PFIZER’S OWN DOCUMENTS STATE BOTH INHALATION AND SKIN CONTACT WILL TRANSMIT WHATEVER IS IN THE VAX FROM THE VACCINATED TO THE UN-VACCINATED

tankasnowgod

Member
Joined
Jan 25, 2014
Messages
8,131
I am curious if anyone is keeping a record of those who are newly infected and the percentage of that group that are fully vaccinated.

Why would they?

First, they never even detected this "Novel Corona Virus" in most continents, seeing as they are using a PCR test that doesn't directly test for any virus, anyway. And none of these so-called health agencies ever got a sample of this virus, so what, exactly, are they even testing for?

Second, it's been clear everywhere that anywhere fro 88-99% of so called "COVID Deaths" had serious pre-existing conditions, that they are simply rebranding into COVID deaths. In the US, it's about 95%, meaning the deaths are at least 95% inflated. I would argue 100%.

They don't tell you the remaining number that died while on a ventilator. Or from a motorcycle crash, or gunshots wounds, or murder suicides. And even when they do break out these stats, it's been clear that over 90% of deaths were people over 70%.
 

bookshelf

Member
Joined
Nov 16, 2020
Messages
298
Methylene (sp?) blue. I also have throat irritation most days. When i get home typ mid afternoon I'll drink gelatin in water or bone broth and both of those also seem to ease the irritation. Youre probably right in that it's just a coincidence but i never noticed prior to a couple of months ago.
Oh yes, Methylene Blue. I've heard it to be good for respiratory but am not as familiar with it for throat irritation. It does make sense, though. There are studies out there that demonstrate that gargling with povidone iodine is great for killing off germs in the oral cavity. Here's one but there are others: Gargling with povidone-iodine reduces the transport of bacteria during oral intubation - PubMed It can even be applied as nasal swabs. I also have a friend who is a dental hygienist and she had to go to a seminar where they showed that, out of gargling for 30 seconds with hydrogen peroxide, listerine, povidone iodine and one other thing (sorry, don't know-maybe salt water?), the P.I. zapped the germs instantaneously and thoroughly. The others were not as effective. I think this is good if one suspects exposure or is presenting with symptoms but I wouldn't make a habit of any of them out of concern for killing off good bacteria. Maybe that would help? I am not sure how any of it would protect us from the transporting (shedding) from the "vaccine".
 

J.R.K

Member
Joined
Aug 4, 2020
Messages
1,836
Thank
PFIZER’S OWN DOCUMENTS
STATE BOTH INHALATION AND SKIN CONTACT WILL TRANSMIT WHATEVER IS IN THE
VAX FROM THE VACCINATED TO THE UN-VACCINATED

