My Government is Lying to Me

David PS

Member
Joined
Jan 5, 2016
Messages
14,675
Location
Dark side of the moon
David are you pretty familiar with the Tartaria history?? I cant get enough of it...
I am not that familar with Tartaria.
 

Birdie

Member
Joined
Aug 10, 2012
Messages
5,783
Location
USA
One more example of the lies... First sugar substitutes are backed by the government, then years later, the people themselves demand the dangerous product be continued. And now people are told not to replace fake sugars with real sugar. Just drink water.


"Thanks to President Theodore Roosevelt, who thought that this artificial sugar was a guilt-free way to lose weight, saccharin dodged a ban by the nascent U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA).

In 1977, when the FDA tried again to ban saccharin because of the suspected risk of causing cancer in rats, Americans fought back. They sent millions of letters to Congress, the FDA, and President Jimmy Carter protesting the proposed ban.

In the United States, a 2017 nationwide nutritional survey found 80 percent of children and more than half of adults consumed low-calorie sweeteners once daily. Obese adults used low-calorie sweeteners more frequently.

This study provides fairly decisive evidence of both short-term harmful effects and of mechanisms that might cause the same adverse effects in the long term, Katz says. “That does not mean non-nutritional sweeteners should be replaced with sugar, but rather that alternative approaches to reducing sugar intake should be prioritised.”

 

David PS

Member
Joined
Jan 5, 2016
Messages
14,675
Location
Dark side of the moon

David PS

Member
Joined
Jan 5, 2016
Messages
14,675
Location
Dark side of the moon
1663440493502.png
 

David PS

Member
Joined
Jan 5, 2016
Messages
14,675
Location
Dark side of the moon

David PS

Member
Joined
Jan 5, 2016
Messages
14,675
Location
Dark side of the moon
Z

Zsazsa

Guest
The fact checkers tried to deny it, unsuccessfully


Open Access Library Journal > Vol.4 No.10, October 2017
HCG Found in WHO Tetanus Vaccine in Kenya Raises Concern in the Developing World

Abstract
In 1993, WHO announced a “birth-control vaccine” for “family planning”. Published research shows that by 1976 WHO researchers had conjugated tetanus toxoid (TT) with human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) producing a “birth-control” vaccine. Conjugating TT with hCG causes pregnancy hormones to be attacked by the immune system. Expected results are abortions in females already pregnant and/or infertility in recipients not yet impregnated. Repeated inoculations prolong infertility. Currently WHO researchers are working on more potent anti-fertility vaccines using recombinant DNA. WHO publications show a long-range purpose to reduce population growth in unstable “less developed countries”. By November 1993 Catholic publications appeared saying an abortifacient vaccine was being used as a tetanus prophylactic. In November 2014, the Catholic Church asserted that such a program was underway in Kenya. Three independent Nairobi accredited biochemistry laboratories tested samples from vials of the WHO tetanus vaccine being used in March 2014 and found hCG where none should be present. In October 2014, 6 additional vials were obtained by Catholic doctors and were tested in 6 accredited laboratories. Again, hCG was found in half the samples. Subsequently, Nairobi’s AgriQ Quest laboratory, in two sets of analyses, again found hCG in the same vaccine vials that tested positive earlier but found no hCG in 52 samples alleged by the WHO to be vials of the vaccine used in the Kenya campaign 40 with the same identifying batch numbers as the vials that tested positive for hCG. Given that hCG was found in at least half the WHO vaccine samples known by the doctors involved in administering the vaccines to have been used in Kenya, our opinion is that the Kenya “anti-tetanus” campaign was reasonably called into question by the Kenya Catholic Doctors Association as a front for population growth reduction.

ttv1.png


ttv2.png
 

David PS

Member
Joined
Jan 5, 2016
Messages
14,675
Location
Dark side of the moon

David PS

Member
Joined
Jan 5, 2016
Messages
14,675
Location
Dark side of the moon
1663679678453.png
 

Birdie

Member
Joined
Aug 10, 2012
Messages
5,783
Location
USA
It makes my blood boil when I see recommendations to 'vaccinate' high risk groups only. The implication of this is that it is ok to harm high risk groups.
This always bothered me here in Florida but I figured it was all he could do. At least not forced vaxx I mean.
 

Similar threads

Back
Top Bottom