Our Tarot Reader On The Antagonistic Effects Of Magnesium On Calcium

haidut

Member
Forum Supporter
Joined
Mar 18, 2013
Messages
19,799
Location
USA / Europe
@haidut what type of magnesium supplement do you use? and what have you tried and gotten good effects with?

When I used it as supplement, I make magnesium bicarbonate. It seems to be the least irritating and never causes laxative effect for me.
 
Joined
Feb 1, 2016
Messages
384
Location
NY
Have you tried magnesium chloride or sodium bicarbonate to make sure that it's related to that effect? I suggest you try magnesium first to avoid sodium confusion.
It would be interesting to compare to sodium bicarb, but I find the taste of that stuff apPauling, Linus (Is that a good quip?). I think I remember a few others on the forum had similar misgivings avec mag bicarb. Ive been taking mag citrate w/ no sides, but looking at malate now thanks to your suggestion. The only acetate I could find on ebay was a lab chemical named magnesium acetate tetrahydrate, any info on that is welcome.
 
Joined
Feb 1, 2016
Messages
384
Location
NY
On Mag acetate tetrahydrate:

MAGNESIUM ACETATE TETRAHYDRATE

"Magnesium acetate tetrahydrate is a hydrated form of anhydrous magnesium acetate salt with the chemical formula of Mg(CH3COO)2 • 4H2O. As a salt form of magnesium, magnesium acetateis one of the bioavailable forms of magnesium and forms a very water soluble compound. Magnesium is an essential element and second most abundant cation in the body that plays a key role in maintaining normal cellular function such as production of ATP and efficient enzyme activity. Magnesium acetate tetrahydrate can be used as an electrolyte supplementation or a reagent in molecular biology experiments."
 
OP
Amazoniac

Amazoniac

Member
Joined
Sep 10, 2014
Messages
8,583
Location
Not Uganda
It would be interesting to compare to sodium bicarb, but I find the taste of that stuff apPauling, Linus (Is that a good quip?). I think I remember a few others on the forum had similar misgivings avec mag bicarb. Ive been taking mag citrate w/ no sides, but looking at malate now thanks to your suggestion. The only acetate I could find on ebay was a lab chemical named magnesium acetate tetrahydrate, any info on that is welcome.
- Albion's magnesium malate provide two magnesium atoms per molecule, which minimizes the acid exposure a bit.

- The only trouble with magnesium gluconate is that it would be hard to fit into a capsule, other than that I'm not aware of downsides.
https://www.pureformulas.com/magnesium-gluconate-500-mg-90-tablets-by-windmill.html
I don't think you can't fake reviews any further than that, but I'm posting just to show how little magnesium you'll get per capsule.

- paymanz trained the forum during a bootcamp on magnesium acetate preparation from its hydroxide. I'm not sure if some is left unreacted, and vinegar is more than just acetic acid, so you'll be getting unnecessary stuff along. But there's an advantage which is knowing how much acid you're ingesting when you prepare it on your own. There should be videos on Youtube if you search for "magnesium hydroxide" and "acetic acid"; or "milk of magnesia" and "vinegar".
 
OP
Amazoniac

Amazoniac

Member
Joined
Sep 10, 2014
Messages
8,583
Location
Not Uganda
I was thinking that when magnesium is combined with organic acids, there's a possibility that they could enhance the absorption of contaminants. I already posted that malic acid can chelate aluminium, but the reaction can occur before digestion, picking up metals and shoving them inside. If I'm not wrong, I think I read some concerns about this elsewhere. Perhaps the same thing can occur with lead:

Influence of dietary factors on the gastrointestinal absorption of lead - ScienceDirect

"Sodium citrate and citric acid are added to many kinds of foods for a variety of reasons (Furia, 1968). Citrate also occurs naturally in foods and plays a role in several biochemical systems. In this investigation, it was found that both sodium citrate and orange juice, a source of citric acid, increased GI absorption of lead. It is common knowledge that lead poisoning can occur as a result of storing acidic beverages in pottery coated with lead-containing glazes (Klein et al., 1970). The enhancement of lead absorption by sodium citrate and orange juice should be distinguished from the ability of acidic solutions to leach lead from lead-containing pottery glazes. Both factors may contribute to the health hazards associated with the storage of acidic fruit juices in improperly glazed vessels."
__
Nutrition of lead - ScienceDirect

"Since all soil contains lead, there is no lead-free food; a natural level of lead exists in food according to natural levels in the soil. The main source of contamination of soil is aerial deposition, the aspect which has received the greatest attention in recent years being the emissions of motor vehicles derived from the use of leaded fuels. Other sources, such as mining, may also contribute to lead in the atmosphere, lead levels in soil and air being highest in areas of high industrialization (Schulter and Egan. 1976; Underwood, 1971)."

"Lead paint on walls, woodwork and toys, lead glazes on ceramics, and pewter containers may all contribute to the total lead intake and to the possibility of lead poisoning (Arrow, 1976). Infants and children between the ages of 1 and 6 years have been the main victims of lead poisoning, chiefly from the ingestion of flaking paint (pica) from old houses and apartments (Mahaffey, 1981; Lin-fu, 1970). whereas exposure in adults is often associated with the consumption of moonshine whiskey made in lead-contaminated stills (Conrad and Barton. 1978)."

"Nutritional factors are thought to play an important role in lead poisoning (Mahaffey, 1981). Studies in animals have shown that certain substances bind lead and increase its solubility, thus enhancing its absorption. These dietary components consist of sodium citrate, ascorbate, amino acids (Kehoe, 1961), vitamin D (Smith et al., 1978; Barton et al., 1980), protein and fat (Barltrop and Khoo, 1976) and lactose [no one is ingesting isolated lactose, milk is inhibitory for the most part] (Bushnell and DeLuca, 198 1, 1982; Nutr. Rev., 1982; Stephens and Waldron, 1975). Nutritional iron deficiency and during rapid periods of growth (infancy) in laboratory animals also enhances lead absorption and promotes lead toxicity, thereby giving concern that pregnant women and young children may be more susceptible to dietary lead (Mahaffey, 1981). Iron (Barton et al., 1978a; Flanagan et al., 1979; Flanagan et al., 1982), zinc (Cerklewski and Forbes, 1976), calcium (Barton et al., 1978b), phosphorus, ethanol and magnesium decrease the absorption of lead without affecting its solubility, probably by competing for shared absorptive receptors in the intestinal mucosa (Conrad and Barton, 1978)."

"The total bodily amount of lead does not affect lead absorption. Thus, lead does not have a feedback mechanism which limits absorption."

"Kehoe (1976) performed a long-term balance study with chemical lead determinations. Their data suggest that under ordinary circumstances in eating food and beverages containing customary amounts of lead (0.1-0.4 mg/day), only 5% (food lead) to 10% (water-soluble lead) of the lead is absorbed. Rabinowitz et al. (1976) showed that the average absorption of stable lead tracers from food over a period of 124 days varied from 6.5 to 13.7% in five adult males."

"Barltrop and Khoo (1976) observed that the level of dietary fat had an influence on lead absorption. They showed that lead absorption is dependent upon both the quantity and type of dietary fat. Their work pointed out that by increasing the corn oil content from 5 to 40% of a diet, this resulted in a 7-14-fold increase in the lead content of several tissues. It has also been observed that lecithin when mixed with bile salts and choline (type of dietary fat) increased lead uptake (Mahaffey. 1981)."

"Shields and Mitchell (1941) showed that lowering the calcium and/or phosphorus intake could increase the lead content of bone or soft tissue at low levels of lead intake (32 ppm). These workers also observed that the influence of calcium intake on lead metabolism was seen primarily at low levels of calcium intake; increasing dietary calcium to high levels, 1.1% of the diet, did not decrease tissue stores of lead below those found on a normal calcium diet (Mahaffey and Rader, 1980)."
"A reduction of dietary calcium to approximately 40-50% of the dietary recommendation was necessary before increases in tissue lead content occurred (Mahaffey et al., 1973; Hsu et al., 1975)."
"Vitamin D appears to play a role in this as well. In animals low in vitamin D, less lead is absorbed; this implies a competitive interaction between the two divalent cations. Both lead absorption and calcium absorption are stimulated by 1.25-dihydroxycholecalciferol, but this occurs primarily in the distal small intestine for lead and in the duodenum for calcium (Smith et al., 1978; Barton et al., 1978b: Mahaffey et al., 1979: Frolik and DeLuca, 1971)."

