PFIZER’S OWN DOCUMENTS STATE BOTH INHALATION AND SKIN CONTACT WILL TRANSMIT WHATEVER IS IN THE VAX FROM THE VACCINATED TO THE UN-VACCINATED

[mostlylurking]

PFIZER’S OWN DOCUMENTS
STATE BOTH INHALATION AND SKIN CONTACT WILL TRANSMIT WHATEVER IS IN THE
VAX FROM THE VACCINATED TO THE UN-VACCINATED

Here is what just this
small portion of this Pfizer document is saying:
1. If a man who was not vaccinated touches a vaccinated woman, or
breathes any of the air she breathes, (in other words, walks by her in
the office) and he then has sex with his wife, his wife can have an
adverse event and she should avoid having children.
2. If a woman who was never vaccinated gets exposed to a woman who was
vaccinated, she can:
A: miscarry,
B: spontaneously abort,
C. poison a baby via her breast milk
D: Have babies that have congitive difficulties.
This is universal, and very bad. Here is a small section of text I
translated to English:
8.3.5.3. Occupational Exposure
“An occupational exposure occurs when a person receives unplanned
direct contact with a vaccine test subject, which may or may not lead to
the occurrence of an adverse event. These people may include health care
providers, family members, and other people who are around the trial
participant.
When such exposures happen, the investigator must report them to Pfizer
saftey within 24 hours of becoming aware of when they happened,
regardless of whether or not there is an associated secondary adverse
event. This must be reported using the vaccine secondary adverse event
report form. SINCE THE INFORMATION DOES NOT PERTAIN TO A PARTICIPANT
INVOLVED IN THE STUDY, THE INFORMATION WILL BE KEPT SEPARATE FROM THE
STUDY.”
TO CLARIFY: Vaccine study participants become super spreaders of
something, they don’t say what it is, but it triggers secondary
adverse events in people that never had the vax, when they are exposed
to people who did have the vax.
THIS IS SO BAD that right here, in this little bit of quoted text, it
warns that un-vaccinated men who have been exposed to a woman who was
vaxxed will then pass whatever is in the vax to another woman.
Even the relatively small portion of the document I have put below here
says the vax triggers spontaneous abortions and reproductive problems
when un-vaccinated people are exposed to the vaccinated and that breast
milk from a vaccinated mom can harm the infant. And if anyone does not
believe it, then click the link above and wade through that enormous and
intentionally confusing document. It’s for real folks, the vax is
indeed the kill shot.
Do not permit the vaccinated to come anywhere near you, it is now
official.
Here is a small portion of this huge document, straight from pfizer:
Terms:
Study intervention – A vaccine test subject.
AE – Adverse event in someone who got the vax.
SAE: An adverse event in someone who was exposed to someone who got the
vax.
EDP: Exposure during pregnancy
8.3.5. Exposure During Pregnancy or Breastfeeding, and Occupational
Exposure Exposure to the study intervention under study during pregnancy
or breastfeeding and occupational exposure are reportable to Pfizer
Safety within 24 hours of investigator awareness.
8.3.5.1. Exposure During Pregnancy An EDP occurs if:
* A female participant is found to be pregnant while receiving or after
discontinuing study intervention.
* A male participant who is receiving or has discontinued study
intervention exposes a female partner prior to or around the time of
conception.
* A female is found to be pregnant while being exposed or having been
exposed to study intervention due to environmental exposure. Below are
examples of environmental exposure during pregnancy:
* A female family member or healthcare provider reports that she is
pregnant after having been exposed to the study intervention by
inhalation or skin contact.
* A male family member or healthcare provider who has been exposed to
the study intervention by inhalation or skin contact then exposes his
female partner prior to or around the time of conception.
____
If this vax is not shedding into other people, why would contact between
vaccinated and un-vaccinated be an event worth noting? If this vax is
not shedding, then WHY does a guy who has been around a vaccinated
woman, even if he did not touch her or have sex, need to worry about
getting a different woman pregnant?
That’s not all, the following is detailed, and far worse.
The investigator must report EDP to Pfizer Safety within 24 hours of the
investigator’s awareness, irrespective of whether an SAE has occurred.
The initial information submitted should include the anticipated date of
delivery (see below for information related to termination of
pregnancy).
* If EDP occurs in a participant or a participant’s partner, the
investigator must report this information to Pfizer Safety on the
Vaccine SAE Report Form and an EDP Supplemental Form, regardless of
whether an SAE has occurred. Details of the pregnancy will be collected
after the start of study intervention and until 6 months after the last
dose of study intervention.
* If EDP occurs in the setting of environmental exposure, the
investigator must report information to Pfizer Safety using the Vaccine
SAE Report Form and EDP Supplemental Form. Since the exposure
information does not pertain to the participant enrolled in the study,
