5LGreenback
Member
Thanks for this, I’ll go thru it all when I have time.@5LGreenback
https://viroliegy.com/2022/09/16/dr-mark-bailey-bids-farewell-to-virology/
There is this link a bit down on the leftside.... and a short excerpted version only 19 pages long.
https://drsambailey.com/a-farewell-to-virology-expert-edition/
Dr. Mark Bailey has done a great job. As in Fantastic!!! Mate! This is truly a clear takedown. Apologies if this has been posted on this thread. I know it is at least posted once elsewhere on the forum.
I have read up to mid 6th page. Thanks for the encouragement @RealNeat to get to the finer details of this excellent thread.
Also posted elsewhere is the accounts of the WWI soldiers who did NOT get sick when trying to get 'infected' by the coughing sick soldiers presumably down with 'Spanish Flu'. They could not get ill. They were coughed on with saliva/mucous particulates and..... Nothing. No transmission. They were 'volunteers' to help find a cure of this 'terrible pandemic'. Same game play 100 years later. Only this time with TV and internet propelling the narrative.
So far I’ve only got thru the first part, but already her explanation is the same. Basically randomly choosing the longest sequence they could find and calling that covid-19.
Okay, so what are the odds of that a randomly chosen sequence is more likely to be found in people with symptomatic illness?
I’m not saying they aren’t deceiving us, I’m just saying there’s gotta be more to the selection of this sequence they chose to test for.