"Rats were found more sensitive to lead intoxication if they were iron deficient (Mahaffey-Six and Goyer, 1972). Iron-deficient (not severe) rats also had increased concentrations of lead in kidney and bone compared with rats ingesting equivalent amounts of water containing 200ppm lead and an iron-adequate diet (Mahaffey, 1981; Mahaffey-Six and Goyer, 1972)."

"Recent work (Levander et al., 1980) suggests that lipid peroxidation plays a vital role for increased sphericity of erythrocytes from vitamin E-deficient rats and that a couple of different mechanisms are considered for the increase in toxicity of lead poisoning. Lead could react with certain membrane components, such as the phosphate groups of phospholipids, to disrupt the structure of the lipid bilayer, thus rendering the polyunsaturated fatty acids more susceptible to peroxidative attack (Levander et al., 1980). Lead is also known to be a weak catalyst of lipid peroxidation and could therefore promote loss of structural integrity."​
 
OP
Amazoniac

Amazoniac

Member
Joined
Sep 10, 2014
Messages
8,583
Location
Not Uganda
Various organic acids that are present in foods, such as citric, malic and lactic acid, have been shown to facilitate the absorption of iron (Gillooly et al. 1983). These acids, however, are less effective than ascorbic acid for stimulating iron absorption, and it is believed that the effect is due to weak chelation, which may help keep the metal ion in solution or facilitate its uptake by the mucosal cell. Although these acids may enhance iron absorption less than ascorbic acid, it should be emphasized that in many foods they are present in substantial concentrations.
..and probably the contaminants in magnesium supplements as well.
 

Dave Clark

Member
Joined
Jun 2, 2017
Messages
1,999
When I used it as supplement, I make magnesium bicarbonate. It seems to be the least irritating and never causes laxative effect for me.
Did you make it using the milk of magnesia formula, re-acting it with carbonated water, etc.?
 

haidut

Member
Forum Supporter
Joined
Mar 18, 2013
Messages
19,799
Location
USA / Europe
Did you make it using the milk of magnesia formula, re-acting it with carbonated water, etc.?

Yes, I bought the Milk of Magnesia from the local CVS and mixed with club soda.
 
OP
Amazoniac

Amazoniac

Member
Joined
Sep 10, 2014
Messages
8,583
Location
Not Uganda
http://gotmag.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/04/MAG-Booklet-Download.pdf#page=7
It would be impractical to fix these, but I'm saving just in case.

IT IS OFTEN STATED

that large amounts of calcium are

required for strong bones, to calm

nerves and for other characteristics

of good health. Some nutritionists

recommend up to three grams of

calcium a day to prevent calcium

deficiency. The purpose of this

editorial is to review some aspects

of Human Evolution, Physiology,

Biochemistry and Dietary Habits in

order to clarify calcium requirements

and its close relationship to intake of

other nutrients, mainly magnesium.

EVOLUTIONARY CONSIDERATIONS

Over the past 6000 years or more man evolved in a magnesium and

potassium-rich, but calcium and sodium-poor, environment. For survival, the

human body had to develop efficient conserving mechanisms for sodium and

calcium. To conserve sodium, the Zona Glomerulosa of the Adrenal Cortex secretes

a very potent mineralocorticoid, Aldosterone, which increases sodium retention

via the kidney27. To conserve calcium, the skin developed a synthetic process

that manufactures Vitamin D3 from a cholesterol derivative, under the influence

of solar ultraviolet radiation. Vitamin D3 is then hydroxylated by the liver to

25-OH-D3. The kidney is the site of the most important step: 1-hydroxylation

of 25-OH-D3 to generate 1, 25 (OH)2 D3, the most potent calcium-conserving

substance16. It increases calcium and phosphate absorption in the small intestine

and decreases calcium excretion in the urine:

PHYSIOLOGICAL CONSIDERATIONS

The 1-hydroxylase is located in the kidney as a mitochondrial enzyme. It is sensitive

to intramitochondrial calcium and phosphate. Intromitochondrial accumulation

of both calcium and phosphate depress the activity of 1-hydroxylase, thereby

decreasing formation of 1, 25 (OH)2 D322. A low phosphate diet increases and a

high phosphate diet depresses 1, 25 (OH)2 D3 production20.

Besides 1, 25 (OH)2 D3, there are two hormones that play an important role in

calcium metabolism: Calcitonin (CT) and Parathyroid Hormone (PTH)3. Both

hormones are sensitive to serum ionized calcium levels. An increase in serum

ionized calcium results in stimulation of CT secretion and suppression of PTH

secretion. CT and PTH regulate skeletal turnover of calcium and availability

of cytoplasmic calcium3. The major skeletal effect of PTH is to increase bone

resorption by stimulating osteoclasts, thereby increasing mobilization of calcium

from bone. PTH also favors cellular uptake of calcium by soft tissues and

phosphate excretion by the kidney. CT has the opposite effect, that is, it increases

deposition of calcium in the bone matrix and blocks cellular uptake of calcium by

soft tissues. Magnesium suppresses PTH and stimulates CT secretion28, therefore

favoring deposition of calcium in the bone and removal of calcium from soft

tissues. Furthermore magnesium enhances calcium absorption and retention5, 12,

whereas increasing calcium intake suppresses magnesium absorption2, 25.

BIOCHEMICAL CONSIDERATIONS

Calcium and magnesium are often antagonistic in their effect of biological

reactions7. For example, the biosynthesis of both phospholipids and proteins

involve enzymatic steps which have an obligatory requirement for magnesium

and are calcium-inhibited. The glycolytic pathway contains five enzymatic

reactions that have an absolute requirement for magnesium and require optimal

magnesium/calcium ratio for peak performance.

In order for the cell to maintain the proper magnesium/calcium ratio, several

levels of regulation are available, acting on the removal of calcium from the

cytoplasm. One such mechanism is the ATP-dependant calcium pump in the cell

membrane9, 10. The other important mechanism is the transport of calcium inside

the mitochondria. The mitochondria uptake of calcium is reversible if calcium

concentrations in the microenvironment are kept below certain limits. Above

these limits, calcification of mitochondria occurs with subsequent cellular death.

In the presence of magnesium, the uptake of calcium by mitochondria can be

slowed down. Since ATP utilization is magnesium-dependent, it becomes obvious

that the calcium pump at the cell membrane is also magnesium-dependent. The

generation of ATP itself through the glycolytic pathway is in part magnesium-

dependent and inhibited by calcium.

DIETARY CONSIDERATIONS

Stable civilizations have arisen only when primitive hunting communities have

learned to cultivate cereals, such as wheat, rice maize, millets, barley, oats and

rye. In many rural areas, cereals provide more than 70% of the energy consumed9.

Table I shows the magnesium and calcium concentrations in these staple foods.

They contain two to eight times more magnesium than calcium, and as much

as one thousand milligrams of magnesium could be consumed if two thousand

calories were obtained from these sources. One may argue that dairy products

contributed to most of the ingested calcium. This is unlikely since 50% of individuals

tested so far show allergic reactions to dairy products and lactose intolerance is

common in most ethnic groups, occurring in 70% of Black Americans and over

70% of Orientals, Jews, Arabs, Greeks, Japanese, Eskimos, Indians, Africans and

Asians23, 17, 13, 14, 15, 1, 24, 18, 8, 19 ,30, 31.

Considering that 99% of the total body calcium is located in the bones, it is not

surprising that academic proponents of high calcium intake have used as an

argument the possible role of calcium deficiency in osteoporosis11, 4, 29. There is

no evidence, however, to support this view. Osteoporosis is not more common

in those parts of Asia and Africa where diets are relatively low in calcium

(300-500 mg/day) than in Europe and North America where consumption of

dairy products contributes to more than 1000 mg of calcium/day When patients

with severe osteoporosis were given massive doses of calcium they went into

positive calcium balance, but radiographic studies revealed no changes in the

osteoporotic process. Where did that calcium go? Obviously into the soft tissues

where it does not belong.

