I know a man who has type 2 diabetes at age 50+. I know he got it from eating junk food (chicken nuggets, hotdogs, cheese burgers, bacon, sausages, fast food, lots of oil...). But he was convinced that "sugar is your enemy, fat is your friend" by his doctor because eating sugar raises blood glucose/sugar and eating fat doesn't. From that he concluded that drinking a lot of coke caused type 2, not eating a lot of fatty food throughout his life.
Even though sugar doesn't cause diabetes he's already diabetic, so eating too much sugar raises blood glucose. Would it be smart to feed him sugary foods little by little and continuously upping the sugar intake while lowering the fat/junk food intake? Here is a sample of what I mean:
day 1: glass of low fat milk and a fruit or a potato (or however much the diabetic can tolerate at first)
day 2: 2 glasses of low fat milk and a fruit or a potato
And this would continue until he lost visceral & subcutaneous fat and also stopped consuming fatty junk food. This would eventually cure his diabetes.
This person eats sugar daily. He just doesn't eat a lot because it raises blood glucose, which is the reason doctors say to avoid sugar. The bulk of his diet consists of anything except sugar. It is detrimental to eat like this long-term because he's just eating more of what made him diabetic.
So is this the best Ray Peat way to cure type 2 diabetes in people aged 50+ who got it from consuming lots of fatty food?
To convince him all I need to do is show him this quote from American Diabetes Association:
(statement that contradicts everything taught by orthodox medecine for the past 150 years)
In other words, would it work to simply lower his fatty food intake and introduce sugar slowly?
Even though sugar doesn't cause diabetes he's already diabetic, so eating too much sugar raises blood glucose. Would it be smart to feed him sugary foods little by little and continuously upping the sugar intake while lowering the fat/junk food intake? Here is a sample of what I mean:
day 1: glass of low fat milk and a fruit or a potato (or however much the diabetic can tolerate at first)
day 2: 2 glasses of low fat milk and a fruit or a potato
And this would continue until he lost visceral & subcutaneous fat and also stopped consuming fatty junk food. This would eventually cure his diabetes.
This person eats sugar daily. He just doesn't eat a lot because it raises blood glucose, which is the reason doctors say to avoid sugar. The bulk of his diet consists of anything except sugar. It is detrimental to eat like this long-term because he's just eating more of what made him diabetic.
So is this the best Ray Peat way to cure type 2 diabetes in people aged 50+ who got it from consuming lots of fatty food?
To convince him all I need to do is show him this quote from American Diabetes Association:
Of note, there is little evidence that total carbohydrate intake is associated with the development of type 2 diabetes (30,70,73,74). Rather, a stronger association has been observed between total fat and saturated fat intake and type 2 diabetes (75,76), although not all findings are in agreement (30). Additionally, two prospective cohort studies have shown no risk of diabetes from consuming increased amounts of sugar (74,77), and in one study, a negative association was observed between sucrose intake and diabetes risk (72). Intakes of both whole grains (72,78) and dietary fiber (in particular, cereal fiber) are associated with lower risk of type 2 diabetes (30,70–72).
(statement that contradicts everything taught by orthodox medecine for the past 150 years)
In other words, would it work to simply lower his fatty food intake and introduce sugar slowly?