One Law For All Cancers - Cancer Is A Viral Disease

[TreasureVibe]

Gershom Zajicek M.D,
Published on 6 nov. 2017

Prof. Gershom Zajicek M.D.
Faculty of Medicine
Hebrew University of Jerusalem

(From the description)

One Law for all Cancers (Update)
1. Cancer is a viral disease.
2. The infected organ responds with a chronic inflammation called dysplastic field.
3 After a long latency tumor emerges.
4. All cancers progress in the same way.
5. Viral interference cures cancer.

One law for all cancers is a theory which highlights the essence of the cancer phenomenon.

It is a chapter of the theory of medicine which I discuss in other presentations:

Theory of Epstein-Barr Phenomena Update 2017
Theory of Symptoms and Signs
Theory of Disease
Theory of cancer

First we have to define fundamental element (atom) of cancer. We may start with cell as an atom.
Since all cells come from cells. Yet the cancer atom is more than that it is a cell clone.
We find the cancer atom in a tissue. “There are four basic types of animal tissues: muscle tissue,
nervous tissue, connective tissue, and epithelial tissue. All tissue types are subtypes of these four
basic tissue types (for example, blood is classified as connective tissue.)
Tissue composed of units called tissue proliferative unit (TPU). Its cells are progeny of the stem cell.
TPU is the tissue atom.
TPU cells are monoclonal
There are three major types of tissue.
Their nature was determined in the beginning of embryogenesis. Each germ layer is origin of a distinct tissue and its potential cancers.
Each tissue has its specific carcinoma. Carcinoma “remembers” its tissue of origin
Dysplastic field
1. Epithelium changes
2. Stroma : Chronic inflammation
3. Carcinoma emerges after a long latency
Question: What determines which tissue will grow a tumor? Answer : Virus infection.
Viral tropism: Virus will infect only cells with the same receptor like that of cell of its birth.

Source: https://www . youtube. com/watch?v=E4wXQ07RVlY

YouTube channel of the professor: Gershom Zajicek M.D,


-


I think what adds to the confusion is that every scientist which comes up with a new proposed theory, says that ALL cancers are caused/of the type that he or she proposes. I think from now on, you could say that there are cancers of various categories:

Viral
Fungal
Hormonal
Metabolic
Genetic (controversial)
Toxic cell overload (perhaps a more common pre-category)
Electrical
Energetic? (not sure if this is an existing category)
Emotional? (not sure if this is an existing category either)
And more


Perhaps it is shortsighted to say ''cancer is just a tumor'', I think what we're looking at here is a multi-dimensional and unexplored scientific area when it comes to studying the origins of cancer.

Each cancer has a unique personality or so to say.

Perhaps all body cells have an alternative existence/are in a alternate dimension, or rather an alternative circuit ruled by the unconsciousness, as opposed to the primary dimension or circuit which is ruled by the consciousness?

Perhaps there are multiple layers of cell identity? Multiple layers of immune system? Perhaps a cancer has multiple layers of causes?

 

[Diokine]

Lysogeny

Lysogeny

Lysogeny

 

[Peatful]

Lysogeny

Lysogeny

Lysogeny

Curious @Diokine
Are you for or against phage technology, such as Florassist, orally?

 

[TreasureVibe]

Curious @Diokine
Are you for or against phage technology, such as Florassist, orally?

What if bacteria aren't supposed to be in your gut at all, and what if the idea of a ''natural gut flora'' is a big lie? Just throwing out some random ideas.

 

[kayumochi]

What if bacteria aren't supposed to be in your gut at all, and what if the idea of a ''natural gut flora'' is a big lie? Just throwing out some random ideas.

That idea is definitely random :)

 

[Diokine]

@Peatful

I'm not sure - I took a 30 day course of Florassist and my results were inconclusive. I think that it helped with reducing a tendency towards loose bowels. I'm almost certain it did change something with my guts. Dr. Zajicek does not recommend untargeted, nonspecific phage therapy, and I think with good reason.

