Drareg
Member
- Joined
- Feb 18, 2016
- Messages
- 4,772
Good to see studies like this, the vile nerd bill Epstein gates was pumping ventilators and oxygen on his Twitter recently in spite of the many studies discussing the dangers of it.
The final paragraph I quoted below is damning , they have murdered people, iatrogenic is the term when a doctor/expert murders
We really need the numbers on how many worldwide where put on ventilators and actually died from ventilator induced pneumonia, it’s likely in the thousands, they scum media and covid shills are sharing images and horror stories of lung fibrosis when it’s possibly being caused by ventilator abuse in many cases.
The covid 19 is a cult and articles like this are confirming it.
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jpc.14989
"Critical care management of patients with COVID‐19 has been influenced by a mixture of public, media and societal pressure, as well as clinical and anecdotal observations from many prominent researchers and key opinion leaders. These factors may have affected the principles of evidence‐based medicine and encouraged the widespread use of non‐tested pharmacological and aggressive respiratory support therapies, even in intensive care units (ICUs). The COVID‐19 pandemic has predominantly affected adult populations, while children appear to be relatively spared of severe disease. Notwithstanding, paediatric intensive care (PICU) clinicians may already have been influenced by changes in practices of adult ICUs, and these changes may pose unintended consequences to the vulnerable population in the PICU. In this article, we analyse several potential iatrogenic causes of the detrimental effects of the current pandemic to children and highlight the risks underlying a sudden change of clinical practice".
"The mixture of these factors, coupled with economic and political factors, puts at risk the fundamental principle of medicine built on science for patient well‐being, and the loss of this may increase the risk of harm to our patients. This is particularly true in countries where social pressures may be acute".
"Although, to date, no drug has shown to be beneficial for COVID‐19 in randomised trials, many advocated for the off‐label prescription of many pharmacological treatments, mostly based on anecdotes, small observational studies and biological plausibility: a ‘this makes sense’ or ‘my way to do it’ approach".
"The tendency towards more aggressive ICU management was mainly based on weak or absent supportive data, fuelled by a secondary pandemic of webinars, press coverage and social media spread of potential golden bullets to treat this new disease. The early approach to severe COVID‐19 was in clear dissonance with the paradigm shift towards evidence‐based ICU care over the last decade, with a ‘less is more’ approach for ventilatory management, resuscitation fluids, transfusions and other interventions"
"An example is the intubation of hypoxaemic patients. Anecdotal reports suggesting a more favourable outcome with ‘early’ intubation in COVID‐19 led to recommendations to avoid commonly used non‐invasive treatments such as continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP), high‐flow nasal cannula (HFNC) or non‐invasive ventilation (NIV). Not surprisingly the first figures showed that NIV was used only in 1 of 10 patients with confirmed COVID‐19 infection.4 Early intubation of a patient with known or suspected COVID‐19 with respiratory distress likely resulted in intubating patients who would have otherwise improved on CPAP or NIV. In addition, early intubation may also have denied life‐saving treatment for other patients, especially in resource‐limited settings. The iatrogenic costs, including ventilator associated pneumonia (VAP), ventilator‐induced lung injury (VILI), hemodynamic disturbances, as well as the adverse effects of sedation and immobilisation, could have been avoided in some cases"
The final paragraph I quoted below is damning , they have murdered people, iatrogenic is the term when a doctor/expert murders
We really need the numbers on how many worldwide where put on ventilators and actually died from ventilator induced pneumonia, it’s likely in the thousands, they scum media and covid shills are sharing images and horror stories of lung fibrosis when it’s possibly being caused by ventilator abuse in many cases.
The covid 19 is a cult and articles like this are confirming it.
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jpc.14989
"Critical care management of patients with COVID‐19 has been influenced by a mixture of public, media and societal pressure, as well as clinical and anecdotal observations from many prominent researchers and key opinion leaders. These factors may have affected the principles of evidence‐based medicine and encouraged the widespread use of non‐tested pharmacological and aggressive respiratory support therapies, even in intensive care units (ICUs). The COVID‐19 pandemic has predominantly affected adult populations, while children appear to be relatively spared of severe disease. Notwithstanding, paediatric intensive care (PICU) clinicians may already have been influenced by changes in practices of adult ICUs, and these changes may pose unintended consequences to the vulnerable population in the PICU. In this article, we analyse several potential iatrogenic causes of the detrimental effects of the current pandemic to children and highlight the risks underlying a sudden change of clinical practice".
"The mixture of these factors, coupled with economic and political factors, puts at risk the fundamental principle of medicine built on science for patient well‐being, and the loss of this may increase the risk of harm to our patients. This is particularly true in countries where social pressures may be acute".
"Although, to date, no drug has shown to be beneficial for COVID‐19 in randomised trials, many advocated for the off‐label prescription of many pharmacological treatments, mostly based on anecdotes, small observational studies and biological plausibility: a ‘this makes sense’ or ‘my way to do it’ approach".
"The tendency towards more aggressive ICU management was mainly based on weak or absent supportive data, fuelled by a secondary pandemic of webinars, press coverage and social media spread of potential golden bullets to treat this new disease. The early approach to severe COVID‐19 was in clear dissonance with the paradigm shift towards evidence‐based ICU care over the last decade, with a ‘less is more’ approach for ventilatory management, resuscitation fluids, transfusions and other interventions"
"An example is the intubation of hypoxaemic patients. Anecdotal reports suggesting a more favourable outcome with ‘early’ intubation in COVID‐19 led to recommendations to avoid commonly used non‐invasive treatments such as continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP), high‐flow nasal cannula (HFNC) or non‐invasive ventilation (NIV). Not surprisingly the first figures showed that NIV was used only in 1 of 10 patients with confirmed COVID‐19 infection.4 Early intubation of a patient with known or suspected COVID‐19 with respiratory distress likely resulted in intubating patients who would have otherwise improved on CPAP or NIV. In addition, early intubation may also have denied life‐saving treatment for other patients, especially in resource‐limited settings. The iatrogenic costs, including ventilator associated pneumonia (VAP), ventilator‐induced lung injury (VILI), hemodynamic disturbances, as well as the adverse effects of sedation and immobilisation, could have been avoided in some cases"