Calcium balance studies have indicated that man can adapt to relatively

low calcium intake by increasing calcium absorption and decreasing

urinary excretion10. There is not such a mechanism for magnesium26. The

adaptation to low calcium intake is most likely via synthesis of 1, 25 (OH)2

D3 by the kidney. It was previously discussed that high intramitochondrial

concentrations of phosphate and calcium in the kidney suppress the formation of

1, 25 (OH)2 D320, 22. Therefore, mechanisms that increase intracellular and

intramitochondrial calcium would prevent adaptation to low calcium intake.

Failure of the calcium-pump at the cell membrane and increased uptake of

calcium by mitochondria are two such mechanisms which are both magnesium-

dependent as previously discussed. Since a low phosphate diet increases

formation of 1, 25 (OH)2 D320 and a high magnesium diet would keep calcium

out of the mitochondria, it seems therefore that one approach to improving the

adaptation to low calcium intake is to ingest a diet low in phosphate and high

in magnesium. Such an approach to the management of osteoporosis would

seem more appropriate than the ingestion of massive doses of calcium. The latter

approach blocks magnesium absorption and creates a magnesium deficiency,

conducive to a failure of the calcium- pump and intracellular accumulation of

calcium in soft tissues that eventually leads to irreversible cell damage. Also,

magnesium deficiency results in elevated PTH which prevents the utilization of

the absorbed calcium for bone formation and favors soft tissue calcification.

Recent studies suggest that calcium requirements are increased by acid-ash,

high- protein and high sulfur diet21. In order to increase the efficiency of the

adaptation mechanism to low calcium intake, every attempt should be made to

ingest foods containing a magnesium/calcium ratio of two or more, with neutral

or alkaline ash, not excessive in phosphate, sulfur, proteins, refined sugar, fats and

other substances that drain the body of both calcium and magnesium. Magnesium

deficiency causes a reduced intestinal absorption of calcium and decreased

serum ionized calcium. Magnesium has a calcium-sparing effect and decreases

the need for calcium.

Since magnesium suppresses PTH and increases CT, adequate magnesium intake

would improve the phosphorous balance from a low phosphate diet by increasing

phosphate absorption via the 1, 25 (OH)2 D3 mechanisms and by preventing the

PTH induced phosphaturia. Furthermore, a high magnesium intake would enhance

calcium absorption by the 1, 25 (OH)2 D3 mechanisms, increase serum ionized

calcium, promote deposition of calcium in the bone matrix where it belongs and

minimize cellular uptake and mitochondrial accumulation of calcium. With such an

approach there would be no need for pharmaceutical companies to develop new

and improved calcium blockers in the management of cardiovascular diseases,

since magnesium works naturally to produce the same end result. ■


ABOUT THE AUTHOR

Guy E. Abraham, MD, is a former professor of Obstetrics and, Gynecology, at the UCLA

School of Medicine. Some 45 years ago, he pioneered the development of assays to measure

minute quantities of steroid hormones in biological fluids. His contributions have been

acknowledged with several awards: General Diagnostic Award from Canadian Association of

Clinical Chemist, 1974; the Medaille d’Honneur from the University of Liegc, Belgium, 1976;

the Senior Investigator Award of Pharmacia Sweden, 1980.

Some 30 years ago Dr. Abraham developed a magnesium emphasized nutritional program

for women with premenstrual tension syndrome and post-menopausal osteoporosis. This

magnesium emphasized program is currently part of the nutritional management of PMS and

osteoporosis of many gynecologists. In 2000 he initiated the Iodine Project, a reevaluation

of the role of the essential element iodine in medical practice. In order to better understand

iodine metabolism, he developed a simple technique to measure iodide and other halides in

biological fluids. Ten years ago, he introduced the concept of Orthoiodosupplementation,

that is, iodine supplementation for whole body sufficiency, based on an iodine/iodide test

that he developed. He is currently involved in research on the effects of negatively charged

electrolyzed water on aging and degenerative disease.

REFERENCES:

1. Alzante, H. Gonzalez, H. and Guzman, J. “Lactose intolerance in

South American Indians.” Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 22: 122, (1969).

2. Amiot, D., Hioco, D. and Durlach, J. “Frequence du deficit

magnesique chez le sujet et dans diverses osteopathies.” J. Med.

Besancon 5:371-378, (1969).

3. Aurbach, GD., Marx, S.J. and Spiegel, AM. ”Parathyroid Hormone,

Calcitonin, and Calciferols.” In textbook of Endocrinology, Williams,

RH. (Ed), Saunders Co., 922-1032, (1981).

4. Aviolo, LV. “Postmenopausal osteoporosis: prevention versus

cure.” Fed. Proc. 40: 2418, (1981).

5. Briscoe, A.M. and Ragen, C. “Relation of magnesium on calcium

metabolism in man.” Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 19: 296-306, (1966).

6. Bryan, W.T.K. and Bryan, M.P. ”Cytotoxic Reactions in the Diagnosis

of Food Allergy.” Otol. N. Am. 4: 523-533, (1971).

7. Bygrave, F.L. “Cellular Calcium and Magnesium Metabolism.” In

An Introduction to Bio-inorganic Chemistry. Williams, D. R. (Ed)

Thomas, 171-184, (1976).

8. Cook. G.C. and Kajubi, SK. “Tribal incidence of lactase deficiency in

Uganda.” Lancet l: 725, (1966).

9. Davidson, S., Passmore. R., Brock, J.F. and Truswell, AS. “Human

Nutrition and Dietetics.” Churchill Livingstone, 166-175, (1979).

10. Davidson, S., Passmore, R., Brock, J.F. and Truswell, A.S. “Human

Nutrition and Dietetics.” Churchill Livingstone, 90-106. (1979).

11. Draper, H.H. and Scythes, C.A. ”Calcium, phosphorous, and

osteoporosis.” Fe. Proc. 40: 2434, (1984).

12. DuRuisseau, J.P. and Marineau, J.M. “Osteoporose medication

calcique et magnesienne,” See Int’l Sympos on Magnesium, 223-

226, (1971/1973).

13. Gilat, T., et. al. “Lactase deficiency in Jewish communities in

Israel.” Am J. Digest. Dis. 16:203, (1971).

14. Gilat. T., et. al “Lactose intolerance in an Arab population.” Am. J.

Digest. Dis. 16:203, (1977)

15. Gudmand-hoyer, and F., Jarnum, S. “Lactose malabsorption in

Greenland Eskimos.” Acta Med. Scand. 186:235, (1969).

16. Holick, M.F. and Clark, MB. “The photobiogenesis and metabolism

of Vitamin D.” Fed. Proc. 37: 2567-2574, (1978).

17. Huang, S.S. and Bayless, T.M. “Milk and lactose intolerance in

healthy orientals.” Science 160: 83, (1968).

18. Johnson, J.D., et. al. “Lactose malabsorption among the Pima

Indians of Arizona.” Gastroenterology 73: 985, (1977).

19. Kretchmer, N., et.al. “Intestinal absorption of lactose in Nigerian

ethnic groups.” Lancet 2: 392, (l971).

20. Larkins, R.G., McAuley, S.J., Colston, K.W., Evans, I.M.A., Galante,

L.S. and Macintyre, I. “Regulation of Vitamin D. Metabolism without

Parathyroid Hormone.” Lancet: 289-291, (1973).

21. Linkswiler, H.M., Zemel, M.B., Hegsted, M., and Schuette, S.

“Protein-induced hypercalciuria.” Fed. Proc. 40:2429, (1981).

22. MacIntyre, I. “Vitamin D and the integration of Calcium

Regulating Hormones.” In First European Symposium on hormones

and Cell Regulation. Dumont, J. and Nunez. J. (Ed) North Holland,

195-208, (1977).

23. Nasrallah, SM. “Lactose intolerance in the Lebanese population

and in ‘Mediterranean lymphoma’.” Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 32:1994-1996,

(1979).

24. Newcomer, AD., et. al. “Family studies of lactose deficiency in

the American Indian.” Gastroenterology 73; 1299, (1977).

25. Parlier. R., Hioco, D. and LeBlanc, R. “Les troubles du metacolisme

magnesien. Symptomes et traitment des carences et des plethores

magnesiennes.” Rev. Franc. Endocr. Clin. 4: 335-339, (1963).

26. Rude, R.K., Bethune, J.E. and Singer, F.R. “Renal tubular

maximum for magnesium in normal, hyperparathyroid and

hypoparathyroid man.” J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 51: 1425-1431,

(1980).

