Pfizer/BioNTech seek full FDA approval for their Covid-19 vaccine

David PS

Member
Joined
Jan 5, 2016
Messages
14,675
Location
Dark side of the moon

Full approval will permit Pfizer to roll out yearly vaccines without any fuss. It will also make it easier for companies (and the like) to mandate vaccination as a condition of employment.
 

Nemo

Member
Joined
Jul 8, 2019
Messages
2,163
Yale public health professor says 60% of new Covid patients have been fully vaccinated for Covid.


This should be a wake-up call to people who think the vaccine will “free them up from all restrictions,” he said. The vaxxes don't stop transmission.

Right now there are claims that the vaxxes cut transmission by half. But I don't see that in the charts. All I see is a surge of Covid cases and deaths after the start of mass vaxxing and then the case/death count falls back to where it already was.

 

Fred

Member
Joined
Jul 25, 2013
Messages
487
"Pfizer has been a habitual offender, persistently engaging in illegal and corrupt marketing practices, bribing physicians and suppressing adverse trial results." - PubMed
 

Tim Lundeen

Member
Joined
Feb 19, 2017
Messages
396
Right now there are claims that the vaxxes cut transmission by half. But I don't see that in the charts. All I see is a surge of Covid cases and deaths after the start of mass vaxxing and then the case/death count falls back to where it already was.
We don't have valid data. False-positive rate depends on the PCR cycle count, and we don't know what that is. Apparently the CDC is requiring all "breakthrough" post-covid-vaccines to have a ct of 28 or less, while other "cases" may have a ct of 42. So we know that CDC numbers for post-covid-vaccine illness are valid. We don't know about anything else, and we certainly can't compare post-vaccine with others.
 

tankasnowgod

Member
Joined
Jan 25, 2014
Messages
8,131

Full approval will permit Pfizer to roll out yearly vaccines without any fuss. It will also make it easier for companies (and the like) to mandate vaccination as a condition of employment.

So, that would eliminate the EUA and not apply to children....... so if they get approval...... new people who get the "vaccine" can start suing Pfizer then, yeah?
 

Missenger

Member
Joined
Mar 15, 2018
Messages
720
So, that would eliminate the EUA and not apply to children....... so if they get approval...... new people who get the "vaccine" can start suing Pfizer then, yeah?
In the vaccine courts?
 
OP
David PS

David PS

Member
Joined
Jan 5, 2016
Messages
14,675
Location
Dark side of the moon
So, that would eliminate the EUA and not apply to children....... so if they get approval...... new people who get the "vaccine" can start suing Pfizer then, yeah?

Full approval would overide some of the restrictions imposed in the EUA. It seems silly to still have an EUA when the number of PCR positive tests is so low. The nyumber is a a 7 month low. The number is relatively low especially when you consider number of Covid deaths compared to deaths from other things like heart disease, cancer, accidents and shootings. That may be part of the reason for the news stories about the out-of-control spread of Covid in India. First, it keeps the US population panicked and the vaccine shots flowing. Secondly, the worldwide nature of this pandemic and its continuing uncontrolled spread in India is a reason to keep the EUA alive in the US. Vaccines are our only hope.

Pfizer may not want a gap between the end of the EUA and the beginning of full authorization. I presume it wants to get full authorization as soon as possible. If I recall correctly, animal testing is not due to be completed until 2023. The concerning part of the new story at the start of this thread is that the FDA may bend the rules and fully authorize the shots without proof of safety based on intergenerational animal tests. Such safety testing has been problematic in the past with mrna shots and there is no explaination or confirmation that the issues have been resolved with the Pfizer shots.

Pfizer may be requesting full approval based on its US safety record for the covid shots. Thanks to various manipulations including scientific censorship, Pfizer may get its way and be granted full authozization for the adult covid shots. With regard to the children, they were not part of the granted EUA. Pfizer is still working on an independent EUA for children.

Former President Bush signed legistation that granted the maufacturers of vaccines and all the people involved in their adminstration full liability. At the time the legislation was signed, the covid shot did not meet the scientific definition of "vaccine" that existed. There may be a legal question (if it raised in court) that the Pfizer covid shot does not meet the technical standard for inclusion to the class of injectable substances that are called 'vaccines". In aditon, the legistative history of the bill may indicate that special status of being a 'vaccine' is related to the safety as proven by intergenerational safety studies. (i am just guessing)

In the vaccine courts?
If the Pfizer covid shot is a 'vaccine', then any and all awards of $ will be paid by the US taxpayers and not Pfizer.


.
 

tankasnowgod

Member
Joined
Jan 25, 2014
Messages
8,131
Former President Bush signed legistation that granted the maufacturers of vaccines and all the people involved in their adminstration full liability.
Not true. It was President Reagan, and you are thinking of the 1986 Childhood Vaccine Injury Act. It doesn't apply to vaccines only offered to adults.


