Immunity COVID Passport Can’t Be Forged

Drareg

Member
Joined
Feb 18, 2016
Messages
4,772
Danny Roddy and @haidut recently discussed this on Friday nights chat.

It’s an intelligent response to attempt forgery in this instance, they are clearly psychotic and want to use this "immunity" passport to achieve a mandatory global sign up to digital identity.
Whether or not you believe this tech can be useful is not really the question, it’s who’s behind it that can’t be trusted.
In saying all that, is life really that complicated with paper birth certificates and paper passports?
But think of all the undocumented the ruling class say, it’s humanitarian to have bio ID’s, evil dictators take their papers etc (ironically using weapons the elite sell them),of course in the Epstein esque ruling class cliques I’m sure the kids he trafficked will never have their digital identities wiped or anything like that.......

It’s likely Microsoft will store all the "government stored" blockchain info IMO, this means Israel will have direct access to your information, I doubt anything will be open source knowing Bill Epstein Gates’ s form, if Israel have it this means China and Russia will automatically have it too.

"Immunity license" is the new language, the term license means pay a tax and also mitigates the nuance of potential accusations of discrimination, for example you can’t drive a car without a "license", get it?


https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10916-020-01616-4?fbclid=IwAR164c_2kVwq8nlT3vbunWhT-npjMrlDiVBH2JvmFc0iTsbetEs80C6F7UA


In an effort to lift the social distancing measures, some countries including Chile, Germany, the UK and others have suggested the use of COVID-19 “immunity passports” or “immunity certificates” or “immunity licenses” i.e. document that certify an individual has been infected and is immune to coronavirus disease 2019 [1]. Individuals with immunity certificates could be exempt from physical restrictions and could return to work, school and other daily activities. However, there are various practical and legal challenges [2,3,4] in adequate implementation of “immunity certificates.” The use of immunity licenses would create a restriction on who can and cannot participate in social and work-related activities and this would encourage forgery and incentivize people to seek infection. Herein, we propose a blockchain technology [5, 6] to combat two challenges while using immunity certificates, falsification of information and people seeking out for COVID-19 infection.

Citizens register on a government run blockchain which would maintain and verify the COVID 19 related data. Testing facilities and hospitals are also required to be on the blockchain network so that all the reports are automatically uploaded on the distributed ledger and cannot be modified later. When an individual takes the COVID-19 antibody test, the details are kept confidential using smart contracts. Smart contracts swap the public key of the individual with an anonymous key which is received by health care workers. Once the sample is tested, the smart contract is able to tag the anonymous key with the actual public key of the individual. If the test confirms that the person has developed antibodies to SARS-CoV-2, a token is issued in the account of that person with expiry date according to the expected age of antibodies. This means that the tokens can be verified only until a particular time frame. This blockchain takes biometric authentication as a private key so as to prevent people using each other’s blockchain account. Since every person’s data is encrypted with their biometrics, privacy and anonymity is maintained. This system cannot be used to extract any information of the individual but only to verify the claims of a person. Another advantage is the ease of verification, since it is a public digital ledger run by the government, it provides quick and trusted verification across borders. Just like bitcoin, everyone can see how much a particular wallet owns, the person just needs to prove the ownership of that wallet. This can be achieved simply by sending a message from your account to the person who is verifying the claim. It could be made more robust if the laboratory and hospital devices are IoT (Internet of things) enabled so that they are able to work directly with the blockchain without any human intervention. Smart contracts make it extremely easy to verify if any of the devices have been tempered with or not.

Utilizing blockchain can mitigate the falsification of test reports and encourage people to come in contact with individuals having immunity-based licenses rather than actively seeking for COVID 19 infection. This blockchain based system also offers an opportunity to prioritize individuals for antibody testing via contact tracing. However, the major concern while implementing this blockchain system is that there is currently not enough evidence that people with antibodies are protected from having a second COVID 19 infection [7, 8]. Thus, contact with individuals possessing immunity certificates might increase the risk of infection. There exists a challenge of social division between the licensed and unlicensed people [9]. Therefore, in conclusion, we believe that the above mentioned blockchain system would mitigate some of the challenges existing with the current implementation of “immunity certificates” or “immunity licenses.”
 