27. Schrier, R.W. and Leaf, A. “Effect of Hormones on Water, Sodium,

Chloride, and Potassium Metabolism.” In Textbook of Endocrinology,

Williams RH. (Ed) Saunders Co., 1032-

28. Seelig, MS. “Magnesium Deficiency in the Pathogenesis of

Disease.” Plenum Medical Book Company, 3 17-321, (1980).

29. Seeman, E. and Riggs, B.L. “Dietary prevention of bone loss in

the elderly.” Geriatrics 36:71-79, (1981).

30. Senewiratne, B., et. al. “Intestinal lactase deficiency in Ceylon

(Sri Lanka).” Gastroenterology 72:1257, (1977).

31. Shibuya, S. et. al. “Lactose intolerance in Japanese children.”

Advan. Med (Japan). 72:323, (1970).
 
OP
Amazoniac

Amazoniac

Member
Joined
Sep 10, 2014
Messages
8,583
Location
Not Uganda
I was thinking that when magnesium is combined with organic acids, there's a possibility that they could enhance the absorption of contaminants. I already posted that malic acid can chelate aluminium, but the reaction can occur before digestion, picking up metals and shoving them inside. If I'm not wrong, I think I read some concerns about this elsewhere. Perhaps the same thing can occur with lead:

Influence of dietary factors on the gastrointestinal absorption of lead - ScienceDirect

"Sodium citrate and citric acid are added to many kinds of foods for a variety of reasons (Furia, 1968). Citrate also occurs naturally in foods and plays a role in several biochemical systems. In this investigation, it was found that both sodium citrate and orange juice, a source of citric acid, increased GI absorption of lead. It is common knowledge that lead poisoning can occur as a result of storing acidic beverages in pottery coated with lead-containing glazes (Klein et al., 1970). The enhancement of lead absorption by sodium citrate and orange juice should be distinguished from the ability of acidic solutions to leach lead from lead-containing pottery glazes. Both factors may contribute to the health hazards associated with the storage of acidic fruit juices in improperly glazed vessels."
__
Nutrition of lead - ScienceDirect

"Since all soil contains lead, there is no lead-free food; a natural level of lead exists in food according to natural levels in the soil. The main source of contamination of soil is aerial deposition, the aspect which has received the greatest attention in recent years being the emissions of motor vehicles derived from the use of leaded fuels. Other sources, such as mining, may also contribute to lead in the atmosphere, lead levels in soil and air being highest in areas of high industrialization (Schulter and Egan. 1976; Underwood, 1971)."

"Lead paint on walls, woodwork and toys, lead glazes on ceramics, and pewter containers may all contribute to the total lead intake and to the possibility of lead poisoning (Arrow, 1976). Infants and children between the ages of 1 and 6 years have been the main victims of lead poisoning, chiefly from the ingestion of flaking paint (pica) from old houses and apartments (Mahaffey, 1981; Lin-fu, 1970). whereas exposure in adults is often associated with the consumption of moonshine whiskey made in lead-contaminated stills (Conrad and Barton. 1978)."

"Nutritional factors are thought to play an important role in lead poisoning (Mahaffey, 1981). Studies in animals have shown that certain substances bind lead and increase its solubility, thus enhancing its absorption. These dietary components consist of sodium citrate, ascorbate, amino acids (Kehoe, 1961), vitamin D (Smith et al., 1978; Barton et al., 1980), protein and fat (Barltrop and Khoo, 1976) and lactose [no one is ingesting isolated lactose, milk is inhibitory for the most part] (Bushnell and DeLuca, 198 1, 1982; Nutr. Rev., 1982; Stephens and Waldron, 1975). Nutritional iron deficiency and during rapid periods of growth (infancy) in laboratory animals also enhances lead absorption and promotes lead toxicity, thereby giving concern that pregnant women and young children may be more susceptible to dietary lead (Mahaffey, 1981). Iron (Barton et al., 1978a; Flanagan et al., 1979; Flanagan et al., 1982), zinc (Cerklewski and Forbes, 1976), calcium (Barton et al., 1978b), phosphorus, ethanol and magnesium decrease the absorption of lead without affecting its solubility, probably by competing for shared absorptive receptors in the intestinal mucosa (Conrad and Barton, 1978)."

"The total bodily amount of lead does not affect lead absorption. Thus, lead does not have a feedback mechanism which limits absorption."

"Kehoe (1976) performed a long-term balance study with chemical lead determinations. Their data suggest that under ordinary circumstances in eating food and beverages containing customary amounts of lead (0.1-0.4 mg/day), only 5% (food lead) to 10% (water-soluble lead) of the lead is absorbed. Rabinowitz et al. (1976) showed that the average absorption of stable lead tracers from food over a period of 124 days varied from 6.5 to 13.7% in five adult males."

"Barltrop and Khoo (1976) observed that the level of dietary fat had an influence on lead absorption. They showed that lead absorption is dependent upon both the quantity and type of dietary fat. Their work pointed out that by increasing the corn oil content from 5 to 40% of a diet, this resulted in a 7-14-fold increase in the lead content of several tissues. It has also been observed that lecithin when mixed with bile salts and choline (type of dietary fat) increased lead uptake (Mahaffey. 1981)."

"Shields and Mitchell (1941) showed that lowering the calcium and/or phosphorus intake could increase the lead content of bone or soft tissue at low levels of lead intake (32 ppm). These workers also observed that the influence of calcium intake on lead metabolism was seen primarily at low levels of calcium intake; increasing dietary calcium to high levels, 1.1% of the diet, did not decrease tissue stores of lead below those found on a normal calcium diet (Mahaffey and Rader, 1980)."
"A reduction of dietary calcium to approximately 40-50% of the dietary recommendation was necessary before increases in tissue lead content occurred (Mahaffey et al., 1973; Hsu et al., 1975)."
"Vitamin D appears to play a role in this as well. In animals low in vitamin D, less lead is absorbed; this implies a competitive interaction between the two divalent cations. Both lead absorption and calcium absorption are stimulated by 1.25-dihydroxycholecalciferol, but this occurs primarily in the distal small intestine for lead and in the duodenum for calcium (Smith et al., 1978; Barton et al., 1978b: Mahaffey et al., 1979: Frolik and DeLuca, 1971)."

"Rats were found more sensitive to lead intoxication if they were iron deficient (Mahaffey-Six and Goyer, 1972). Iron-deficient (not severe) rats also had increased concentrations of lead in kidney and bone compared with rats ingesting equivalent amounts of water containing 200ppm lead and an iron-adequate diet (Mahaffey, 1981; Mahaffey-Six and Goyer, 1972)."

"Recent work (Levander et al., 1980) suggests that lipid peroxidation plays a vital role for increased sphericity of erythrocytes from vitamin E-deficient rats and that a couple of different mechanisms are considered for the increase in toxicity of lead poisoning. Lead could react with certain membrane components, such as the phosphate groups of phospholipids, to disrupt the structure of the lipid bilayer, thus rendering the polyunsaturated fatty acids more susceptible to peroxidative attack (Levander et al., 1980). Lead is also known to be a weak catalyst of lipid peroxidation and could therefore promote loss of structural integrity."​
I checked an Albion's magnesium malate analysis that I have, stating that it has up to 1.5ppm of lead. Since their magnesium malate is 20% magnesium, for every 300mg of magnesium, you'll have 1500mg of total mass; and up to 2.25mcg of lead.
I'm not sure if it's something to worry if you divide in two doses and take it with food.

The problem with magnesium bicarbonate is that you usually take it away from meals, so every contaminant has a greater chance of being absorbed: water fluoride, lead, arsenic, etc.
 
OP
Amazoniac

Amazoniac

Member
Joined
Sep 10, 2014
Messages
8,583
Location
Not Uganda
"Mobilization of Intracellular Calcium

Caffeine can induce calcium release from the sarcoplasmic reticulum [50] and can also inhibit its reuptake [51]. Through these mechanisms, caffeine can increase contractility during submaximal contractions in habitual and nonhabitual caffeine users. Intracellular calcium determines the activation of endothelial nitric oxide synthase (eNOS), with the production of higher quantities of nitric oxide [47]. Therefore, some of the effects induced by caffeine might be partly mediated by neuromuscular function modulation and contractile force increase in the skeletal muscles [52, 53].