Here is what just this
small portion of this Pfizer document is saying:
1. If a man who was not vaccinated touches a vaccinated woman, or
breathes any of the air she breathes, (in other words, walks by her in
the office) and he then has sex with his wife, his wife can have an
adverse event and she should avoid having children.
2. If a woman who was never vaccinated gets exposed to a woman who was
vaccinated, she can:
A: miscarry,
B: spontaneously abort,
C. poison a baby via her breast milk
D: Have babies that have congitive difficulties.
This is universal, and very bad. Here is a small section of text I
translated to English:
8.3.5.3. Occupational Exposure
“An occupational exposure occurs when a person receives unplanned
direct contact with a vaccine test subject, which may or may not lead to
the occurrence of an adverse event. These people may include health care
providers, family members, and other people who are around the trial
participant.
When such exposures happen, the investigator must report them to Pfizer
saftey within 24 hours of becoming aware of when they happened,
regardless of whether or not there is an associated secondary adverse
event. This must be reported using the vaccine secondary adverse event
report form. SINCE THE INFORMATION DOES NOT PERTAIN TO A PARTICIPANT
INVOLVED IN THE STUDY, THE INFORMATION WILL BE KEPT SEPARATE FROM THE
STUDY.”
TO CLARIFY: Vaccine study participants become super spreaders of
something, they don’t say what it is, but it triggers secondary
adverse events in people that never had the vax, when they are exposed
to people who did have the vax.
THIS IS SO BAD that right here, in this little bit of quoted text, it
warns that un-vaccinated men who have been exposed to a woman who was
vaxxed will then pass whatever is in the vax to another woman.
Even the relatively small portion of the document I have put below here
says the vax triggers spontaneous abortions and reproductive problems
when un-vaccinated people are exposed to the vaccinated and that breast
milk from a vaccinated mom can harm the infant. And if anyone does not
believe it, then click the link above and wade through that enormous and
intentionally confusing document. It’s for real folks, the vax is
indeed the kill shot.
Do not permit the vaccinated to come anywhere near you, it is now
official.
Here is a small portion of this huge document, straight from pfizer:
Terms:
Study intervention – A vaccine test subject.
AE – Adverse event in someone who got the vax.
SAE: An adverse event in someone who was exposed to someone who got the
vax.
EDP: Exposure during pregnancy
8.3.5. Exposure During Pregnancy or Breastfeeding, and Occupational
Exposure Exposure to the study intervention under study during pregnancy
or breastfeeding and occupational exposure are reportable to Pfizer
Safety within 24 hours of investigator awareness.
8.3.5.1. Exposure During Pregnancy An EDP occurs if:
* A female participant is found to be pregnant while receiving or after
discontinuing study intervention.
* A male participant who is receiving or has discontinued study
intervention exposes a female partner prior to or around the time of
conception.
* A female is found to be pregnant while being exposed or having been
exposed to study intervention due to environmental exposure. Below are
examples of environmental exposure during pregnancy:
* A female family member or healthcare provider reports that she is
pregnant after having been exposed to the study intervention by
inhalation or skin contact.
* A male family member or healthcare provider who has been exposed to
the study intervention by inhalation or skin contact then exposes his
female partner prior to or around the time of conception.
____
If this vax is not shedding into other people, why would contact between
vaccinated and un-vaccinated be an event worth noting? If this vax is
not shedding, then WHY does a guy who has been around a vaccinated
woman, even if he did not touch her or have sex, need to worry about
getting a different woman pregnant?
That’s not all, the following is detailed, and far worse.
The investigator must report EDP to Pfizer Safety within 24 hours of the
investigator’s awareness, irrespective of whether an SAE has occurred.
The initial information submitted should include the anticipated date of
delivery (see below for information related to termination of
pregnancy).
* If EDP occurs in a participant or a participant’s partner, the
investigator must report this information to Pfizer Safety on the
Vaccine SAE Report Form and an EDP Supplemental Form, regardless of
whether an SAE has occurred. Details of the pregnancy will be collected
after the start of study intervention and until 6 months after the last
dose of study intervention.
* If EDP occurs in the setting of environmental exposure, the
investigator must report information to Pfizer Safety using the Vaccine
SAE Report Form and EDP Supplemental Form. Since the exposure
information does not pertain to the participant enrolled in the study,
the information is not recorded on a CRF; however, a copy of the
completed Vaccine SAE Report Form is maintained in the investigator site
file. Follow-up is conducted to obtain general information on the
pregnancy and its outcome for all EDP reports with an unknown outcome.
The investigator will follow the pregnancy until completion (or until
pregnancy termination) and notify Pfizer Safety of the outcome as a
follow-up to the initial EDP Supplemental Form. In the case of a live
birth, the structural integrity of the neonate can be assessed at the
time of birth. In the event of a termination, the reason(s) for
termination should be specified and, if clinically possible, the
structural integrity of the terminated fetus should be assessed by gross
visual inspection (unless preprocedure test findings are conclusive for
a congenital anomaly and the findings are reported). Abnormal pregnancy
outcomes are considered SAEs. If the outcome of the pregnancy meets the
criteria for an SAE (ie, ectopic pregnancy, spontaneous abortion,
intrauterine fetal demise, neonatal death, or congenital anomaly), the
investigator should follow the procedures for reporting SAEs. Additional
information about pregnancy outcomes that are reported to Pfizer Safety
as SAEs follows:
* Spontaneous abortion including miscarriage and missed abortion;
* Neonatal deaths that occur within 1 month of birth should be reported,
without regard to causality, as SAEs. In addition, infant deaths after 1
month should be reported as SAEs when the investigator assesses the
infant death as related or possibly related to exposure to the study
intervention. Additional information regarding the EDP may be requested
by the sponsor. Further follow-up of birth outcomes will be handled on a
case-by-case basis (eg, follow-up on preterm infants to identify
developmental delays). In the case of paternal exposure, the
investigator will provide the participant with the Pregnant Partner
Release of Information Form to deliver to his partner. The investigator
must document in the source documents that the participant was given the
Pregnant Partner Release of Information Form to provide to his partner.
8.3.5.2. Exposure During Breastfeeding An exposure during breastfeeding
occurs if:
* A female participant is found to be breastfeeding while receiving or
after discontinuing study intervention.
* A female is found to be breastfeeding while being exposed or having
been exposed to study intervention (ie, environmental exposure). An
example of environmental exposure during breastfeeding is a female
family member or healthcare provider who reports that she is
breastfeeding after having been exposed to the study intervention by
inhalation or skin contact. The investigator must report exposure during
breastfeeding to Pfizer Safety within 24 hours of the investigator’s
awareness, irrespective of whether an SAE has occurred. The information
must be reported using the Vaccine SAE Report Form. When exposure during
breastfeeding occurs in the setting of environmental exposure, the
exposure information does not pertain to the participant enrolled in the
study, so the information is not recorded on a CRF. However, a copy of
the completed Vaccine SAE Report Form is maintained in the investigator
site file. An exposure during breastfeeding report is not created when a
Pfizer drug specifically approved for use in breastfeeding women (eg,
vitamins) is administered in accord with authorized use. However, if the
infant experiences an SAE associated with such a drug, the SAE is
reported together with the exposure during breastfeeding.
Here’s the clear part of this, that everyone can understand:
8.3.5.3. Occupational Exposure An occupational exposure occurs when a
person receives unplanned direct contact with the study intervention,
which may or may not lead to the occurrence of an AE. Such persons may
include healthcare providers, family members, and other roles that are
involved in the trial participant’s care. The investigator must report
occupational exposure to Pfizer Safety within 24 hours of the
investigator’s awareness, regardless of whether there is an associated
SAE. The information must be reported using the Vaccine SAE Report Form.
Since the information does not pertain to a participant enrolled in the
study, the information is not recorded on a CRF; however, a copy of the
completed Vaccine SAE Report Form is maintained in the investigator site
file.
I WILL TRANSLATE THAT TO ENGLISH:
An occupational exposure occurs when a person receives unplanned direct
contact with a vaccine test subject, which may or may not lead to the
occurrence of an adverse event. These people may include health care
providers, family members, and other people who are around the trial
participant.
When such exposures happen, the investigator must report them to Pfizer
saftey within 24 hours of becoming aware of when they happened,
regardless of whether or not there is an associated secondary adverse
event. This must be reported using the vaccine secondary adverse event
report form. SINCE THE INFORMATION DOES NOT PERTAIN TO A PARTICIPANT
INVOLVED IN THE STUDY, THE INFORMATION WILL BE KEPT SEPARATE FROM THE
STUDY.
My comment:
India is having their disaster happen now because they started with the
vaxxes first, and have more people vaxxed than any other country.