N-acetyl-cysteine, foam rolling, liver/b vitamin consumption, reduction in coffee consumption and extremely low starch were the things that helped me the most I think.

Bromocriptine also tended to help my guts acutely but I think it can encourage oscillations in nervous activity that may be difficult to accommodate.

 

[TreasureVibe]

Either a pathogen hijacks the cell, taking the place of the somatid, or its the somatid itself that this professor describes. See my topic here: Cancer = Cell Fermentation?

 

[Diokine]

What is the effect of sympathetic/adrenergic nervous activity on the electrical environment of a collection of cells, tissue?

What is the effect on collection or condensation of water soluble ionic compounds?

What happens upon removal of adrenergic stimulus?

What happens with excessive adrenergic stimulation?

How do viral/immune factors play into adrenergic sensitivity?

What happens to tissue that has very little adrenergic sensitivity, electrically?

 

[TreasureVibe]

What is the effect of sympathetic/adrenergic nervous activity on the electrical environment of a collection of cells, tissue?

What is the effect on collection or condensation of water soluble ionic compounds?

What happens upon removal of adrenergic stimulus?

What happens with excessive adrenergic stimulation?

How do viral/immune factors play into adrenergic sensitivity?

What happens to tissue that has very little adrenergic sensitivity, electrically?

I think, that in any case, whatever the environment is, what all cancer cells have in common, is that all are in a state of fermentation. This fermentation is controlled inside the cell by either a body's own somatid that has pleomorphized into any kind of pathogen, or a foreign pathogen that apparently has taken the place of the somatid, or took a place next to it, but still somehow is in control of the cell's energy metabolism.

''You can take the cell out of cancer, but you can't take the cancer out of a cell (atleast, we are trying to figure the latter out)''

Think fermentation. What influences fermentation. What can steer fermentation to a succesful end. What can modulate fermentation.

Glycine for example is touted as possessing anti-cancer benefits. see: Glycine May Treat Lung, Brain And Other Cancers


Glycine is also used for either making or boosting yeast assimilable nitrogen, which is an agent that is used for wine fermentation.

See: Glutathione (GSH: L-gamma-glutamyl-L-cysteinylglycine) is present in high concentrations up to 10 mM in yeast cells. It assumes a pivotal role in response to sulfur and nitrogen starvation.[6]

There are many types of nitrogen supplements available for winemakers to use. Most of them are complex formulations that include nitrogen (from either amino acids or ammonium salts) along with vitamins, minerals and other growth factors and sold under brand names like Go-Ferm, Superfood, Fermaid K (the later two also containing some DAP).[2] Amino acids can be added directly to the must though as of 2010 only glycine is permitted to be added to must in the United States.[4]


Urea is also touted as possessing anti-cancer benefits. see: Using Urea And Creatine As A Cancer Treatment

Urea is also used for either making or boosting yeast assimilable nitrogen, for wine fermentation.

See:
In the vineyard, nitrogen is taken up by the grapevine as nitrate (NO3−), ammonium or urea which gets reduced into ammonia. Through additional reactions the nitrogen is incorporated into glutamine and glutamate and eventually used in the synthesis of other amino acids and nitrogenous compounds.[1]

Nitrogen levels in the wine can have an influence on many sensory aspects of the resulting wine, including the synthesis of many aromatic compounds. Fusel alcohols are made by the degradation of amino acids though in the presence of high levels of ammonia and urea their production is reduced. When available nitrogen is limited, the levels of glycerol and trehalose, which may influence mouthfeel, are higher.[3]

Urea was also used as an early nitrogen supplement but research linking it to the development of ethyl carbamate has led to its banning in many countries, including the United States since 1990.[2][18][19]

Excessive levels of the amino acid arginine (greater than 400 mg/l), especially near the end of fermentation, can pose the risk increase the production of ethyl carbamate. This is because arginine gets broken down into urea which can be reabsorbed and utilized by yeast or metabolized into ammonia. However, urea also reacts with ethanol if it is not completely metabolized which coupled with long term exposure (as well as high temperatures) can lead to the production of the ester ethyl carbamate.[1]

Yeast assimilable nitrogen - Wikipedia


Keep in mind here that Gaston Naessens cured patients by providing the somatid/pathogen inside the cancer cell with nitrogen, whilst I don't know the mechanism of how he did it, he injected a certain compound of his own making in the lymphatic system that achieved this.

