schultz
Member
- Joined
- Jul 29, 2014
- Messages
- 2,653
I would like to know the exact mechanism though how omega 3 does more harm in the long run. Is there any study showing this? If it does reduce prostaglandin synthesis by displacing omega 6 then it would be beneficial long term.
It might be more useful to search for MDA, acrolein, or TBARS in pubmed to see possibly detriments of Omega 3. They have been shown to increase lipid peroxidation products significantly, even in the presence of antioxidants. The compounds I listed above are some indicators and direct products of the omega 3 fatty acids. Also check out lipofuscin in pubmed. If your not a fish living in cold water i’d avoid. Btw heres some studies on longevity and PUFA:
I didn't read the whole thread so forgive me. @CLASH is spot on here. If you search 'fish oil' or something in Pubmed you are more likely to get epidemiological type studies, or simple comparison studies showing differences between basic diets short-term. Omega-3 does have some nice positive effects, especially short term, and it's not very difficult to demonstrate this in a study. But these oils breakdown more easily than omega-6, which is not something that is controversial. Several studies have shown that fish oil as a supplement contains a lot of very dangerous breakdown products like HNE (1, 2). I know you're talking about eating fatty fish and are not talking about taking supplements, but I thought I would point that out. I did enjoy the last couple sentences from the abstract in the second link...
"Aldehydes have the potential to precipitate serious health problems even at very low absolute intake volumes. These findings may provide reason for sober reflection."
This paper (Reactive Carbonyl Species Derived from Omega-3 and Omega-6 Fatty Acids. - PubMed - NCBI) says something similar at the end of the abstract...
"Omega-3 fatty acids might be easily degraded to smaller monoaldehydes or dicarbonyls. Omega-3 fatty acids have been considered as health improvement components for a long time. However, on the basis of the results presented here, use of omega-3 fatty acids should be re-evaluated in vivo for safety purposes."
So what we are worried about with this type of oil, regardless of whether it came from a supplement or not, is the formation of aldehydes, ketones, epoxy, etc, as these breakdown products are involved in many degenerative diseases. Mainstream science recognizes this, but sometimes they don't implicate omega-3's directly, possibly because there are a lot of studies showing beneficial effects of omega-3's.
If the beneficial effect of omega 3's are through inhibition of omega-6 prostaglandin formation, then I would think omega-6 avoidance + aspirin would be safer options. If you want to eat fatty fish once in a while because you enjoy it, then I say go for it, but if you're eating it strictly for health and you don't enjoy it all that much, then I say skip it.