the information is not recorded on a CRF; however, a copy of the
completed Vaccine SAE Report Form is maintained in the investigator site
file. Follow-up is conducted to obtain general information on the
pregnancy and its outcome for all EDP reports with an unknown outcome.
The investigator will follow the pregnancy until completion (or until
pregnancy termination) and notify Pfizer Safety of the outcome as a
follow-up to the initial EDP Supplemental Form. In the case of a live
birth, the structural integrity of the neonate can be assessed at the
time of birth. In the event of a termination, the reason(s) for
termination should be specified and, if clinically possible, the
structural integrity of the terminated fetus should be assessed by gross
visual inspection (unless preprocedure test findings are conclusive for
a congenital anomaly and the findings are reported). Abnormal pregnancy
outcomes are considered SAEs. If the outcome of the pregnancy meets the
criteria for an SAE (ie, ectopic pregnancy, spontaneous abortion,
intrauterine fetal demise, neonatal death, or congenital anomaly), the
investigator should follow the procedures for reporting SAEs. Additional
information about pregnancy outcomes that are reported to Pfizer Safety
as SAEs follows:
* Spontaneous abortion including miscarriage and missed abortion;
* Neonatal deaths that occur within 1 month of birth should be reported,
without regard to causality, as SAEs. In addition, infant deaths after 1
month should be reported as SAEs when the investigator assesses the
infant death as related or possibly related to exposure to the study
intervention. Additional information regarding the EDP may be requested
by the sponsor. Further follow-up of birth outcomes will be handled on a
case-by-case basis (eg, follow-up on preterm infants to identify
developmental delays). In the case of paternal exposure, the
investigator will provide the participant with the Pregnant Partner
Release of Information Form to deliver to his partner. The investigator
must document in the source documents that the participant was given the
Pregnant Partner Release of Information Form to provide to his partner.
8.3.5.2. Exposure During Breastfeeding An exposure during breastfeeding
occurs if:
* A female participant is found to be breastfeeding while receiving or
after discontinuing study intervention.
* A female is found to be breastfeeding while being exposed or having
been exposed to study intervention (ie, environmental exposure). An
example of environmental exposure during breastfeeding is a female
family member or healthcare provider who reports that she is
breastfeeding after having been exposed to the study intervention by
inhalation or skin contact. The investigator must report exposure during
breastfeeding to Pfizer Safety within 24 hours of the investigator’s
awareness, irrespective of whether an SAE has occurred. The information
must be reported using the Vaccine SAE Report Form. When exposure during
breastfeeding occurs in the setting of environmental exposure, the
exposure information does not pertain to the participant enrolled in the
study, so the information is not recorded on a CRF. However, a copy of
the completed Vaccine SAE Report Form is maintained in the investigator
site file. An exposure during breastfeeding report is not created when a
Pfizer drug specifically approved for use in breastfeeding women (eg,
vitamins) is administered in accord with authorized use. However, if the
infant experiences an SAE associated with such a drug, the SAE is
reported together with the exposure during breastfeeding.
Here’s the clear part of this, that everyone can understand:
8.3.5.3. Occupational Exposure An occupational exposure occurs when a
person receives unplanned direct contact with the study intervention,
which may or may not lead to the occurrence of an AE. Such persons may
include healthcare providers, family members, and other roles that are
involved in the trial participant’s care. The investigator must report
occupational exposure to Pfizer Safety within 24 hours of the
investigator’s awareness, regardless of whether there is an associated
SAE. The information must be reported using the Vaccine SAE Report Form.
Since the information does not pertain to a participant enrolled in the
study, the information is not recorded on a CRF; however, a copy of the
completed Vaccine SAE Report Form is maintained in the investigator site
file.
I WILL TRANSLATE THAT TO ENGLISH:
An occupational exposure occurs when a person receives unplanned direct
contact with a vaccine test subject, which may or may not lead to the
occurrence of an adverse event. These people may include health care
providers, family members, and other people who are around the trial
participant.
When such exposures happen, the investigator must report them to Pfizer
saftey within 24 hours of becoming aware of when they happened,
regardless of whether or not there is an associated secondary adverse
event. This must be reported using the vaccine secondary adverse event
report form. SINCE THE INFORMATION DOES NOT PERTAIN TO A PARTICIPANT
INVOLVED IN THE STUDY, THE INFORMATION WILL BE KEPT SEPARATE FROM THE
STUDY.
My comment:
India is having their disaster happen now because they started with the
vaxxes first, and have more people vaxxed than any other country.

