Post Plandemic Legal Actions Here

[Mossy]

https://x.com/JimFergusonUK/status/1728389646575370679

View attachment 58585

Three cheers for Estonia.

 

[Beatrix_]

Why is taking them so long?


View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9L3xxE8AGqE


press conference on the letter from EMA, by Forum for Democracy in the European Parliament

Nov 21, 2023
“By circumventing and ignoring several laws, the committee knowingly introduced potentially lethal injections onto the market. The batch dependency due to the side effects has been admitted, as has the DNA contamination.” EU/FvD Press Conference November 21, 2023The press conference starts in Dutch and is continued in English. Botyh parts are subtitled.In this press conference, Marcel de Graaff (FVD MEP) and Joachim Kuhs (AfD MEP), Willem Engel and Vibeke Manniche (doctor) will discuss shocking revelations arising from the letter from the European Medicines Agency (EMA). This letter came in response to the request from Marcel de Graaff and Joachim Kuhs to immediately suspend the licenses of Covid-19 vaccines.A press conference will take place on Tuesday, November 21, 2023, from 3:00 PM to 3:30 PM, at the European Parliament in Strasbourg (Daphné Caruana Galizia Room - Weiss N-1/201).The press conference can be followed live via: https://ep.interactio.eu/66e2-hy1p-1w4uPress release Voorwaarheid https://voorwaarheid.nl/juridisch/per...on Potkaars: https://potkaars.nl/blog/2023/11/21/pers Conference-ema

Transcript​

Follow along using the transcript.

 

[ThinPicking]

Why is taking them so long?

Good question.

I only have a crappy one. What the hell is up with those podiums? Some children need to scribble pictures on them statim!

Everything done in Strasbourg and Brussels is so grossly sterile.

 

[Beatrix_]

Good question.

I only have a crappy one. What the hell is up with those podiums? Some children need to scribble pictures on them statim!

Everything done in Strasbourg and Brussels is so grossly sterile.

Actors role-playing

 

[Beatrix_]

https://x.com/TheChiefNerd/status/1730308332454347153

“Pfizer engaged in false, deceptive, and misleading acts and practices by making unsupported claims regarding the company's COVID-19 vaccine in violation of the Texas Deceptive Trade Practices Act.The pharmaceutical company's widespread representation that its vaccine possessed 95% efficacy against infection was highly misleading. That metric represented a calculation of the so-called ‘relative risk reduction’ for vaccinated individuals in Pfizer's initial, two-month clinical trial results. FDA publications indicate ‘relative risk reduction’ is a misleading statistic that ‘unduly influences’ consumer choice.”

 

[David PS]

View: https://twitter.com/TheChiefNerd/status/1745609374834323954

 

[Beatrix_]

https://assets.cureus.com/uploads/review_article/pdf/203052/20240125-8235-1308nlg.pdf

Abstract
Our understanding of COVID-19 vaccinations and their impact on health and mortality has evolved substantially since the first vaccine rollouts. Published reports from the original randomized phase 3 trials concluded that the COVID-19 mRNA vaccines could greatly reduce COVID-19 symptoms. In the interim, problems with the methods, execution, and reporting of these pivotal trials have emerged. Re-analysis of the Pfizer trial data identified statistically significant increases in serious adverse events (SAEs) in the vaccine group. Numerous SAEs were identified following the Emergency Use Authorization (EUA), including death, cancer, cardiac events, and various autoimmune, hematological, reproductive, and neurological disorders. Furthermore, these products never underwent adequate safety and toxicological testing in accordance with previously established scientific standards. Among the other major topics addressed in this narrative review are the published analyses of serious harms to humans, quality control issues and processrelated impurities, mechanisms underlying adverse events (AEs), the immunologic basis for vaccine inefficacy, and concerning mortality trends based on the registrational trial data. The risk-benefit imbalance substantiated by the evidence to date contraindicates further booster injections and suggests that, at a minimum, the mRNA injections should be removed from the childhood immunization program until proper safety and toxicological studies are conducted. Federal agency approval of the COVID-19 mRNA vaccines on a blanket-coverage population-wide basis had no support from an honest assessment of all relevant registrational data and commensurate consideration of risks versus benefits. Given the extensive, welldocumented SAEs and unacceptably high harm-to-reward ratio, we urge governments to endorse a global moratorium on the modified mRNA products until all relevant questions pertaining to causality, residual DNA, and aberrant protein production are answered.

 

[Peatress]

Landmark Covid vaccine injury win

Employers on notice as Tribunal decides employer is liable

news.rebekahbarnett.com.au