Thank you md_a, for this posting! I am curious if you have any thoughts about whether it is the spike protein, the RNA or something else within the vaccine that is being shed that is causing these terrible common contact in passing with a vaccinated person then coming in contact with a female that causes these reactions to the menstural cycles or pregnancy and breast feeding.
 

Drareg

Member
Joined
Feb 18, 2016
Messages
4,772
Thanks for this, are your sources legit?

If so, this is nuts, the thing is this applies to the ruling class also which makes it a strange twist.

Did India get hit hard initially? I still believe India is part hysterical psyop, the homeless are being used as they were in NYC to generate mania.

It will be interesting then if the same thing happens in Africa, they didn’t get hit hard by covid it seems, vaccines are being ramped up there now, if we see similar hysteria in the media about Africa soon it will be clear it’s the vaccine IMO.
 

J.R.K

Member
Joined
Aug 4, 2020
Messages
1,836
Why would they?

First, they never even detected this "Novel Corona Virus" in most continents, seeing as they are using a PCR test that doesn't directly test for any virus, anyway. And none of these so-called health agencies ever got a sample of this virus, so what, exactly, are they even testing for?

Second, it's been clear everywhere that anywhere fro 88-99% of so called "COVID Deaths" had serious pre-existing conditions, that they are simply rebranding into COVID deaths. In the US, it's about 95%, meaning the deaths are at least 95% inflated. I would argue 100%.

They don't tell you the remaining number that died while on a ventilator. Or from a motorcycle crash, or gunshots wounds, or murder suicides. And even when they do break out these stats, it's been clear that over 90% of deaths were people over 70%.
I can see your point, but in any clinical trial detailed notes and records would need to be kept. Arguably the release of this vaccine / drug upon an unsuspecting global population one would think that someone is monitoring the casualties that are directly attributed to the vaccine/ drug. If not for the deadly aftermath perhaps to increase the efficacy of its original purpose.its
 