www.jimstone.is

https://media.tghn.org/medialibrary/2020/11/C4591001_Clinical_Protocol_Nov2020_Pfizer_BioNTech.pdf

Why do I get a "leaving Facebook" notice when I click on the Jim Stone link?

 

[Nemo]

Ok, so let’s pretend this is True then there’s no way out anyway ?‍

Nobody had any problem quarantining fake Covid cases.

Maybe we should quarantine the vaxxed until we have a better handle on the environmental transmission risks.

Or maybe people should stop contributing to the problem by getting vaxxed and vaxxing others.

Or maybe we should use hydroxychloroquine and povidone throat spray to decrease the risk of environmental exposure.

Or maybe we should insist on exposure of the contents of these vaccines.

 

[Ben.]

I dont get quit get this. Does that mean we are basicly ffed? there is no way we can avoid vaccinated people.
Wether it is at work or with family/friends.

I am not a conspiracy theorist but if it was about reducing the population then this would disprove it in a way or atleast make no sense.

Maybe we should quarantine the vaxxed until we have a better handle on the environmental transmission risks.

I think the vaccinated people are the ones bigger in numbers and have the authorities/goverments/system above/with them. If anyone gets quarantined, exiled, crucified or burned like a witch it will be the unvaccinated people probably.

 

[Nemo]

I am skeptical of this hypothesis. What is the actual mechanism? I have read a lot about these vaccines and I don't see a logical reason why this should occur. The vaccines don't contain actual viral material and are unlikely to reach the skin or airways. This, to me, seems like saying that a peanut allergy is transmittable which I don't believe. However, I think that the brain is very powerful and if we are terrified of vaccinated people, we may bring the symptoms on ourselves. So as of now I am not worrying about this. And if it is occurring, there is nothing to be done and we might as well not bring this kind of stress on ourselves. Just my two cents.

Peat has explained several times about all the things exhaled in breath, including genetic material.

The vaccines contain mRNA to create the spike proteins as well as prion material and other horrors. It's been shown that the spike protein will get into something like 28 of 50 types of tissue in your body, including virtually every organ, including your lungs. Why wouldn't you exhale it?

And there is something to be done. We can demand a stop to the illegal vaccine mandates and educate people not to get the vax. Vax demand has crashed. Probably this can still be contained.

Why would you just roll over and play dead?

 

[Nemo]

I think the vaccinated people are the ones bigger in numbers and have the authorities/goverments/system above/with them. If anyone gets quarantined, exiled, crucified or burned like a witch it will be the unvaccinated people probably.

