Low-dose niacinamide has striking anti-obesity effects

haidut

Member
Forum Supporter
Joined
Mar 18, 2013
Messages
19,799
Location
USA / Europe
It looks like the medical world has firmly set its sights on the bioenergetic wave/target, as the number of scientific papers focusing on niacinamide, NAD/NADH ratio and OXPHOS in general has been steadily climbing since 2010. That would be good news, despite the attempts of companies such as ChromaDex to fully "own" that market by claiming that their "patented" substances such as nicotinamide ribodise (NR) are the most effective intervention for reliably raising NAD levels (and thus the NAD/NADH ratio), and all others should be declared by the FDA to be "adulterated drugs". The presence of all these "bottom feeders" aside, the role of OXPHOS in various pathologies such as diabesity, CVD, and even cancer is becoming almost impossible to deny any longer. Speaking of diabesity, the study below presents some remarkable findings, that may send shivers down ChromaDex' spine. Namely, the administration of the cheap, unpatentable NAD precursor niacinamide (NAM), at low HED dose of 2.5mg/kg daily for 3 weeks, had striking anti-obesity effects in animals fed a high-fat diet. The low-dose NAM intervention reduced body fat by almost 50%, while also increasing lean muscle mass. In addition, NAM not only served as precursor to NAD but increased the activity of the enzyme NAMPT that synthesizes NAD. This increase in NAD also resulted in increased mitochondrial biogenesis, higher CO2 levels, improved insulin sensitivity, increased physical activity of the (formerly) obese animals back to control levels, and generally higher levels of OXPHOS. Finally, as another confirmation of the anti-obesity effects of this substance, NAM administration reduced the weight of not only the group that ate the high-fat diet, but also the weight of the group that ate the regular/normal diet.

Nicotinamide reprograms adipose cellular metabolism and increases mitochondrial biogenesis to ameliorate obesity

"...A three-week NAM supplementation significantly decreased the body weight in mice (Figure 1A). NAM also decreased fat mass by 47% as measured by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) (9.39 ± 0.64 g fat mass of CTR group vs 2.94 ± 0.27 g of NAM group), while lean mass was increased by 1.4 fold (22.04 ± 0.46 g lean mass of CTR group vs 18.55 ± 1.35 g of NAM group) (Figure 1B). In addition, weights of subcutaneous adipose tissue (SCAT), epididymal adipose tissue (eWAT), brown adipose tissue (BAT) and liver were all significantly decreased (Figure 1C). Especially, the volume of SCAT and eWAT also declined (Figure 1D). Consistently, HE staining showed that NAM decreased hepatic lipid content and the size of adipocytes from several anatomical locations including SCAT, eWAT and BAT (Figure 1E). In addition, NAM supplementation lowered the glucose level at each time point over glucose tolerance test (GTT) (Figure S1A and S1B). Meanwhile, we observed carefully raw phenotype of the mice treated with NAM, and no symptoms including diarrhoea and vomiting were observed during NAM supplementation. In addition, we found hair color of NAM-treated mice looked black and glossy as control group mice did with less oil on the surface of hair induced by high fat diet than control group (Figure S1C). NAM-treated mice move as much as control group and showed similar day-night rhythm (Figure S1D). Food intakes were similar between mice treated with NAM and control (Figure S1E). In order to examine whether NAM supplementation induced injury of liver and heart, we checked the serum protein aspartate aminotransferase (AST), lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) and creatine kinase (CK). We found that AST and CK were not changed (Figure S1F, G), and LDH were decreased by NAM treatment (Figure S1H), indicating NAM supplementation did not change significant injury of liver and heart. In addition, after measuring serum content of creatinine and uric acid by LC-MS/MS, we found that level of creatinine was not changed and uric acid even decreased (Figure S1I, J), so it can be concluded that NAM supplementation did not lead to injury of kidney. Furthermore, we examined the effects of NAM on 16-week C57BL/6J male mice fed a chow diet. NAM decreased body weight of mice fed a normal diet (Figure S1K). As obese mice, AST, ALP, CK or LDH were not increased by NAM supplementation, suggesting NAM supplementation did not induce injury of liver and heart (Figure S1L- O). The data indicated that NAM reduced fat content in DIO mice and improved glucose metabolism."

"...As shown in Figure 2C, glucose was consumed via glycolysis pathway to produce intermediate metabolites such as F16BP, 3PG and pyruvate, or pentose phosphate pathway (PPP) to produce 5-phosphoribosyl-1-pyrophosphate (PRPP). NAM treatment did not change the levels of F16P, and 3PG (Figure S2D, E), suggesting glycolysis was not altered in NAM treated cells while PRPP was decreased (Figure S2F). PRPP was used to synthesize NMN, which were converted into (m+5) and (m+10) NAD+, in which 22% and 55% of NAD+ were in (m+5) and (m+10) forms, respectively (Figure 2C). NAM treatment increased the labelling efficiency in both (m+5) and (m+10) forms (Figure 2D), suggesting that supplementary NAM enhanced NAD+ biosynthesis. Moreover, in 3T3L1 cells, both protein level and mRNA level of NAMPT were increased while NNMT was not changed as the dosage of NAM increased (Figure 2E, F). These data demonstrated that NAM increased NAMPT and enhance NAD+ synthesis."

