Monkeypox "epidemic"

OP
ivy

ivy

Member
Joined
Mar 18, 2017
Messages
314
Location
Portugal
Ray said (during one of the Roddy/Dinkov trio talks) something like that they'd pick something visually horrifying such as ebola/marburg. That way they would only need a small amount of actual examples to freak everyone out and the rest is mind control and their usual tricks with the "news" and "testing" and "prediction" models.....
Thanks for mentioning. Any idea what episode that was?
 
OP
ivy

ivy

Member
Joined
Mar 18, 2017
Messages
314
Location
Portugal
Looks like there was some noise around smallpox circa 2002:

Smallpox by Dr. Vivian Virginia Vetrano
A dead disease is being resurrected. Now the media will have something exciting to talk about everyday and to frighten the benighted American public with. For whatever reason, the revivification of smallpox is certainly on the current agenda.

Not too long ago Fox News showed us a picture of a man who was covered with smallpox pustules on his arms, face, legs and abdomen. The pustules were big, black, ugly, scabby and closely compacted. He looked like he was a monster from some other world. It was enough to scare me, were it not for the fact that I know that it was drug treatment that caused that ugly picture and not the disease at all. The cause of those ugly marks was carbolic acid that had been used to kill the supposed germ that caused the eruptive rash.

The doctors who were interviewed on recent television shows admit that the vaccine may cause many serious side-effects and that a certain number of persons will develop painful and sometimes lethal sequelae. Yet, they advise that it is better to take the chance and be vaccinated in spite of these dangers.

According to the medical profession, smallpox or variola is an acute highly infectious and contagious disease characterized by a specific rash. According to past and present Natural Hygienic practitioners smallpox is primarily a disease brought about by gastrointestinal putrescence. Fermenting and rotting food in the intestinal tract enervates, and causes increased digestive impairment accompanied by increased systemic toxemia. The toxins are from the absorption of the fermentation products formed in the intestinal tract.

Smallpox is about as contagious as stumbling over a rock. Dr. Herbert M. Shelton slept in the same bed with his brother while the latter was in the so-called infectious stage with vesicles all over. Yet Dr. Shelton did not develop smallpox.

Smallpox begins with the same symptoms that many acute diseases do; such as chills, fever, backache, and vomiting. This is indicative of a common cause and a common way to deal with the cause. The body is a magnificent ecosystem and when it finds abnormal and extraneous substances anywhere within its domain, it creates a higher temperature, purposely, to overcome the foreign proteins, toxic substances, viruses, bacteria or other microorganisms. Whatever is upsetting the ecosystem must be corrected by the organism itself. It needs no alien “cures.” The symptoms should not be “cured.” To suppress these symptoms assures that some other worse problem will develop.

Some substances, such as an excess of protein putrefactive products, are so toxic that it is urgent to eliminate them immediately. The papular eruption of smallpox is purposely created and chosen as the correct channel at the time for the elimination of these types of noxious substances. Furthermore, the body may not have the specific enzymes to biodegrade whatever it is. Instead of being taken care of by the liver or the kidneys the body chooses to eject them through the skin. Vicarious eliminations such as this are often natural emergency measures.


SMALLPOX VACCINE RESULTS ARE IN By Jon Rappoport
DECEMBER 9. The first returns are in on the smallpox vaccine. Arecent multi-center US government clinical trial on 200 “young adults” has been completed.

MSNBC reports. The volunteers who got the shot were VERY healthy to begin with. One researcher, Kathy Edwards, called them the “crème de la crème.”

Okay? So get this. “Yet when she [Edwards] inoculated them with smallpox vaccine, arms swelled, temperatures spiked and panic spread [at Baylor University]. It was the same at clinics in Iowa, Tennessee, and California.”

Stats: After the shot, one-third of the volunteers missed at least a day of work or school. 75 out of 200 experienced high fever. “Several were put on antibiotics because physicians worried that their blisters signaled a bacterial infection.”