That's wrong. We know from CNN that 62% of Americans haven't gotten the vax and have no intention of getting it.

And as a propaganda outlet for the people behind the vax, they are probably exaggerating the number vaxxed.

We know in Israel, where there's a mandate, only half have been vaxxed and huge numbers are using counterfeit vaccine passports.

I would say it's the vaxxed that are in trouble from the rest of us. I am thoroughly sick of these dupes.

And if this is about depopulation, it makes perfect sense.

 

[Ben.]

That's wrong. We know from CNN that 62% of Americans haven't gotten the vax and have no intention of getting it.

And as a propaganda outlet for the people behind the vax, they are probably exaggerating the number vaxxed.

We know in Israel, where there's a mandate, only half have been vaxxed and huge numbers are using counterfeit vaccine passports.

I would say it's the vaxxed that are in trouble from the rest of us. I am thoroughly sick of these dupes.

And if this is about depopulation, it makes perfect sense.

They haven't gotten it yet and opinions seem to change very often especially in these times.

I hope you are right, maybe im just on the sceptical/glass half empty perspective.

Why would it make sense if it basicly harms everyone and everything regardless of wether you had the jab or not? It would only make sense if a select few unvaccinated elites would isolate themself until all is over from a conspiracy pov.

 

[md_a]

Why do I get a "leaving Facebook" notice when I click on the Jim Stone link?

I have no idea.

 

[Nemo]

They haven't gotten it yet and opinions seem to change very often especially in these times.

I hope you are right, maybe im just on the sceptical/glass half full perspective.

Why would it make sense if it basicly harms everyone and everything regardless of wether you had the jab or not? It would only make sense if a select few unvaccinated elites would isolate themself until all is over from a conspiracy pov.

They haven't gotten it and they tell pollsters they have no intention of getting it.

Since there's known bias in favor of telling pollsters what they want to hear and giving the official approved response (see the Bradley effect), this 62% number is impressive and suggests strengthening resistance.

If you want to depopulate the world, you'd want vaccine material that can easily travel from the vaxxed to the unvaxxed. My hypothesis is that elites were very disappointed in the failure of Bat Plague to be highly infectious and may have tried to do better with the vaccines.

So right now we are hoping that they are still as incompetent at bioweapons as they were with the original Covid.

Elites aren't standing in line at Wal-Mart with the likes of us. They're off at their estates where their ancestors survived the plague.

 

[Missenger]

Peat has explained several times about all the things exhaled in breath, including genetic material.

That's fine and dandy and all but the pdf isn't proof, Ray has common sense.

 

[Nemo]

That's fine and dandy and all but the pdf isn't proof, Ray has common sense.

The PDF is proof that the people who developed the vaccine felt the need to warn about environmental exposure.

And now we are seeing the exact types of things they warned about. Infants dying from breastfeeding. People reporting symptoms after contact with health care workers. Odd symptoms after exposure to a vaccinated spouse, etc.

It's not proof in the same way as results of a peer-reviewed randomized control trial study, but it's enough to form a worrisome hypothesis and take the danger seriously.

 

[tankasnowgod]

Probably this can still be contained.

If you really think there is a risk that Unvaccinated people who don't directly touch the vaccine or have intimate contact with someone who had the vaccine can still suffer from Vaccine injury....... then there is no freaking way it can be "contained."

Official estimates of the US pop is 330 Million, but it might be closer to 400 Million. 131 Million have taken the mRNA shot. Even if that number is inflated, then it's 1 in 4. If you live in a city over the size of 100,000 people, welp, you've been "exposed" in this sense.

At this point, if you believe the above, everyone has already been exposed. It's done. No need to worry about it, whatever is going to happen will happen. I personally don't think there is much, if any, risk to the unvaxxed (assuming they are not handling it), but then it doesn't matter.

If I'm right, no danger to me, I don't have to worry about it.
If I'm wrong, death is already locked in for me, and I don't have to worry about it.

