Has Peat Written About Trans-genderism ?

[Namer]

I heard a psychologist say in an interview that over 90% of children with gender identity issues grow out of it. Many of them though realize that they are gay. I feel bad for kids whose parents start giving them sex hormones at such a young age before they're capable of making that decision. That used to be called child abuse and now its the Standard of Care.

Adults, even mid teens, have the right to make their own decision in that regard. But there is no way that adults have the right to interfere, and interfere permanently, with the natural physical sexual development of an individual, of a child. Someone who can't possibly be expected to understand the implications.

What's happening is child abuse.

 

[Namer]

Yeah they are all mentally ill and messed up in the head. No outrage about the things threat to Ben. If Ben did the same thing they all would be in hysteria calling him a transphobic bigot, trying to get him fired, etc.

I used to protest the gay parades due to my religious beliefs; the conclusion is most of them have lost their soul and conscience and given it all up to follow after hedonism; in the transgender's case the most mentally ill version of it. When you protest a parade, you can just stand there with a generic sign and they will attack you, threaten you and do everything imagible, even if you are stoic, but if say Christians did that to gays; it would be called a hate crime and the Christians would be jailed.

The gays and trannies can do pretty much anything they want and get away with it. Mr. Bruce Jenner; oh I accidentally ran some people over, but it's ok I'm a woman now. Leftist society: Agreed Caitlyn Jenner you are the real victim here, no in fact a hero.

Society is messed up.

Forced anything is a bad idea.

The problem now, is that the baby is being thrown out with the bath water. Intolerance by the left, is now leading to intolerance towards anything associated with it. This is leading to predjudice against people like gays and transgender individuals, and this is wrong. Of course before everyone drank the monkey-mindset cool-aid and went bananas, it was starting to be recognized that the leftists pushing this gender-baiting, race-baiting crap were themselves, funnily enough mostly white hetero people. Who didn't exactly have a whole lot of 'diversity' on their boards of management.

Oh, and Caitlin Jenner is a conservative gun-rights supporter, who wasn't exactly welcomed by the right. Many gays and different people would happily move away from the left political spectrum if the alternatives were less hostile to them.

One will not 'cure' gays, by protesting their gayness, one might however, manage to convince them not to pass stupid laws to take our freedom away if one is less hostile to them and talks to them.

 

[Namer]

Giving your child hormones is child abuse. 8 out of 10 children that say they have transgender feelings grow out of it as they get older.

You're free to have any kinds of surgery you want and dress however you want. Chop it all off. Call yourself whatever you want. I couldn't care less. But if you attack and assault me because I called you a name you don't like then that's the problem, like what happened here to Ben Shapiro when he called this trans person "sir." He grabbed him by the back of his neck and threatened him on live TV:





.

Unfortunately it's not enough for some to have the freedom, they need to shove it down our throats. The resulting backlash will not be good, or right or even necessary. But it will be predictable.

Hoping that people will see sense, and move towards a less authoritarian social model.

 

[Namer]

This is going to seriously offend people

But I stumbled upon a video of a vegan man, I assume his whole family is also vegan

In the last bit of the video we get to see his teenage children, and I couldn't help but notice how......different they looked



Maybe I am delusional ?

Depends on what you mean by different. Honestly they look incredibly healthy, and I am NOT a vegan.
The guys have long hair, as most men have had historically, they are also very slender, as most men were historically.

The 'bulky' look of men is a very, very modern thing. Most warriors in medievil times were quite skinny. The average marine in ww2 was about 140lbs I believe.

Look, when you take out clothes and hair, honestly I think the whole thing is overblown. I would not generally entertain that guys are 'estrogenized' unless they are fat, and or hysterical.

Some people want us to believe that masculinity is disappearing in a sea of gayness and transgenderism, but really? I don't think so. I think that reporting and media presence of these things has increased much more than those things themselves.

 

[Namer]

The transgender woman in the above video was about to make a similar point before being provoked and then penalised by people who watch it, for rightfully getting angry.

Rightfully getting angry? subjective. Rightfully threatening someone? Nope. Absolutely not.

 

[Namer]

The sons look gay.

Would you reckon most women would regard him as better looking than you? How do you feel about that?

Oh, and Native American men hated body and facial hair so much that they pulled it out with a tweezers, leaving them unable to grow a beard. They grew their hair long, and wore makeup and feathers. Just sayin'

 

[Namer]

Here are two ideal faces

Ideal by some standards, but not others. Some people like nordic types, but many do not. It depends on ones ancestral heritage, the REAL reason some people look different to others, despite the silly bro-science of some rightists.

Viggo likes dudes btw.

 

[Namer]

Your post is insane.