 

[Peater]

Pretty sure viruses had nothing to do with my grandfather's mesothelioma. Unless asbestos is viral.

 

[TreasureVibe]

Pretty sure viruses had nothing to do with my grandfather's mesothelioma. Unless asbestos is viral.

Then it was the body cell's own somatid that pleomorphized into a pathogen or anything that looked like it, under the circumstances of asbestos exposure.

 

[Peater]

Then it was the body cell's own somatid that pleomorphized into a pathogen or anything that looked like it, under the circumstances of asbestos exposure.

Isn't cancer then better described as an autoimmune disease?

 

[TreasureVibe]

Isn't cancer then better described as an autoimmune disease?

Describe autoimmune disease.

 

[Peater]

Describe autoimmune disease.

My understanding is that the body's immune system responds to part(s) of the organism as though it was an infectious agent.

 

[TreasureVibe]

My understanding is that the body's immune system responds to part(s) of the organism as though it was an infectious agent.

That's a very smart rendition of what could possibly be happening when a healthy cells converts to a cancer cell. BUT Ray Peat says there is no such thing as autoimmune disease. So we're at a T-intersection here. But we'll keep that in mind.

Another hypothesis, the cell is starving. The body extracts whatever is in the gut in panic, like pathogens. The pathogens are able to intrude the cell that is starving of required nutrients. The cell gets taken over. The pathogen takes the wheel of the cell, and makes it into a state of fermentation. The (pre-)cancer cell is born.

 

[TreasureVibe]

Hypothesis: The cancer cell is starving. It requires proper feeding, suited for the right state of energy metabolism it is currently in, which is fermentation, in order to revert back to a normal cell, or a more normal-looking cell, in which it either just stays as a healthy cell, or gets killed by the immune system. The cancer cell wants to cooperate, but it is not capable to. Fermentation may or may not be a last-resort state of energy metabolism.

In brewing and winemaking, free amino nitrogen (FAN) is a measure of the concentration of individual amino acids and small peptides (one to three units) which can be utilized by beer and wine yeast for cell growth and proliferation. Together with ammonia, FAN makes up the measurement of yeast assimilable nitrogen that can be measured prior to the start of fermentation.[1]

The exact components of FAN will vary from composition of the wort or grape must. In wine, all 21 amino acids can be found in trace amounts with arginine, proline and glutamine being the most abundant. However, as Saccharomyces cerevisiae, the primary yeast for both beer and wine, can not utilize proline in the anaerobic conditions of ethanol fermentation it is not included in FAN (and subsequently YAN) calculations.[1]

Free amino nitrogen - Wikipedia

We either cooperate with the driver (the pleomorphized somatid or a foreign pathogen), or we kill it.

Also, see Triméthylaminohydroxybicycloheptane chloride.

How does this product work ?

2. Once triméthylaminohydroxybicycloheptane chloride has been absorbed through the lymph, it brings to the blood circulation particular elements (structured and organized molecules including nitrogen fixed to camphor) to directly address white blood cells (leucocytes) to resume their respective defense functions. They may then restore previously disrupted intercellular and intracellular communication.

This second function of triméthylaminohydroxybicycloheptane chloride, by activating cytokine receptors specific to each group of white blood cells, assures a harmonious recovery of all immune defense levels.

Thus, the inflammatory process, common to many degenerative diseases, fades and comes back to its normal state. Cell, tissue and organ repair progress at a rate specific to each individual.

