OP
-
By using this site you agree to the terms, rules, and privacy policy.
-
Charlie's Restoration Giveaway #2 (Entire Home EMF Mitigation & Protection Along With Personal Protection) - Click Here To Enter
-
Dear Carnivore Dieters, A Muscle Meat Only Diet is Extremely Healing Because it is a Low "vitamin A" Diet. This is Why it Works so Well...
Rest the rest of this post by clicking here
-
The Forum is transitioning to a subscription-based membership model - Click Here To Read
Click Here if you want to upgrade your account
If you were able to post but cannot do so now, send an email to admin at raypeatforum dot com and include your username and we will fix that right up for you.
OP
Peatness
Guest
Not just Boris
OP
Peatness
Guest
Lord Frost demands end to vaccine passports and masks which he calls part of a 'Covid theatre'. Hear, hear!
www.dailymail.co.uk
Lord Frost says PM's advisers let him down in fight against Covid
Lord Frost, 56, said Boris Johnson's government must also end vaccine passports and masks, which he said 'don't work' and are just part of a 'Covid theatre'.
OP
Peatness
Guest
Was this the reason we were being distracted with Boris and his parties?
View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9dCs_m0PnQA
www.theguardian.com
Baroness Claire Fox says the Police Crime Bill is ‘draconian’ ahead of House of Lords vote
View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9dCs_m0PnQA
Labour peers to oppose amendments to police and crime bill
Move means late changes focusing on powers to control protests could be voted down in House of Lords
OP
Peatness
Guest
Another reason we are being distracted by Boris and his parties
ukdefencejournal.org.uk
View: https://twitter.com/clif_high/status/1483229987863871489?cxt=HHwWgoCqrZj0vpUpAAAA
British military aircraft rapidly supplying weapons to Ukraine
British transport aircraft are currently moving "light anti-armour" weapons into Ukraine in light of "increasingly threatening" behaviour from Russia.
ukdefencejournal.org.uk
View: https://twitter.com/clif_high/status/1483229987863871489?cxt=HHwWgoCqrZj0vpUpAAAA
OP
Peatness
Guest
Grapelander
Member
Milton Mayer: They Thought They Were Free - Interviews with 10 Germans on how they lost control of governance.
“What no one seemed to notice,” said a colleague of mine, a philologist, “was the ever widening gap, after 1933, between the government and the people. Just think how very wide this gap was to begin with, here in Germany. And it became always wider. You know, it doesn’t make people close to their government to be told that this is a people’s government, a true democracy, or to be enrolled in civilian defense, or even to vote. All this has little, really nothing, to do with knowing one is governing.
“What happened here was the gradual habituation of the people, little by little, to being governed by surprise; to receiving decisions deliberated in secret; to believing that the situation was so complicated that the government had to act on information which the people could not understand, or so dangerous that, even if the people could understand it, it could not be released because of national security. And their sense of identification with Hitler, their trust in him, made it easier to widen this gap and reassured those who would otherwise have worried about it.
“This separation of government from people, this widening of the gap, took place so gradually and so insensibly, each step disguised (perhaps not even intentionally) as a temporary emergency measure or associated with true patriotic allegiance or with real social purposes.
“You will understand me when I say that my Middle High German was my life. It was all I cared about. I was a scholar, a specialist. Then, suddenly, I was plunged into all the new activity, as the university was drawn into the new situation; meetings, conferences, interviews, ceremonies, and, above all, papers to be filled out, reports, bibliographies, lists, questionnaires. And on top of that were the demands in the community, the things in which one had to, was ‘expected to’ participate that had not been there or had not been important before. It was all rigmarole, of course, but it consumed all one’s energies, coming on top of the work one really wanted to do. You can see how easy it was, then, not to think about fundamental things. One had no time.”
“What no one seemed to notice,” said a colleague of mine, a philologist, “was the ever widening gap, after 1933, between the government and the people. Just think how very wide this gap was to begin with, here in Germany. And it became always wider. You know, it doesn’t make people close to their government to be told that this is a people’s government, a true democracy, or to be enrolled in civilian defense, or even to vote. All this has little, really nothing, to do with knowing one is governing.
“What happened here was the gradual habituation of the people, little by little, to being governed by surprise; to receiving decisions deliberated in secret; to believing that the situation was so complicated that the government had to act on information which the people could not understand, or so dangerous that, even if the people could understand it, it could not be released because of national security. And their sense of identification with Hitler, their trust in him, made it easier to widen this gap and reassured those who would otherwise have worried about it.
“This separation of government from people, this widening of the gap, took place so gradually and so insensibly, each step disguised (perhaps not even intentionally) as a temporary emergency measure or associated with true patriotic allegiance or with real social purposes.
