Future Predictions from Goobal trends 2040 and The Johns Hopkins Center 2025-28

Drareg

Member
Joined
Feb 18, 2016
Messages
4,772
This report is interesting, just like the past predictions intelligence organizations and think tanks made many came true.

The Johns Hopkins Center has released this report, we have covered this organization on here in relation to covid19, Alison McDowell also covers them quite well, they are linked into all future authoritarian ideas under the guise of humanitarianism, I think it was done in 2017.

Once again we are given several future scenarios.


The intelligence report from the USA is far more interesting with its predictions, it’s got many things right in the past probably because they create the problems, it’s like a script for them, I have no evidence for this claim however I think it’s wise to presume they behave this way, they clearly cannot be trusted based on past behavior.

What concerns me here is their prediction/scenario that young kids now when adults will see how bad the older generation have been to our planet, the kids will step in to save the day, we are seeing the focus the ruling class have on kids in education these days, wokism is rampant in the classroom, the are also driving climate emergency hysteria into their brains.
It covers this in the section "tragedy and mobilization", for me this is the likely goal of the ruling class, the kids will be ripe by this time, meanings are currently being propagated into their minds, it seems covid 19 was a catalyst to begin the propaganda campaign aimed at kids.
By 2030 we get a global famine, Green Parties come to power, it seems the fourth industrial revolution via schwaub et al is happening in 2030, Bill Gates as we know is positioning himself quite literally at the top of the food chain via farm land acquisition and GMO’s.

It also highlights how economics is the reason for migrants not humanitarianism, economics is more important than culture, this doesn’t work in reality, it’s a delusion. Keep in mind we will have a lot of automation, job losses, this however isn’t the concern of ruling class, it’s not manual labor they require so much anymore but consumerism, nike need to keep selling nike’s, they will ruin cultures to maintain this human ponzi scheme.

"The most certain trends during the next 20 years will be major demographic shifts as global population growth slows and the world rapidly ages. Some developed and emerging economies, including in Europe and East Asia, will grow older faster and face contracting populations, weighing on economic growth".



Human responses to these core drivers and emerging dynamics will determine how the world evolves during the next two decades. Of the many uncertainties about the future, we explored three key questions around conditions within specific regions and countries and the policy choices of populations and leaders that will shape the global environment. From these questions, we constructed five scenarios for alternative worlds in the year 2040.

• How severe are the looming global challenges?
• How do states and nonstate actors engage in the world, including focus and type of engagement?
• Finally, what do states prioritize for the future?

In Renaissance of Democracies, the world is in the midst of a resurgence of open democracies led by the United States and its allies. Rapid technological advancements fostered by public-private partnerships in the United States and other democratic societies are transforming the global economy, raising incomes, and improving the quality of life for millions around the globe. The rising tide of economic growth and technological achievement enables responses to global challenges, eases societal divisions, and renews public trust in democratic institutions. In contrast, years of increasing societal controls and monitoring in China and Russia have stifled innovation as leading scientists and entrepreneurs have sought asylum in the United States and Europe.

In A World Adrift, the international system is directionless, chaotic, and volatile as international rules and institutions are largely ignored by major powers like China, regional players, and nonstate actors. Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) countries are plagued by slower economic growth, widening societal divisions, and political paralysis. China is taking advantage of the West’s troubles to expand its international influence, especially in Asia, but Beijing lacks the will and military might to take on global leadership, leaving many global challenges, such as climate change and instability in developing countries, largely unaddressed.

In Competitive Coexistence, the United States and China have prioritized economic growth and restored a robust trading relationship, but this economic interdependence exists alongside competition over political influence, governance models, technological dominance, and strategic advantage. The risk of major war is low, and international cooperation and technological innovation make global problems manageable over the near term for advanced economies, but longer term climate challenges remain.

In Separate Silos, the world is fragmented into several economic and security blocs of varying size and strength, centered on the United States, China, the European Union (EU), Russia, and a couple of regional powers; these blocs are focused on self-sufficiency, resiliency, and defense. Information flows within separate cyber-sovereign enclaves, supply chains are reoriented, and international trade is disrupted. Vulnerable developing countries are caught in the middle with some on the verge of becoming failed states. Global problems, notably climate change, are spottily addressed, if at all.

In Tragedy and Mobilization, a global coalition, led by the EU and China working with nongovernmental organizations and revitalized multilateral institutions, is implementing far-reaching changes designed to address climate change, resource depletion, and poverty following a global food catastrophe caused by climate events and environmental degradation. Richer countries shift to help poorer ones manage the crisis and then transition to low carbon economies through broad aid programs and transfers of advanced energy technologies, recognizing how rapidly these global challenges spread across borders.

HOW WE GOT THERE


In the early 2030s, the world was in the midst of a global catastrophe. Rising ocean temperatures and acidity devastated major fisheries already stressed by years of overfishing. At the same time, changes in precipitation patterns depressed harvests in key grain producing areas around the world, driving up food prices, triggering widespread hoarding, and disrupting the distribution of food supplies, leading to global famine. A wave of unrest spread across the globe, protesting governments’ inability to meet basic human needs and bringing down leaders and regimes. In one of many incidents in the Western world, thousands of people were killed in three days of violence in Philadelphia triggered by social media rumors about bread shortages.

