johnwester130
Member
- Joined
- Aug 6, 2015
- Messages
- 3,563
interesting
can coconut oil expel parasites?
can coconut oil expel parasites?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Click Here if you want to upgrade your account
If you were able to post but cannot do so now, send an email to admin at raypeatforum dot com and include your username and we will fix that right up for you.
???Homosexual men spread parasites through the Poop Path. The Chocolate Road! The Oreo Trail!
View attachment 30571
@LokzoIf the parasites cause hormonal changes i dont see why this shoudn't be possible? I mean Lokzo i think posted a case study of a man becming gay from a antipsychotic which i think haidut explained trough a hormonal mechanism.
I think parasites are underrated in treating many ailments. On another note tho, removing certain parasites have been shown in a few case studies to actually inflict chronic issues instead of resolving them. much like bacteria and fungi they realy play their role in this wierd ecosystem that is our body.
Sources for this theory?This is hilarious because the whole premise is wrong. Please go back and study biological evolution.
Homosexuals can and do reproduce. Just because many don't doesn't mean they can't, and this is an important distinction in evolutionary biology. Homosexuals are fertile, therefore they serve a natural selection function. They have had children throughout history. Even in the modern world, it's not uncommon for a person to take an opposite sex partner to fulfill familial duties and have a same-sex lover on the side. The notion that homosexuals can't have opposite-sex sex and heterosexuals can't have homosexual sex is a modern social invention.
Besides that, heterosexuals produce homosexuals even in the complete absence of homosexuals. The parents are not secretly homosexual.
Homosexuality seems to be tied to female fecundity. The more fertile a woman is, the more likely she is to produce homosexual offspring. There is likely an altruistic advantage to this because an offspring that is less likely to reproduce is more likely to aid the fecundity of females in the community. In other words, homosexuals are biological altruists because they aid the fitness advantage of other reproductive humans at the cost to their own reproduction. It doesn't mean they don't reproduce though, it just means they are less likely to. Nature is cool like that. Even in those less likely to reproduce, they are not sterile and therefore can still contribute to natural selection.
Go back and learn some biology!
Except where they seem to:It was proven a very long time ago (1960s-70s) that hormones have zero impact on sexual orientation. They know because they tried altering homosexuality with hormone treatment and it not only destroyed lives, it led to suicides. That led to it being removed from the DSM as a psychiatric condition. NOTHING cures homosexuality because it's not a disease.
The theory you're pushing so passionately has already been thoroughly debunked like half a century ago.
I am not pushing theories, i've never said or implied that homosexuality is a disease or of pathogenic nature. No idea why you are so passioned about explaining people what they supposedly said and how wrong they are. Seems like this is for some reason, personal to you. Read my posts carefully again and do not mix it with someone elses.You're just pushing incorrect theories that make it seem like homosexuality is part of the pathogenesis of an infection.
You think scientists didn't look into that decades ago?
In other words, homosexuals are biological altruists because they aid the fitness advantage of other reproductive humans at the cost to their own reproduction
You might want to read the Bible. It's all about Satan, who owns this world and apparently you. No one is born homosexual unless the dna has been manipulated via all kinds of toxins, including parasites. It is NOT a natural phenomenon. God doesn't work that way, but the controllers want you to believe something else.This is hilarious because the whole premise is wrong. Please go back and study biological evolution.
Homosexuals can and do reproduce. Just because many don't doesn't mean they can't, and this is an important distinction in evolutionary biology. Homosexuals are fertile, therefore they serve a natural selection function. They have had children throughout history. Even in the modern world, it's not uncommon for a person to take an opposite sex partner to fulfill familial duties and have a same-sex lover on the side. The notion that homosexuals can't have opposite-sex sex and heterosexuals can't have homosexual sex is a modern social invention.
Besides that, heterosexuals produce homosexuals even in the complete absence of homosexuals. The parents are not secretly homosexual.
Homosexuality seems to be tied to female fecundity. The more fertile a woman is, the more likely she is to produce homosexual offspring. There is likely an altruistic advantage to this because an offspring that is less likely to reproduce is more likely to aid the fecundity of females in the community. In other words, homosexuals are biological altruists because they aid the fitness advantage of other reproductive humans at the cost to their own reproduction. It doesn't mean they don't reproduce though, it just means they are less likely to. Nature is cool like that. Even in those less likely to reproduce, they are not sterile and therefore can still contribute to natural selection.
Go back and learn some biology!
All of those things are complex and chronic stressors. Same with parasites.
We also know that in animals hormones and drugs can change sexuality. Gay frogs etc
I do agree with not taking 4chan at face value.
Related to this, there is a woman who claims to have helped countless autistic kids with antiparasite regime:
View: https://www.bitchute.com/video/MJhlztQffkBM/
I heard Ecuador is a great country to live.Well, I get Ivermectin for practically nothing down here in Ecuador and my gut has never been better since taking it prophylactically for several months.
Ivermectin is extremely safe and tested ad nauseum. It's cheap, easily manufactured anywhere in the world. It's basically a treatment for Scabies, which is mange in dogs and fairly common in 3rd world countries.I could definitely see some kind of connection here although I would wager there are many straight men who are also infected with intestinal parasites.
Hasn't haidut mentioned that there are other anti parasite substances that are much safer and more effective than ivermectin? Can't recall what they are off the top of my head. Think he mentioned it on one of his podcasts with Danny Roddy.
I agree it is very safe but there is a small risk when compared to some other alternatives that are more effective.Ivermectin is extremely safe and tested ad nauseum. It's cheap, easily manufactured anywhere in the world. It's basically a treatment for Scabies, which is mange in dogs and fairly common in 3rd world countries.
There may be something to this. Probably not in the way retardchan explains it
I took Ivermectin a couple times for a podcast as an experiment and noticed on those days women noticed me more then usual.
So I decided to take a 5 day run of 12mg per day.
It was amazing. I couldn't stop. Very masculinizing. Have probably put on a pound of muscle in a month. Doing 12mg per day.
It did increase my insulin needs dramatically. I could also be benefiting from the anti-viral properties
That’s pretty interesting. How did you get it, or did the podcast help with that?
Any info on how to get it would he much appreciated if that’s ok!
This is false.It was proven a very long time ago (1960s-70s) that hormones have zero impact on sexual orientation. They know because they tried altering homosexuality with hormone treatment and it not only destroyed lives, it led to suicides. That led to it being removed from the DSM as a psychiatric condition. NOTHING cures homosexuality because it's not a disease.
The theory you're pushing so passionately has already been thoroughly debunked like half a century ago.
I agree. Whether it's a mental illness is an opinion.This is false.