Right now, lawyers and their clients are suing Merck, the manufacturer, for injuries incurred from Merck’s shingles vaccine, Zostavax.

Among the claimed injuries: contracting shingles; blindness in one eye; partial paralysis; brain damage; death.

One of the plaintiffs’ attorneys told me he has already filed two cases in California. Each case has 50 plaintiffs. He states he has 5000 clients waiting in the wings. There are other attorneys with other plaintiffs.

But wait. Isn’t there a federal law that bars people from suing vaccine manufacturers?

Isn’t that law the 1986 Childhood Vaccine Injury Act? Doesn’t it demand that people go to a special federal “vaccine tribunal/court” and plead for compensation from the government?

Aren’t vaccine manufacturers shielded from liability for causing injury?

Well, it turns out there are exceptions to the rule.

Adult vaccines are not part of the 1986 federal law.

The law shielding vaccine companies only applies to childhood vaccines.


The Merck shingles vaccine is only for adults.
 
OP
David PS

David PS

Member
Joined
Jan 5, 2016
Messages
14,675
Location
Dark side of the moon
Not true. It was President Reagan, and you are thinking of the 1986 Childhood Vaccine Injury Act. It doesn't apply to vaccines only offered to adults.
Thanks for the correction.
 

Missenger

Member
Joined
Mar 15, 2018
Messages
720
The FDA just ok'd the vaccine on kids so that's probably why they went ahead, more scripted bull.
 

Lollipop2

Member
Joined
Nov 18, 2019
Messages
5,267
Joined
Aug 14, 2015
Messages
874
Age
67
Location
London,England

Bombshell leak: Countries that buy Pfizer’s vaccine undertake to break the law​

Leaked information from confidential agreements that vaccine manufacturer Pfizer concluded with a large number of buyer countries, revealed slave contracts that violate legislation in each and every country. Buyers undertake to break all laws that stand in the way of mass vaccination. The buyers also undertake to bear all costs and all responsibility for the experimental jabs and waive the right to breach the agreement.
Published: August 8, 2021, 12:09 pm
In history’s largest medical experiment with “vaccines” that have not been approved for use in humans, it is the buyers’ responsibility to defend Pfizer for causing harm, leaked documents showed. Pfizer has escaped all liability and is indemnified, arguing that side effects and the long-term effects of the injections are unknown – to the company as well. Pfizer thus admits that an insufficiently tested product is being pushed in literally billions of doses on the world market.
This means that all responsibility for costs, healthcare, etc. due to vaccine damage – no matter how large and onerous – is passed on to the taxpayers in the countries that have signed the agreements. Since the agreements put each country’s own laws out of play, they have all been signed at government level. The design of the agreements is an important explanation for why the propaganda for mass vaccination is of a totalitarian nature and does not allow for debate or questioning.
In view of the fact that the majority of those now in hospital for Covid-19 are fully vaccinated – a situation that buyers could never have anticipated – the agreements certainly appear to be criminal. The buyer countries have been forced to sign the blank agreements, without knowing what they were actually buying.
On July 28 , NBC Chicago reported that 169 people in Illinois died and 644 were hospitalized for Covid-19. Everyone was fully vaccinated. Israel with 9,3 million inhabitants was among the first to sign an agreement with Pfizer. The vaccination rate in the country is 55 percent, and 11 051 469 vaccine doses have been distributed. On June 30, the alarming news broke that fully vaccinated patients accounted for half of Covid adults hospitalized in Israel. In just over a month, the numbers have increased dramatically.

Albania’s agreement with Pfizer​

Even from Iceland, which has a vaccination rate of as much as 71,1 percent, there are worrying reports that the majority of hospitalized Covid-19s have been fully vaccinated. Vaccines that have been presented as “safe” and painted as the only salvation in the pandemic, have turned out to be the opposite. Pfizer had good reason to force binding agreements with buyer countries before the truth about the “vaccines” started emerging. One of the top managers in the WHO, Mariangela Simao, admit that people can not feel safe just because they have taken the jab. Vaccines are not enough to prevent the spread of infection.