 

[Nemo]

If you really think there is a risk that Unvaccinated people who don't directly touch the vaccine or have intimate contact with someone who had the vaccine can still suffer from Vaccine injury....... then there is no freaking way it can be "contained."

Official estimates of the US pop is 330 Million, but it might be closer to 400 Million. 131 Million have taken the mRNA shot. Even if that number is inflated, then it's 1 in 4. If you live in a city over the size of 100,000 people, welp, you've been "exposed" in this sense.

At this point, if you believe the above, everyone has already been exposed. It's done. No need to worry about it, whatever is going to happen will happen. I personally don't think there is much, if any, risk to the unvaxxed (assuming they are not handling it), but then it doesn't matter.

If I'm right, no danger to me, I don't have to worry about it.
If I'm wrong, death is already locked in for me, and I don't have to worry about it.

Probably 65 million have gotten the shot in the U.S. That's my estimate based on other fake news reports of statistics on which I had hard info (other polls or hard data).

People don't come into contact with all other people. Instead, people walk through daily routines where they are exposed to a limited number of people over and over, with little exposure to the people outside their little world. So you're not necessarily exposed already.

More important, so far the thousands of reports seem to indicate that environmental exposure involves touching, sex, breastfeeding, or some kind of close-up, repeated exhalations. They are coworkers working all day together in an office. A secretary working closely with a boss. People being handled and examined close up by healthcare workers.

But I agree I don't know for sure what kind of contact is required. Is the supposed outbreak in India due to the vax? Are people catching it there from touching a mango in the market that someone else touched?

If the thousands of reports in the U.S. turn into another mass Covid breakout (with data that look legitimate) then I agree, it can't be contained.

I want to know what is in those vaccines in case there are legitimate protective measures that can be taken, like hydroxychloroquine and povidone throat spray (I linked to a study earlier showing that this combo protected people in high-transmission situations). I want to know if they added something to make the vaccine material more transmissible.

I'm probably going to avoid people for a while (definitely planes and gatherings) as this shakes out. I hope you are right and this flare-up of reports dies down or someone does a study showing nothing is being transmitted by breath or skin.

 

[tankasnowgod]

More important, so far the thousands of reports seem to indicate that environmental exposure involves touching, sex, breastfeeding, or some kind of close-up, repeated exhalations. They are coworkers working all day together in an office. A secretary working closely with a boss. People being handled and examined close up by healthcare workers.

What? You were calling me crazy in the other thread for suggesting this was the only way a vaxxed person could trigger something in the unvaxxed. Now you are suggesting the exact same thing I was? Did you even read what I wrote?

I hope you are correct in your 65 Million estimate, but 131 Million seems about right, based on people who take the flu shot every year. Although, as I stated before, everyone who is reporting these vaccine numbers has reason to inflate the number. The drug companies especially, as they can get more money out of the Federal Government.

But I agree I don't know for sure what kind of contact is required. Is the supposed outbreak in India due to the vax? Are people catching it there from touching a mango in the market that someone else touched?

I think the "outbreak" in India is due to PCR test manipulation. I haven't changed any of my views on so called COVID just because there is a risky drug being experimented on the population at large.

If the thousands of reports in the U.S. turn into another mass Covid breakout (with data that look legitimate) then I agree, it can't be contained.

There was never a mass Covid breakout in the first place.

I want to know what is in those vaccines in case there are legitimate protective measures that can be taken, like hydroxychloroquine and povidone throat spray (I linked to a study earlier showing that this combo protected people in high-transmission situations). I want to know if they added something to make the vaccine material more transmissible.

I'm probably going to avoid people for a while (definitely planes and gatherings) as this shakes out. I hope you are right and this flare-up of reports dies down or someone does a study showing nothing is being transmitted by breath or skin.

No matter any disagreements I may have with you, I am in full agreement that these experimental shots are very risky, we should have full disclosure, and ideally, be stopped immediately.

