L
Lord Cola
Guest
Is this sarcasm?People really think Malone is some kind of deep state controlled op, when he has such trustable physiognomy?
View attachment 32399
View attachment 32401
View attachment 32400
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Click Here if you want to upgrade your account
If you were able to post but cannot do so now, send an email to admin at raypeatforum dot com and include your username and we will fix that right up for you.
Is this sarcasm?People really think Malone is some kind of deep state controlled op, when he has such trustable physiognomy?
View attachment 32399
View attachment 32401
View attachment 32400
Stay Thirsty, My Friends.Is this sarcasm?
Lol.This is how they are going to capture Africa. Win them over then JAB!!.
And even the 2003 SARS-CoV and similar are based on a faulty test“the establishment and validation of a diagnostic workflow for 2019-nCoV screening and specific confirmation, designed in absence of available virus isolates or original patient specimens. Design and validation were enabled by the close genetic relatedness to the 2003 SARS-CoV, and aided by the use of synthetic nucleic acid technology.”
Whale.to has a lot of info.Thanks.
I was also interested in the negatives in the use of Ivermectin as well as the monoclonal antibodies. It has a perspective that is not often mentioned. There is always a gotcha, and often gotchas get lost in the emotional wrangling involved in two sides arguing each their case. I often wonder if McCullough's advocacy of monoclonal antibodies is genuine. It may be, as there are some forum members who've seen positive results. But still, having monoclonal antibodies that are specific to a virus is not believed to be possible, and even if that were true, this virus has not been isolated and so how can monoclonal antibodies be made for it?
Yes and medical error is the 3rd leading cause of death ?Virtually every doctor thinks covid is real.
Well yes discernment is key. But as a general rule I wouldn’t trust anyone who is promoted in this “storyline”.People need to learn to distinguish between nefarious intent and good intentions with limited understanding. Malone falls into the latter category. Take what's good in what he says and discard the rest. Avoid the tendency to make someone either a god or a devil.
Controlled ops have been instrumental in waking people up (if they didn’t reveal truths then what would be the point), but they’re always going to steer you in a certain direction or waste your time going down irrelevant rabbit holes (eg. believing in viruses and the need for testing and “safe” vaccines). They don’t care that you don’t believe in the mainstream theory as long as you believe their other made-up storyline... when in reality the truth is behind door number 3.
They also breed complacency because you feel like you have important people on your side fighting for you.
A major red alert is why now? Obviously msm is in a coordinated effort to wrap up the pandemic in the last 2 weeks with the court case ruling and other skeptical headlines regarding natural immunity and how well just have to live with covid that we would have NEVER seen 2 years ago. Why didn’t rogan have Malone on a year ago, when the vaccines began to roll out? Or better yet this summer? When the initial mandates were dropping? To me this is just another indicator that he’s a controlled op playing his part of wrapping things up to keep faith in some parts of darpa medicine.So what direction is Malone trying to steer us? The central issue at the moment is mRNA clot shot safety/efficacy and mandates, which Malone is exposing and opposing. Those are existential issues. Other non-mRNA vaccines and existence of viruses are side issues.
A major red alert is why now? Obviously msm is in a coordinated effort to wrap up the pandemic in the last 2 weeks with the court case ruling and other skeptical headlines regarding natural immunity and how well just have to live with covid that we would have NEVER seen 2 years ago. Why didn’t rogan have Malone on a year ago, when the vaccines began to roll out? Or better yet this summer? When the initial mandates were dropping? To me this is just another indicator that he’s a controlled op playing his part of wrapping things up to keep faith in some parts of darpa medicine.
Whose Twitter account is this? Twitter has given his account back?
Right, just now I realized this is another handleHave no idea. It's not his original account that got banned.
I think it coincided with him going on Joe Rogan's podcast, reaching 50+ million views, on a platform that cannot (so far) be silenced or censored. And he was the 3rd guest on that show discussing the nonsense of the narrative; first was Peter McCullough, then John Abramson and then finally him. Previously censored information was finally getting out to a large population.A major red alert is why now?
January 15, 2022 | sundance | 322 Comments
I saw this last night and was actually a little taken back in the exchange. For some unknown reason (though I have suspicions), instead of Alex Berenson using his time on Fox News to confront the malicious and fraudulent manipulation of medical science, he decided to attack the credibility of Dr. Robert Malone.
There could be nefarious motives for this; however, the Occam’s Razor perspective is simply that Alex Berenson carries a thin-skinned trait of social awkwardness and is unaware how his engagements with people can be off-putting. You decide. WATCH:
View: https://youtu.be/smE-PCW75Ho
Dr. Robert Malone expanded on his opinion of Berenson via Substack:
“Unprofessional, rude and an arsehole to boot. But beyond that, I think we can all assume CONTROLLED OPPOSITION.”
Socrates, Thought Police, Ivermectin and Uttar Pradesh
Part 2 of my response to Mr. Alex Berenson’s personal attack on Foxrwmalonemd.substack.com