It seems to me that having a higher basal temperature, is indicative of a higher metabolism. I'm confused because of my GP's sheer dismissal of the suggestion though.
Background:
I've been tracking my pulse rate and temps for weeks.
RHR is never over 60 (average is about 50) and my temperature is never really over 36.5*C (97.7*F).
I explained this to my GP. She measured my temp at 36.4*c (97.52*F) and she said: "There you go, your temperature is completely normal".
I also posted an article a few weeks ago about oral temperature not always being reliable.
I haven't had a chance to read Broda Barnes's work yet, but I believe he's very much in favour of oral temperature readings.
Background:
I've been tracking my pulse rate and temps for weeks.
RHR is never over 60 (average is about 50) and my temperature is never really over 36.5*C (97.7*F).
I explained this to my GP. She measured my temp at 36.4*c (97.52*F) and she said: "There you go, your temperature is completely normal".
I also posted an article a few weeks ago about oral temperature not always being reliable.
I haven't had a chance to read Broda Barnes's work yet, but I believe he's very much in favour of oral temperature readings.