 

[Nicole W.]

If you really think there is a risk that Unvaccinated people who don't directly touch the vaccine or have intimate contact with someone who had the vaccine can still suffer from Vaccine injury....... then there is no freaking way it can be "contained."

Official estimates of the US pop is 330 Million, but it might be closer to 400 Million. 131 Million have taken the mRNA shot. Even if that number is inflated, then it's 1 in 4. If you live in a city over the size of 100,000 people, welp, you've been "exposed" in this sense.

At this point, if you believe the above, everyone has already been exposed. It's done. No need to worry about it, whatever is going to happen will happen. I personally don't think there is much, if any, risk to the unvaxxed (assuming they are not handling it), but then it doesn't matter.

If I'm right, no danger to me, I don't have to worry about it.
If I'm wrong, death is already locked in for me, and I don't have to worry about it.

Well, are you just a ray of sunshine today! . FWIW, it’s the point leading UP TO death that worries me. If it were quick and painless that would be one thing but.... and I’m not going to even think about that right now!

Anyway, if we step back and look at the big picture here, we know they are still campaigning hard to get everyone vaccinated. Especially young people. I’ve been getting text messages daily from my county to get an appointment for the vaccine, not to mention letters from my HMO. If exposure from a vaccinated person were that deadly, I honestly don’t think they would bother with these efforts. They would just let nature take it’s course and sit back. This suggests that healthy people of all ages and young people are probably not that vulnerable, and thus, remaining unvaccinated, pose a problem. I pray this is the case. All the more reason to ramp up efforts to stay healthy if we are older and also protect our young from this vaccine.

I think I might have been exposed to the shedding or whatever this phenomenon is called. Here was my experience: Three weeks ago, I spent a week with a friend that was vaccinated about 1.5 months prior. Three days into our visit, I started to feel terrible. On that day, we had gone hiking, (not too strenuous) and when I got back I had to lay down. I was “sick” for about 4 days. Still functioning, but pretty exhausted. It felt like super low thyroid function and pms-related tired and achy muscles. By day 4 I came out of it ...just thinking, wow, that was weird.

I wondered about being around someone who has experienced a vaccine “trauma”. Maybe not an obvious injury like miscarriage or clots or heart attack, but the body’s recognition that there has been a traumatic event. I would think their bodies would set about unloading major toxins, stress chemicals, viruses/bacteria... trying it‘s best to unburden itself so as to preserve and heal itself. I am sure that could affect bystanders and it could be dose dependent, meaning the more time you are nearby, the greater the chance of “catching” something.

 

[animalcule]

I work with a number of people who are vaccinated, including one who covers my desk while I take lunch, and sometimes sits next to me during the day. Initially I wasn’t super worried bc for the most part I don’t have contact with people, except for when he sits at my desk.

But last week I got this really weird earache that lasted for a day, along with a sore throat and tiny cough and feeling tired. This was before I’d read more about vaccine transmission, so I started wondering if I was coming down with a cold. But it went away after a day and I forgot about it.

Now I’m reading about people who are getting these earaches or mastoid tension that they claim is coming from being in contact with vaccinated individuals. So ... if transmission is possible, I may have been hit. It was an out-of-the-blue earache that went away after a day.

I’d like to believe that none of this is possible. But it seems.

 

[Nemo]

What? You were calling me crazy in the other thread for suggesting this was the only way a vaxxed person could trigger something in the unvaxxed. Now you are suggesting the exact same thing I was? Did you even read what I wrote?

I hope you are correct in your 65 Million estimate, but 131 Million seems about right, based on people who take the flu shot every year. Although, as I stated before, everyone who is reporting these vaccine numbers has reason to inflate the number. The drug companies especially, as they can get more money out of the Federal Government.


I think the "outbreak" in India is due to PCR test manipulation. I haven't changed any of my views on so called COVID just because there is a risky drug being experimented on the population at large.

There was never a mass Covid breakout in the first place.


