Is Frequent Eating Really Better?

Joined
Nov 21, 2015
Messages
10,504
Hypercaloric diets with increased meal frequency, but not meal size, increase intrahepatic triglycerides: A randomized controlled trial
American children consume up to 27% of calories from high-fat and high-sugar snacks. Both sugar and fat consumption have been implicated as a cause of hepatic steatosis and obesity but the effect of meal pattern is largely understudied.

We hypothesized that a high meal frequency, compared to consuming large meals, is detrimental in the accumulation of intrahepatic and abdominal fat.

To test this hypothesis, we randomized 36 lean, healthy men to a 40% hypercaloric diet for 6 weeks or a eucaloric control diet and measured intrahepatic triglyceride content (IHTG) using proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy (1H-MRS), abdominal fat using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and insulin sensitivity using a hyperinsulinemic euglycemic clamp with a glucose isotope tracer before and after the diet intervention.

The caloric surplus consisted of fat and sugar (high-fat-high-sugar; HFHS) or sugar only (high-sugar; HS) and was consumed together with, or between, the three main meals, thereby increasing meal size or meal frequency.

All hypercaloric diets similarly increased body mass index (BMI). Increasing meal frequency significantly increased IHTG (HFHS mean relative increase of 45%; P = 0.016 and HS mean relative increase of 110%; P = 0.047), whereas increasing meal size did not (2-way analysis of variance [ANOVA] size versus frequency P = 0.03). Abdominal fat increased in the HFHS-frequency group (+63.3 ± 42.8 mL; P = 0.004) and tended to increase in the HS-frequency group (+46.5 ± 50.7 mL; P = 0.08).

Hepatic insulin sensitivity tended to decrease in the HFHS-frequency group while peripheral insulin sensitivity was not affected.

Conclusion: A hypercaloric diet with high meal frequency increased IHTG and abdominal fat independent of caloric content and body weight gain, whereas increasing meal size did not. This study suggests that snacking, a common feature in the Western diet, independently contributes to hepatic steatosis and obesity. (Trial registration: www.clinicaltrials.gov; nr.NCT01297738.) (Hepatology 2014;60:545–553)
 

Jsaute21

Member
Joined
Sep 3, 2016
Messages
1,344
Meal frequency is extremely individual, and IMO should not be put in a one size fits all category. It all comes down to how one stores blood sugar, and how their liver functions. If in a hypo metabolic state, one needs to eat constantly. If healthy, one just needs to eat when hungry. This could be 2 times a day, or 3, or 4. Ignoring hunger signs however is a sure fire way to long term hurt your metabolic state. Take it from an active guy who did that for years.
 
J

James IV

Guest
Meal frequency is extremely individual, and IMO should not be put in a one size fits all category. It all comes down to how one stores blood sugar, and how their liver functions. If in a hypo metabolic state, one needs to eat constantly. If healthy, one just needs to eat when hungry. This could be 2 times a day, or 3, or 4. Ignoring hunger signs however is a sure fire way to long term hurt your metabolic state. Take it from an active guy who did that for years.

Good advice.
 

Constatine

Member
Joined
Sep 28, 2016
Messages
1,781
Well of course a high fat high sugar hypercaloric diet is going to wreck ones health. One needs plenty of protein and exercise to handle such conditions. Fat and sugar don't mix well together in large quantities. They produce energy via competitive means. Sugar obviously being the much more efficient method. With plenty of sugar fat is not used for energy and is stored. A healthy diet has plenty of sugar and only a moderate amount of fat with high amounts of protein... Then again people seem to do well on ice cream. Perhaps because it stimulates metabolism so much.
 
Last edited:

tara

Member
Joined
Mar 29, 2014
Messages
10,368
To test this hypothesis, we randomized 36 lean, healthy men ...
Quite possibly not, for most really healthy men.
A good many of us here are not in that category.

Meal frequency is extremely individual, and IMO should not be put in a one size fits all category. It all comes down to how one stores blood sugar, and how their liver functions. If in a hypo metabolic state, one needs to eat constantly. If healthy, one just needs to eat when hungry. This could be 2 times a day, or 3, or 4. Ignoring hunger signs however is a sure fire way to long term hurt your metabolic state. Take it from an active guy who did that for years.
+1
 

DuggaDugga

Member
Joined
Jun 7, 2017
Messages
204
Hypercaloric Diets

All diets consisted of a 40% caloric surplus on top of the ad libitum weight-maintaining diet (calculated as 1.4 × REE). The hypercaloric diet groups were:

  1. HFHS-size group: high-fat-high-sugar (HFHS) diet using Nutridrink Compact three times a day, consumed together with the three daily main meals.
  2. HFHS-frequency group: HFHS diet using Nutridrink Compact three times a day, consumed 2-3 hours after each meal.
  3. HS-size group: high-sugar (HS) diet using commercially available sucrose-sweetened beverages three times a day, consumed together with the three daily main meals.
  4. HS-frequency group: HS diet using commercially available sucrose-sweetened beverages three times a day, consumed 2-3 hours after each meal.
Nutridrink Compact (Nutricia Advanced Medical Nutrition; Zoetermeer, the Netherlands) is a liquid meal with nutritive value of 240 kcal/100 mL; 16 energy% protein (mainly casein), 49 energy% carbohydrates (mainly maltose and polysaccharides) and 35 energy% fat (mainly unsaturated fat). As HS liquid, subjects consumed commercially available sucrose-sweetened (=50% glucose/50% fructose) soft drinks. The soft drinks contained no fat or protein. Participants chose their beverage from a list of soft drinks with comparable nutritive value. Soft drinks contained 43.3 (range 36-49) kcal/100 mL and 10.3 (range 9-12) g/100 mL of sucrose. Participants consumed on average 1,000 mL 3 times per day.

A different user of this forum posted a similar (maybe the same?) study to defend his/her anti-fructose stance. These individuals drank a massive amount of nurtient-void, hypercaloric liquid in addition to their normal diet and got fat, so therefore fructose is bad -- ????? Crazy to think a couple individuals probably earned phDs for conducting this research. Think about all the other relevant aspects to these diets not included, the non-dietary aspects of metabolism not included. And their sample size is 40 to ice the cake? Yikes.
 

Constatine

Member
Joined
Sep 28, 2016
Messages
1,781
A different user of this forum posted a similar (maybe the same?) study to defend his/her anti-fructose stance. These individuals drank a massive amount of nurtient-void, hypercaloric liquid in addition to their normal diet and got fat, so therefore fructose is bad -- ????? Crazy to think a couple individuals probably earned phDs for conducting this research. Think about all the other relevant aspects to these diets not included, the non-dietary aspects of metabolism not included. And their sample size is 40 to ice the cake? Yikes.
True
 

paymanz

Member
Joined
Jan 6, 2015
Messages
2,707
overeating can't be healthy.

Sometimes we eat too much because there is no better enjoying activity in not around.there is a sweet point where you got to refrain from eat more.

Your digestive system is under pressure with overeating too.
 

DuggaDugga

Member
Joined
Jun 7, 2017
Messages
204
EMF Mitigation - Flush Niacin - Big 5 Minerals

Similar threads

Back
Top Bottom