714X | Cerbe Distribution Inc

"He used the somatoscope routinely to determine whether treatment with 714-X, a mixture of nitrogen and camphor (to deliver the nitrogen), was working for each particular patient. Naessens theorized that cancer cells are deficient in nitrogen, and that injecting 714-X into the lymph system would convert them to normal cells." (Cassileth)

"The goal is to fluidify the lymph, and to direct nitrogen to the cancerous cells in order to stop their toxic secretions, which block the organism's defense mechanism." (Fink 1997)

"Naessens selected camphor as the base because he believes it has special affinity for cancer cells. ... Naessens included ammonium salts because he believes they improve the circulation of lymph in cancer patients. He also believes that the ammonium salts activate certain kinins that inhibit abnormal cell growth and enhance the healthy functioning of the immune system." (Kaegi)

"Dr. Naessens discovered that tumor cells produce a substance, cocancerogenic K factor (CKF), which paralyzes the immune system. 714X seems to neutralize CKF, thereby enabling the immune system to more readily identify and destroy cancer cells." (Diamond)

"Recently, the distributors have advised that 714-X can sometimes be administered nasally using a nebulizer containing a solution of 0.6 mL of 714-X in 1.9 mL of saline. The nasal route has been recommended for patients with lung or oral cancers." (Kaegi)

"Dr. Atkins cautions that patients undergoing the 714X treatment should not take therapeutic doses of vitamin E or vitamin B12 at the same time, as the two vitamin supplements may interfere with its therapeutic action." (Diamond)

"Naessens's theories about the underlying causes and mechanisms of cancer are clearly not consistent with current scientific opinion. Although a small number of researchers have long believed that certain bacteria, viruses and other organisms such as cell-wall deficient or pleomorphic bacteria play a much more important role in the development of cancer, this view is not generally accepted by mainstream scientists." (Kaegi)

Gaston Naessens: Somatids, Somatoscope, & 714X; Alternative cancer treatment; Articles & 2 Patents

 

[SOMO]

What if bacteria aren't supposed to be in your gut at all, and what if the idea of a ''natural gut flora'' is a big lie? Just throwing out some random ideas.

1. If sterile hospital rooms or vacuum chambers existed in nature, you might be correct.

2. Humans "naturally" give birth outside or even in water, i.e. not a sterile environment.

3. Bacteria and simpler life forms (viruses/fungi/archeaea) have been on this planet way before homo sapiens and bacteria are even found near lava.

4. There is no way to be born into a sterile world. When RP speaks about sterile mice, he's referring to a LAB setting lol.

5. Antibiotics given to babies often have side-effects. You would think a sterile gut would be enough to protect them antibiotics themselves, but this does not appear to be the case.

6. Bacteria COMPETE FOR RESOURCES AND SPACE just like humans do - it's called Competitive Exclusion. By having more "good bacteria" you actually force the "bad ones" (the ones that produce unique protein Exotoxins like Shiga Toxin by Shigella which causes dysentery: Shiga toxin - Wikipedia) to die off, reduce in number or to be excreted in feces.
Competitive exclusion principle - an overview | ScienceDirect Topics

Competitive exclusion
Competitive exclusion (CE) is based on the administration of non-pathogenic bacterial culture to promote microbial competition and thus reduce colonisation or decrease populations of pathogenic bacteria in the gastrointestinal tract (Callaway et al., 2004). A CE culture should ideally be composed of species normally resident in the animal intestinal microflora. The use of CE cultures in cattle to eliminate E. coli O157:H7 from the rumen has been shown to be successful and has potential for further commercial development (Brashears et al., 2003a, b; Zhao et al., 2003; Younts-Dahl et al., 2004).


Mechanisms of Exclusion of Intestinal Pathogens by Probiotics
Competitive exclusion of pathogens is thought to be one of the most important beneficial mechanisms of probiotic bacteria [80, 109, 110]. Other mechanisms as inhibitions of pathogen adhesion by probiotic strains and displacement of pre-adhered pathogens have also been described [5, 44]. Competitive exclusion by intestinal bacteria is based on a bacteria-to-bacteria interaction mediated by the competition for available nutrients and for mucosal adhesion sites.

This is just more vegan/paleo/new age "Purism" bull****. Basically it's an eating disorder and having a sterile gut makes you feel "clean" inside because you have disordered eating habits.

