miquelangeles
Member
- Joined
- Mar 18, 2021
- Messages
- 928
From the conference "Vaccinating entire Russia or threat of national security?"
I couldn't find an English version, so here is a rough translation of what he's saying:
the immunologist who put the basis of contemporary immunology
Frank Burnet,
received the Nobel prize,
became a Sir, the queen granted him the title,
and this is what he said:
the lymphocytes, the main cells of the immune system, are the "bad guys" which the organism produce only because these will fight the "even worse guys", the microbes.
but these "bad guys" are always at the boundary of loyalty towards the organism.
and it happens that, according to Burnet,
after the disease resolves,
or after vaccination,
these "guys" start to misbehave,
and from this, a lot of the leukemias, lymphoproliferative disorders
and other oncologic diseases are initiated.
and also, Burnet says, a multitude of autoimmune diseases;
we know that the incidence of autoimmune and oncologic disease has increased dramatically
beginning with the 60s and 70s when mass vaccination campaigns were commenced.
there is enough literature written on this subject, this is not just empty words
and many oncologists believe that if all the vaccinations were completely stopped
the incidence of leukemias would drop by 2 thirds (particularly children leukemias)
and the incidence of cancers would drop by 50%
we can speculate about these numbers, because there have never been rigurous epidemiological studies
but what Burnet said, for me it is undoubtedly true;
I have faced numerous such complications in my medical practice;
we are being lied that one vaccine or another is absolutely safe;
they are lying to us, because there is no such thing as a safe vaccine;
there is always a risk of inducing tumoral processes, small or big, but the risk exists;
but a mother doesn't care if the risk is small or not, if it happened to her son;
the immune response begins with the molecules of the histocompatibility complex
but these are extremely different across individuals
for example, in the population there are approximately 1-2 million individuals having different HLA-A MHC molecules
why is this important?
because depending on which HLA set you have,
as a response to infection or response to vaccination
you will have a certain immune response vector
(let's say it is the "good" one, the intended one)
but that boy for example will have a vector that will lead to diabetes,
or to multiple sclerosis, or to something else extremely unpleasant;
we do not know yet how to anticipate the risks of vaccinations,
the risks of introducing a new type of antigen,
and its relation with the molecules of the histocompatibility complex;
as long as we don't know, the risks will always exist;
and we must not lie about this, in mass media, that a certain vaccine is safe;
enough;
Two days after this conference, prof. Alexandr Borisovici died.
I couldn't find an English version, so here is a rough translation of what he's saying:
the immunologist who put the basis of contemporary immunology
Frank Burnet,
received the Nobel prize,
became a Sir, the queen granted him the title,
and this is what he said:
the lymphocytes, the main cells of the immune system, are the "bad guys" which the organism produce only because these will fight the "even worse guys", the microbes.
but these "bad guys" are always at the boundary of loyalty towards the organism.
and it happens that, according to Burnet,
after the disease resolves,
or after vaccination,
these "guys" start to misbehave,
and from this, a lot of the leukemias, lymphoproliferative disorders
and other oncologic diseases are initiated.
and also, Burnet says, a multitude of autoimmune diseases;
we know that the incidence of autoimmune and oncologic disease has increased dramatically
beginning with the 60s and 70s when mass vaccination campaigns were commenced.
there is enough literature written on this subject, this is not just empty words
and many oncologists believe that if all the vaccinations were completely stopped
the incidence of leukemias would drop by 2 thirds (particularly children leukemias)
and the incidence of cancers would drop by 50%
we can speculate about these numbers, because there have never been rigurous epidemiological studies
but what Burnet said, for me it is undoubtedly true;
I have faced numerous such complications in my medical practice;
we are being lied that one vaccine or another is absolutely safe;
they are lying to us, because there is no such thing as a safe vaccine;
there is always a risk of inducing tumoral processes, small or big, but the risk exists;
but a mother doesn't care if the risk is small or not, if it happened to her son;
the immune response begins with the molecules of the histocompatibility complex
but these are extremely different across individuals
for example, in the population there are approximately 1-2 million individuals having different HLA-A MHC molecules
why is this important?
because depending on which HLA set you have,
as a response to infection or response to vaccination
you will have a certain immune response vector
(let's say it is the "good" one, the intended one)
but that boy for example will have a vector that will lead to diabetes,
or to multiple sclerosis, or to something else extremely unpleasant;
we do not know yet how to anticipate the risks of vaccinations,
the risks of introducing a new type of antigen,
and its relation with the molecules of the histocompatibility complex;
as long as we don't know, the risks will always exist;
and we must not lie about this, in mass media, that a certain vaccine is safe;
enough;
Two days after this conference, prof. Alexandr Borisovici died.