mm33

Member
Forum Supporter
Joined
Dec 12, 2020
Messages
178
Oh yes, Methylene Blue. I've heard it to be good for respiratory but am not as familiar with it for throat irritation. It does make sense, though. There are studies out there that demonstrate that gargling with povidone iodine is great for killing off germs in the oral cavity. Here's one but there are others: Gargling with povidone-iodine reduces the transport of bacteria during oral intubation - PubMed It can even be applied as nasal swabs. I also have a friend who is a dental hygienist and she had to go to a seminar where they showed that, out of gargling for 30 seconds with hydrogen peroxide, listerine, povidone iodine and one other thing (sorry, don't know-maybe salt water?), the P.I. zapped the germs instantaneously and thoroughly. The others were not as effective. I think this is good if one suspects exposure or is presenting with symptoms but I wouldn't make a habit of any of them out of concern for killing off good bacteria. Maybe that would help? I am not sure how any of it would protect us from the transporting (shedding) from the "vaccine".
Excellent thank you so much for this. I'll look into povidone-iodine-, sounds very promising.
 

StephanF

Member
Forum Supporter
Joined
Jul 8, 2014
Messages
707
Location
Reno
Thanks for this, are your sources legit?

If so, this is nuts, the thing is this applies to the ruling class also which makes it a strange twist.

Did India get hit hard initially? I still believe India is part hysterical psyop, the homeless are being used as they were in NYC to generate mania.

It will be interesting then if the same thing happens in Africa, they didn’t get hit hard by covid it seems, vaccines are being ramped up there now, if we see similar hysteria in the media about Africa soon it will be clear it’s the vaccine IMO.
My thinking exactly, I doubt the authenticity of that ‘Pfizer’ paper. I haven’t read it yet but a lot of things by just browsing through doesn’t make sense to me. You are the first to question it!
 
Joined
Nov 16, 2012
Messages
1,100
After months of working from home I spent 3 days at the office and some after-work socializing... Came home, felt fine, fell asleep in my bed still in clothes around 1 AM, woke up around 4 AM feeling like my airways were inflamed and body aches. Downed some monolaurin and went back to sleep.

Woke up around 8 AM and sure enough I have a fever, 37.6° as of now. I had something like this already three times this year, fever that shoots up to 38.7° and general malaise that goes away the next day.

May be a coincidence, or not...
 

Canti

New Member
Joined
Jun 25, 2014
Messages
1
My thinking exactly, I doubt the authenticity of that ‘Pfizer’ paper. I haven’t read it yet but a lot of things by just browsing through doesn’t make sense to me. You are the first to question it!
A Quick search and you will fund it on their page. But i dont know about the interpretation. But clearly they count on people transmitting via breathing or skin contact.
 

Lollipop2

Member
Joined
Nov 18, 2019
Messages
5,267
A Quick search and you will fund it on their page. But i dont know about the interpretation. But clearly they count on people transmitting via breathing or skin contact.
Thanks for this. I was wondering about the authenticity of the paper but my gut felt it was true.
 

Nemo

Member
Joined
Jul 8, 2019
Messages
2,163

"Between 60 and 70 percent of “third wave” COVID deaths and hospitalizations will be from people who were fully vaccinated, according to the study, Summary of Further Modeling of Easing Restrictions, published March 31 by the London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine."

You have to be in the right mood, but I find this hilarious.
 

Happycat

Member
Joined
Sep 17, 2020
Messages
240
"Between 60 and 70 percent of “third wave” COVID deaths and hospitalizations will be from people who were fully vaccinated, according to the study, Summary of Further Modeling of Easing Restrictions, published March 31 by the London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine."

You have to be in the right mood, but I find this hilarious.
Yes I read that model too and iI just didn't understand why they would say that.
But one explanation would be that, most deaths and hospitalisations will be from people who got both doses of the vaxx not because the vaxx caused it, but because the people who happened to have got both doses are from the older age groups and vulnerable.
Makes sense?
 

Nemo

Member
Joined
Jul 8, 2019
Messages
2,163
Oh yes, Methylene Blue. I've heard it to be good for respiratory but am not as familiar with it for throat irritation. It does make sense, though. There are studies out there that demonstrate that gargling with povidone iodine is great for killing off germs in the oral cavity. Here's one but there are others: Gargling with povidone-iodine reduces the transport of bacteria during oral intubation - PubMed It can even be applied as nasal swabs. I also have a friend who is a dental hygienist and she had to go to a seminar where they showed that, out of gargling for 30 seconds with hydrogen peroxide, listerine, povidone iodine and one other thing (sorry, don't know-maybe salt water?), the P.I. zapped the germs instantaneously and thoroughly. The others were not as effective. I think this is good if one suspects exposure or is presenting with symptoms but I wouldn't make a habit of any of them out of concern for killing off good bacteria. Maybe that would help? I am not sure how any of it would protect us from the transporting (shedding) from the "vaccine".