Israeli Ehden Biber, a cyber security expert, has revealed Pfizer’s agreement with the buyer countries. Photo: Private
It is Israeli cyber security expert, Ehden Biber, who lives in England, that is responsible for the sensational leak regarding the agreements of Pfizer and its customers. Unsurprisingly, the explosive information he recently shared on Twitter on this issue was immediately deleted.
The basis of Biber’s revelation is Albania’s agreement with Pfizer, which was published in the newspaper Gogo.al in January. Curiously, not a single journalist investigated the leak or found it interesting enough to report on.
“They should be ashamed,” said Ehden Biber, who has also leaked Pfizer’s agreements with the EU, Israel, Brazil (signed by Roberto Ferreira Dias, head of the logistics department) and the Dominican Republic. The agreements are designed in the same way, only with different pricing based on what countries could endure. Albania pays $12 per dose, the United States $19,5 per dose and Israel $62 per dose.
“Netanyahu [Israel’s former prime minister] is certainly a magician – he made Israel pay $62 per vaccine dose – five times more than Albania – and got people to worship him for the lousy deal,” noted Biber.
A group of independent investigative journalists in South America has revealed that Pfizer in negotiations with Brazil and Argentina, among others, demanded that the country provide state assets such as embassy buildings and military bases as a guarantee for future costs for possible lawsuits.
The negotiations have been marked by conflicts and delays, and government officials have stated that they were being held hostage by “life-saving vaccines”. After protracted and divisive controversies, Argentina did not sign an agreement until 27 July with Pfizer for about 20 million vaccine doses.
Pfizer has negotiated with more than a hundred countries and signed agreements with a dozen countries in Latin America that have been forced to agree to the company’s outrageous demands. The industry’s greed and abuse are all the clearer in light of the fact that Pfizer and other vaccine manufacturers had received generous grants of hundreds of millions of dollars from several governments throughout the vaccine development process. The German government, for example, gave Pfizer’s business partner BioNTech $445 million.
Sweden has recently obediently agreed to increased prices per vaccine dose in the EU’s latest agreement with Pfizer/BioNTech and Moderna. For Pfizer/BioNTech, this is an increase from around SEK 160 to SEK 200 per dose. For Moderna from 190 to about 220 kronor, according to the Financial Times.
The reason for the price increase is that the vaccine has been “updated”. Sweden’s “vaccine coordinator”, pharmacist Richard Bergström (with a long history in the pharmaceutical industry) welcomed the price hike. “It’s well worth the money. I call it an ‘all inclusive’ award.”
There is no way out or any way for the buyers to break the agreement if it turns out that the “vaccine” is harmful and large parts of the population suffer from death or other serious side effects. The buyer must complete the agreement and pay the full amount anyway.

Some samples from the confidential agreements​

  • The purchaser is aware that the efficacy and long-term effects of the vaccine are unknown and that side effects may occur which are not currently known.
  • The buyer must pay Pfizer for the ordered doses, regardless of how many you use and regardless of whether Pfizer has the preparation approved by the authorities. ” (This was written before the FDA’s emergency approval of the so-called “vaccines”).
  • The buyer hereby agrees to indemnify, defend and hold Pfizer/BioNTech and their subsidiaries indemnified against all claims, documents, claims, losses, damages, debts, settlements, penalties, fines, costs and expenses.
  • The buyer must pay all losses, including and without limitation costs for legal fees and other legal costs.
  • Buyer must indemnify Pfizer for claims and all losses and must implement this through statutory or regulatory requirements.
  • Pfizer has the right to make necessary adjustments to the agreed number of contracted doses and delivery schedule, based on principles decided by Pfizer. The buyer is obliged to agree to any change.
  • The agreement must be kept secret for ten years.
  • However, for the state of Israel’s agreement with Pfizer, signed by the Israeli Ministry of Health on January 6, a full 30 years of secrecy apply. The reason is unclear.
The Covid vaccines were emergency approved (EUA) by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) on December 1, 2020 – in violation of the agency’s own rules. Emergency approval can only be granted if there is no other, effective treatment. Such treatments exist – but were eliminated by medical authorities around the world. The reason was simple: if effective drug treatments were available, the FDA’s emergency approval would be invalidated and the “vaccines” would be illegal.
Both Plaquenil (Hydroxychloroquine) and the 2015 Nobel Prize-winning drug Scatol (Ivermectin) have been shown to be effective and safe. they areb also cheap, because the patents have expired. Ivermectin has been used for 35 years and 4 billion doses have been distributed. But on March 31, the corrupt WHO banned Ivermectin from treating Covid-19 with the argument “insufficient safety”, despite studies showing that Ivermectin, if used at an early stage of the disease, reduced mortality by 74 percent and has 85 percent efficiency if used as prophylaxis.
International health authorities, including the Swedish Medicines Agency, have slavishly complied with the WHO’s injunctions.

