Drareg
Member
- Joined
- Feb 18, 2016
- Messages
- 4,772
The mainstream media and our rulers were pumping herd immunity as goal at the start then a myth and now here we are close to herd immunity according to this research.
It’s clear covid19 is a political exercise, the narrative in the media is will try to claim it was stupidity from politicians as more is uncovered and the doomsday narrative doesn’t occur.
It’s mainly a cover up for the tax payer funded bailouts of banks which would have happened with or without covid 19, it’s also a cover for the Jeffrey Epstein child sex trafficking ring which involves many elites, Bill Gates is intimately connected to Jeffrey Epstein.
Many of the new Epstein "exposers" that came on the scene last year should be taken with a grain of salt, if they are not speaking about Bill Gates and are pro covid lockdowns you should approach with caution their information.
"As severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) spreads, the
susceptible subpopulation declines causing the rate at which new infections occur
to slow down. Variation in individual susceptibility or exposure to infection
exacerbates this effect. Individuals that are more susceptible or more exposed
tend to be infected and removed from the susceptible subpopulation earlier. This
selective depletion of susceptibles intensifies the deceleration in incidence.
Eventually, susceptible numbers become low enough to prevent epidemic growth
or, in other words, the herd immunity threshold is reached. Here we fit
epidemiological models with inbuilt distributions of susceptibility or exposure to
SARS-CoV-2 outbreaks to estimate basic reproduction numbers () alongside
coefficients of individual variation (CV) and the effects of containment strategies.
Herd immunity thresholds are then calculated as − (⁄)⁄#$' or −
(⁄)⁄#$', depending on whether variation is on susceptibility or
exposure. Our inferences result in herd immunity thresholds around 10-20%,
considerably lower than the minimum coverage needed to interrupt transmission
by random vaccination, which for higher than 2.5 is estimated above 60%.
We emphasize that the classical formula, − ⁄, remains applicable to
describe herd immunity thresholds for random vaccination, but not for
immunity induced by infection which is naturally selective. These findings have
profound consequences for the governance of the current pandemic given that
some populations may be close to achieving herd immunity despite being under
more or less strict social distancing measures".
https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2020.07.23.20160762v1.full.pdf
It’s clear covid19 is a political exercise, the narrative in the media is will try to claim it was stupidity from politicians as more is uncovered and the doomsday narrative doesn’t occur.
It’s mainly a cover up for the tax payer funded bailouts of banks which would have happened with or without covid 19, it’s also a cover for the Jeffrey Epstein child sex trafficking ring which involves many elites, Bill Gates is intimately connected to Jeffrey Epstein.
Many of the new Epstein "exposers" that came on the scene last year should be taken with a grain of salt, if they are not speaking about Bill Gates and are pro covid lockdowns you should approach with caution their information.
"As severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) spreads, the
susceptible subpopulation declines causing the rate at which new infections occur
to slow down. Variation in individual susceptibility or exposure to infection
exacerbates this effect. Individuals that are more susceptible or more exposed
tend to be infected and removed from the susceptible subpopulation earlier. This
selective depletion of susceptibles intensifies the deceleration in incidence.
Eventually, susceptible numbers become low enough to prevent epidemic growth
or, in other words, the herd immunity threshold is reached. Here we fit
epidemiological models with inbuilt distributions of susceptibility or exposure to
SARS-CoV-2 outbreaks to estimate basic reproduction numbers () alongside
coefficients of individual variation (CV) and the effects of containment strategies.
Herd immunity thresholds are then calculated as − (⁄)⁄#$' or −
(⁄)⁄#$', depending on whether variation is on susceptibility or
exposure. Our inferences result in herd immunity thresholds around 10-20%,
considerably lower than the minimum coverage needed to interrupt transmission
by random vaccination, which for higher than 2.5 is estimated above 60%.
We emphasize that the classical formula, − ⁄, remains applicable to
describe herd immunity thresholds for random vaccination, but not for
immunity induced by infection which is naturally selective. These findings have
profound consequences for the governance of the current pandemic given that
some populations may be close to achieving herd immunity despite being under
more or less strict social distancing measures".
https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2020.07.23.20160762v1.full.pdf