BearWithMe

Member
Joined
May 19, 2017
Messages
2,020
Damn, what a dark times are ahead :-/

Where to move to avoid this?
 
Last edited:
OP
Drareg

Drareg

Member
Joined
Feb 18, 2016
Messages
4,772
An now this from the WHO, media staying relatively quite about its release because the alternative media have primed people for aver a year about digital baccine passes and their link to the bill and Melinda Gates foundation via the WHO.

This quote is interesting to me, "The digital record is not intended to serve as an immunity passport or provide a judgement or decision on what that vaccination means or permits".
It can’t be an immunity passport because the vaccines do not provide immunity, they want us to continually take boosters, some Australian politicians have lets this slip because they are under massive pressure down there.
The Hegelian wordplay here on what a vaccination means or permits, what this statement really means is the fascist will decide what the meaning of words are going forward, what that means is they get more power and profit via control of your body as a digital slave.
Its also a legal out constitutionally speaking.

The International Certificate of Vaccination and Prophylaxis database is the big one in my opinion, you have a national vaccine digital record separate to the international record, the ICVP is the door for global governance via geofenced tracking.

This being released explains why we have western nations pulling back on restrictions IMO, they have the blockchain ledger system ready to go with this.

Here we have it, the guidelines from the global fascist ruling class, it’s absolutely vital to resist this.


What is the DDCC:VS?
A vaccination certificate is a health document that records a vaccination service received by an individual, traditionally as a paper card noting key details about the vaccinated individual, vaccine administered, date administered, and other data in the core data set (see section 5.2). Digital vaccination certificates are immunization records in an electronic format that are accessible by both the vaccinated person and authorized health workers, and which can be used in the same way as the paper card: to ensure continuity of care or provide proof of vaccination. These are the two scenarios considered in this document (see Table 1).

A vaccination certificate can be purely digital (e.g. stored in a smartphone application or on a cloud- based server) and replace the need for a paper card, or it can be a digital representation of the traditional paper-based record (see Fig. 2). A digital certificate should never require individuals to have a smartphone or computer. The link between the paper record and the digital record can be established using a one-dimensional (1D) or two-dimensional (2D) barcode, for example, printed on
or affixed to the paper vaccination card. References to the “paper” record in this document mean a physical document (printed on paper, plastic card, cardboard, etc.). An illustrative example of a paper- based DDCC:VS is given in Annex 1.

The guidance in this document is for a digital record that only shows that a vaccination has occurred. The digital record is not intended to serve as an immunity passport or provide a judgement or decision on what that vaccination means or permits.
This guidance is consistent with advice provided to the WHO secretariat at the eighth meeting of the International Health Regulations (2005) Emergency Committee (IHR EC) regarding the coronavirus disease (COVID-19), “advocating for WHO to expedite the work to establish updated means for documenting COVID-19 status of travellers, including vaccination, history of SARS-CoV-2 infection, and SARS-CoV-2 test results.”1 In the absence of a mechanism to digitally document COVID-19 vaccination status, it may be recorded in the International Certificate of Vaccination and Prophylaxis (ICVP). The ICVP format and data set would suffice as a valid health document for any future digitization efforts.
Furthermore, in response to the IHR EC advice to the Secretariat, WHO is actively working to update the design of the ICVP to accommodate the COVID-19 status of travelers, including vaccination, history of infection, and test results consistent with the DDCC:VS specifications. In relation to the ICVP, The IHR EC furthermore recommends States Parties “recognition of all COVID-19 vaccines that have received WHO Emergency Use Listing in the context of international travel. In addition, States Parties are encouraged to include information on COVID-19 status, in accordance with WHO guidance, within the WHO booklet containing the International Certificate of Vaccination and Prophylaxis; and to use the digitized version when available.”
 
