GAPING Holes In Evolutionary Theory Leave Scientists Baffled (and Darwin Rolling In His Grave) 2018

TreasureVibe

Member
Joined
Jul 3, 2016
Messages
1,941
GAPING holes in evolutionary theory leave scientists baffled (and Darwin rolling in his grave)

Wednesday, June 20, 2018 by: Ethan Huff

(Natural News) The theory of evolution is taught as undeniable fact in many of America’s public schools, despite the fact that even evolutionary scientists admit that they’re unable to explain certain key elements of its dogma, including how the first man and woman came into existence and procreated.

Many call it the “queen of evolutionary problems” – the inability to even remotely explain the origin of sex using evolutionary rationale. And yet, questioning this glaring issue is prohibited by members of the evolution cult, many of whom argue that the mere act of discussing the matter with an open mind breaches Thomas Jefferson’s “wall of separation” between church and state.

Writing about this hypocrisy, former law professor LaGard Smith, who used to teach at Pepperdine University, reveals some specifics as to what would have been necessary within the evolutionary model for humanity to have begun.

“Given the unique nature of gendered, sexual meiosis compared with non-gendered, asexual mitosis, the first-ever generation of sexual reproduction would have required 1) a never-before-seen male organism and a novel female organism, 2) magically having compatible chromosomes, and 3) a death-defying process of precisely halving their chromosomes, mixing them together in a revolutionary way, and then recombining to produce, not a clone (as in asexual replication), but a unique offspring unlike any on the planet,” Smith writes.

This is quite the tall order, and one so rationally and scientifically motivated that even the staunchest evolutionist would be remiss to accuse it of stemming from religious convictions. In truth, the evolutionary theory itself fails to address these aspects of how human beings came to exist, and it’s the evolutionary theorists who maintain the burden of proof in explaining it using their own methods.

The problem is that they can’t, and nobody is willing to talk about it. Public schoolchildren are indoctrinated into evolutionary theory without ever being offered even a rudimentary explanation as to how and why humans exist. They’re simply shown the “tree of evolution” and told that it’s absolute truth, no questions asked.

“Natural selection could not possibly have provided simultaneous, on-time delivery of the first compatible male/female pair of each of millions of sexually-unique species,” adds Smith.

If you really think about it, evolution would have been impossible as currently described
And this doesn’t even touch on the evolutionary magic that would have had to take place in order for the first man and woman who “evolved” to have done so in the same geographic location along with a strong natural desire or instinct to mate. All of these factors would have had to been perfectly aligned, which is both a statistical and mathematical impossibility.

“Forget religion. Forget the Bible. Forget teaching creationism. On its own terms, the romanticized, politicized, (increasingly even theologized!) microbe-to-man evolution story presented as undeniable fact in the schoolroom is simply bad science,” concludes Smith. “Why should anyone insist that students be taught bad science?”

Even skeptic Jerry Coyne, author of the book Why Evolution is True, admits that there’s no valid explanation for any of this. Coyne says that even Charles Darwin, the “father” of evolution, never explained how one species is capable of splitting into two, which is why he jokes that Darwin’s famous book The Origin of Species should have probably been called The Origin of Adaptation.

Coyne attempts to explain this himself by using the excuse of “geographic isolation,” meaning that the many species that populate the earth were all in their own separate areas just with one another. But this, too, is impossible, seeing as how there would have had to have been far more isolating mountains, rivers, and lakes to contain the tens of millions of different species that now exist.

Be sure to check out LaGard Smith’s book, Darwin’s Secret Sex Problem: Exposing Evolution’s Fatal Flaw – The Origin of Sex.

Sources for this article include:

DailyCaller.com

GoodReads.com

NaturalNews.com


Source: GAPING holes in evolutionary theory leave scientists baffled (and Darwin rolling in his grave)
 

kayumochi

Member
Joined
Oct 7, 2015
Messages
376
Looks like pseudoscience.


It's not even that:

"F. LaGard Smith is the author of more than 30 books and is the compiler and narrator of The Daily Bible ® . Smith, who has devoted a lifetime to Christian higher education, spends much of his time each year writing in the quiet Cotswolds of England."
 

mt_dreams

Member
Joined
Oct 27, 2013
Messages
620
well at least they aint saying anything about the earth only being 6000 years old. there's most likely holes in the theory of evolution, it doesn't hurt trying to clean up some of the issues as long as there's no ulterior motives. a quick paragraph from one of the links show the 2 guys who wrote the study. there's a pdf in the dailywire link if anyone is interested. this is not in my wheelhouse as too much opinion & dogma usually takes up this particular field.

Mark Young Stoeckle of the Program for the Human Environment at The Rockefeller University and David S. Thaler of the University of Basel authored the study, titled, "Why should mitochondria define species?" Stoeckle told The Christian Post:

Our findings challenge the idea that present-day animal species are millions of years old. A short summary of our view is “life keeps evolving.” What we show is that most (90 percent) of animal species have similarly low mitochondrial DNA variation. This is surprising because theory predicts that older species and species with large populations should have more genetic variation. We propose that most present-day animal species, including humans, arose in the past 100,000 to 200,000 years.
 

Similar threads

Back
Top Bottom