Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Click Here if you want to upgrade your account
If you were able to post but cannot do so now, send an email to admin at raypeatforum dot com and include your username and we will fix that right up for you.
Joel Smalley on Twitter does a good job of analysis. Also lockdownsceptics.org will have it on their front page tomorrow.if half the excess deaths are in the home then lockdown is the cause
What happened in 1993 sir?
@JKX Your not alone, and we have to pay a license fee for the privilege!388 people died in the UK last year when accounting for no pre-existing conditions and aged under 60 years.
Not sure about that figure touted by the bbc. I despise that organisation.
Me too.@JKX Your not alone, and we have to pay a license fee for the privilege!
Sweden had no lockdown and no mask wearing mandate, the final stats are in and the mortality rate for 2020 (0.9%) was substantially lower than 1993 (1.1%).The thing is too, these deaths are including mask wearing and lockdowns. Most covid-hoax people claim this means that masks and lockdowns dont work, but another view point would be, how much higher would deaths be if things went on 100% normally? How is it that excess deaths occured (In the US its like 400000 excess deaths from last years or something) all while people were locked at home. Surely things would be much worse if there was 0 precaution taken?
I’m starting to feel the exact same way. Impartial my ****.Not sure about that figure touted by the bbc. I despise that organisation.
What would be useful for determining abnormal increase in deaths are total deaths, total population, and crude death rates over the past decade or more. From what I've seen, total deaths for a year usually take about a year to tally, and during that time who knows what they'll do to inflate the numbers. What became plainly visible in 2020 is the willingness of interested groups to brazenly twist definitions and methodologies to mess with statistics to support their narratives, and they don't even care about presenting logical arguments since they know most people will go along with their stories no matter how ridiculous."Estimates of excess deaths can be calculated in a variety of ways, and will vary depending on the methodology and assumptions about how many deaths are expected to occur. Estimates of excess deaths presented in this webpage were calculated using Farrington surveillance algorithms (1). A range of values for the number of excess deaths was calculated as the difference between the observed count and one of two thresholds (either the average expected count or the upper bound of the 95% prediction interval), by week and jurisdiction." - Excess Deaths Associated with COVID-19 (accessed 14 January 2021)
@Collden Thanks for that, please can you link source for me to save it, cheersSweden had no lockdown and no mask wearing mandate, the final stats are in and the mortality rate for 2020 (0.9%) was substantially lower than 1993 (1.1%).
Where is this summary from? Cannot find it at ONS
I think this has only been reported by swedish sources so far.@Collden Thanks for that, please can you link source for me to save it, cheers