OP
Drareg

Drareg

Member
Joined
Feb 18, 2016
Messages
4,772

I think this is the blockchain they are using for the WHO digital vaccine tracking, notice the language used like commodities, finance and insurance etc, basically plantation language.​

My guess is this easily hackable and that’s probably the idea, down the line they will start another crisis that will require even more authoritarian measures because of the "hackers".
Money or tokens to stimulate bodies in need of resources and bodies traceable is all you need for a global slave plantation.

Architecture & Standards Community​

The OpenHIE Architecture & Standards community was created for members of OpenHIE and its Communities to discuss cross-cutting technical issues about how components work with one another and the affect they have on our health information exchange.
Quick Links




Artboard%201.png

The big grey box represents the OpenHIE components that are a part of a shared infrastructure that may be supported at a national, project or organization level. The point-of-service applications represent applications or systems that are such as the OpenMRS electronic medical records (EMR) system and the RapidSMS mHealth application, are used by clinicians and by community health workers to access and update a patient’s person-centric shared health information and to record other healthcare transactions. The OpenHIE components are described below:

Business Domain Services - Are Health Exchange components that are designed to support specific health system business domains and would have the potential to combine data Health Exchange data from multiple point-of-care systems.
  1. Logistics Management Information Service (LMIS) - A Logistics Management Information System (LMIS) is an IT system that plays a central role in enabling commodity visibility and operational management of a wide-area supply chain operation. Typically the commodities in this supply chain are health-related, the organization that sponsors the system is a department or agency under a government's health ministry and the operation is carried out at scale for an entire region or even an entire nation. An LMIS typically bridges the health and supply chain operations by enabling re-supply workflows for clinical locations and the vertical programs targeting families of commodities, as well as interfacing with supplier's IT systems to ensure the re-supply process is fulfilled as needed. Particular LMIS tools may have additional capabilities that enhance these re-supply workflows and/or add to the maturity of the wider supply chain operation.

  2. A Shared Health Record (SHR) is a repository containing the normalized version of content created within the community, after being validated against each of the previous registries. It is a collection of person-centric records for patients with information in the exchange. See also: What constitutes an OpenHIE SHR?

  3. A Health Management Information Service (HMIS) stores routinely-collected aggregate health care data, and facilitates their analysis with the goal of improving the quality of health services. See also: What constitutes an OpenHIE HMIS?

  4. Finance and Insurance Service stores, categorizes and facilitates the administration of centralised claims and finance related data to care provision to patients within the HIE. The service receives claims/financial data from Point of Service applications (including financing applications acting as a point of service interface outside of other PoS systems) and curates the management of them.
 
OP
Drareg

Drareg

Member
Joined
Feb 18, 2016
Messages
4,772
This seems to have developed in Africa, Ethiopia. It’s incredible the brass balls the ruling class have, it’s open neo-colonization.
 
P

Peatness

Guest
This seems to have developed in Africa, Ethiopia. It’s incredible the brass balls the ruling class have, it’s open neo-colonization.
Why would this surprise anyone? Isn’t this what has been going on for decades?
 
OP
Drareg

Drareg

Member
Joined
Feb 18, 2016
Messages
4,772
Why would this surprise anyone? Isn’t this what has been going on for decades?
Sure has, the roll out now begins yet most people just don’t get it yet.
 
P

Peatness

Guest
Sure has, the roll out now begins yet most people just don’t get it yet.
I've always been of the mindset that we should pay more attention to what's going on elsewhere ('over there') because if we don't they eventually come for us.
 
OP
Drareg

Drareg

Member
Joined
Feb 18, 2016
Messages
4,772
"immunity license" I am really sure @charlie will love this orwellian neolanguage one.
That’s the hegelians for you, they twist language and the meanings, Peat has been a real gift to all of us, finding his work before all this happened allows you to see beyond language and focus more on the actions.
The ruling class are behind the twisting of words around sex and gender also, it’s Hegelian dialectics being used as tool, the public in general can’t keep up, we need to teach our kids these techniques.
 

Similar threads

Back
Top Bottom