Peat, Blake and the "Satanic"

Discussion in 'Ray Peat Quotes' started by narouz, Aug 26, 2012.

Tags:
  1. narouz

    narouz Member

    Joined:
    Jul 22, 2012
    Messages:
    4,429

    Dr. Ray Peat in Can Art Instruct Science? William Blake as Biological Visionary
    http://raypeat.com/articles/articles/william-blake.shtml
     
  2. gummybear

    gummybear Guest

    William Blake was just a freemason, or the people we today call Illuminati. His art is so Illuminati it's almost comical.
     
  3. peatarian

    peatarian Member

    Joined:
    Sep 18, 2012
    Messages:
    313
    I don't understand what that's supposed to mean, gummybear.
     
  4. gummybear

    gummybear Guest

    He was a helpful idiot.
     
  5. texas peatatarian

    texas peatatarian Member

    Joined:
    Sep 24, 2012
    Messages:
    22
    Gummybear, what's with the esoteric dribble? Go ahead and explain your position including some context, seriously. Btw care to expand on ray peats ideas being lies?
     
  6. charlie

    charlie The Law & Order Admin

    Joined:
    Jan 4, 2012
    Messages:
    11,408
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    USA
  7. peatarian

    peatarian Member

    Joined:
    Sep 18, 2012
    Messages:
    313
    So were Johann Wolfgang von Goethe, Wolfgang Amadeus Mozart, Louis Armstrong and Kurt Tucholsky.
    Please stop using estrogen.
     
  8. gummybear

    gummybear Guest

    It is no secret that William Blake's paintings and writings are full of Gnostic symbolism, and coded messages.
     
  9. texas peatatarian

    texas peatatarian Member

    Joined:
    Sep 24, 2012
    Messages:
    22
    Ok, but what's the relevant implication? Or is there one?
     
  10. gummybear

    gummybear Guest

    My implication was that blake was just a person working for different goals that people thought. Satanists believe the dominance of evil is the natural order; good is intrinsically passive, while evil is active. William Blake had the same idea in 'Beyond Heaven and Hell', a book I once admired but now recognize as cabalist.

    "Without contraries is no progression. Attraction and Repulsion, Reason and Energy, Love and Hate are necessary to Human existence. From these contraries spring what the religious call Good and Evil. Good is the passive that obeys Reason. Evil is the active springing from Energy. Good is heaven. Evil is hell."
     
  11. OP
    narouz

    narouz Member

    Joined:
    Jul 22, 2012
    Messages:
    4,429
    gummybear--
    I think you're oversimplifying and misinterpreting Blake.
    Yes, Blake lived at times within a block or so of both Freemasonry temples and Druidic temples,
    but there is scant evidence that he belonged to either group.
    It is entirely possible he adopted some of their symbols,
    but that doesn't mean he believed their ideas.
    I'm sure Blake was "cabalistic" in ways during is life,
    but not in the Satanic sense you express.
    Hard to encapsulate Blake's strange mythology,
    but he generally is seen as a sort of radical Christian.
    He hated the establishment, organized churches of his era,
    and he often presented them as a form of evil in his work.
    He also hated (and portrayed as evil) child labor and the British war-making efforts
    and war-supporting arsenal industry.
    And, more generally, he thought certain forms of rigidified thinking (see the lead quote in this thread)
    were evil.
    But no experts that I know of consider Blake a "satanist" in the sense you seem to mean.
    He did invert a lot of orthodox thinking,
    and so forces like the orthodox churches were often portrayed, as I said, in his work
    as evil;
    whereas people who believed in "free love" and sexual freedom, etc
    (there was quite an upsurge of thinking and, yes, cabalistic groups centered around
    those kind of ideas at the time Blake was living in London)
    were often portrayed as "the good guys."
     
  12. peatarian

    peatarian Member

    Joined:
    Sep 18, 2012
    Messages:
    313
    Your interpretation made me laugh. I seriously doubt you've read "Beyond Heaven and Hell". You certainly didn't understand it. William Blake was as much 'cabalist' as he was a cannibal.

    I don't know where you get your definition of satanism, either. When it started in the 1960 it had a lot to do with opposing the oppressing Catholic church and with an admiration for liberating figures like prometheus or lucifer who defied the authorities. In this they might have found Blake interesting. I suggest you read the page you posted (http://www.albion.com), you might learn that Blake used a language he knew his contemporaries would understand -- which was a language coined by the religious believes of its time.

    I am sure there are twisted people with perverted believes who call themselves a lot - satanists for one, but many of them 'Christians' I am sure - but I am more worried by this tendency of labeling art and artists as being 'satanic', 'a-moral', 'cabalist' or 'evil' ... In my opinion this mindset leads to burning books -- and burning books leads to burning people.
    Maybe you should concentrate on what a book tells you and not what others tell you about a book.
     
  13. gummybear

    gummybear Guest

    Narouz, I respect your opinion but I don't agree with you. In fact I think you a terrible wrong.


     
  14. peatarian

    peatarian Member

    Joined:
    Sep 18, 2012
    Messages:
    313
    Gummybear, I have to say, your reasoning is mind-blowing.
    Have you thought of any 'Ray Peat lies' yet?
     
Loading...