Povidone also destroys DNA/RNA.

So it would destroy, in theory, everything in your throat that you're inhaling from a shedder.

Assuming you're not hugging a shedder, you use some appropriate hand-wipes. The Covidian Cult has been doing this for over a year. I just started.

My great-aunt Ollie used to dunk everything she ever ate in a bleach solution. I have a clear memory of visiting her in her apartment as a little kid and seeing a head of cabbage floating in the sink in bleach solution. She was born in the old country in 1880, lived to be 91, in her own apartment until her last day.

She only had two chairs in her entire apartment, both painted wood. One was her rocking chair and one was a chair at her kitchen table. That way she could wipe them down with bleach frequently.

She was considered insane by the entire family but I always liked her. Obviously that method affects what you can eat.

I bought a bunch of oranges to squeeze for juice this morning and dunked them in bleach solution before I started squeezing. Ollie would be proud.
 

Missenger

Member
Joined
Mar 15, 2018
Messages
720
They didn't have sociopaths trying to kill people with mutagen injections back then either Nemo.
 

Nemo

Member
Joined
Jul 8, 2019
Messages
2,163
Yes I read that model too and iI just didn't understand why they would say that.
But one explanation would be that, most deaths and hospitalisations will be from people who got both doses of the vaxx not because the vaxx caused it, but because the people who happened to have got both doses are from the older age groups and vulnerable.
Makes sense?

Happycat, there are already studies on this now, including a study based on data from the Israeli Health Department. The links are posted in various Covid vax threads here.

The hypothesis of the study author was that the Covid vax appears to greatly weaken your immune system for about 30 days after each dose. At least, it appeared to weaken your immune response to Covid.

On the other hand, data are now showing that islands with few to no Covid cases or deaths, like the Seychelles, the Isle of Man, and others, suddenly get big numbers of Covid cases and deaths after mass vaxxing of the population. The curve for cases and deaths is a mirror of the curve for numbers of people vaxxed. I posted links to charts of that data yesterday.

We know from another study (link has been posted several times here) that the spike protein alone is enough to damage your lungs (essentially with Covid type damage). The vaccines are designed to turn you into a spike protein factory. It could just be the vaxxes making people sick.

And we also know that doctors and scientists are reporting that there are thousands of cases of apparent environmental transmission from the "leaky vaccines." Microbiologist Janci Chunn Lindsay is one. I posted a video of a doctor saying the same thing. Richard Fleming, MD said back in late March that there was evidence this was happening.

Some people believe what's happening in India is that mass vaccination and vaccine "leakage" is responsible for creating a more virulent Covid virus and that's why cases and deaths are surging there (if we can believe the data that cases are surging there).
 

Nemo

Member
Joined
Jul 8, 2019
Messages
2,163
After months of working from home I spent 3 days at the office and some after-work socializing... Came home, felt fine, fell asleep in my bed still in clothes around 1 AM, woke up around 4 AM feeling like my airways were inflamed and body aches. Downed some monolaurin and went back to sleep.

Woke up around 8 AM and sure enough I have a fever, 37.6° as of now. I had something like this already three times this year, fever that shoots up to 38.7° and general malaise that goes away the next day.

May be a coincidence, or not...

Are you hanging around with shedders, MyUsername?
 

Peater

Member
Joined
Mar 26, 2014
Messages
2,632
Location
Here
An occupational exposure occurs when a person receives unplanned
direct contact with a vaccine test subject

I could only find
"An occupational exposure occurs when a person receives unplanned direct contact with the study intervention"
 
Joined
Nov 16, 2012
Messages
1,100
Are you hanging around with shedders, MyUsername?

Hard to say, I've mostly hung around people from my company, and we're a young bunch. I don't think anyone has been vaccinated yet, or at least not the majority. The vaccinations have only been going around here since late January or so, and it's mostly been the elderly.

However these "flash flu's" as I call them - seem to be a new thing this year. I've had FOUR of them in the past 4 months, and each time they manifest in the same way; sudden onset of body aches, airway inflammation followed by fever up to 38.7°c which dissipates completely in less than 24 hours. Certainly not something I've ever had or seen before. I wonder if these are some kind of mild mutations of the corona virus going around, or maybe even something that the vaxxed are releasing into the environment.
 

Similar threads

Back
Top Bottom