The fact that intersex people have supposedly spanned back through history isn't really the point. The point is that environmental and cultural pollution (read: tumblr, MSM, basically everything) has seemingly lead to an increase in biological malfunctions (chromosomal sex defects, hormonal changes, mental illness, mental illness fetishes).

Rubs hands...
Yes, teh internets duz be sendin teh sex-rays to make poeplz gayz.
No.

Environmental pollution is definitely messing with guys testosterone, But here's the thing, it doesn't manifest in an androgynous physical appearance, that is caused by good testosterone function, in the presence of high progesterone. That's why healthy 'androgynous' guys age far better, and are physically stronger and fitter into older age. A better survival trait in any scenario. Better genetics, not worse.

Society hasn't developed the ideals of masculinity and femininity, evolution did.

Evolution did not develop the ideals of masculinity and femininity that you cling to. That is a relatively modern construct. The historical story is much more nuanced. Not necessarily regarding social roles, those were needs-must, but regarding physical appearance and mannerisms, even the body-type of men that was optimal for survival. Look to the historical record if you don't believe me.

The further you are from the masculine/feminine ideal, the worse you will be at hunting/familial defense/caring/etc.

Civilization has moved further away from the so called 'ideal' that you value so much, yet it continues to progress. Yes, there are problems, but things ARE getting better, for most people, everywhere. If this path was so anathema to the progress of western civilization, then why has it continued?

Hate to break it to you, but some humans have been practicing agriculture and civilization for at least ten thousand years. More than long enough to affect a change in the criteria that females use for selecting males. Yes, many marriages were historically arranged, by BOTH parents...

As civilization has progressed historically, young fertile women have continued to prefer more gentle looking, more intelligent men. Its the reason men shave.

Leading to my point about pair bonding. Female and masculine traits appear complementary because they are. 'Sluthating' will never disappear because it makes sense to shame sluts. Human babies are born into complete dependence on their parents. In order to give your lineage the best chance of survival in the best state it can be, you need a complementary pair bonded male and female couple.

Certain simple precautions can easily be applied to make sure that out of wedlock sex does not result in unplanned pregnancies and children. Recklessness may be viewed with contempt, but sex does not have to be reckless. Most reasonably sane men and women know this, and practice sex responsibly,with no problems.

Provided that we are not forced to pay for the reckless choices of others. But that is a political matter, and affects many things.

There is nothing new about contraception. The increased agency and sexual agency of females has parallelled the rise of western civilization. There is no reason to suggest it should be reversed.

'Sluthating' only makes sense, for losers who needs to demonize female sexuality because of the chip on their shoulder, i.e, that they can't get laid with the women their attracted to. Of course we do see insecure and jealous women doing this too. 'Makes sense' lots of unjust things make sense from the point of people doing them, that doesn't justify them.

'Oh but if x was prevelant historically, that must mean x serves legitimate purpose for humanity, lets keep x at all costs.'

Wrong. X has declined historically.
There is a reason that western civilization has become more egalitarian, its the natural path of advancement for our species. To reject the new, simply because it is new is to be a social luddite.

On pair bonding:
Just a thought but...If it's not socially acceptable for women to have sexual agency, for males and females to date and have sex outside of wedlock, then how is a man supposed to find the female he really wants to be with? Do you really want your dream girl to refuse your offer of a date because she's worried what people will think of her? if her freedom regarding relationships is socially (even if not legally ) restricted, isn't yours also? Think about it...

Historically, most marriages were arranged, or at least very restricted, given the taboo of road testing ones prospective partner. Restricting the freedom of men, just as much as women. Leading to unsatisfied men, leading to infidelity, and out of wedlock children.

If the sexual freedom of women is restricted, then so too of men.

'But men can learn to restrain there lustful wa-' Bwhahahaha!

Oh, and eh, making it shameful just makes it more exciting anyway btw, sorry.

The pragmatist will say, that we need a solution. People want sex. People are going to have sex. No matter what. So what do we do about it? hmm? Given the existence of contraception it is simply not necessary to advocate restricting the sexual agency of men and women. Nor does it work in the long term.

We can either have a society in which one sex attempts to dominate and control the other, ie rightist patriarchs vs leftist matriarchs, both are a disaster, or we can have an egalitarian ( in terms of rights ) society.

I like that you try to say that people who believe this have swallowed some wholesale philosophy from somebody else. The only problem with saying that is that a very liberal philosophy hedged on the ol' adage of 'WHY CAN'T WE ALL JUST GET ALONG?!' is THE easiest viewpoint to have. No thought whatsoever is required to take this stance -- you don't have to worry about the reality of human nature.

Whether it's easy or not is irrelevant. And why can't we all just get along? your throwing the baby out with the bath water.

