Meningitis due to cerebrospinal fluid leak after nasal swab testing for COVID‐19

Mito

Member
Joined
Dec 10, 2016
Messages
2,554
“A 41‐year‐old woman presented to the emergency department, in October 2020, with holocraneal headache worsened by position changes and fever up to 37.7°C that started 12 h. She had no medical history of cephalea, visual loss or traumatic brain injury, or other secondary causes of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) fistula. The patient had completed a nasal reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT‐PCR) COVID‐19 testing in March 2020 which came back negative. One week after, she developed unilateral continuous rhinorrhoea with metallic taste. She was then diagnosed of allergic rhinitis by her general practitioner, who prescribed antihistaminics and a short‐term antibiotherapy (amoxicillin‐clavulanic), with no resolution of the symptoms. In July 2020, a nasal drainage tested positive for β2‐transferrin and head computed tomography was performed identifying a CSF fistula at the lamina cribrosa.”

CONCLUSION​

Cerebrospinal fluid fistulas appear as a result of the rupture between barriers from the nasal cavity and paranasal sinuses from the subarachnoid spaces. The reported iatrogenic CSF leaks from intranasal procedures or surgical trauma at the cribriform plate represent up to 16% of the secondary causes of CSF fistula, and contrast‐enhanced MR cisternography is the gold standard for the diagnosis.[1] Recently, the first iatrogenic CSF leak after a nasal swab for COVID‐19 in a patient with idiopathic intracranial hypertension and a skull base defect has been reported,[2] but meningitis was not described in that patient. Persistent rhinoliquorrhoea is unlikely to close spontaneously and the risk of infection increases significantly. The global risk of meningitis before surgical treatment is about 30.6%.[3] The inflammation of the meninges and the form of granulation tissue can favour the closing of the fistula.[4]

The RT‐PCR test is the gold standard for the diagnosis of COVID‐19 disease, and in Spain about 16.2 million tests have been performed.[5] A technique with more sensitivity in the diagnosis of SARS‐CoV‐2 infection is RT‐PCR of a sample from the nasopharyngeal area. Epistaxis occurring immediately or shortly following the removal of the swab is the most frequently reported adverse effect of the technique.[6] From the million RT‐PCR tests run around the world this is the second case reported of CSF leak due to swab test of COVID‐19, and the first one with meningitis. As the number of daily COVID‐19 nasal and nasopharyngeal swab specimen collection procedures increases, we should be aware of CSF leaks as a possible meningitis cause in our patients. The use of minimally invasive techniques such as RT‐PCR of COVID‐19 is not exempt from risks and it is necessary a proper formation for the correct procedure of these techniques.
 
Last edited:
OP
Mito

Mito

Member
Joined
Dec 10, 2016
Messages
2,554

PCR test rod particles can act like asbestos in the body​

“The experimental physicist and biomaterial researcher Prof. Antonietta Gatti examined various PCR test rods under the microscope and analyzed their ingredients. The irritating result: they are made of hard materials and contain a variety of (nano) particles made of silver, aluminium, titanium, glass fibers ect, some of which are undeclared in the package leaflet. When they enter the mucous membrane, they can cause wounds and inflammation, the scientist said. ENT doctors told 2020News that they are finding more hardened mucous membranes in people who are often tested for SARS-CoV-2. No longer intact mucous membranes can no longer fulfil their task of repelling viruses, bacteria and fungi before they reach the airways, as the pediatrician Eugen Janzen also reports. The germs thus penetrate into the airways without any immune filter. Particularly problematic in this context: the warm breath moisture under the masks is the ideal breeding ground for germs of all kinds.”

 

grithin

Member
Joined
Jul 1, 2020
Messages
120
No longer intact mucous membranes can no longer fulfil their task of repelling viruses, bacteria and fungi before they reach the airways
When they enter the mucous membrane, they can cause wounds and inflammation

- make people more susceptible to COVID
- make people more susceptible to general infection
- cause a mild inflammation response

If I were trying to get people to take the vaccines, I don't know if I could have designed a more purposeful PCR test
 

Abba

Member
Joined
Mar 6, 2019
Messages
29

'PCR test rod particles can act like asbestos in the body'​

@Mito ; Web Translator won't process - perhaps you have a different link, or can post the actual article.
Thank you very much
 
EMF Mitigation - Flush Niacin - Big 5 Minerals

Similar threads

Back
Top Bottom