Nemo
Member
- Joined
- Jul 8, 2019
- Messages
- 2,163
Mike Cernovich is always running cover and decoys for the Epstein circle, he done the same with dershowitz and now for gates.
No visible job, not-credible bio.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Click Here if you want to upgrade your account
If you were able to post but cannot do so now, send an email to admin at raypeatforum dot com and include your username and we will fix that right up for you.
Mike Cernovich is always running cover and decoys for the Epstein circle, he done the same with dershowitz and now for gates.
yea i've increasingly come to this conclusion. if there is any hope in fighting for freedom from power in all aspects of life, it has to be done collectively in-person in local communities. the internet, used as a means for a public forum, frequently degenerates into speech controlled by bots, spam, paid shills, and propaganda so even in a decentralized platform, the participants of the forum are likely to not be acting in good faith. the separation between two people using the internet in two different places, takes away the human instinct of empathy and cooperation, because you are unable feel the physical effects of your words and ideas on someone else. in-person communities can organize empathetically and rationally, where someone else is front and center and there's no hiding behind a screen. even a virus, if you have a strong community you will be able to see first hand if there's a deadly plague because people around you will show it. what we have now is everyone alone in a home having to see what's going on through the internet, which makes it difficult to understand the true nature of whats happening because we dont know what we can and cant believe, despite our desire to empathize with peoples situationsThe issue isn't just the tech, it's the relationship between the tech and the people that own it, namely the military. We can invent all kinds of cryptocurrencies and decentralized tools, but at the end of the day, the military founded the Internet for surveillance, and that's still its orientation, so it's hard for me to imagine (although it is theoretically possible), the people in the government who are providing and managing the infrastructure of the Internet itself, wanting to make it a more free and open place. A lot of things could be done and effort made by the government or businesses to make the world a more livable place. The question is will they? I don't expect them to. Domination and control is all they seem to know how to do. Realistically, I think change most easily happens at the local level, through communities, and we are probably going to be the only ones steering our own ships and relying on our friends, family, neighbors, local communities to do things, rather than politics or what-have-you. And that may be within the confines of the modern industrial system as long as it currently stands as even if you live in the middle of nowhere, there's still building codes and what have you.
Well said. As to your original question, I doubt the China involvement idea, the US gov't has been practicing "Full Spectrum Dominance" for years and the "Pivot" to Asia foreign policy happened under the Obama administration. Hence since then, there's been an increasing number of warships surrounding China particularly in the South China sea. The warhawks have been gearing to go to war for China for a while now. Blaming their leak at Fort Detrick, perhaps even intentional leak -- blaming that on China, just adds fuel to the fire and suits their long-seated agenda to bait China into war. I find Unz's argument quite convincing that the US leaked the virus to initiate biowarfare against China and Iran. Have you heard the latest Roddy podcast? They mention the Unz article (01:23:45).yea i've increasingly come to this conclusion. if there is any hope in fighting for freedom from power in all aspects of life, it has to be done collectively in-person in local communities. the internet, used as a means for a public forum, frequently degenerates into speech controlled by bots, spam, paid shills, and propaganda so even in a decentralized platform, the participants of the forum are likely to not be acting in good faith. the separation between two people using the internet in two different places, takes away the human instinct of empathy and cooperation, because you are unable feel the physical effects of your words and ideas on someone else. in-person communities can organize empathetically and rationally, where someone else is front and center and there's no hiding behind a screen. even a virus, if you have a strong community you will be able to see first hand if there's a deadly plague because people around you will show it. what we have now is everyone alone in a home having to see what's going on through the internet, which makes it difficult to understand the true nature of whats happening because we dont know what we can and cant believe, despite our desire to empathize with peoples situations
Exactly. It's a huge contradiction: criticizing China for their lack of privacy, yet praising the very same privacy-invading tech and pushing for it in the US.Futhur, using China as the new enemy allows industry to justify spending more and more money on military, AI, tech, in order to "compete" with China, the country that they want to convince us is the one who released Covid. It's not a coninicidence that the biggest neocons, like Pompeo, Cotton, are the ones pushing the China story the heaviest.
Danny Roddy reads Unz? I am pleasantly surprised by that. Unz Review has done a great job of spreading economic literacy on the Financial Machinations of the Oligarchy. Much better than other counter culture sites like even Zero Hedge, which is Finance-focused.Well said. As to your original question, I doubt the China involvement idea, the US gov't has been practicing "Full Spectrum Dominance" for years and the "Pivot" to Asia foreign policy happened under the Obama administration. Hence since then, there's been an increasing number of warships surrounding China particularly in the South China sea. The warhawks have been gearing to go to war for China for a while now. Blaming their leak at Fort Detrick, perhaps even intentional leak -- blaming that on China, just adds fuel to the fire and suits their long-seated agenda to bait China into war. I find Unz's argument quite convincing that the US leaked the virus to initiate biowarfare against China and Iran. Have you heard the latest Roddy podcast? They mention the Unz article (01:23:45).
Exactly. It's a huge contradiction: criticizing China for their lack of privacy, yet praising the very same privacy-invading tech and pushing for it in the US.
Mystery vaping illness started in USA August 2019. Symptoms identical to covid.
Later found that vapers contract covid 5x more easily.
Media silently stopped reporting the vaping illness as COVID became rampant.
There was also the March 2019 Spanish sewer sample. That one is a wildcard.
ATM the most likely theory is that a bioweapon escaped from Fort Detrick, so they seeded it heavily in Wuhan in order to cover up their tracks. The fact that WIV also did coronavirus Gain of Function research (funded by the US) made it even easier to frame them.
George thinks Covid-19 was launched from Ft. Belvoir, where the freshly-assassinated Col. Dr. McDaniel gave our troops the vax before deploying them to the Wuhan military games with the bioweapon.
I agree with @Ivysaur's hypothesis that the bioweapon escaped from Ft. Detrick in July 2019, killing three and hospitalizing many more at that nursing home near Ft. Detrick (CDC said they couldn't identify the mystery virus), plus launching the mystery vaping illness with symptoms identical to Covid-19.
Then we launched the bioweapon attack on Wuhan to cover up our tracks, so the good Col Dr. McDaniel had to be assassinated for the cover-up.
Ft. Belvoir has tons of military intelligence and we already know the good Col. Dr. was part of Special Forces deploying bioweapons in Iran and Iraq.
View: https://twitter.com/RealGeorgeWebb1/status/1400833312101384195
@Nemo
The Pentagon funneled $39million to a charity that funded Wuhan lab
Federal data seen by DailyMail.com reveals The Pentagon gave $39 million to charity EcoHealth Alliance (EHA), which funded a lab in Wuhan, China.www.dailymail.co.uk
Well, I rest my case.Good grief!
What a find. Thank you for finding the entity for which Fauci was the bag man.
I am floored.
ps I am also not a fan of China.
But the US regime is a different kind of evil. Beyond Satanic.