A potential counter effect of caffeine is represented by diuresis stimulation, accountable for ergolytic effects in endurance athletes during prolonged workouts and competitions [54]."
 
OP
Amazoniac

Amazoniac

Member
Joined
Sep 10, 2014
Messages
8,583
Location
Not Uganda
After reading gbolduev's post on chlorides, it reminded me of potassium chloride used as sodium chloride substitute. I'm posting it here because this review offers a lot of combinations for people to experiment with depending on needs.

Potassium Chloride‐Based Salt Substitutes: A Critical Review with a Focus on the Patent Literature

"From a sensory standpoint, KCl has a salty taste with relatively strong offensive unpleasant side tastes which are described as bitter, acrid, chemical, and metallic (Sinopoli and Lawless 2012). Nevertheless, in comparison with NaCl the saltiness of KCl is significantly lower when we compare the same mass concentrations. Despite all these objective disadvantages, KCl is still the best alternative for common salt (NaCl) substitution. In this manner, all research and development work that has been performed by numerous scientists and developing engineers was focused on creating such salt substitutes that would minimize these sensory KCl drawbacks in, as much as possible, efficient manner."

"Inorganic salts have been the 1st TIAs [taste-improving agents] in the KCl-based salt substitutes. The simplest option included the use of NaCl as published back in 1967 (Morton Inc. 1967a). Scientists at Morton Inc. had reported that homogeneous mixtures of KCl and NaCl with a weight ratio of KCl:NaCl = 20:80 to 80:20 could be successfully used as salt substitutes. On this basis, Davis and others (1982) developed a flaked salt composition with 30% to 70% KCl and 70% to 30% NaCl by a process which was comprised of first pulverizing the homogeneous mixture of these ingredients to particles with a size smaller than 0.212 mm and subsequent compacting of such admixture into flakes, which were then screened to provide various sizes of particles in the form of flakes. The obtained flaked salt substitute is more homogeneous, coarser, lighter in weight, more cake-resistant, more liquid-absorptive, and flowable in comparison with the corresponding simple mixtures of KCl + NaCl without the above-mentioned preliminary grinding step. Such a product is especially suitable for surface-sprinkling on bakery products like pretzel salt.

Besides NaCl, various inorganic salts have been employed as taste improvers of KCl-based salt substitutes, for instance, calcium chloride as dihydrate (CaCl2•2H2O), or hexahydrate (CaCl2•6H2O), calcium sulfate as dihydrate (CaSO4•2H2O), magnesium sulfate heptahydrate (MgSO4•7H2O), magnesium chloride (MgCl2) or its hexahydrate (MgCl2•6H2O), sodium sulfate (Na2SO4), potassium sulfate (K2SO4), carnallite (KMgCl3•6H2O), kainite (KMgClSO4•3H2O), schoenite [K2Mg(SO4)2•6H2O], as well as some of their particular combinations. Moreover, even water-insoluble or, more precisely, very poorly soluble calcium and magnesium salts such as calcium carbonate (CaCO3), calcium dihydrogen phosphate [Ca(H2PO4)2], calcium hydrogen phosphate [CaHPO4], calcium phosphate [Ca3(PO4)2], magnesium carbonate (MgCO3), and magnesium phosphate [Mg3(PO4)2] have been used for the same purpose.

Among such salt substitute compositions, the simplest concept involves the use of a single TIA. In this manner, Wilson (2002) found that MgSO4•7H2O can be used as the TIA for KCl-based salt substitute of the following composition: 35% to 45% NaCl, 35% to 45% KCl, and 10% to 30% MgSO4•7H2O, eventually with the addition of some suitable anticaking agent, such as silicon dioxide (SiO2). The most effective formulation contained 41% NaCl, 41% KCl, 17% MgSO4•7H2O, and 1% SiO2.

Klinge and others (2009) developed a salt substitute to be used as a table salt in salt hand mills, which is based on a melt of NaCl, KCl, and MgCl2. Such a melt is allowed to cool to form a solid which is subsequently ground and screened to a desired size of particles suitable to be used in hand mills. In this composition, MgCl2 serves not only as the TIA, but also as a technological additive for lowering the melting point of the KCl–NaCl mixture.

Additionally, Rood and Tilkian (1983) described a composition of a salt substitute with reduced sodium content consisting of 40% to 50% NaCl, 25% to 35% KCl, and 15% to 25% MgSO4•7H2O or MgCl2•6H2O, the former being preferred due to the hygroscopicity of magnesium chloride hexahydrate. In such formulation not only the bitterness of KCl has been efficiently suppressed, but also the overall saltiness per unit weight has been slightly enhanced.

Similarly, Deveau and others (1993) found that a combination of magnesium chloride hexahydrate and calcium chloride acts as an effective taste modifier of KCl-containing salt substitute, which proved to be suitable for salting and preserving meat products. Thus, successful compositions were 50% NaCl, 20% to 30% KCl, 10% to 20% MgCl2•6H2O, and 10% CaCl2•6H2O.

The combination of magnesium sulfate and calcium sulfate as a TIA for NaCl–KCl mixtures was described by Joly and others (2012). They developed the salt substitutes of the following preferred compositions:

  • (i)24% KCl, 70% NaCl, 4.5% MgSO4•7H2O, 1.5% CaSO4•2H2O;
  • (ii)40% KCl, 50% NaCl, 7.5% MgSO4•7H2O, 2.5% CaSO4•2H2O; and
  • (iii)53.3% KCl, 30% NaCl, 10% MgSO4•7H2O, 3.4% CaSO4•2H2O;
wherein all of them contained small amounts of colloidal silicon dioxide as an anticaking agent.

Bonorden and others (1997) found that a combination of magnesium chloride and magnesium sulfate is an effective TIA for KCl-based salt substitutes. The preferred formulation contained 33.05% KCl, 53.19% NaCl, 11.35% MgCl2•6H2O, and 2.41% MgSO4•7H2O.

The same authors (Bonorden and others 1998) also described that the sensory properties of KCl–NaCl mixtures could be additionally improved by the use of sulfate-containing salt, or a combination of sulfate- and chloride-containing salt or salts. Taste improvers from this invention have been found to be K2SO4, MgCl2•6H2O, CaCl2•2H2O, or CaSO4•2H2O. One of the preferred formulations consisted of 51.5% NaCl, 36% KCl, CaCl2•2H2O, 4% MgCl2•6H2O, 3% K2SO4, and 2% CaSO4•2H2O.

Among the technical solutions for the taste improvement of KCl–NaCl mixtures with a complex mixture of inorganic salts, an outstanding natural one is that described by Heron (1989). He discovered that KCl can be mixed with fully dried total sea salt yielding a complex mixture of good sensory properties. Herein, “total sea salt” means not only NaCl, but a mixture of all dissolved sea salts. The weight ratio of KCl compared with dried total sea salt was such as to give a product with the following composition: 41.5% KCl, 46.6% NaCl, 6.5% MgCl2•6H2O, 2.8% MgSO4•7H2O, 2.2% CaSO4•2H2O, 0.2% CaCO3, and 0.1% MgBr2.

A similar solution was developed by Einarsson and Sigurjonsson (2010) who developed a few low sodium formulations of which the following one is outlined: 69.5% KCl, 20% NaCl, 8.4% Mg-salts (MgCl2•6H2O, MgSO4•7H2O), and 0.2% trace minerals from sea water.

Another interesting solution was reported by Wixforth (1980) who prepared a salt substitute from NaCl and Dead Sea salt which contains carnallite (KMgCl3•6H2O). Of course, the latter does not contain pure carnallite, but also a whole range of “natural” trace minerals from the Dead Sea water, yielding the final product of the following composition regarding main ingredients: 24% to 76% NaCl + 76% to 24% KCl•MgCl2•6H2O.

Somewhat special solutions for taste-masking of KCl-containing salt substitutes are those with stoichiometrically well-defined double salts. In this manner, Sundstroem (1988) discovered that carnallite (KMgCl3•6H2O) and kainite (KMgClSO4•3H2O) can be used as such taste improvers, and preferred formulations were:

  • (i)1/3 KCl, 1/3 NaCl, 1/3 kainite; and
  • (ii)42% KCl, 48% NaCl, and 10% kainite.
Kainite was shown to be of slightly better usefulness, but all these formulations had to be processed with an anticaking agent to avoid clumping.