No matter any disagreements I may have with you, I am in full agreement that these experimental shots are very risky, we should have full disclosure, and ideally, be stopped immediately.

Here is the point. We have imperfect information on what's happening. Until we can get better information on what's happening from studies and/or mass population data, we have to form assumptions about what's happening to guide our actions.

So this is essentially a gambling proposition. Do you just assume all these reports are lies and hysteria until you see data on likely environmental transmission in millions of people or you see a study proving there is no environmental transmission?

I would argue that it's unwise to bet your life that these are lies or hysteria. My estimate of the odds that these are lies or hysteria is right now maybe 50/50. Basically, I haven't had time to think much about it. That will change as more evidence comes in. Your estimate might be that there's only a 1% chance this is real. Either way, you don't bet your life that these are lies or hysteria. It's simply the mathematically incorrect bet to make.

We agree that there was never a mass Covid outbreak. We agree that the "outbreak" in India is probably the same old fake PCR data. We both agree the vaccines are risky.

We SHOULD both agree, since you seem mathematically competent, that it's unwise to bet your life that these are lies or hysteria. Anyone who denies there's any risk is betting his life that this is hysteria.

So then you go from there. Let's say your livelihood depends on being among a lot of people who got the vax. You're a doctor and you have to treat patients or you're a teacher and you have to show up to teach. Should you quit your job and retire to your Unabomber cabin? How do you balance the risk between the risk of environmental transmission and the risk to your life and health of losing your career and important social contacts?

That calculation will depend on your estimate of the risk of each and what you can do to reduce that risk.

 

[sugarisgreat]

Dear God. My poor children.


They have teachers flexing at school and pressuring them due to their own fear.

This is elementary and middle school children.

im a pretty grounded no nonsense pull up your bootstraps kind of parent. And this appears to be close to terrifying.

Lord Jesus. Mercy.

Homeschool your children, be monogamous, and move to the country/small town.
Rationale people are going to have to change their lives, if they want to be separate from this madness.

 

[PurpleHeart]

Even if this was true, which is probably not, there is literally no way you can avoid coming into contact with vaccinated people, so why even worry about something impossible to control,

I personally came into contact with a few vaccinated people and I don't feel any different, maybe it's a nocebo effect.

I am not saying the vaccine is safe, I will personally not get it, but being afraid of coming into contact with vaccinated people seems like needless paranoia.

 

[Missenger]

That calculation will depend on your estimate of the risk of each and what you can do to reduce that risk.

It's not hard to screencap legitimate bull from said document saying these things without paraphrased bull. Feel free to find it because I can't with crtl+f.

 

[Nemo]

Even if this was true, which is probably not, there is literally no way you can avoid coming into contact with vaccinated people, so why even worry about something impossible to control,

I personally came into contact with a few vaccinated people and I don't feel any different, maybe it's a nocebo effect.

I am not saying the vaccine is safe, I will personally not get it, but being afraid of coming into contact with vaccinated people seems like needless paranoia.

Wrong, wrong, wrong.

We don't yet know the chances of getting infected by vaccinated people. We just know that doctors are taking seriously thousands of reports of infection of the non-vaccinated by vaccinated people. And we know Pfizer warned the FDA about such exposures in their application for emergency authorization.

Lots of people have not yet gotten side effects from the vax. That doesn't mean hundreds of thousands of people aren't getting severe side effects from the vax.

Everyone just submitted to over a year of lockdowns, mask mandates and social distancing over a fake pandemic from a mildly-infectious virus with the death rate of the annual flu and now you pretend nothing can be done to limit potential risk from a dangerous vaccine that turns your body into a blood clot factory even though we may be seeing environmental transmission of vaccine material.

That's hilarious. There's been no reason for all these measures since at least mid April 2020. Now there's an actual reason for caution until we can get a study or more data, and nobody wants to be cautious because they spent a year being cautious for no reason.

If the cabal truly is trying to kill as many people as possible, they have played this magnificently.