Pfizer booster clinical trials experimental doses and placebos

K

Kayaker

Guest
When the time comes these are the people we must hold accountable
One of those is Professor Ravi Gupta, a member of the New and Emerging Respiratory Virus Threats Advisory Group (Nervtag).

He told the Financial Times: “We’re just far too reliant on our relatively modest vaccination coverage as our only line of defence.”
Inb4 speed boost using tax$ to rollout booster jabs for the lil guppies.
 

pushkin

Member
Joined
Sep 9, 2021
Messages
131
Location
France
I think this winter in the UK the boosters are being given at the same time as the flu vaccines.

I just read that France is rolling out its flu jab program today and they advise that "covid vax and flu jab can be given on the same day - one in each arm"
 
OP
P

Peatness

Guest
In this interview, Dr. Meryl Nass, an internist specializing in toxicology, vaccine-induced illnesses and Gulf War sickness, shares her insights into the dangers of the COVID jab, which October 26, 2021, received emergency use authorization for children as young as 5.


We also discuss the conflicts of interest within the U.S. Food and Drug Administration that seem to be behind this reckless decision, and how the agency pulled the wool over our eyes with its approval of Pfizer/BioNTech’s Comirnaty COVID injection.


- Pfizer/BioNTech’s Comirnaty COVID shot was approved (licensed) by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration in late August 2021, but only for adults, and only when carrying the Comirnaty label. No other COVID shot has been FDA approved. However, Comirnaty is currently not available, and while the experimental, emergency use authorized (EUA) Pfizer shot is substituted for Comirnaty, the two products are clearly legally distinct and not the same


- A licensed vaccine is not shielded from liability until or unless it’s added to the recommended childhood vaccination schedule by the CDC. So, if you were injured by Comirnaty, you could sue Pfizer. You cannot sue if injured by the EUA Pfizer shot (or any of the other EUA COVID injections)


- Even though several hundred claims have been filed with the Countermeasures Injury Compensation Program (CICP) for injuries resulting from the COVID shots — which is the only possible avenue to obtain damages — not a single claim has been paid out


- Natural immunity is much stronger than what you can achieve from the injection, which only provides antibodies against the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein and wanes within a few months. The shots may in fact permanently limit the kind of immune response you would make were you to later be exposed or infected with COVID


- Children’s Health Defense has filed a lawsuit arguing you cannot have a vaccine that is both an emergency use product and a licensed product at the same time. That's against the law, but the government has done it anyway. Remarkably, the request for an injunction was initially thrown out, but the CHD has not given up and is still pursuing the case

Dr. Meryl Nass - FDA, Boosters, and the CDC​


View: https://www.bitchute.com/video/dE0ehrlMGcQY/
 
OP
P

Peatness

Guest
Last edited by a moderator:
OP
P

Peatness

Guest
 

tankasnowgod

Member
Joined
Jan 25, 2014
Messages
8,131

The title of that article is a flat out lie.

1200 people did not die "in the first 28 days of the trial." There were only about 40,000 total participants, so that number would be absolutely staggering.

That number is deaths after it was available EUA. The table he cites clearly says "Post-authorization adverse events." This is not the trial data. Nor was it hidden. Anthony Colpo reported on the high number of deaths from these shots back in March of 2021, using VAERS data-


"Over 92 million doses of COVID-19 vaccines were administered in the United States from December 14, 2020, through March 8, 2021. During this time, VAERS received 1,637 reports of death (0.0018%) among people who received a COVID-19 vaccine." (Bold emphasis added)

Colpo is using numbers from VAERS that included both Pfizer and Moderna, so it makes sense that there would be differences between that and Pfizer's internal data for their own product, but the numbers are pretty close. They are not off by a factor of 1000, which is what the article was claiming for Pfizer's trial data (that they reported to the FDA in back in late 2020).

Another hint that this isn't trial data is that there were over 5,000 adverse events in those over 75. Drug companies rarely include anyone over 65 in their trials, because they want to make their product look better, by choosing the healthiest people. There is no way they would compose more than 10% of their trial with this demo. Also, there were almost 7,000 people of "unknown" age with adverse events.
 
EMF Mitigation - Flush Niacin - Big 5 Minerals

Similar threads

Back
Top Bottom