Similarly, DeJong and Grobbee (1993) described the use of KMgCl3•6H2O and KMgClSO4•3H2O as the TIA in KCl-based salt substitutes, even in larger weight percentage of the latter. For instance, they found acceptable sensory properties even in a wide range of compositions such as: 0% to 65% KCl, 15% to 70% NaCl, and 5% to 85% carnallite or kainite. The optimal formulations were 16% to 35% KCl, not more than 48% NaCl, and not less than 16% carnallite or kainite.

Zuniga (2008) found that, beside kainite, sodium sulfate (Na2SO4), potassium sulfate (K2SO4), their double salts glaserite (3K2SO4•Na2SO4), as well as schoenite [K2Mg(SO4)2•6H2O] can be used as the TIAs for KCl–NaCl salt substitute formulations. One of the preferred formulations contained 33% KCl, 33% NaCl, and 33% schoenite.

Additionally, not less surprising, a combination of salts with extremely low water solubility such as CaCO3 and MgCO3 was employed as a taste improver for KCl–NaCl formulations. Krotkiewski and others (1987) described the salt substitute composition to be containing 5% to 45% KCl, 40% to 85% NaCl, 2% to 10% CaCO3, and 2% to 10% MgCO3. As a source of NaCl, natural rock salt could be used to yield a product rich in essential microminerals such as iron (Fe), manganese (Mn), copper (Cu), and cobalt (Co). Derrien and Fontvieille (1998) disclosed the use of several calcium phosphates, namely, calcium dihydrogen phosphate [Ca(H2PO4)2], calcium hydrogen phosphate [CaHPO4], calcium phosphate [Ca3(PO4)2], as well as magnesium phosphate [Mg3(PO4)2] as TIAs for KCl-based salt substitutes. A general formula for their preparation was 40% to 50% KCl, 15% to 25% NaCl, 15% to 25% of one or more calcium phosphates, and 8% to 15% magnesium phosphate."
 

Regina

Member
Joined
Aug 17, 2016
Messages
6,511
Location
Chicago
After reading gbolduev's post on chlorides, it reminded me of potassium chloride used as sodium chloride substitute. I'm posting it here because this review offers a lot of combinations for people to experiment with depending on needs.

Potassium Chloride‐Based Salt Substitutes: A Critical Review with a Focus on the Patent Literature

"From a sensory standpoint, KCl has a salty taste with relatively strong offensive unpleasant side tastes which are described as bitter, acrid, chemical, and metallic (Sinopoli and Lawless 2012). Nevertheless, in comparison with NaCl the saltiness of KCl is significantly lower when we compare the same mass concentrations. Despite all these objective disadvantages, KCl is still the best alternative for common salt (NaCl) substitution. In this manner, all research and development work that has been performed by numerous scientists and developing engineers was focused on creating such salt substitutes that would minimize these sensory KCl drawbacks in, as much as possible, efficient manner."

"Inorganic salts have been the 1st TIAs [taste-improving agents] in the KCl-based salt substitutes. The simplest option included the use of NaCl as published back in 1967 (Morton Inc. 1967a). Scientists at Morton Inc. had reported that homogeneous mixtures of KCl and NaCl with a weight ratio of KCl:NaCl = 20:80 to 80:20 could be successfully used as salt substitutes. On this basis, Davis and others (1982) developed a flaked salt composition with 30% to 70% KCl and 70% to 30% NaCl by a process which was comprised of first pulverizing the homogeneous mixture of these ingredients to particles with a size smaller than 0.212 mm and subsequent compacting of such admixture into flakes, which were then screened to provide various sizes of particles in the form of flakes. The obtained flaked salt substitute is more homogeneous, coarser, lighter in weight, more cake-resistant, more liquid-absorptive, and flowable in comparison with the corresponding simple mixtures of KCl + NaCl without the above-mentioned preliminary grinding step. Such a product is especially suitable for surface-sprinkling on bakery products like pretzel salt.

Besides NaCl, various inorganic salts have been employed as taste improvers of KCl-based salt substitutes, for instance, calcium chloride as dihydrate (CaCl2•2H2O), or hexahydrate (CaCl2•6H2O), calcium sulfate as dihydrate (CaSO4•2H2O), magnesium sulfate heptahydrate (MgSO4•7H2O), magnesium chloride (MgCl2) or its hexahydrate (MgCl2•6H2O), sodium sulfate (Na2SO4), potassium sulfate (K2SO4), carnallite (KMgCl3•6H2O), kainite (KMgClSO4•3H2O), schoenite [K2Mg(SO4)2•6H2O], as well as some of their particular combinations. Moreover, even water-insoluble or, more precisely, very poorly soluble calcium and magnesium salts such as calcium carbonate (CaCO3), calcium dihydrogen phosphate [Ca(H2PO4)2], calcium hydrogen phosphate [CaHPO4], calcium phosphate [Ca3(PO4)2], magnesium carbonate (MgCO3), and magnesium phosphate [Mg3(PO4)2] have been used for the same purpose.

Among such salt substitute compositions, the simplest concept involves the use of a single TIA. In this manner, Wilson (2002) found that MgSO4•7H2O can be used as the TIA for KCl-based salt substitute of the following composition: 35% to 45% NaCl, 35% to 45% KCl, and 10% to 30% MgSO4•7H2O, eventually with the addition of some suitable anticaking agent, such as silicon dioxide (SiO2). The most effective formulation contained 41% NaCl, 41% KCl, 17% MgSO4•7H2O, and 1% SiO2.

Klinge and others (2009) developed a salt substitute to be used as a table salt in salt hand mills, which is based on a melt of NaCl, KCl, and MgCl2. Such a melt is allowed to cool to form a solid which is subsequently ground and screened to a desired size of particles suitable to be used in hand mills. In this composition, MgCl2 serves not only as the TIA, but also as a technological additive for lowering the melting point of the KCl–NaCl mixture.

Additionally, Rood and Tilkian (1983) described a composition of a salt substitute with reduced sodium content consisting of 40% to 50% NaCl, 25% to 35% KCl, and 15% to 25% MgSO4•7H2O or MgCl2•6H2O, the former being preferred due to the hygroscopicity of magnesium chloride hexahydrate. In such formulation not only the bitterness of KCl has been efficiently suppressed, but also the overall saltiness per unit weight has been slightly enhanced.

Similarly, Deveau and others (1993) found that a combination of magnesium chloride hexahydrate and calcium chloride acts as an effective taste modifier of KCl-containing salt substitute, which proved to be suitable for salting and preserving meat products. Thus, successful compositions were 50% NaCl, 20% to 30% KCl, 10% to 20% MgCl2•6H2O, and 10% CaCl2•6H2O.

The combination of magnesium sulfate and calcium sulfate as a TIA for NaCl–KCl mixtures was described by Joly and others (2012). They developed the salt substitutes of the following preferred compositions:

  • (i)24% KCl, 70% NaCl, 4.5% MgSO4•7H2O, 1.5% CaSO4•2H2O;
  • (ii)40% KCl, 50% NaCl, 7.5% MgSO4•7H2O, 2.5% CaSO4•2H2O; and
  • (iii)53.3% KCl, 30% NaCl, 10% MgSO4•7H2O, 3.4% CaSO4•2H2O;
wherein all of them contained small amounts of colloidal silicon dioxide as an anticaking agent.

Bonorden and others (1997) found that a combination of magnesium chloride and magnesium sulfate is an effective TIA for KCl-based salt substitutes. The preferred formulation contained 33.05% KCl, 53.19% NaCl, 11.35% MgCl2•6H2O, and 2.41% MgSO4•7H2O.

The same authors (Bonorden and others 1998) also described that the sensory properties of KCl–NaCl mixtures could be additionally improved by the use of sulfate-containing salt, or a combination of sulfate- and chloride-containing salt or salts. Taste improvers from this invention have been found to be K2SO4, MgCl2•6H2O, CaCl2•2H2O, or CaSO4•2H2O. One of the preferred formulations consisted of 51.5% NaCl, 36% KCl, CaCl2•2H2O, 4% MgCl2•6H2O, 3% K2SO4, and 2% CaSO4•2H2O.