You can either have your gut populated by strains that we have shared agricultural land and farms with or you can have your gut populated by pathogens that increased after urbanization/industrialization became commonplace. You can not have a sterile gut in 2018 lol.

 

[TreasureVibe]

1. If sterile hospital rooms or vacuum chambers existed in nature, you might be correct.

2. Humans "naturally" give birth outside or even in water, i.e. not a sterile environment.

3. Bacteria and simpler life forms (viruses/fungi/archeaea) have been on this planet way before homo sapiens and bacteria are even found near lava.

4. There is no way to be born into a sterile world. When RP speaks about sterile mice, he's referring to a LAB setting lol.

5. Antibiotics given to babies often have side-effects. You would think a sterile gut would be enough to protect them antibiotics themselves, but this does not appear to be the case.

6. Bacteria COMPETE FOR RESOURCES AND SPACE just like humans do - it's called Competitive Exclusion. By having more "good bacteria" you actually force the "bad ones" (the ones that produce unique protein Exotoxins like Shiga Toxin by Shigella which causes dysentery: Shiga toxin - Wikipedia) to die off, reduce in number or to be excreted in feces.
Competitive exclusion principle - an overview | ScienceDirect Topics



This is just more vegan/paleo/new age "Purism" bull****. Basically it's an eating disorder and having a sterile gut makes you feel "clean" inside because you have disordered eating habits.

You can either have your gut populated by strains that we have shared agricultural land and farms with or you can have your gut populated by pathogens that increased after urbanization/industrialization became commonplace. You can not have a sterile gut in 2018 lol.

"All diseases begin in the gut." - Hippocrates

 

[TreasureVibe]

Reactive nitrogen species (RNS) are a family of antimicrobial molecules derived from nitric oxide (•NO) and superoxide (O2•−) produced via the enzymatic activity of inducible nitric oxide synthase 2 (NOS2) and NADPH oxidase respectively. NOS2 is expressed primarily in macrophages after induction by cytokines and microbial products, notably interferon-gamma (IFN-γ) and lipopolysaccharide (LPS).[2]

Reactive nitrogen species act together with reactive oxygen species (ROS) to damage cells, causing nitrosative stress. Therefore, these two species are often collectively referred to as ROS/RNS.

Reactive nitrogen species are also continuously produced in plants as by-products of aerobic metabolism or in response to stress.[3]

Reactive nitrogen species - Wikipedia

Think nitrogen. Think fermentation. Think of correct food for the starving cancer cell to revert back to a healthier state.

the tumor cells will consume amino acids as fuel, as well as using them as material for growth.
Tumors have been called "nitrogen traps" or "glutamine traps," but this has meaning
beyond the use of the nitrogen for growth; it is involved in the energetic inefficiency of
this process, and the reorganizing effects this wasteful flow of energy has on the tissue structure (Medina, 2001).

Ray Peat on Cancer: Disorder and Energy

Abstract
Glutamic acid and alanine make up more than 60 per cent of the total amino acids in the human body. Glutamine is a significant source of energy for cells and also a prime donor of nitrogen in the biosynthesis of many amino acids. Several studies have advocated the role of glutamic acid in cancer therapy. Identification of metabolic signatures in cancer cells will be crucial for advancement of cancer therapies based on the cell’s metabolic state. Stable nitrogen isotope ratios (15N/14N, δ15N) are of particular advantage to understand the metabolic state of cancer cells, since most biochemical reactions involve transfer of nitrogen. In our study, we used the natural abundances of nitrogen isotopes (δ15N values) of individual amino acids from human colorectal cancer cell lines to investigate isotope discrimination among amino acids. Significant effects were noticed in the case of glutamic acid, alanine, aspartic acid and proline between cancer and healthy cells. The data suggest that glutamic acid is a nitrogen acceptor while alanine, aspartic acid and proline are nitrogen donors in cancerous cells. One plausible explanation is the transamination of the three acids to produce glutamic acid in cancerous cells.
https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-017-02793-y