“You will understand me when I say that my Middle High German was my life. It was all I cared about. I was a scholar, a specialist. Then, suddenly, I was plunged into all the new activity, as the university was drawn into the new situation; meetings, conferences, interviews, ceremonies, and, above all, papers to be filled out, reports, bibliographies, lists, questionnaires. And on top of that were the demands in the community, the things in which one had to, was ‘expected to’ participate that had not been there or had not been important before. It was all rigmarole, of course, but it consumed all one’s energies, coming on top of the work one really wanted to do. You can see how easy it was, then, not to think about fundamental things. One had no time.”
Grapelander
Member
Treason - The New World Order
The most dangerous scam used against the people are presidential edicts. Every president has issued orders and directives which are often called Executive Orders (EO); however, in the 20th century the use, scope, and authority of EOs greatly increased. These edicts have the force and effect of law; however, there is no constitutional basis for a president to make laws. Congress should make the law and the president should administer and enforce it. There is much room for abuse of presidential power with these edicts. Nowhere does the Constitution say that a president can issue an EO, nor do any federal statutes exist defining the purpose or permissible subject matter of EOs.
Previously, most EOs dealt with routine administrative issues such as land use and civil service regulations. EOs now exist for the Feds to seize all communications (EO 10995), to takeover all food supplies and farms (EO 10998), to control all transportation (EO 10999), to force all civilians into work brigades (slave labor) (EO 11000), to takeover all health and education activities (EO 11001), and for the post office to register everyone (EO 11002). These and other EOs have been combined into EO 11490, which Carter signed in 1979. This is a dictatorship in waiting. One can only image the horrors of the secret EOs that have never been published or leaked.
The greatest abuse of presidential authority lies in presidents declaring a national emergency and martial law. Presidents have already signed EOs declaring national emergencies because of events in the Middle East, Yugoslavia, South Africa, Kuwait, and chemical/biological problems. How these events require a national emergency in the U.S. defies reality. In 1985 the New York Times asked why there had to be a national emergency in the U.S. over South Africa. 1 1 Having a national emergency with a weakened Constitution has become the norm to gradually get people used to the conditions of a police state.
The most dangerous scam used against the people are presidential edicts. Every president has issued orders and directives which are often called Executive Orders (EO); however, in the 20th century the use, scope, and authority of EOs greatly increased. These edicts have the force and effect of law; however, there is no constitutional basis for a president to make laws. Congress should make the law and the president should administer and enforce it. There is much room for abuse of presidential power with these edicts. Nowhere does the Constitution say that a president can issue an EO, nor do any federal statutes exist defining the purpose or permissible subject matter of EOs.
Previously, most EOs dealt with routine administrative issues such as land use and civil service regulations. EOs now exist for the Feds to seize all communications (EO 10995), to takeover all food supplies and farms (EO 10998), to control all transportation (EO 10999), to force all civilians into work brigades (slave labor) (EO 11000), to takeover all health and education activities (EO 11001), and for the post office to register everyone (EO 11002). These and other EOs have been combined into EO 11490, which Carter signed in 1979. This is a dictatorship in waiting. One can only image the horrors of the secret EOs that have never been published or leaked.
The greatest abuse of presidential authority lies in presidents declaring a national emergency and martial law. Presidents have already signed EOs declaring national emergencies because of events in the Middle East, Yugoslavia, South Africa, Kuwait, and chemical/biological problems. How these events require a national emergency in the U.S. defies reality. In 1985 the New York Times asked why there had to be a national emergency in the U.S. over South Africa. 1 1 Having a national emergency with a weakened Constitution has become the norm to gradually get people used to the conditions of a police state.
Peatful
Member
- Joined
- Dec 8, 2016
- Messages
- 3,582
OP
Peatness
Guest
@Grapelander thank you for those quotes.
OP
Peatness
Guest
OP
Peatness
Guest
OP
Peatness
Guest
This is how dangerous covid is
View: https://twitter.com/BernieSpofforth/status/1486317381681135616?cxt=HHwWgIC-6ZTyuqApAAAA
View: https://twitter.com/BernieSpofforth/status/1486317381681135616?cxt=HHwWgIC-6ZTyuqApAAAA
Grapelander
Member
The BMJ - Covid 19: The trampling of Human Rights may never heal
Dear Editor
The WHO has stated that they, ”do not advocate lockdowns as the primary means of control of this virus…. it seems that we may well have a doubling of world poverty by next year. We may well have at least a doubling of child malnutrition”(i). The consequences of ‘lockdown’ may therefore include loss of life, contravening Article 2 of the Human Rights Act 1998, which states, “Everyone’s right to life shall be protected by law”.
Part I: Article 3: ”No one shall be subjected to torture or to inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment”. Detaining old people in care homes against their will and prohibiting them from seeing or touching their loved ones, amounts to inhuman treatment and psychological torture. Social isolation is well documented to cause psychological damage (ii). The same applies to hospitalised patients who are kept apart from those whose presence would otherwise contribute to their recovery. Withholding medical services from patients suffering from cancer and other serious diseases also constitutes inhuman treatment. Terrifying the population with ever-changing death narratives via the mainstream media inevitably predisposes to mental ill-health problems amongst those of the general public who believe what they see and hear (iii).