Among the technical solutions for the taste improvement of KCl–NaCl mixtures with a complex mixture of inorganic salts, an outstanding natural one is that described by Heron (1989). He discovered that KCl can be mixed with fully dried total sea salt yielding a complex mixture of good sensory properties. Herein, “total sea salt” means not only NaCl, but a mixture of all dissolved sea salts. The weight ratio of KCl compared with dried total sea salt was such as to give a product with the following composition: 41.5% KCl, 46.6% NaCl, 6.5% MgCl2•6H2O, 2.8% MgSO4•7H2O, 2.2% CaSO4•2H2O, 0.2% CaCO3, and 0.1% MgBr2.

A similar solution was developed by Einarsson and Sigurjonsson (2010) who developed a few low sodium formulations of which the following one is outlined: 69.5% KCl, 20% NaCl, 8.4% Mg-salts (MgCl2•6H2O, MgSO4•7H2O), and 0.2% trace minerals from sea water.

Another interesting solution was reported by Wixforth (1980) who prepared a salt substitute from NaCl and Dead Sea salt which contains carnallite (KMgCl3•6H2O). Of course, the latter does not contain pure carnallite, but also a whole range of “natural” trace minerals from the Dead Sea water, yielding the final product of the following composition regarding main ingredients: 24% to 76% NaCl + 76% to 24% KCl•MgCl2•6H2O.

Somewhat special solutions for taste-masking of KCl-containing salt substitutes are those with stoichiometrically well-defined double salts. In this manner, Sundstroem (1988) discovered that carnallite (KMgCl3•6H2O) and kainite (KMgClSO4•3H2O) can be used as such taste improvers, and preferred formulations were:

  • (i)1/3 KCl, 1/3 NaCl, 1/3 kainite; and
  • (ii)42% KCl, 48% NaCl, and 10% kainite.
Kainite was shown to be of slightly better usefulness, but all these formulations had to be processed with an anticaking agent to avoid clumping.

Similarly, DeJong and Grobbee (1993) described the use of KMgCl3•6H2O and KMgClSO4•3H2O as the TIA in KCl-based salt substitutes, even in larger weight percentage of the latter. For instance, they found acceptable sensory properties even in a wide range of compositions such as: 0% to 65% KCl, 15% to 70% NaCl, and 5% to 85% carnallite or kainite. The optimal formulations were 16% to 35% KCl, not more than 48% NaCl, and not less than 16% carnallite or kainite.

Zuniga (2008) found that, beside kainite, sodium sulfate (Na2SO4), potassium sulfate (K2SO4), their double salts glaserite (3K2SO4•Na2SO4), as well as schoenite [K2Mg(SO4)2•6H2O] can be used as the TIAs for KCl–NaCl salt substitute formulations. One of the preferred formulations contained 33% KCl, 33% NaCl, and 33% schoenite.

Additionally, not less surprising, a combination of salts with extremely low water solubility such as CaCO3 and MgCO3 was employed as a taste improver for KCl–NaCl formulations. Krotkiewski and others (1987) described the salt substitute composition to be containing 5% to 45% KCl, 40% to 85% NaCl, 2% to 10% CaCO3, and 2% to 10% MgCO3. As a source of NaCl, natural rock salt could be used to yield a product rich in essential microminerals such as iron (Fe), manganese (Mn), copper (Cu), and cobalt (Co). Derrien and Fontvieille (1998) disclosed the use of several calcium phosphates, namely, calcium dihydrogen phosphate [Ca(H2PO4)2], calcium hydrogen phosphate [CaHPO4], calcium phosphate [Ca3(PO4)2], as well as magnesium phosphate [Mg3(PO4)2] as TIAs for KCl-based salt substitutes. A general formula for their preparation was 40% to 50% KCl, 15% to 25% NaCl, 15% to 25% of one or more calcium phosphates, and 8% to 15% magnesium phosphate."
I've been making it easy on myself by increasing my use of SaltStick electrolyte capsules.
 

Sheila

Member
Joined
Nov 6, 2014
Messages
374
Dear Amazoniac
Yet another remarkable find on potassium chloride as a sodium chloride substitute.

And interesting timing also for me since I had just finished very briefly (for me!) discussing the qualities of regular, low dose KCl (65mg) on health vs dear Yerrag's use as higher dosing for potassium repletion. I'll just add something I forgot; yes KCl is absolutely foul to taste but it will reliably improve mouth ulcers and swollen neck lymph glands if a small dose is sucked a few times a day. Maybe the pain of an ulcerated mucosa is just overwhelmed by the sheer disgust emanating from the taste buds. And may the most deranged cell win.

The use of low (by current standards) dose and inorganic mineral salts has interested me greatly for a decade or so and indeed I have experience with potassium and calcium sulphates in this vein, and here they are bold as brass as TIA (not transient ischaemic attacks then) for KCl-based NaCl salt replacement products. Looking at the combinations from the 'therapeutic' inorganic salt perspective, minerals that cells have used since the dawn of time, those partaking of these combinations might experience greater physiological benefit than just taste modification. A case of what you don't know can help you for once.

Calcium sulphate, for example, works nicely at very low doses (12mg) when there are suppurating ulcers and potassium sulphate (65mg) is a favourite of mine to enhance antibiotic effect as it seemingly assists with liver detoxification of same. The lack of sulphates today in diets is an interesting issue as I have alluded to before. The use of these simple mineral combinations was developed c.1940 when simplicity was more admired and 'don't stack easy ingress molecules in a cell with no get out clause', also known as 'first, do no harm' was more in vogue. These inorganic mineral combinations were based on the earlier tissue salts of, as you would say, 'the homeopathy of 6X persuasion'. But they were bulk minerals not the succussed dust of the fairies and the anion was equally as important as the cation, not just along for the ride.

Given that I have used 65mg magnesium phosphate 1-3x daily with food to good effect for issues stonking (technical term) great amounts of 'organic' mag are now more religiously given, I have to wonder whether it was merely my brilliance, or force of personality getting results - no, surely not, (and I am joking for those readers, many decades younger than me, for whom the nuances/irony and sheer hypocrisy of my commentary may tragically be lost) or indeed whether larger doses so commonly described today are really necessary. Does the body not limit intake when it reaches sufficiency? Where does the unwanted mineral go? And what about its side kick? Must energy now be wasted to remove? Is the same 'take that!' dose really necessary every day? When one has finished for example dampening a nerve's response with a landslide of organic 'get me to the cell on time' mag, does one get to investigate the root cause of a food-irritated colon instead, or doesn't that really matter any more. Personally, I much prefer to hunt down an offending food so that a tic, cramp, restlessness, even sciatic pain is no more than take tsps of contaminated mineral powders (now with extra lead!) for aeons and pay more than handsomely for the privilege. But then I am so damn old school (excepting one should never start a sentence with but of course).

There you go, Hercule; you wish you had never mentioned the inorganic salts now, don't you? But it is too late. At least 80 years in fact since the first use of such things, commercially.

You may return to your Bestest of Magnesiums now, I must away and take my medicine....but only a little at a time of course.

Thank you again for the find, most interesting, sincerely,

Sheila
 
OP
Amazoniac

Amazoniac

Member
Joined
Sep 10, 2014
Messages
8,583
Location
Not Uganda
Here's why Rajmond often comments that context matters:

When it comes to impurities, people often think in terms of proportion of contamination and neglect the amounts.

These are contaminants reported in the lab analysis of:

Zinc gluconate:

Cd <1.0 ppm
Pb 01.5 ppm
Hg <1.0 ppm
.
And this is from Albion's magnesium malate:

Cd <0.5 ppm
Pb <1.5 ppm
Hg <0.1 ppm
.
But you consume about..

100 mg (of zinc gluconate) to get 15 mg (of zinc)
2000 mg (magnesium malate) to get 400 mg (of magnesia)​

Then in a day you can have..

100 mg of zinc gluconate (1 ppm = 0.1 mcg):

Cd <1.0 ppm = 0.10 mcg
Pb 01.5 ppm = 0.15 mcg
Hg <1.0 ppm = 0.10 mcg
.
2000 mg of magnesium malate (1 ppm = 2.0 mcg):

Cd <0.5 ppm = 1.00 mcg
Pb <1.5 ppm = 3.00 mcg
Hg <0.1 ppm = 0.20 mcg
.
The values might be not be right, but the point is that it's silly to neglect the amounts consumed because you might end up ignoring the major source of impurities. This is a skin to someone that's concerned about the quality of food but barely finds time to chew it.

