-Luke-
Member
A little thought experiment:
Person A eats 0.5g of Phosphate and 1.0g of Calcium a day.
Person B eats 2.0g of Phosphate and 4.0g of Calcium a day.
Both have a ratio of 2:1 in favor of Calcium.
Let's say there's is no difference in all other variables and let's ignore whether that's realistic or not.
Would Person B be unhealthier because of the high amount of Phosphate in the diet or would there be no or just a insignificant difference between A and B, because the ratio is way more important than the total amount?
Person A eats 0.5g of Phosphate and 1.0g of Calcium a day.
Person B eats 2.0g of Phosphate and 4.0g of Calcium a day.
Both have a ratio of 2:1 in favor of Calcium.
Let's say there's is no difference in all other variables and let's ignore whether that's realistic or not.
Would Person B be unhealthier because of the high amount of Phosphate in the diet or would there be no or just a insignificant difference between A and B, because the ratio is way more important than the total amount?
