Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Click Here if you want to upgrade your account
If you were able to post but cannot do so now, send an email to admin at raypeatforum dot com and include your username and we will fix that right up for you.
jyb said:I always take gelatin with sugar and fat, and in small doses (1-2 tablespoons) spread throughout the day and at night. Never had issues.
edwardBe said:Here is a post on resistant starch from Free the Animal (Yes I know we aren't about Paleo, but it is interesting),
http://freetheanimal.com/2013/04/resist ... tance.html
Bluebell said:Just out of interest, stuff that claims to feed the good bacteria in the gut, wouldn't that feed the bad bacteria too?
http://www.hindawi.com/journals/cdi/2013/872632/#B71The main substrate that is necessary for the growth of colonic microbial agents includes starch and complex carbohydrates which are usually available in considerable amounts in the bowel. In a study, carried out by a group from Minnesota, using hydrogen breath tests as an index of carbohydrate absorption in healthy individuals, up to 20% of a test meal of starch was found to be available for metabolism by the colonic microflora [69]. It has been found also that up to 10%, of consumed starch can escape the absorption in the small bowel [70], indicating that a considerable proportion of dietary starch reaches the large intestine. In another experimental study it has been shown that a significant increase in the total bacterial population of enterobacterial microbial agents was noticed in the faeces of rats which have been fed diets containing resistant potato starch when compared to those taking rapidly digestible waxy maize starch
[71]
In your opinion, that is.Mittir said:This whole approach of feeding resistant starch to bacteria goes against basic
goal of peatian approach.
Yes, but that doesn't mean that it lowers thermogenesis, itself, it just means resistant starch is not as thermogenic as cooked starch, which is understandable, since it is not metabolized by the small intestine.Mittir said:This following study shows how raw starch lowers thermogenesis, energy expenditure and glucose oxidation compared to cooked starch.
Bluebell said:Just out of interest, stuff that claims to feed the good bacteria in the gut, wouldn't that feed the bad bacteria too?