"...We performed ingenuity pathway analysis (IPA) of these 154 DEPs to identify the biological pathways regulated by these DEPs. The results showed that NAM dramatically increased the abundance of proteins associated with oxidative phosphorylation (OXPHOS), fatty acid β-oxidation, TCA cycle and oxidative stress defense system (Figure 3B). To confirm that mitochondrial proteins were upregulated, western blot analysis was used to examine the expressions of COXIV and SOD2 and found that NAM upregulated both proteins (Figure 3C). Additionally, mRNA levels of mitochondrial genes such as COXIV, COX8b, SOD1, SOD2, ACADm, and ACADl were increased (Figure 3D). To confirm that NAM enhanced mitochondrial biogenesis, we performed qPCR on PPARα and PGC1α and found that both genes were upregulated in NMN-treated mice (Figure 3D)."

"...Herein, we reported that NAM supplementation ameliorated metabolic dysfunction in high fat diet induced obese (DIO) mice. We found that NAM strikingly decreased mass of SCAT, and boosted adipose NAD+, NADP, and N1-methylNAM, in which NAD+ was increased by 32 fold. The increase of lean mass partly contributed to the dramatic increase of NAD+ level. Interestingly, NAM also upregulated NAMPT expression, the rate limiting enzyme in NAD+ synthesis from NAM [38,39], and thus suggested that NAM reprogrammed NAD+ salvage pathway. The elevated NAD+ activated SIRTUINs. Consequently, protein acetylation was decreased in NAM-treated adipose tissue. Furthermore, the decreased acetylation intensity of SOD2 suggested that NAM improved the function of SIRT3, the major mitochondrial deacetylase to control mitochondrial biogenesis [33,35,40,41]. NAM-enhanced mitochondrial biogenesis was confirmed by proteomic analysis showing that mitochondrial proteins involved in fatty acid β oxidation, OXPHOS and TCA were all upregulated in adipose tissue. Consistently, NAM also increased O2 consumption, CO2 production, and adipose acylcarnitine levels by increasing expression of genes for carnitine biosynthesis in DIO mice."

"...In conclusion, our results provided a systemic perspective of effects of NAM on adipose tissue by reprogramming metabolic pathway to enhance mitochondrial biogenesis, and increased GSH production. These results suggested that NAM supplementation was an effective approach to increase fatty acid catabolism and to ameliorate obesity."
 

Mauritio

Member
Joined
Feb 26, 2018
Messages
5,669
What a study!
That's the stuff we need.

The animals did not eat less or move more so the weight loss was from an increased metabolism.

"NAM also decreased fat mass by 47% as measured by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) (9.39 ± 0.64 g fat mass of CTR group vs 2.94 ± 0.27 g of NAM group), while lean mass was increased by 1.4 fold (22.04 ± 0.46 g lean mass of CTR group vs 18.55 ± 1.35 g of NAM group) (Figure 1B). "
 
Last edited:

Mauritio

Member
Joined
Feb 26, 2018
Messages
5,669
This study really shows how great niacinamide is!

Look at the decrease in white adipose tissue:
Screenshot_20220531-203420_Chrome.jpg


A staggering increase in oxidative phosphorylation and a strong decrease in free radicals:
Screenshot_20220531-210400_Chrome.jpg
 

Mauritio

Member
Joined
Feb 26, 2018
Messages
5,669
Also interesting that it increased some things that wouldn't be deemed beneficial by many on this forum like Sirt3 or PGC1a. I'm personally not convinced that they're bad.
Screenshot_20220531-210747_Chrome.jpg
 

LeeLemonoil

Member
Joined
Sep 24, 2016
Messages
4,265
Also interesting that it increased some things that wouldn't be deemed beneficial by many on this forum like Sirt3 or PGC1a. I'm personally not convinced that they're bad.
View attachment 37372
PGC1a-Expression in my book absolutely beneficial. And I Also think Peat reconsidered on some of the mainstream anti-age proposed mechanism recently
 

Mauritio

Member
Joined
Feb 26, 2018
Messages
5,669
PGC1a-Expression in my book absolutely beneficial. And I Also think Peat reconsidered on some of the mainstream anti-age proposed mechanism recently
I think I'm confusing it with something else . It was also something that increases nutrient oxidation, but was reliant on the estrogen receptor . It was increased in a similar study which also increased sirtuins . I'm blanking on the name right now.
 

Kvothe

Member
Joined
Jul 31, 2019
Messages
586
Location
Newarre
What's the conversion factor for mice to human again? Divide by 6? That would mean 0.6mg per kg, or ~50mg for an average 80kg man.
 