Wow. And look, smallpox is a VIRUS, and antibiotics DON’T WORK against viruses. So, in essence, the researchers were inferring that the vaccine SUPPRESSED THE IMMUNE SYSTEMS of the volunteers –— thus allowing bacterial infections to bloom suddenly—OR the vaccine was contaminated with bacteria to begin with.

PENTAGON PLANS FOR SMALLPOX OUTBREAK by Pamela Hess
WASHINGTON, Dec. 13 (UPI) — The military could be called on to keep order and quarantine affected areas if there were a smallpox outbreak in the United States, according to a Defense Department response plan completed in September.

The White House and Pentagon unveiled plans Friday to begin vaccinating health-care workers and as many as 500,000 military personnel against the release of smallpox on the battlefield, but it also has a step-by-step guide for military commanders in the event of a domestic biological weapons attack.

Because the disease was finally eradicated in 1979, a single case of smallpox would be considered to be the result of a germ warfare attack. There are only two known stocks of the disease — in the United States and Russia — but the U.S. government fears that some of the stock may have been stolen and sold on the black market.

Smallpox would kill one-third of its victims if they are not treated in time, according to the Centers for Disease Control.
Thank you for these!
 

TheSir

Member
Joined
Jan 6, 2019
Messages
1,952
From a strategic exercise from march 2021:
1653041805507.png
1653041812883.png


Makes you wonder.
 
P

Peatness

Guest
They simply reclassified existing endemic diseases as AIDS.
They did a lot more than that


About the deliberate spreading of AIDS in Africa.​


View: https://www.bitchute.com/video/qJvpqtqHU4YU/
 

JamesGatz

Member
Joined
Jun 22, 2021
Messages
3,189
Location
USA

David PS

Member
Joined
Jan 5, 2016
Messages
14,675
Location
Dark side of the moon
P

Peatness

Guest

tankasnowgod

Member
Joined
Jan 25, 2014
Messages
8,131
Yes, those men had weakened immune systems because of their lifestyle but the hep vaccine kicked the whole thing off.
Prove it. Link a hep vaccine to every single AIDS and HIV case ever diagnosed from the early 80s until 2020.

Your linked article doesn't even attempt claim that. Here is the claim-

The men in the 'Manhattan experiment' had the highest rate of HIV ever recorded for that time period: 20% were discovered to be HIV-positive in 1980, and over 40% in 1984.

In addition, a re-examination of the stored blood samples from an AIDS trial in NYC by epidemiologists at the National Cancer Institute found that one out of five gay men (20%) tested positive for the new KS herpes-8 virus (Kaposi’s Sarcoma virus in 1982.)
Or, stated another way, 80% of people who received the Hep B vaccine in that trial weren't HIV positive in 1980, and around 50% weren't in 1984.

Plus, I highly doubt Jm J Bullock, Freddie Mercury, Magic Johnson and boxer Tommy Morrison volunteered for an experimental vaccine. The first three were too rich and famous, and the last 2 had physically demanding careers, all of which would prevented them from being part in medical experimentation.

Again, I don't doubt it's a factor, but even 1 experimental injection isn't going to have the same effect as using copious amount of cocaine and heroin on a weekly or even daily basis. Some of these men were doing this for 10 years straight.

Also what about the millions in Africa that were not using poppers?
I never said "poppers" was THE cause of AIDS. Merely a factor. Also, there are not "millions" of people in Africa with AIDS. No one really knows the number, because most areas (especially in the 80s, 90s, and early 2000s) didn't have any good way to diagnose it, or record it. All those "AIDS" numbers from Africa you have heard are largely an unsourced myth.

