges don't know how to make anything valuable without a pandemic by the media to fake it into relevance. Sad.
 

Regina

Member
Joined
Aug 17, 2016
Messages
6,511
Location
Chicago
lol this country is a ******* ***t hole (becoming one fast). HCQ works. Ivermectin works. Hell, even Hydrogen Peroxide works to kill viruses if you turn it into a mist and breath it in! But no, REMDESIVIR. The only one under patent. lol what a ******* joke of a medical system.

It's like the whole thing was conjured up for their share holders. Pathetic these stooges don't know how to make anything valuable without a pandemic by the media to fake it into relevance. Sad.
"these stooges don't know how to make anything valuable without a pandemic"
WORD!!
and what's up with the creepy medals?
 

Attachments

  • medals.jpeg
    medals.jpeg
    107.9 KB · Views: 43
Last edited:

LeeLemonoil

Member
Joined
Sep 24, 2016
Messages
4,265
Don’t forget that only days ago someone at the WHO leaked preliminary results of Remdesivir not working.

Was either a stunt to down stocks of Gilead once more to buy before the eventual „success“ report

Or a legit whistleblower and they now just go on and present the „true“ data as if nothing happened

Either way, big MSM from all around the world are reporting headline news of Remdesivir succes. This is sickening. No significant change in Mortality, possible extreme side effects with RNA tinkering. Who cares, it’s a breakthrough
 

LeeLemonoil

Member
Joined
Sep 24, 2016
Messages
4,265
I don’t think that the majority of doctors and hospitals around the world would easily adapt using Remdesivir based on these shitty data.
But in the US if Fauci is shilling so shamelessly already... it will be nothing but Remdesivir once you enter a hospital with suspected Covid.

And vaccination will come too in the US. Don’t harbor illusions about Trump preventing that. You will get vaccinated no matter how effective and eventual active will be.

I don’t know about the Gates-conspiracies with Microchips and all that stuff.
But I know about Pharma. If they can make you swallow mutagenic Remdesivir and injections you with heavy metal adjuvants to make you sick and possibly docile, they will.
 

Regina

Member
Joined
Aug 17, 2016
Messages
6,511
Location
Chicago
Don’t forget that only days ago someone at the WHO leaked preliminary results of Remdesivir not working.

Was either a stunt to down stocks of Gilead once more to buy before the eventual „success“ report

Or a legit whistleblower and they now just go on and present the „true“ data as if nothing happened

Either way, big MSM from all around the world are reporting headline news of Remdesivir succes. This is sickening. No significant change in Mortality, possible extreme side effects with RNA tinkering. Who cares, it’s a breakthrough
"a stunt to down stocks of Gilead once more to buy before the eventual „success“'
Correct. Just look at the movement of all the clique of stocks.
Trumps acting like a pharma salesman pumping [ABT] stock. Harvard professor made billionaire in 2020 from [MRNA].
[GILD] has this crap sitting on their shelves for ooooo EBOLA 00000. Front running and Fauci pump.

Remember, Martha Stewart went to the slammer for way less.

These psychopaths are over-playing their pair of 2's in a giggling frenzied fit.

They think we are so ridiculously stupid and blind. They are laughing at us; humiliating us; and think it's a lay up check mate.

Do you know BG wants to feed us cockaroach "milk"? That's what he thinks of us.

Listen to Clinton say how a peasant can "earn credits":
debess
and why oh why are these unelected and past elected citizens running roughshod over all our lives.
They go where they want. They do as they please. Entirely entitled and above reproach.
 
Last edited:

Regina

Member
Joined
Aug 17, 2016
Messages
6,511
Location
Chicago
I don’t think that the majority of doctors and hospitals around the world would easily adapt using Remdesivir based on these shitty data.
But in the US if Fauci is shilling so shamelessly already... it will be nothing but Remdesivir once you enter a hospital with suspected Covid.

And vaccination will come too in the US. Don’t harbor illusions about Trump preventing that. You will get vaccinated no matter how effective and eventual active will be.

I don’t know about the Gates-conspiracies with Microchips and all that stuff.
But I know about Pharma. If they can make you swallow mutagenic Remdesivir and injections you with heavy metal adjuvants to make you sick and possibly docile, they will.
have any ideas how we can escape it? Willing to move virtually ANYwhere to not succomb to their injections.
 

LeeLemonoil

Member
Joined
Sep 24, 2016
Messages
4,265
Needs to be seen. I'd really like to see some crowdfunded action or something like that to have lots of randomly picked Vaccines for Covid analyzed by third party labs.
If there is really the stuf fin it that is claimed, the world might not be so bad after all.
 

