GorillaHead
Member
This is just likeThis.
I think this kind of thinking should be applied to all health related issues that are chronic or "uncurable".
The question is not if vitamin A is bad or good. The question is what are the variables under which one thrives or suffers from it and as you pointed out, what is the actual source of the problem? Why would the body be able to deal with it or even need it and why is it not able to now? Why is this one guy thriving on it and the other one suffers from it? I don't think it is the vitamin on its own, and genetics don't explain everything either.
We should be able to eat, even "non peaty" stuff, without having all hell break loose on us and our wellbeing.
Isolated pov's in chemicals, vitamins etc. in vitro is interesting, perhaps even in vivo we can make good observations but all the cofactors and mechanisms linked in an enormous chain of processes before and after its consumption/oxidation seems to be, as of now ... hard to figure out. So many variables in place, some we dont even know of yet.
Sorry i took my personal thought a little beyond in what you were saying or implying.
magnesium/calcium
Copper/zinc
retinol/vitamin D
almost all issues and diseases ride on this