Dear Editor
The WHO has stated that they, ”do not advocate lockdowns as the primary means of control of this virus…. it seems that we may well have a doubling of world poverty by next year. We may well have at least a doubling of child malnutrition”(i). The consequences of ‘lockdown’ may therefore include loss of life, contravening Article 2 of the Human Rights Act 1998, which states, “Everyone’s right to life shall be protected by law”.
Part I: Article 3: ”No one shall be subjected to torture or to inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment”. Detaining old people in care homes against their will and prohibiting them from seeing or touching their loved ones, amounts to inhuman treatment and psychological torture. Social isolation is well documented to cause psychological damage (ii). The same applies to hospitalised patients who are kept apart from those whose presence would otherwise contribute to their recovery. Withholding medical services from patients suffering from cancer and other serious diseases also constitutes inhuman treatment. Terrifying the population with ever-changing death narratives via the mainstream media inevitably predisposes to mental ill-health problems amongst those of the general public who believe what they see and hear (iii).
OP
Peatness
Guest
New Proposed Bill of Rights
www.standard.co.uk
On the 14th December 2021, the Government published a Report by the Independent Human Rights Act Review and alongside the Report, released a new consultation paper setting out that they plan to replace our Human Rights Act with a Bill of Rights.
This has caused widespread concern and frustration across civil society in the UK, for many reasons. Widespread frustration because it appears that our government has largely ignored its own Independent Review into our HRA. Rather than reflecting (or arguably even reading) the evidence provided by thousands of people and organisations, the Ministry of Justice has instead released a consultation which proposes not amending the HRA (which is what the Review looked into) but instead replacing it with a Bill of Rights.
Put simply, the government intends to largely ignore a public consultation and the recommendations of a Panel of independent experts (put together by the government itself) and instead appears to be basing the case for reform on the same arguments the new Justice Secretary, Dominic Raab, put forward in his 2009 book ‘An Assault on Liberty’.
Widespread concern because the government is suggesting rewriting the law which sets rules on the power of the state and provides minimum standards for how people should be treated when interacting with the state, and domestic legal remedy when this doesn’t happen.
We’ve covered what’s happened, how we got here and our concerns in more detail in other recent pieces. The focus of this piece is to share what actions we’ll be taking at BIHR and how you can get involved to ensure your voice is heard.
www.bihr.org.uk
UK column covers this proposal @30mins in this episode
www.ukcolumn.org
Raab unveils new Bill of Rights to replace human rights laws
The Justice Secretary presented the reforms to the Commons on Tuesday.
www.standard.co.uk
On the 14th December 2021, the Government published a Report by the Independent Human Rights Act Review and alongside the Report, released a new consultation paper setting out that they plan to replace our Human Rights Act with a Bill of Rights.
This has caused widespread concern and frustration across civil society in the UK, for many reasons. Widespread frustration because it appears that our government has largely ignored its own Independent Review into our HRA. Rather than reflecting (or arguably even reading) the evidence provided by thousands of people and organisations, the Ministry of Justice has instead released a consultation which proposes not amending the HRA (which is what the Review looked into) but instead replacing it with a Bill of Rights.
Put simply, the government intends to largely ignore a public consultation and the recommendations of a Panel of independent experts (put together by the government itself) and instead appears to be basing the case for reform on the same arguments the new Justice Secretary, Dominic Raab, put forward in his 2009 book ‘An Assault on Liberty’.
Widespread concern because the government is suggesting rewriting the law which sets rules on the power of the state and provides minimum standards for how people should be treated when interacting with the state, and domestic legal remedy when this doesn’t happen.
We’ve covered what’s happened, how we got here and our concerns in more detail in other recent pieces. The focus of this piece is to share what actions we’ll be taking at BIHR and how you can get involved to ensure your voice is heard.
Human Rights Act Reform: BIHR launches 5-part action plan and sets out how you can be involved
Our Manifesto in response to the Government's consultation on 'A British Bill of Rights'
www.bihr.org.uk
UK column covers this proposal @30mins in this episode
UK Column News - 15th December 2021
www.ukcolumn.org
OP
Peatness
Guest
You can buy bottles of Liquid Fear (LF) at your local pharmacy. Over the counter.
No refrigeration necessary.
I suggest sipping through a straw to start. Don’t gulp it all at once. You want it to seep in.
One day you won’t take a walk in the park. You’ll say you have other things to do. But you’ll be afraid of strangers breathing on you. Breathing is dangerous. Who knew?
Now you do.
No refrigeration necessary.
I suggest sipping through a straw to start. Don’t gulp it all at once. You want it to seep in.
One day you won’t take a walk in the park. You’ll say you have other things to do. But you’ll be afraid of strangers breathing on you. Breathing is dangerous. Who knew?
Now you do.
Grapelander
Member
OP
Peatness
Guest
EMF Mitigation - Flush Niacin - Big 5 Minerals
Similar threads
