Peats Antibody-Quote (Tennis Ball or Orange?)

LeeLemonoil

Member
Joined
Sep 24, 2016
Messages
4,265
Am I hallucinating or wasn’t there a quote from one of Peats texts or letters where he said that if our organism would synthesize antibodies against any microbiotic we encounter every cell would be as big as s tennis ball?

Or something similar?

Does anybody know where to find that quote?
And how substantiated is it?
 
Joined
Mar 10, 2021
Messages
21,516
 

Rafe

Member
Joined
Feb 26, 2016
Messages
737
Darn, @Rinse & rePeat, you really gotta teach me your filing methods. Much respect, woman.
 
OP
L

LeeLemonoil

Member
Joined
Sep 24, 2016
Messages
4,265

J.R.K

Member
Joined
Aug 4, 2020
Messages
1,837
Am I hallucinating or wasn’t there a quote from one of Peats texts or letters where he said that if our organism would synthesize antibodies against any microbiotic we encounter every cell would be as big as s tennis ball?

Or something similar?

Does anybody know where to find that quote?
And how substantiated is it?
I have heard a similar description on Dr Flemings event 2021 talk out of Texas. He described the immune system will identify a virus and take it and present it to the T Cells, which in turn tear it apart into seven to thirty pieces, they will then essentially analyze those pieces to see if they can identify any similar parts to what they have seen before, which they will present the pieces that match to the memory cells, which in turn will manufacture the corresponding antibodies to the matching pieces. This would be IGg or IGa antibodies. This process takes about ten days.
If in the event the T cells do not recognize any parts of the virus pieces they will begin manufacture of new antibodies IGm to this new specimen, this process takes about thirty days.
I am starting to believe this emphasis on antibodies is more of a sales pitch for the vaccines as it only talks about antibodies, as if they are the only thing that provides protection.
 
OP
L

LeeLemonoil

Member
Joined
Sep 24, 2016
Messages
4,265
I have heard a similar description on Dr Flemings event 2021 talk out of Texas. He described the immune system will identify a virus and take it and present it to the T Cells, which in turn tear it apart into seven to thirty pieces, they will then essentially analyze those pieces to see if they can identify any similar parts to what they have seen before, which they will present the pieces that match to the memory cells, which in turn will manufacture the corresponding antibodies to the matching pieces. This would be IGg or IGa antibodies. This process takes about ten days.
If in the event the T cells do not recognize any parts of the virus pieces they will begin manufacture of new antibodies IGm to this new specimen, this process takes about thirty days.
I am starting to believe this emphasis on antibodies is more of a sales pitch for the vaccines as it only talks about antibodies, as if they are the only thing that provides protection.

Thanks.
The Focus on antibody-Titers is definitely a sales pitch. Worse, it deflects from the mRNA-vaccines crucial weakness: lack of inducing multi-epitope immune response and thus much more resilient immunity.

And it’s very striking that the high vaccine titers get reducer so quickly. Much quicker than titers after infection. 40% reduction in a month compared to 5% in a month, roughly.
 

J.R.K

Member
Joined
Aug 4, 2020
Messages
1,837
Thanks.
The Focus on antibody-Titers is definitely a sales pitch. Worse, it deflects from the mRNA-vaccines crucial weakness: lack of inducing multi-epitope immune response and thus much more resilient immunity.

And it’s very striking that the high vaccine titers get reducer so quickly. Much quicker than titers after infection. 40% reduction in a month compared to 5% in a month, roughly.
I find that interesting as well this message that the antibodies wane, I seen a video with Michael Yeadon, he said outright that this message was a lie. They took blood from people that had SARS - the very first outbreak. So this was eighteen years ago, now he says that SARS COV 2 has an eighty percent similarity to SARS COV and those people had antibodies that recognized SARS COV 2. So if this is true our immune system does appear to have a very good system of recall and identification of virus that is slightly different from previous invaders.
 

J.R.K

Member
Joined
Aug 4, 2020
Messages
1,837
Thanks.
The Focus on antibody-Titers is definitely a sales pitch. Worse, it deflects from the mRNA-vaccines crucial weakness: lack of inducing multi-epitope immune response and thus much more resilient immunity.

And it’s very striking that the high vaccine titers get reducer so quickly. Much quicker than titers after infection. 40% reduction in a month compared to 5% in a month, roughly.
At about the 25:00 mark he talks about how antibodies play very little role in viral respiratory diseases, rather he emphasized T Cells. All this talk about antibodies might just be smoke and mirrors or fear porn.

 

RealNeat

Member
Joined
Jan 9, 2019
Messages
2,373
Location
HI
I think I heard it specifically on a ORN interview. If you look at the date of my post then go to the "guest by date/ name" section of ORN website you should be able to tie the date of my post close to the date of the interview, early 2020.
 
EMF Mitigation - Flush Niacin - Big 5 Minerals

Similar threads

Back
Top Bottom