Mauritio

Member
Joined
Feb 26, 2018
Messages
5,669
What's the conversion factor for mice to human again? Divide by 6? That would mean 0.6mg per kg, or ~50mg for an average 80kg man.
I think its 12 . Rats are 6.
 
OP
haidut

haidut

Member
Forum Supporter
Joined
Mar 18, 2013
Messages
19,799
Location
USA / Europe
What's the conversion factor for mice to human again? Divide by 6? That would mean 0.6mg per kg, or ~50mg for an average 80kg man.

The HED is listed in the original post. How are you getting the ~ 50mg hor a human?
 

Kvothe

Member
Joined
Jul 31, 2019
Messages
586
Location
Newarre
The HED is listed in the original post. How are you getting the ~ 50mg hor a human?
Sorry, I read too quickly. Thought 2.5mg whas the dose the mice were given. Can we agree that NAM supplementation theoretically requires increasing glycine intake?
 

EvanHinkle

Member
Joined
May 2, 2021
Messages
359
So if mice live between 12 months and 5 years, how would one account for the conversion of the three week study to human time?

For instance, @haidut mentioned 2.5mg/kg HED, but does that mean the human equivalent time frame would be like 60-100 weeks? If so, would upping the dosage beyond 2.5 mg/kg be advisable to shorten the time frame?

Sorry if this has been previously addressed. I often see HED mentioned on the forum, but not HETF, (human equivalent time frame - if I can coin an acronym).
 
OP
haidut

haidut

Member
Forum Supporter
Joined
Mar 18, 2013
Messages
19,799
Location
USA / Europe
So if mice live between 12 months and 5 years, how would one account for the conversion of the three week study to human time?

For instance, @haidut mentioned 2.5mg/kg HED, but does that mean the human equivalent time frame would be like 60-100 weeks? If so, would upping the dosage beyond 2.5 mg/kg be advisable to shorten the time frame?

Sorry if this has been previously addressed. I often see HED mentioned on the forum, but not HETF, (human equivalent time frame - if I can coin an acronym).

Good point, not sure about the HETF. I guess the way to calculate it is to see how much the RER/RMR of the mice rose over baseline due to NAM supplementation. Then, assuming the HED of NAM would cause similar increase in RE/RMR in humans, we can get an idea how many more calories over the baseline RER/RMR daily a person would be burning and what that translates into in terms of weight loss. That would show the time period needed to see same/similar effects on weight as in the mice.
 

EvanHinkle

Member
Joined
May 2, 2021
Messages
359
Good point, not sure about the HETF. I guess the way to calculate it is to see how much the RER/RMR of the mice rose over baseline due to NAM supplementation. Then, assuming the HED of NAM would cause similar increase in RE/RMR in humans, we can get an idea how many more calories over the baseline RER/RMR daily a person would be burning and what that translates into in terms of weight loss. That would show the time period needed to see same/similar effects on weight as in the mice.
Fantastic, love it! Many thanks!
 

CLASH

Member
Joined
Sep 15, 2017
Messages
1,219
Also interesting that it increased some things that wouldn't be deemed beneficial by many on this forum like Sirt3 or PGC1a. I'm personally not convinced that they're bad.
View attachment 37372
It depends on the context in which its being activated. Low ATP state vs. high ATP state. Same thing with ROS and uncoupling.
 

Jam

Member
Joined
Aug 10, 2018
Messages
2,212
Age
52
Location
Piedmont
Also interesting that it increased some things that wouldn't be deemed beneficial by many on this forum like Sirt3 or PGC1a. I'm personally not convinced that they're bad.
View attachment 37372
Interesting... PPAR alpha controls beta oxidation by upregulating CPT1, the enzyme that controls the rate at which fat enters the mitochondria.

PPAR-α is a transcription factor regulated by free fatty acids, and is a major regulator of lipid metabolism in the liver.[7] PPAR-alpha is activated under conditions of energy deprivation and is necessary for the process of ketogenesis, a key adaptive response to prolonged fasting.[8][9] Activation of PPAR-alpha promotes uptake, utilization, and catabolism of fatty acids by upregulation of genes involved in fatty acid transport, fatty acid binding and activation, and peroxisomal and mitochondrial fatty acid β-oxidation.[10] Activation of fatty acid oxidation is facilitated by increased expression of CPR1 (which brings long-chain lipids into mitochondria) by PPAR-α.[11] PPAR-α also inhibits glycolysis, while promoting liver gluconeogenesis and glycogen synthesis.[7]

In macrophages, PPAR-α inhibits the uptake of glycated low-density lipoprotein (LDL cholesterol), inhibits foam cell (atherosclerosis) formation, and inhibits pro-inflammatory cytokines.
 
EMF Mitigation - Flush Niacin - Big 5 Minerals

Similar threads

Back
Top Bottom