Energy and Nitrogen Metabolism in Cancer
Publisher Summary
The profound effects that a malignant neoplasm often produces in its host have long been evident to clinicians and investigators. Some neoplasms distort normal structures and anatomical relationships. Others produce the ulceration of epithelial surfaces that may cause exsanguinating hemorrhage or overwhelming sepsis. On rare occasions, a neoplasm may damage an organ to such an extent that it is unable to function, and the host presents a symptom complex characteristic of ablation of that organ. Some neoplasms produce biologically active substances, identical with or similar to naturally occurring hormones that ultimately threaten the existence of the organism because of the profound pharmacological responses that they elicit. Many malignant neoplasms and related diseases kill their hosts without producing any of these effects. The activity of certain neoplastic cells seems to be oriented toward the synthesis of proteins rather than the storage of energy-rich materials, such as glycogen. With progressive tumor growth, the amino acids would be removed from the circulating fluid by the neoplastic tissue at a more rapid rate than they would by normal cells, and the effect would be that of a nitrogen trap. Many of the problems concerning nitrogen and energy metabolism in the host–tumor relationship can be attacked only in the intact animal. In vitro studies of tumors have been immensely valuable in demonstrating the possible pathways in the intermediate metabolism of some of the substances that are utilized by neoplasms in their growth.


Don't they say that antibiotics are anti-cancer? Tetracyclines (and A Few Other Antibiotics) As A Cure For Cancer


Nitrogen is a constituent of every major pharmacological drug class, including antibiotics.
Nitrogen - Wikipedia


Cyanogenic glycosides
Cyanogenic glycosides are nitrogen-containing secondary metabolites
Cyanogenic glycosides - an overview | ScienceDirect Topics

Cyanogenic glycosides
Examples include amygdalin and prunasin which are made by the bitter almond tree; other species that produce cyanogenic glycosides are sorghum (from which dhurrin, the first cyanogenic glycoside to be identified, was first isolated), barley, flax, white clover, and cassava, which produces linamarin and lotaustralin.[6]

Glycoside - Wikipedia

Amygdalin, aka vitamin B17, isn't that the controversial alternative cancer cure?


It’s been known for well over 100 years that nitrogen utilization is a key concept in the understanding of cancer.

According to “Clue to How Cancer Kills: Cancer, at least in mice, picks up nitrogen from protein food and holds it trapped so that body can’t use it. With nitrogen gone, the body dies,” Science News Letter, Sept. 13, 1947, “As the cancer grows larger, the demands for nitrogen exceed the supply from the diet. The cancer gets the chemical at the expense of the body. Death comes when the body tissues cannot supply further nitrogen. […] Some ways in which cancer kills are already known. It may kill by interfering with the function of a vital organ or by causing hemorrhage or ulcers which get infected and then the patient dies of the infection. But injury and other non-cancerous conditions may kill by the same means. The killing effect of cancer itself is not understood unless the nitrogen trapping action explains it.”

Adano Ley (Swami Nitty-Gritty) subscribed to and elaborated on what has been called …

the “theory of embryonic rest,”

the “Beardian thesis,”

the “trophoblastic thesis of cancer,”

the “nitrogen theory of cancer,” etc.

Adano said …

“Cancer, the ‘disease without cause,’ is the minus range of protein [protein minus nitrogen].”

“Cancer is caused by eating protein without nitrogen. There are approximately 15 different kinds of cancer. Cancers feed between 2:00-6:00 pm and are inactive between 3:00 AM-1:00 pm. For cancer treatment, do not eat between 2:00-6:00 PM, and do not eat nitrogen-poor proteins. Take vitamin A, niacin, pancreatin, and natural cyanide in the form of apricot pits.”

“All immunity deficiency is a lack of vitamin C and nitrogen. People with AIDS eat fried foods, soda pop, and candy. They don’t eat vitamin C and nitrogen. Nitrogen is in the top of an onion, and oxygen is in the bottom. Cancer is a lack of nitrogen. Cooking food destroys nitrogen.”

