Looking back early this year, around March, I had two 24 hr dry fasts, and I was able to maintain a blood sugar of 75 throughout the fast. That was before my endotoxin storm, which occurred in July. Now, when I fast, my blood sugar would go down to 60. At this low level, I have a good chance of getting sick - colds, fever, or even flu. Years back, I struggled with these. That was from childhood to twenty years ago. I was very sickly because I had not realized it was my blood sugar goes down to hypoglycemic levels 3 hours after a meal. But that was then. I have corrected my blood sugar regulation and have not had a fever since, and I attribute this to a very good blood sugar regulation in place.IMHO, this post, and the previous one, are absolutely brilliant.
I,ve been thinking for some time, that endotoxin somehow messes up the body's energetic system, so that we become insulin resistant and can't use the fat stores properly. If this is the truth, there is a great hope for guys like us, despite, as you mentioned, very difficult to achieve.
Yerrag, until my stearic acid and cocoa butter arrived, can you tell me how to dance with the dry fast (I don't need supervision, I,m a big boy, lol)? And also, how come you take food (sugar) while on it? If it,s a fast, shouldn't be a full one (otherwise it turns into diet)?
Thanks
But with the endotoxemia I'm in now, I could not maintain the blood sugar I had earlier this year. On a dry fast, it would reach 60. I had to take a tsp sugar each time I felt low blood sugar. It could be every 2 hours, but I try to hold out until I felt I had to take it. Hopefully, as I do my dry fasts over time, I would notice that I won't need the sugar assist anymore. This would mean that I'm getting the endotoxins out of my system. The fasts are intended to destroy endotoxins, and if I'm seeing improvement on my blood sugar levels, it's a good sign the fasts are doing their job.
I don't want to shock my system though. I rather proceed cautiously and gradually build up the length of my dry fasts. I've done two 24hr dry fasts, and currently on the 2nd day of a 48hr dry fast. I'm holding up well. It helps to have a glucometer on hand to test oneself, but it's not a must, as we can usually feel blood sugar lows.
I hope to get my blood sugar level back to 75 on a 24hr dry fast, as that would mean my glycogen stores, which last for a day, are doing their job, and that my insulin is kicking in just at the right moment and in the right quantity, and is regulating not just my blood sugar level, but also the other metabolic processes involving lipolysis, proteolysis, gluconeogenesis, and glycogenolysis - such that they are in tune with one another and providing an orderly flow of energy to my body. When there is mayhem and discoordination, overweight and obesity is a result.
I agree with the other posters like @ecstatichamster and @Nicole W. though, that being overweight is better than being thin . It is protective over running out of energy stores, being that fat is an energy store, and that being thin at the expense of having energy is worse. Having said that, if one could get that balance in energy, having a constant supply of it endogenously and externally, and minimizing stress while at it, as well as minimizing excessive energy stores in fat accumulation, it would be expressed as being in normal weight and not in overweight or obesity.
It is a big "if" when you say "when glucose is restricted you simply must oxidize fat to stay alive."Carnivore diet is maybe a more natural and healthier version of the tried and true (intermittent) fasting/keto craze that is empirically found to work very well for most people. The additional magic that Peat offers is to understand the whole picture, and realize that these are interventions/treatments to restore normal metabolism, not diets for life.
carnivore/fasting/keto all do their magic through the same pathway: when glucose is restricted you simply must oxidize fat to stay alive. This means new mitochondria are generated, badly functioning ones are recycled etc. Which might many-fold increase the amount of active centers that partake in glucose metabolism once it is re-introduced and stress metabolism stopped. Without glucose restriction the body adapts to stress by keeping mitochondria broken and simply ferment the sugar for hibernation level energy needs.
Not all body tissues can survive on fatty oxidation. The brain is one tissue. Our red blood cells is another. So the body has to break down protein to produce sugar. In a fast, the body is forced to break down old tissues and convert them to sugar. In so doing, there is renewal and old mitochondria gets replaced by new mitochondria. But in a carnivore diet, I doubt this process is at play. I may be wrong, but won't the body simply use dietary protein and convert this protein to sugar. If it does this, it won't be using old tissues and breaking them down for conversion to sugar. And this would still leave old and broken mitochondria intact. If this were the case, eating a carnivore diet would not necessarily produce the effect of mitochondria renewal.
Another issue I have with carnivore diets is acid-base balance. Meat is acidic in nature and needs to be balanced by alkaline content which comes from another macronutrient- carbohydrates. Such as fruits, yams, potatoes, sweet potatoes, vegetables, leaves - without which it would be harder to maintain an ideal environment for the body to be in homeostatis. I don't know if milk is included in the carnivore diet, but without it would there be a calcium imbalance that robs the bones of calcium? Leaves have a lot of calcium. What about magnesium, which meat does not provide enough of? And potassium? Although meat has potassium, is it enough? Consider that the heart's efficiency in pumping is dependent on the ionic action of these minerals, with calcium needing to get in and out of heart muscle cells to induce the regular pumping action.
I'm just afraid that going carnivore as an answer to getting fat will just bring another set of problems.