Pfizer's 6-month follow up to their Covid vaccine - results are in

[David PS]

This could be an important study because its rosy conclusions might be used to buttress the evidence for Pfizer's early full approval. From the study,the good news is that the jab prevents serious Covid. The less good news is that the data is poorly presented and shared and so we don’t know:

• which age groups benefit the most,
• who’s most at risk,
• which co-morbidities fared the best/worst,
• how serious the vaccine adverse events were or even what the categories of adverse events were.

Pfizer 6-month study https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2021.07.28.21261159v1.full.pdf

6-Month study supplementary (data) tables Six Month Safety and Efficacy of the BNT162b2 mRNA COVID-19 Vaccine

This data was gathered pre-Delta variant so we rather expect a follow up report to be much less favorable overall, but still could/would make perfect sense for some to rationally opt for getting the vaccine. Of course, having better age-stratified data inked to actual parameters of interest (sex, morbidities, viral titers, etc.) would make such determinations a lot easier to make.

The video discusses all this and mentions the European data base. Surprisingly, the number of females in their database is more than twice that of the males.

https://dap.ema.europa.eu/analytics/saw.dll?PortalPages

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NRP-_2v8mSQ
00:00 - Intro
00:57 - Pfizer 6 Month Data is in!
04:37 - 15 Deaths in Vaccine group to 14 in Placebo
09:21 - Comorbidities
17:37 - Pretty Shoddy Study. As in Cheap
24:23 - Relative Risk Reduction Looks Great
28:37 - Adverse Events
32:08 - Now For Some Real AE Data
39:32 - Maddie De Garay
44:21 - Viral Loads The Same in Vaccinated and Unvaccinated
48:10 - Pfizer 6-Month data: More Questions Than Answers

 

[tankasnowgod]

From the study,the good news is that the jab prevents serious Covid.

Oh, does it? So, how many cases of serious COVID were in the vaccine group, and how many were in the placebo group?

 

[Elderflower j58]

View: https://youtu.be/NRP-_2v8mSQ

More questions than answers.

 

[David PS]

Oh, does it? So, how many cases of serious COVID were in the vaccine group, and how many were in the placebo group?

The participants in the study were not representative of the public. They were all healthy. The jab is about the same in the healthy groups.

 

[David PS]

View: https://youtu.be/NRP-_2v8mSQ

More questions than answers.

Yes and the conclusions are:
Conclusion: With up to 6 months of follow-up and despite a gradually declining trend in vaccine efficacy, BNT162b2 had a favorable safety profile and was highly efficacious in preventing COVID-19. (ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT04368728)

 

[tankasnowgod]

The participants in the study were not representative of the public. They were all healthy. The jab is about the same in the healthy groups.

True, but that wasn't the question.....

And also, from what I've seen, it looks like Pfizer "lost" at about 8,000 or so people to follow up in the vaccine group. Considering they areadly pulled these shenanigans with the interium trial (bumping 311 from the vaccine group vs 60 from placebo when there were only 170 Covid cases), I would suspect huge fraud once again in this trial.

 

[Tim Lundeen]

How many people have died from the covid vaccines?

Estimating Vaccine-Induced Mortality, Part I

 

[Tim Lundeen]

“...the consent form allows for participants who need emergency care and go straight to their doctor or hospital to be ejected from the study”

In other words, if you got immediately, seriously injured, those injuries don’t count in terms of vaccine safety.

Sloppy Pfizer Booster Clinical Trial Consent Form Provides Way to Exclude Reactions That Require Emergency Care | naked capitalism