Persistent Behavioral Impairment & Alterations Of Brain After Postnatal Administration Of Thimerosal

[TreasureVibe]

Persistent behavioral impairments and alterations of brain dopamine system after early postnatal administration of thimerosal in rats. - PubMed - NCBI

 

[Tristan Loscha]

Persistent behavioral impairments and alterations of brain dopamine system after early postnatal administration of thimerosal in rats. - PubMed - NCBI

this is kind of Yuge,thimerosal is stabilizer/biocide factor in vaccines,it is a mercury compound.

 

[Remedy]

You guys ought to read about the Cutler Protocol. It's of general relevance to anything regarding mercury.

Cutler protocol - OnibasuWiki

And since the topic here is thimerosal (ethylmercury, a type of "organic mercury"), more specifically:

Cutler protocol - OnibasuWiki - Organic and Inorganic Mercury.

Here's a good post:

" Boyd Haley appears to be in the business of making important
statements, or at least getting blamed for them, e. g. that ALA
carries DMSA into cells (which is delusional) so there may be more
drama here than is really appropriate.

Factual information follows:

There are several relevant forms of mercury that one may become
intoxicated (fancy doctor speak for poisoned) by.

Metallic mercury, inorganic mercury in the mercuric (+2) form, and
organic mercury.

There is much misleading dicussion in the literature about organic
mercury being a gazillion times more toxicc than the others. After
all, if anyone admitted the factual reality that it isn't, then the
use of dental amalgam and many other things would be a breathtaking
exercise in criminal irresponsibility.

The reason organic mercury is considered "so much more toxic" is that
it is well absorbed if eaten and 5-10% of the total amount ends up
trapped in the brain as inorganic mercury, which is actually the toxic
form.

Inorganic mercury is not well absorbed from the gut nor does it cross
the blood-brain barrier very well. 10% or less of what is eaten gets
absorbed, and of what is absorbed a lot less than 5% gets into the
brain.

Actually metallic mercury as the vapor is well absorbed both through
the lungs and through the skin (e. g. if in contact with the liquid)
and does cross the blood-brain barrier quite readily. Metallic
mercury is also quite dangerous. As are amalgams, from which metallic
mercury vaporizes readily.

If you have a teaspoonfull of organic mercury (e. g. thimerosal) and
eat it, most of it ends up in you and a lot goes in the brain.

If you have the same amount of inorganic mercury and eat it, most of
it is pooped out, and of what is absorbed, not too much goes in the
brain. It is more likely to kill your kidneys in this case - which is
why the doc's are wasting tons of time and money worrying about kidney
problems in chronically poisoned people who don't have any.
Historiccally this was a way people died in industrial accidents or
suicide attempts.

The inorganic mercury in one sense is less toxic than organic mercury
but that is largely because it doesn't get into you. Once it gets
inside it isn't a lot safer on a weight basis.

Metallic mercury doesn't vaporize very fast. Also when it does, a lot
of vapor escapes. So if you eat some or spill some in your room you
don't actually absorb most of it = which is good since a teaspoon is a
LOT more than a lethal dose of mercury! What you do breathe is well
absorbed and a lot of it gets into the brain. Thus on the basis of
how much is absorbed, it is about as dangerous as organic mercury.
Both can cause similar signs and symptoms.

The really big mercury disasters in the 20th century have been with
organic mercury, because it was relatively new. People had their
enormous disasters with metallic and inorganic mercury earlier and
were careful by the time "modern medicine" started to pay attention to
who was dying of what.

Also most of the organic mercury disasters involved mercury
contaminated FOOD, where all of the mercury gets into the people.
Most of the metallic or inorganic mercury exposures were to vapors,
dust, clothing, etc. where most of it doesn't get into the people
involved.

One example of a big disaster with mercury is that Peter the Great had
a dome on a new palace in St. Petersburg guilded by the simple
expedient of dissolving gold in mercury, painting it on the copper
roof, and heating the roof to drive off the mercury. It is estimated
that 200,000 people became poisoned and many died from this. Modern
medicine wasn't keeping score yet. Besides, to consider mercury
evaporated from a mixture with gold as dangerous would cut awfully
close to mercury mixed with silver and then placed in your teeth as an
amalgam filling.

While it is a commonly held belief that organic mercury is more
dangerous than the other forms, it is misleading to hold it out as FAR
more dangerous or as tremendously more toxic. This really isn't true.
organic mercury is somewhat more dangerous to the brain, but not
dramatically so. On the other hand it isn't dangerous to the kidneys.
Injecting 237.5 mcg of organic mercury into little babies is not
dramatically more harmful than if they inhaled 237.5 mcg of mercury
vapor.

The real problem with thimerosal is that it is given to the most
sensitive group - infants - by injection which guarantees it is all
absorbed, and the target organ of intoxication, the brain, is the most
sensitive organ little babies have. Luckily no doctors ever thought
it was a good idea to rig up little breathing masks and have babies
breathe mercury vapor - it would be just as big a disaster as
thimerosal is.

Andy "​

Source: Re: Mothering Magazine on Thimerosal - Part II