Is The United States Over?

Discussion in 'Political Talk, Alternative World Theories' started by gretchen, May 3, 2013.

  1. gretchen

    gretchen Member

    Joined:
    Nov 30, 2012
    Messages:
    816
  2. 4peatssake

    4peatssake Member

    Joined:
    Feb 7, 2013
    Messages:
    2,055
    Less "political" per se, but still pointing to "establishment."

    Land of the Free and Home of the Brave? :roll:

    Game Over Everywhere!
     
  3. j.

    j. Guest

    I think the dollar is in a lot greater danger than the United States. It's conceivable that the dollar collapses and the country recovers in a short amount of time. The dollar will collapse just because printing money decreases its value, and the U.S. has been off a gold standard since 71, more than 40 years.
     
  4. burtlancast

    burtlancast Member

    Joined:
    Jan 1, 2013
    Messages:
    2,618
    If anyone wants to understand why there's a financial crisis and what are the solutions to get out of it, he needs to read " The creature from Jekyll Island" by Edward Griffin.

    It's a 600 pages book, but it's an example of clarity about the financial system, and quite enjoyable to read.

    Beware of Bill Still's " The money masters", who pushes for more fiat money ( non solution).
     
  5. pboy

    pboy Member

    Joined:
    Jan 22, 2013
    Messages:
    1,681
    We are actually becoming more efficient as a world economy, there is more and more abundance and technology being developed, more buildinds, housing, infrastructure, sharing of information. If you actually look around, the economy and/or dollar aren't weakening at all...what's really going on is more and more psychological ammunition if you will, is being spread, so people are perpetually in a false fear consciousness...the point in this is to make them easy to market to. The truth is we are fine and better off than we pretty much ever have been. The amount of food and resources wasted everyday is so huge that its a joke to think theres any sort of deficiency, if anything its just a distribution / utilization / hoarding issue
     
  6. j.

    j. Guest

    That's really funny. Devaluation of the dollar is the policy of the United States, otherwise the debt won't be possible to pay.
     
  7. jaguar43

    jaguar43 Member

    Joined:
    Oct 10, 2012
    Messages:
    1,310
    Their is a lot of people saying that the U.S is basically over. In my opinion, thats probably true, but some how the rich keep getting richer and the middle class keeps being devoured. I guess its only over the majority of us.
     
  8. OP
    gretchen

    gretchen Member

    Joined:
    Nov 30, 2012
    Messages:
    816
    J, I agree with you to some extent.

    burtlancast, thanks for the book recommendation.

    I think the reasons for America's collapse are manifold but mainly related to the destruction of the Constitution. Enlightenment values do not seem to register well with the masses and the elite apparently has a lot of contempt for them.
     
  9. Asimov

    Asimov Member

    Joined:
    Jan 19, 2013
    Messages:
    162
    Just for the record, this is not true at all.

    The middle class isn't getting devoured, or anything like that. It's just that a larger and larger percentage of their total compensation has been shifted from wages to benefits (health care, retirement, etc). If you look up employee compensation over the last few decades it's gone up consistently.
     
  10. jaguar43

    jaguar43 Member

    Joined:
    Oct 10, 2012
    Messages:
    1,310
    The military has taken away benefits for the enlisted, unions have decrease in states like Ohio which means decrease compensation, basically every retail store has the majority of part timers to not pay for healthcare. Which world are you living in?
     
  11. 4peatssake

    4peatssake Member

    Joined:
    Feb 7, 2013
    Messages:
    2,055
    [​IMG]
     
  12. jaguar43

    jaguar43 Member

    Joined:
    Oct 10, 2012
    Messages:
    1,310
    Asimov took the blue pill. lol
     
  13. Asimov

    Asimov Member

    Joined:
    Jan 19, 2013
    Messages:
    162
    Sorry, I don't deal in rhetoric. The NUMBERS strongly disagree with you. Add up the different levels of employee compensation and you'll find a steadily increasing trend. There's no debate about this.

    If you wish to justify your victimhood, don't bother doing it with this debate. You're wrong. Employee compensation is NOT decreasing. Raises are being shifted away from wages and towards healthcare/retirement benefits. The middleclass is NOT getting devoured...they're just getting paid in a different way. End of discussion.
     
  14. 4peatssake

    4peatssake Member

    Joined:
    Feb 7, 2013
    Messages:
    2,055
    Tell that to my husband and countless others who have been marginalized by corporations that have completely gutted their benefits and wages, scaling them back to the wages they were paid in the 80s. After that they went after their pensions.