“Cancer is a lack of nitrogen.” LET’S QUALIFY THAT.

Nitrogen is an atomic element that can only be “destroyed” in a cyclotron or nuclear reactor.

However, the fragile hydrogen bonds that hold nitrogen-containing protein together CAN readily be destroyed, so the qualitative difference is the same – some, or even many,cancers areassociated with a lack of AVAILABLE nitrogen.

Globular protein is especially susceptible to thermal denaturing.

Cooking any proteinacious food coagulates about 50 percent of its protein, according to the Max Planck Institute.

Perhaps the coagulation of heated blood is related to the coagulation of heated protein.

According to “Mass Detection of Cancer: A new simple and quick blood test for this disease has been discovered which may be used as a mass screening agent such as X-rays are for unsuspected tuberculosis,” Science News Letter, Mar. 20, 1948, “Blood plasma from cancer patients coagulates much faster when heated than blood plasma from healthy persons or from persons sick with diseases other than cancer.”

Heat, as well as ultraviolet light, alkalinity, lengthy storage, etc., disintegrates hydrogen bonds and destroys (denatures, ferments, and degrades) protein.

According to “Ultraviolet Helps Reveal Chemistry of Vitamins,” Science News Letter, Jul. 1, 1944, “… when light of a wavelength that is absorbed by a particular protein molecule shines on that protein the protein is denatured. Vitamins are composed by light of the wavelength they absorb. Viruses are made non-virulent, without coagulation of their protein and without destruction of their immunizing power, by the particular wavelength they absorb.”

Cooking also destroys many other valuable cancer-fighters such as folate and indoles such as indole-3-carbinol and sulforaphane.

In cases where folate feeds cancers, e.g., leukemia, the antimetabolite and antifolate drug Methotrexate contains 20 carbon atoms, 22 hydrogen atoms, and 805 nitrogen atoms (C20H22N805).

The nitrate form of nitrogen is especially transitory, and its content varies on a day-to-day basis while it remains in vegetation.

Source: Is Cancer a Nitrogen Deficiency? - One Radio Network

 

[haidut]

What if bacteria aren't supposed to be in your gut at all, and what if the idea of a ''natural gut flora'' is a big lie? Just throwing out some random ideas.

Peat has said this multiple times and this is why he recommends the carrot salad, bamboo shoots, charcoal (maybe) and occasional antibiotics. Have you read his articles? He mentions this a number of times but says that keeping the gut completely germ-free all the time is not practical as it gets so easily re populated. So, reducing the bacteria burden and endotoxin they produce is a more realistic goal. I don't think bacteria directly cause cancer, but the endotoxin they produce increases serotonin and NO, thus immediately switching cell metabolism from oxidation to fermentation. Serotonin is required for cancer to form. No serotonin, no cancer.
The Serotonin Receptor 5-HT2B Is Required For Cancer; Can Be Blocked

There is no difference between normal and cancerous cell. It is a quorum thing. Once enough cells in a vicinity start fermenting due to a strong stress signal of some sort it forms a cancer "field" and this metabolism and proliferation continues until a strong signal from the environment convinces the cells to stop stressing out. Removing/lowering drastically endotoxin is one such signal, which is probably why antibiotics help for cancer. Progesterone, testosterone, pregnenolone, DHT, DHEA, etc are other such signals with various strength. Estrogen, cortisol, ACTH, CRH, histamine, prolactin, serotonin, growth hormone, hCG, PUFA, excess lipolysis, inflammation from PUFA metabolites, NO, endotoxin, etc are all stress mediators and can all cause the cancer metabolism. Again, mutations in cancer cells happen AFTER their metabolism gets deranged. But the cells themselves are (at least originally) quite normal and can simply do only what the environment allows them. Remove the environmental stress signals and the cells revert back to normal metabolism. In some cases of very severe organ/tissue fibrosis (often seen in solid tumors) completely reversing the scar tissue may not be practical, but the tumor growth can still be restrained so that it does not kill the host.