Pfizer demanded that embassy buildings and military bases be provided as a guarantee for future costs for possible lawsuits​

Mainstream media around the world have contributed to denying patients good and tested treatments by not raising any questions or concerns. Ivermectin was called a “veterinary medicine” and “dangerous”. On May 22, the two reputable medical journals The Lancet and the New England Journal of Medicine published false articles alleging studies of nearly 100 000 Covid-19 patients in 671 hospitals and six continents. The bottom line was that Hydroxychloroquine was ruled out as an effective Covid-19 treatment.
Their scam came down to sheer political and medical terrorism. When the scam was revealed and the authors of the article Surgisphere, an obscure small business in Illinois, could not show the data on which the article was based, both The Lancet and the New England Journal of Medicine were forced on June 4 to retract the article and apologize to readers. But by then the system media’s journalists were no longer interested, so the public was never informed about the scam. The publication error nevertheless had serious consequences. The Swedish Medicines Agency banned Plaquenil (Hydroxychloroquine) for indications other than rheumatism. Ivermectin and Hydroxychloroquine were thus sacrificed to prepare the market for the vaccine manufacturers’ multi-billion profits. And in addition, millions of patients with Covid were sacrificed. They all might have recovered if they had received the proven medicines.

Why does any country sign such a slave contract at all and agree to break its own laws?​

One explanation is the worldwide mass psychosis and the panic and pressure that erupted at the same time as the Corona pandemic in early 2020.
“The globalist entity Pfizer hates nation states and does not recognize their laws and acts as a government that governs other governments in the world. If you look at the complete lawlessness and meltdown of the once stable institutions around the world, you can see that Big Pharma (the multinational pharmaceutical industry) is being used as a massive brick wall to break down national laws and national sovereignty in all countries,” said Ehden Biber.
“Anyone who takes part in the agreements realizes that there are good reasons for Pfizer to keep it a secret and why they make an effort to hide the details of the agreements.”

The Trusted News Initiative took a decision on 10 December 2020, which in practice means that the media undertakes not to report objectively on Covid vaccines. Photo: The Trusted News Initiative
The FDA thus gave an emergency approval to the so-called “Covid vaccines” on December 1, 2020. Ten days later, TNI (Trusted News Initiative), an association of several of the world’s leading media houses and major online platforms, decided to “pioneer a global vaccine campaign and combat the spread of ‘harmful misinformation’ about vaccines”. It was announced at the World Press Freedom Conference on December 10, 2020.
Business magazine Biz News, reported on the initiative: “In a surprisingly underreported event, many of the world’s biggest media, agreed to promote the global vaccine rollout and focus on combating the spread of harmful vaccine disinformation.”
Thus the world’s most influential media groups have decided to act as megaphones for the interests of the vaccine industry and state pharmaceutical authorities. The agreement explains something that has long been obvious to many media consumers, namely the media’s startling one-sided propaganda for the vaccines.
TNI members are some of the largest and leading media houses and news agencies in the world, including the news agencies AP and AFP, Reuters, British BBC, CBC Canada, European Broadcast Union, Facebook, Financial Times, First Draft, Google, YouTube, The Hindu , Microsoft, Twitter and the Washington Post.
Privately owned online platforms such as Facebook, YouTube, Twitter and Google, due to their extreme profitability, evidently colluded with the established media in their efforts to restrict freedom of expression – something that millions of users have experienced in recent years. In Sweden, a seemingly lobotomized and paralyzed journalist corps has so far acted as the megaphones of the Public Health Agency and the vaccine industry and only delivered one-sided vaccine propaganda. The same shills are seen over and over on media platforms, voicing no criticism, opposing views or even questions.
And as if that were not bad enough, one and the same person, James Smith, sits on the board of both Reuters news agency and Pfizer: Two incompatible roles.

James / Jim Smith have incompatible roles. He sits on the board of both Pfizer and the news agency Reuters, one of the media houses that have promised to be at the forefront of the ‘vaccine’ scam. Photos: Reuters, Pfizer
He was previously CEO of Reuters and now calls himself Jim Smith. On Pfizer’s board, he was known as James Smith. In an attempt to hide his dual role, he has removed his image from his LinkedIn profile., but it’s the same person. He is also a member of the International Business Council of the globalist body World Economic Forum.

All rights reserved. You have permission to quote freely from the articles provided that the source (www.freewestmedia.com) is given. Photos may not be used without our consent.
FWMSTAFF

Consider donating to support our work​

Help us to produce more articles like this. FreeWestMedia is depending on donations from our readers to keep going. With your help, we expose the mainstream fake news agenda.
Keep your language polite. Readers from many different countries visit and contribute to Free West Media and we must therefore obey the rules in, for example, Germany. Illegal content will be deleted.
If you have been approved to post comments without preview from FWM, you are responsible for violations of any law. This means that FWM may be forced to cooperate with authorities in a possible crime investigation.
If your comments are subject to preview by FWM, please be patient. We continually review comments but depending on the time of day it can take up to several hours before your comment is reviewed.
We reserve the right to delete comments that are offensive, contain slander or foul language, or are irrelevant to the discussion.
 

Similar threads

Back
Top Bottom