    People have lost their homes, luckily we made some good choices and weren't completely wiped out.

    Look around you and talk to people, instead of reading so called "numbers" on a document. Good God.
    Incidently, there is a huge difference between "victimhood" and evil.

    http://money.cnn.com/2013/03/05/news/economy/middle-class-wages/index.html
     
  15. 4peatssake

    4peatssake Member

    Joined:
    Feb 7, 2013
    Messages:
    2,055
  16. pboy

    pboy Member

    Joined:
    Jan 22, 2013
    Messages:
    1,681
    Yes but ultimately its your fault to lend out all your money and have all that insurance, its better to invest it immediately in tangible commodities and land so you aren't affected by artificlal inflation and things like that. There certainly has been no loss of information, infrastructure, buildings, resources, housing, ect...and minimum wage / wages in general correlate the same to basic purchasing power so Asimov must be right in a sense. My view is that people are wasting their money and through all the credit lines, banking, insurances, ect ect lots of money is lost due to confusion and laundering but the total amount is the same...people on an individual basis should just try to control their own money and value better and invest in real tangible materials and land instead of just having it sit in institutions like insurance and retirement funds where its completely out of your control. However...I'm pretty young so maybe I just haven't been around long enough to realize that there have in fact been significant changes
     
  17. jaguar43

    jaguar43 Member

    Joined:
    Oct 10, 2012
    Messages:
    1,310
    Medical insurance is mandatory unless you have enough money to pay for the medical bills your self. We as people who seek alternative methods are not at the level where we can heal ourselves without external sources like MRI's and Ultrasound's. Credit is must if you ever want to purchase a home unless you have enough money to pay for cash. You need the banks to give you loans unless you have the cash at hand. How can people waste their time on these things if their is no choice( if you are wealthy then I guess not).

    Unless you want to live out on your property with no electric, water, or sources of communications then I guess it is ok, but most people don't.

    The minimum wage is not correlate to basic purchasing power, How in the world are you suppose to pay for a home that is worth 270,000 with a 7.25 hourly wage, with food and gas rising. According to Census Bureau data, The lowest 93% of the population lost 4 % of their net worth, while the wealthiest 7 % had a net gain of 28% in 2011. You don't need statistics to see people suffering, people are living in the woods in cities like manassas and fauquier, and this area is the northern virginia area, which is not doing as bad as other states.
     
  18. jaguar43

    jaguar43 Member

    Joined:
    Oct 10, 2012
    Messages:
    1,310
    Please send me a copy of the statistics, because according to the Census Bureau data the lowest 93% percent of household lost 4 percent of their net worth, while the wealthiest 7% increased their net worth by 28%. The total net worth takes in consideration benefits, 401, stocks, ect. IF you were right there would be no loose on the total net worth, healthcare and retirement benefits are more expensive than just paying someone to work. What am I supposed to do not believe the Census Bureau data because it is funded by the government. Of course in your Libertarianism/republican view anything funded by the government is corrupted.

    If you know anything about ray peat you know that he takes a subjective view on most things. Which means that you view the organism connected to it's environment and you take into consideration all conditions that can alter its output. To say that people are justifying their victimhood by observing what they see, and taking account of other peoples experiences and their own, is not welcome on this forum. Some people on this forum had and still are facing economic difficulties which is a fair way of making an argument.
     
  19. Asimov

    Asimov Member

    Joined:
    Jan 19, 2013
    Messages:
    162
    Net worth doesn't ever include intangible benefits. How could it? There's no way to calculate someone's healthcare benefit payout before they're done receiving healthcare (IE: their entire life). There's no WAY you can calculate net worth on intangible assets.......

    This is why I don't bother having conversations like this because when all else fails, you'll just invent a statistic that supports your point.
     
  20. jaguar43

    jaguar43 Member

    Joined:
    Oct 10, 2012
    Messages:
    1,310
    Tangible Costs
    Tangible costs include the types of things a business writes checks for: salaries and wages, leases, operational inputs, employee medical benefits, transportation and commercial insurance. These costs have a clear place in the general ledger. The company cannot conduct business or produce a quality product without spending on tangible costs. They are also easy to quantify, so management tends to focus on the manipulation of tangible costs.

    dude are you serious??
     
Loading...