Matriarchal societies mostly exist in third world ***t holes. No thanks.
Patriarchal societies have been too violent and have never lasted.
Egalitarian societies have continued to flourish, and will, as they leave behind the traces of the past.

 

[x-ray peat]

Asians are naturally more androgynous than Europeans, always have been. Asians are more neotenous than most other races.

What is your point of reference for the claim that gay men are increasing. What criteria are you using to define effeminate?

Acceptance of these things has not changed as much as people imagine. The behaviours of men in the early 20th century would largely be regarded as quite camp and effeminate by some of todays standards, didn't stop them fighting two ( completley unnecessary ) world wars. Maybe these 'effeminates' are just not insecure men who need to believe that masculinity is a costume, and that how you dress or talk actually affects anything to do with ones core characterstics or skill sets.

My point of reference is personal experience in traveling through Asia many times but more importantly an openness to ideas and phenomena that may not be so politically correct but are worthy of discussion rather than a hasty dismissal.
Herbivore men - Wikipedia
草食 “Soushoku:” Men and the Changing Definition of Masculinity in Japan

 

[Mountain]

Rubs hands...

Hello reddit

Yes, teh internets duz be sendin teh sex-rays to make poeplz gayz.
No.

Many people have noticed that more people are watching trap porn who would consider themselves heterosexual. If you don't think that media of different kinds is affecting people's preferences then you are deluded. Go onto 4chan /gif/ or /b/ boards and notice the number of non-heterosexual threads. There have been studies posted on this forum suggesting that most homosexual behaviour is learned.

Environmental pollution is definitely messing with guys testosterone, But here's the thing, it doesn't manifest in an androgynous physical appearance, that is caused by good testosterone function, in the presence of high progesterone. That's why healthy 'androgynous' guys age far better, and are physically stronger and fitter into older age. A better survival trait in any scenario. Better genetics, not worse.

"Don't worry about those pollutants because it's good to idolize effiminate men now :^)"

but regarding physical appearance and mannerisms

Have you seen any ancient realism sculptures? The ideal has remained the same and only recently has become skewed.

Certain simple precautions can easily be applied to make sure that out of wedlock sex does not result in unplanned pregnancies and children. Recklessness may be viewed with contempt, but sex does not have to be reckless. Most reasonably sane men and women know this, and practice sex responsibly,with no problems.

Provided that we are not forced to pay for the reckless choices of others. But that is a political matter, and affects many things.

There is nothing new about contraception. The increased agency and sexual agency of females has parallelled the rise of western civilization. There is no reason to suggest it should be reversed.

'Sluthating' only makes sense, for losers who needs to demonize female sexuality because of the chip on their shoulder, i.e, that they can't get laid with the women their attracted to. Of course we do see insecure and jealous women doing this too. 'Makes sense' lots of unjust things make sense from the point of people doing them, that doesn't justify them.

'Oh but if x was prevelant historically, that must mean x serves legitimate purpose for humanity, lets keep x at all costs.'

Wrong. X has declined historically.
There is a reason that western civilization has become more egalitarian, its the natural path of advancement for our species. To reject the new, simply because it is new is to be a social luddite.

On pair bonding:
Just a thought but...If it's not socially acceptable for women to have sexual agency, for males and females to date and have sex outside of wedlock, then how is a man supposed to find the female he really wants to be with? Do you really want your dream girl to refuse your offer of a date because she's worried what people will think of her? if her freedom regarding relationships is socially (even if not legally ) restricted, isn't yours also? Think about it...

Historically, most marriages were arranged, or at least very restricted, given the taboo of road testing ones prospective partner. Restricting the freedom of men, just as much as women. Leading to unsatisfied men, leading to infidelity, and out of wedlock children.

If the sexual freedom of women is restricted, then so too of men.

'But men can learn to restrain there lustful wa-' Bwhahahaha!

Oh, and eh, making it shameful just makes it more exciting anyway btw, sorry.

The pragmatist will say, that we need a solution. People want sex. People are going to have sex. No matter what. So what do we do about it? hmm? Given the existence of contraception it is simply not necessary to advocate restricting the sexual agency of men and women. Nor does it work in the long term.

We can either have a society in which one sex attempts to dominate and control the other, ie rightist patriarchs vs leftist matriarchs, both are a disaster, or we can have an egalitarian ( in terms of rights ) society.

You've missed the point here and then went off on a big tangent. I never said that out of wedlock sex was taboo and never specified shaming women -- I think both men and women should be shamed for being overly sexual. On average a person who goes out and seeks as much sex as they want will be worse at raising a family. This is common sense that you can easily observe. That's not to say that excessive sex makes you a bad parent, people with a preoccupation with hooking up will on average be worse parents.