The idea of "AIDS" in Africa is discussed in this documentary at about 40 minutes (for about 5 minutes), and includes Duesberg's thoughts on the matter-

View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XZKl0tozbco


The Diarrhea example makes perfect sense..... there is nothing unique about a case of diarrhea in Africa, but if doctors/governments find they can recieve hundreds or thousands of dollars for every case of "AIDS Diarrhea," well, that last number is going to skyrocket.
They too were deliberately targeted imo. I also posted a video about the deliberate infection of Africans with HIV or at least the use of flawed test to condemn them to a life of medications that would eventually kill them. Gosh the world is too evil.
Again, I don't deny that this sort of medical experimentation is bad, or harmful. But if people are starving in Africa from lack of food or clean water, a diagnosis like "AIDS wasting" is verrrrry convenient, as not only do they have to do nothing about the food or water, but drug companies can make money on "treating" these same people with toxic drugs, including vaccines.
 

tankasnowgod

Member
Joined
Jan 25, 2014
Messages
8,131
Ray said (during one of the Roddy/Dinkov trio talks) something like that they'd pick something visually horrifying such as ebola/marburg.
First off, they wouldn't. They picked a common cold with ZERO visual symptoms for the "COVID pandemic." So, history says they absolutely won't go for a disease that has easily visual symptoms (how are you going to pass off "asymptomatic cases" when no one you know has even heard a rumor of a true visual case?)

Unless they decide to go with my "Dandruff Pandemic" idea. Plenty of people have that, so yes, you could have "visual evidence" on that one. Get ready for Hat Mandates!

Second of all, why try and spread a "virus" and hope that it actually infects people and produces visual evidence? And even if that somehow DID work, what are the odds you would have a professional camera crew at the ready when the "visual symptoms" just start popping out on some random person somewhere?

Clearly, faking the "visual evidence" is the way to go. You can do it on your timetable, and not have to wait around centuries for all those factors I listed above to line up. It worked perfectly in China in late 2019/Early 2020-


View: https://www.bitchute.com/video/EDPef1gbOZtw/


Man, sure is convenient that all those "unconscious" fainting people magically braced themselves for their fall by putting out their arms! And that First Responders went up to all those unconscious people in hazmat looking suits, like they all time did when someone was unconscious in 2019 and previous!
 

Matestube

Member
Joined
Dec 28, 2021
Messages
912
Location
Dubai
Well, I think they're hitting a very specific target with this pox and I'd love to know why. The AIDS epidemic was certainly not exclusive to gay men, and Duesberg and others have elaborated on the specific vulnerabilities created by poppers and lifestyle when it was too politically incorrect to state them, no matter how many could benefit from healthier options.

I'm pretty sure gay men have higher vaccination rates than straight men. They also seem to keep track of STDs more often than other segments of the population. Are they a temporary scapegoat before this hits the whole community? Again, how is this being reported in your own country?
Gays are almost a protected status community nowadays, just like Trans.
You can't stigmatize them or say anything about them, such a message will never be conveied.
It will never be "the pandemic that was started by gay men".
 

Regina

Member
Joined
Aug 17, 2016
Messages
6,511
Location
Chicago
First off, they wouldn't. They picked a common cold with ZERO visual symptoms for the "COVID pandemic." So, history says they absolutely won't go for a disease that has easily visual symptoms (how are you going to pass off "asymptomatic cases" when no one you know has even heard a rumor of a true visual case?)

Unless they decide to go with my "Dandruff Pandemic" idea. Plenty of people have that, so yes, you could have "visual evidence" on that one. Get ready for Hat Mandates!

Second of all, why try and spread a "virus" and hope that it actually infects people and produces visual evidence? And even if that somehow DID work, what are the odds you would have a professional camera crew at the ready when the "visual symptoms" just start popping out on some random person somewhere?

Clearly, faking the "visual evidence" is the way to go. You can do it on your timetable, and not have to wait around centuries for all those factors I listed above to line up. It worked perfectly in China in late 2019/Early 2020-


View: https://www.bitchute.com/video/EDPef1gbOZtw/


Man, sure is convenient that all those "unconscious" fainting people magically braced themselves for their fall by putting out their arms! And that First Responders went up to all those unconscious people in hazmat looking suits, like they all time did when someone was unconscious in 2019 and previous!

We'll see how they play this one.
Wrap it up quick to show-off how great global efforts work??
 
P

Peatness

Guest
Prove it. Link a hep vaccine to every single AIDS and HIV case ever diagnosed from the early 80s until 2020.
Stop already. Where did I link every single Aids/Hiv case with hep vaccine? You like to misrepresent just to make a point.
 
Back
Top Bottom