But there is also another important point to consider: the proportion of magnesium per molecule. 'Magnesium hydroxid' is 42% magnesium whereas 'hydrated magnesium chloride' is 12%. Assuming a similar contamination in the production of both, you have to expose yourself to way more contaminants with magnesium chloride to get the same amount of magnesia.

And yeah, arsenic is not important. I'm not intimidated by it, contrary to the words: OUT OF STOCK.
 
OP
Amazoniac

Amazoniac

Member
Joined
Sep 10, 2014
Messages
8,583
Location
Not Uganda
Nitric Oxide, KMUD 2014

"[..]thyroid makes your cells able to use magnesium and so take it up, but a big organ like your skeletal muscles and bones can take up so much from your blood that your brain and heart and such have trouble getting the magnesium they need to respond to the thyroid, and then you get an exaggerated stress and adrenalin reaction. And low cholesterol is another limiting factor; if you have very low cholesterol you can't respond to increasing your thyroid because one of the basic functions of thyroid is to turn cholesterol into progesterone, pregnenolone and DHEA.

Okay, so what kind of dose of magnesium would you think for that kind of person would be suitable?

About 100 mg at a time as you take the (say) 1-2 mcg of cytomel, or cynomel, 100mg will be plenty for the first 2 or 3 hours of responding to 1 or 2 micrograms."​

--
Intestinal absorption of magnesium from food and supplements.
Magnesium absorption is steep until about 120 mg at a time, beyond that it starts to level. It doesn't stop there at all, it's similar to vit C: you keep pushing, you keep absorbing; but the fact that there's a clear decline in the rate must point that we're better adapted to amounts up to more or less 120 mg in a meal. Suchzord suggested people to spread doses throughout the day, and I think he's right.
upload_2018-9-1_8-37-38.png

"The data in Fig. 1 suggest that a 10-mEq dose of MgAc would be optimal
because fractional absorption falls off fairly steeply with higher doses, leaving
a larger fraction of ingested Mg unabsorbed"

Magnesium Conversions
"1 mEq Mg = 0.5 mmol Mg = 12.3 mg Mg"
 
Last edited:
OP
Amazoniac

Amazoniac

Member
Joined
Sep 10, 2014
Messages
8,583
Location
Not Uganda
It makes no sense to specify the typical absorptions of some given magnesium salts without providing more information on conditions.

Example: in an experiment they find out that the absorption of magnesium [. . . Brewing online victim . . .] blossomate was 20%, but this alone is meaningless; what if people took 45 kg of it and you're comparing it to a different form from people who used 100 mg? What if those 45 kg were in fact 3x 15 kg? What about the state of the gurus involved? What if they took on empty stomach? And so on.​

The story is different if you's comparing various salts of magnesium provided in matching conditions, which is what paymanz and his friends did on rats in a single experiment:
Study of magnesium bioavailability from ten organic and inorganic Mg salts in Mg-depleted rats using a stable isotope approach

Otherwise picking random absorptions under quite different conditions is careless. It's as absurd as stipulating an abortion for vit C.

They've tried to do it here:
Bioavailability and Pharmacokinetics of Magnesium After Administration of Magnesium Salts to Humans
(I can't understand why they added mEq next to % of abortion)

The experiment from the previous post helped shred the lights on absorption.. of magnesium acetate for the most part. Their graph is useful to grasp when the efficiency of absorption decreases ('intake vs net absorption'), but it would be nice if it had one with 'intake vs % absorbed' as well. Here's how it looks like using their information:

upload_2018-12-29_20-0-37.png

For convenience, I have included the following if people want to copy to Excel to estimate how much you's getting from your magnesium salt based on the above.

4.4
desired dose in mg
-0.54
percentage absorption of your Mg salt (no need to add symbol)
experimental dose used to define the above in mg

Percentage absorbed (from desired dose):
=((A1*(A2^A3))*100)*(A4/((A1*(A5^A3))*100))
Amount absorbed (from desired dose again):
=A2*(A8/100)


The first 3 cells are based on the graph formula (for the line).

The fourth is to add the claimed absorption for your supplement.
The fifth requires you to find out how much was given at a time to stipulate the absorption above.
Example: 30 percent was absorbed in a experiment that people received 100 mg.


Percentage absorbed:
This part is just a calculation as if it was magnesium acetate (using the formula) multiplied by 100 so that it appears as percentage to make a cute.
This part the 'dose required in mg' was replaced for the one used in the experiment of your magnesium salt, it will return a result as if it was for magnesium acetate; for a fixed amount of magnesium that you first added, we're dividing 'A4' (the absorption of your supplement) by the absorption for acetate, this way we get a ratio that will serve to move the graphed line up or down depending on how your salt performs in relation to acetate. No sophistication at all.

Amount absorbed:
Just multiplying the 'dose required in mg' by the percentage absorbed.

If you want to use this for magnesium acetate, just add any dose from the graph with its respective absorption. Then add the desired dose.

And of course you might need to substitute dots for commas depending if you live on superior nations.​

Speaking of vit C, the idea of being preferable to take small amounts at a time to avoid wastage applies to magnesium. You'll also decrease contaminant exposure this way. In the case of amount absorbed from magnesium acetate..

4x 75 mg (45%) = 135 mg
1x 300 mg (20%) = 60 mg

The main point in this jabber-jibber is that it's difficult to set values for absorption considering how much it varies even when you change just one thing.
 
Last edited:
OP
Amazoniac

Amazoniac

Member
Joined
Sep 10, 2014
Messages
8,583
Location
Not Uganda
Nitric Oxide, KMUD 2014

"[..]thyroid makes your cells able to use magnesium and so take it up, but a big organ like your skeletal muscles and bones can take up so much from your blood that your brain and heart and such have trouble getting the magnesium they need to respond to the thyroid, and then you get an exaggerated stress and adrenalin reaction. And low cholesterol is another limiting factor; if you have very low cholesterol you can't respond to increasing your thyroid because one of the basic functions of thyroid is to turn cholesterol into progesterone, pregnenolone and DHEA.

Okay, so what kind of dose of magnesium would you think for that kind of person would be suitable?

About 100 mg at a time as you take the (say) 1-2 mcg of cytomel, or cynomel, 100mg will be plenty for the first 2 or 3 hours of responding to 1 or 2 micrograms."​

--

View attachment 10498
"The data in Fig. 1 suggest that a 10-mEq dose of MgAc would be optimal
because fractional absorption falls off fairly steeply with higher doses, leaving
a larger fraction of ingested Mg unabsorbed"

Magnesium Conversions
"1 mEq Mg = 0.5 mmol Mg = 12.3 mg Mg"
As the dose of magnesium in a meal increases, the unadsorbed fraction also increases and can complex with onions such as phosphate making them less available. It's suspected that this is what happened in the interesting experiment above, phosphate adsorption wented from 70% to 30% (!) depending on the magnesium dose:

upload_2019-1-24_8-4-42.png

Some fine art right there.

Standard meal provided 37 mg of magnesium.
Magnesium: 1 mEq = 12.3 mg.​

--
If it wasn't clear for you as it wasn't for me, the equation that they provided for net adsorption is just the sum of the 'saturable' component and the linear one. Here's an example with the intake of 20 mEq:

upload_2019-1-24_8-5-0.png
upload_2019-1-24_8-5-17.png
upload_2019-1-24_8-5-22.png

Since the linear keeps increasing in proportion to the dose, the most efficient range of abortion is determined by the theoresical 'saturable' one, being up until it reaches its limit, which is around 10 mEq.

When the two components inter but also sect is when the intense adsorptive process stops being the main contributor.
 
Last edited:
OP
Amazoniac

Amazoniac

Member
Joined
Sep 10, 2014
Messages
8,583
Location
Not Uganda
Since it isn't rare to find complaints that a combination of magnesium carbonate/hydroxide supplements with acids wasn't satisfactory, it gotted me thinking if it's possible to find a grass-fed magnesium bar to replace powders. For magnesium to appear in the solution it has to be reacted first, so it must be more digestible this way. Has anyone tried this?

- Magnesium and 35% Acetic Acid (Vinegar)
 
EMF Mitigation - Flush Niacin - Big 5 Minerals

Similar threads

Back
Top Bottom