Teres
Member
- Joined
- Jul 13, 2017
- Messages
- 75
Creating a family is normal. Doing that under a contract - not necessarily.
Last edited:
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Click Here if you want to upgrade your account
If you were able to post but cannot do so now, send an email to admin at raypeatforum dot com and include your username and we will fix that right up for you.
You can change together and grow to appreciate your differences.Selection skills mean nothing if I change over time or they change over time.
You can change together and grow to appreciate your differences.
Issues will arise. Conflict opens the possibility for growth and self understanding. I think avoiding conflict is a symptom of helplessness. When you trust that everything is capable of being worked through, you don’t have to project “what if” fears onto the future. Maybe the relationship won’t last. Okay, well, at least you learned something.Appreciating differences would be the cardinal rule. But if there are other issues that arise, as alluded to by other posters here, I don't think it's necessarily a selection fault.
Issues will arise. Conflict opens the possibility for growth and self understanding. I think avoiding conflict is a symptom of helplessness. When you trust that everything is capable of being worked through, you don’t have to project “what if” fears onto the future. Maybe the relationship won’t last. Okay, well, at least you learned something.
I agree that walking away is sometimes best. I think letting previous relationship experiences paint present ones is what can ruin a strong attraction. When you project what someone else did to you on someone new, it’s an easy way to blur a connection into goodbye. I think it’s important to be careful of negative emotions that come up in romantic relationships, and to be able to discern whether it is residual childhood material or not.Maybe it's particular experiences coming through but I think there are things that can't be worked through sometimes, and walking away is not avoiding conflict. I agree that sometimes things don't last, for the betterment of each.
I agree that walking away is sometimes best. I think letting previous relationship experiences paint present ones is what can ruin a strong attraction. When you project what someone else did to you on someone new, it’s an easy way to blur a connection into goodbye. I think it’s important to be careful of negative emotions that come up in romantic relationships, and to be able to discern whether it is residual childhood material or not.
It depends on what you want. If you desire a woman, what the Greeks called eros, then you will both instinctively converge to one another, and not merely physically. There's a kind of completeness in the union of the two. An intellectualized, or worse still, legalized love destroys desire.As awkward as it is for me to admit it, I've been concluding the same. I've held such fear of getting with the wrong person or it not working out, but it feels kind of moot now....and it definitely is built on doctrines/Creeds/custom....when you think about it, it's kind of messed up to have a forever person....it seems that it would require a loss of autonomy on both parts. Now what a next-level partnership would look like is more difficult to grasp.
Do you mean to say soul mates are teleologicalIt depends on what you want. If you desire a woman, what the Greeks called eros, then you will both instinctively converge to one another, and not merely physically. There's a kind of completeness in the union of the two. An intellectualized, or worse still, legalized love destroys desire.
Actually, no. Ideally, desire births from being rather than becoming; it resembles a state of natural intoxication. Speaking of intoxication, excessive alcohol does increase the libido but unfortunately interrupts a normal sexual ritual, which often leads to regret following coitus.Do you mean to say soul mates are teleological
How is being different from becoming?Actually, no. Ideally, desire births from being rather than becoming; it resembles a state of natural intoxication. Speaking of intoxication, excessive alcohol does increase the libido but unfortunately interrupts a normal sexual ritual, which often leads to regret following coitus.
Becoming entails a negation of itself. If you become, then you cannot be. The result of becoming is being. Becoming relies on a temporal nature, and being derives from immortal, superseding and spiritual aspects. The feminine becomes, whereas the masculine is. The cyclical period of death and rebirth often appears alongside maternal figures, as with goddesses of the harvest, fertility and "Earth mother," as with Demeter, Ceres and so on, as well as goddesses of the hunt, moon, night and Nature, as with Artemis, Diana, Dali, Sedna, Skaði and others. The masculine being has no death or birth; it represents the immortal sun and sky, as with the gods Zeus, Apollo, Helios and so on. The masculine does not die or change, and therefore it cannot become anything. Man seeks to cease becoming and enter into being.How is being different from becoming?
Mater-ial. Mother matter, atom and eve.Becoming entails a negation of itself. If you become, then you cannot be. The result of becoming is being. Becoming relies on a temporal nature, and being derives from immortal, superseding and spiritual aspects. The feminine becomes, whereas the masculine is. The cyclical period of death and rebirth often appears alongside maternal figures, as with goddesses of the harvest, fertility and "Earth mother," as with Demeter, Ceres and so on, as well as goddesses of the hunt, moon, night and Nature, as with Artemis, Diana, Dali, Sedna, Skaði and others. The masculine being has no death or birth; it represents the immortal sun and sky, as with the gods Zeus, Apollo, Helios and so on. The masculine does not die or change, and therefore it cannot become anything. Man seeks to cease becoming and enter into being.
Yes, very close. "Adam" literally means "one formed from the earth." Similarly, the Latin "humanus" relates to the word "humus," which itself translates to "earth, ground or soil." "Eve" means "giver of life." As the root of material, the Latin "materia" means "earth" or "wood." Artemis, the goddesses of the hunt, which entails animal death, also governed the forests.Mater-ial. Mother matter, atom and eve.
Also, atman and eternal soul. I imagine this sort of thinking (archetypal) being rooted in the ideal of the universal mind.Yes, very close. "Adam" literally means "one formed from the earth." Similarly, the Latin "humanus" relates to the word "humus," which itself translates to "earth, ground or soil." "Eve" means "giver of life." As the root of material, the Latin "materia" means "earth" or "wood." Artemis, the goddesses of the hunt, which entails animal death, also governed the forests.