To answer some of the points in your tangent. Has the sexual liberation led to more successful marriages? Has it led to an increase in birth rate? Are people happier in their relationships now?

Whether it's easy or not is irrelevant. And why can't we all just get along? your throwing the baby out with the bath water.

People will always value their Kin, their people and then others in that hierarchy.

Oh, and eh, making it shameful just makes it more exciting anyway btw, sorry.

All in all I read your message with a high-pitched and nasally voice

 

[mayweatherking]

That indian savage sure rememberred to take his high dose k2 everyday. Very wide face indeed!

They prob ate organs and got many of those minerals plus out in the sun all day.... Boss status

 

[bboone]

If thats true then just let them be paraphylic, extremely narcissistic, insane, solipsists in a hyper-individualistic society... Your insulting labels are meaningless because trannies are nearly harmless to themselves and others. It's possible you don't notice yourself getting off on your superior intellect and aggressive opinions which is more harmful to the individual and others than being a tranny. For this reason, I ask that you look why you wrote these 2 posts. You're not just stating mere facts, you are also clearly a victim to your harmful enjoyment which is to outsmart and demean an undeserving group of people - MUCH, MUCH BIGGER PERSONAL PROBLEM TO FIX THAN HARMLESS NARCISSISM OR PERVERSION.

I've been there...

autogynephilia in transgenders is fairly well documented, and all fetishes operate on the basic mechanism of you transforming yourself into the object you desire. it is the same with guys who are very much into being "doms", because they themselves want to be dommed etc. it doesn't account for all cases though. i say let the trannies flourish, im for everything that furthers natural selection. all the power to those who make it out of pufa hell with thyroid intact, as they will inherit the earth..

 

[Peatress]

How is this happening????

Transgender toddlers treated at Duke, UNC, and ECU

Top medical schools in the state are now transitioning toddlers and training future primary care doctors on how to engage in the experimental treatment. Duke Medicine opened its Gender Clinic in 2015 to offer a wide variety of services under one roof. The clinic treats children as young as two...

www.edfirstnc.org

 

[Mossy]

How is this happening????

Transgender toddlers treated at Duke, UNC, and ECU

Top medical schools in the state are now transitioning toddlers and training future primary care doctors on how to engage in the experimental treatment. Duke Medicine opened its Gender Clinic in 2015 to offer a wide variety of services under one roof. The clinic treats children as young as two...

www.edfirstnc.org

To paraphrase a timeless truth: if you deny the truth long enough you will start to believe lies.

 

[Peatful]

View: https://youtu.be/3yvjFSX0TB0?si=f-XJE7jaPJ7P_i6q

 

[Rinse & rePeat]

Gestational exposure to phthalates and gender-related play behaviors in 8-year-old children: an observational study - Environmental Health

Background Phthalates, used in a variety of consumer products, are a group of chemicals that are ubiquitous in the environment, and their metabolites are detectable in most humans. Some phthalates have anti-androgenic properties; a prior study reported an association between gestational exposure...

ehjournal.biomedcentral.com

Phthalates Are More Problematic For Children, Especially Boys​

Phthalates are bad for everyone’s hormones, but scientists have recently found them to be more problematic for boys than girls. An article publishedin the Journal of Neurotoxicology investigated whether exposure to phthalates during pregnancy could affect the emotional and behavioral development of two-year-old children. The answer was a resounding YES, but those effects were observable for boys and not for girls at that age.

What types of issues did all these studies on human children observe?

• Shortened Anogenital Distance (AGD) — This is the skin between the anus and the base of the penis. Earlier studies have shown that the AGD is twice in boys as it is in girls, which is because of the high rates of the hormone testosterone. This AGD difference is not as pronounced in little boys exposed to higher levels of phthalates in utero.
• Undescended Testicles — Children exposed to higher amounts of phthalates in utero are more likely to have undescended testicles.
• Changing Masculinazation — This is best described by Dr. Fred Vom Saal as an aversion to “rough and tumble” play or reduced aggression.
• Scored Lower in Personal & Social Development — These skills would include the ability to interact and communicate with others and they are worse among boys exposed to higher levels of phthalates in utero.
• Emotional Discomfort — This is where scientists looked at scales of emotional reactivity, anxiety, and depression and found those to be higher among children exposed to higher rates of phthalates in utero.

These products had phthalate levels above 100 ppb. There were many products that far exceeded 1000 ppb in the oil category.”

Shocking Study Finds Phthalates in Organic Dairy Products & Oils -- Guide

A shocking study found phthalates in organic dairy and oils, some of which marketed specifically to children. Mamavation investigates.

www.mamavation.com