RealNeat

Member
Joined
Jan 9, 2019
Messages
2,376
Location
HI
have any ideas how we can escape it? Willing to move virtually ANYwhere to not succomb to their injections.
Ray said South America lol to the west. Let's all go to Peru, high elevation, good fruit, milk some random animals.
 

yomama

Member
Joined
Sep 8, 2015
Messages
67

alywest

Member
Joined
Apr 19, 2017
Messages
1,028
lol this country is a ******* ***t hole (becoming one fast). HCQ works. Ivermectin works. Hell, even Hydrogen Peroxide works to kill viruses if you turn it into a mist and breath it in! But no, REMDESIVIR. The only one under patent. lol what a ******* joke of a medical system.

It's like the whole thing was conjured up for their share holders. Pathetic these stooges don't know how to make anything valuable without a pandemic by the media to fake it into relevance. Sad.

How do you defend Trump in this situation then? Are you going to say Fauci went behind his back? I’d hope the POTUS would have the authority to demand proof and some sort of research to back up this choice in standard of care. They are all working hand in hand but when the time comes to pay the piper, you know Fauci will have his head on the chopping block saying “please, I was just trying to figure out the least harmful of all the options so we could make everyone feel like they’re somehow safe, and Trump was the one pushing me to do it.”
 

yerrag

Member
Joined
Mar 29, 2016
Messages
10,883
Location
Manila
How do you defend Trump in this situation then? Are you going to say Fauci went behind his back? I’d hope the POTUS would have the authority to demand proof and some sort of research to back up this choice in standard of care. They are all working hand in hand but when the time comes to pay the piper, you know Fauci will have his head on the chopping block saying “please, I was just trying to figure out the least harmful of all the options so we could make everyone feel like they’re somehow safe, and Trump was the one pushing me to do it.”

You don't. Because he needs no defending. Trump's the same guy talking like us with UV light and with disinfectants, and who gets caricatured in media with Chlorox bleach on his face and with Lysol cocktails. Even in own circle of ignorant friends, I know it's not a fight I want to engage in. Fauci is on his team - a team that's always going to include the establishment, simply because Trump still needs the establishment on his side. The problem is that the establishment players on his team - doesn't want to play Trump's team ball.

Picture being in Trump's shoes and the only people you are given to choose from for your team is plucked from the other team. That shows the degree of control the deep state has, its tentacles all over. Given this situation, I give Trump a lot of credit for being able to not only survive, but still be able to get the sympathy and understanding of his supporters. The people who complain the most about Trump failing - are those who I believe to be the most out of touch with reality.

The reality is that you don't go start a presidency with the team you already know. You tend to get the people with the "supposed" qualification - experience. Experience is a terrible basis, but that's still a safe choice. And with his team of "experienced" people on board, Trump gets a reality check. The experience counts for little when the experience is about doing things the wrong way - dishonest, self-serving, or of serving the vested interests, and not the people. In Trump's last year of his first term, having seen his cabinet, and having seen the agencies at work, you can count with your fingers how many people there are that Trump can count on to carry out his policies.

Even with good people, Trump still faces a congress of obstructionists. He continues to face stubborn opposition from congress, from the federal court system, and on top of it, he had to weather the manufactured impeachment proceedings against him. It didn't help his case that media, old and new, ranging from MSNBC to Google, are arrayed against him. Even now, I believe the COVID situation was created to keep him from regaining the initiative that was fresh off his winning the presidency.

It is clear as day to me how enormous the challenge is to anyone who attempts to do what Trump is doing. I don't even know we can have another president who can use the boomerang to great effect on his enemies. The term fake news was fake media's attempt to destroy Trump. Trump outflanked them and used it against fake media. Fake media in the past had no need to blatantly censor and expose their hypocrisy, but Trump left them no choice. Fake media had to resort to outright lies, and this led to even Trump's usual critics not even taking the ***t storm. See Tim Poole and Jimmy Dore, a center-left and a progressive, respectively, becoming a defender of the president as it was their way to expose the rot in their own party, in cahoots with the deep state. Recently, Michael Moore even produced a film exposing the green energy hoax, as the hoax was simply too unbearable to even countenance that being on the side of Trump with regard to green energy is much much the less of two evils, if both are to be seen as evils.

There is more hope if Trump is running the show. You never know how the chips will fall, and there are better chances that the ducks will all fall in a row with him than with any other president, of either party. Whatever these ducks are.
 

thomas00

Member
Joined
Nov 14, 2016
Messages
872
"The most common adverse effects seen in the remdesivir group in studies examining its use for COVID-19 include respiratory failure and blood biomarkers of organ impairment"

Add ventilator, then

'sorry your loved one died of the virus'
 
EMF Mitigation - Flush Niacin - Big 5 Minerals

Similar threads

Back
Top Bottom