This is one of the best explanations I've come across as to why and how T3 in the blood is not equivalent to that amount in the tissue, and why the current thyroid lab tests continue to be a source of confusion rather than revelation. It lists a number of other blood markers that are more relevant at tissue diagnosis of T3 that could be investigated if one chooses to do so. From personal experience and what I read on this forum the question of "why do I feel so bad when my thyroid blood work is great" continues to be one that is unsolved.
Some of the most helpful information I've gleaned from this forum is what blood tests can be done to reveal a situation. An example is the marker for prolactin indicating high estrogen activity because estrogen in the blood is not the same as estrogen in the tissue.
Perhaps everyone already know this information but from the Idealabs threads on Tyromix, Tyronene, and Tyromax it seems the focus is still on the TSH and T4 blood markers in determining if a product is working or not. I recognize every one is different which is what makes this article interesting to me. The variables are acknowledged, examined, and possible tests provided to help sort out the complexities.
Some of the most helpful information I've gleaned from this forum is what blood tests can be done to reveal a situation. An example is the marker for prolactin indicating high estrogen activity because estrogen in the blood is not the same as estrogen in the tissue.
Perhaps everyone already know this information but from the Idealabs threads on Tyromix, Tyronene, and Tyromax it seems the focus is still on the TSH and T4 blood markers in determining if a product is working or not. I recognize every one is different which is what makes this article interesting to me. The variables are acknowledged, examined, and possible tests provided to help sort out the complexities.