The ongoing famines catalyzed a global movement that advocated bold systemic change to address environmental problems. Across the world, younger generations, shaped by the COVID-19 pandemic and traumatized by the threat of running out of food, joined together across borders to overcome resistance to reform, blaming older generations for destroying their planet. They threw their support behind NGOs and civil society organizations that were involved in relief efforts and developed a larger global following than those governments that were perceived to have failed their populations. As the movement grew, it took on other issues including global health and poverty.

After Green parties swept democratic elections in several European countries between 2034 and 2036, the EU launched a campaign within the United Nations (UN) to greatly expand international aid programs and to set a new target date for meeting the UN’s Sustainable Development Goals by 2050. Hurt badly by the famine and hoping to quell unrest in its major cities, China announced its support for the EU effort, which the Chinese Communist Party portrayed as a new national patriotic mission and the kind of global restructuring it had long advocated. Others, including Australia, Canada, and the United States, slowly joined the movement as environmentally focused parties gained political strength, winning several elections, despite strong continued resistance from some domestic groups arguing that their countries were better positioned to adapt to a changing climate and should prioritize domestic industries and constituencies.

The EU initiative resulted in the creation of a new international organization, the Human Security Council, in cooperation with developing countries, which focused on 21st Century transnational security challenges. Open to both states and nonstate actors, membership required a commitment to verifiable actions to improve food, health, and environmental security, even if these were perceived as painful for wealthier states and groups. Members could easily be expelled for noncompliance, and face grassroots, popular backlashes and boycotts, similar to the Anti-Apartheid Movement of the last century. By 2038, global attitudes about the environment and human security were being transformed by growing recognition of the unsustainability of past practices.

States and large corporations concentrated investments to advance technological solutions to food, climate, and health challenges and to provide essential aid to the hardest hit populations. Corporate goals expanded to embrace serving a wider range of stakeholders, including customers, employees, suppliers, and communities.

Not everyone has come on board. Russia and some states in the Organization of Petroleum Exporting Countries resisted change, and some communities found the new global ethos threatening to traditional values and patronage systems. Extremists resorted to cyber attacks and terrorism to draw attention to their causes. States with powerful energy interests, such as Iran, Russia, and some Gulf Arab states, faced disruptive political movements that threaten to lead to a prolonged period of political and social conflict.
 

Badger

Member
Joined
Jan 23, 2017
Messages
960
This report is interesting, just like the past predictions intelligence organizations and think tanks made many came true.

The Johns Hopkins Center has released this report, we have covered this organization on here in relation to covid19, Alison McDowell also covers them quite well, they are linked into all future authoritarian ideas under the guise of humanitarianism, I think it was done in 2017.

Once again we are given several future scenarios.


The intelligence report from the USA is far more interesting with its predictions, it’s got many things right in the past probably because they create the problems, it’s like a script for them, I have no evidence for this claim however I think it’s wise to presume they behave this way, they clearly cannot be trusted based on past behavior.

What concerns me here is their prediction/scenario that young kids now when adults will see how bad the older generation have been to our planet, the kids will step in to save the day, we are seeing the focus the ruling class have on kids in education these days, wokism is rampant in the classroom, the are also driving climate emergency hysteria into their brains.
It covers this in the section "tragedy and mobilization", for me this is the likely goal of the ruling class, the kids will be ripe by this time, meanings are currently being propagated into their minds, it seems covid 19 was a catalyst to begin the propaganda campaign aimed at kids.
By 2030 we get a global famine, Green Parties come to power, it seems the fourth industrial revolution via schwaub et al is happening in 2030, Bill Gates as we know is positioning himself quite literally at the top of the food chain via farm land acquisition and GMO’s.

It also highlights how economics is the reason for migrants not humanitarianism, economics is more important than culture, this doesn’t work in reality, it’s a delusion. Keep in mind we will have a lot of automation, job losses, this however isn’t the concern of ruling class, it’s not manual labor they require so much anymore but consumerism, nike need to keep selling nike’s, they will ruin cultures to maintain this human ponzi scheme.

"The most certain trends during the next 20 years will be major demographic shifts as global population growth slows and the world rapidly ages. Some developed and emerging economies, including in Europe and East Asia, will grow older faster and face contracting populations, weighing on economic growth".



Human responses to these core drivers and emerging dynamics will determine how the world evolves during the next two decades. Of the many uncertainties about the future, we explored three key questions around conditions within specific regions and countries and the policy choices of populations and leaders that will shape the global environment. From these questions, we constructed five scenarios for alternative worlds in the year 2040.

• How severe are the looming global challenges?
• How do states and nonstate actors engage in the world, including focus and type of engagement?
• Finally, what do states prioritize for the future?

In Renaissance of Democracies, the world is in the midst of a resurgence of open democracies led by the United States and its allies. Rapid technological advancements fostered by public-private partnerships in the United States and other democratic societies are transforming the global economy, raising incomes, and improving the quality of life for millions around the globe. The rising tide of economic growth and technological achievement enables responses to global challenges, eases societal divisions, and renews public trust in democratic institutions. In contrast, years of increasing societal controls and monitoring in China and Russia have stifled innovation as leading scientists and entrepreneurs have sought asylum in the United States and Europe.

In A World Adrift, the international system is directionless, chaotic, and volatile as international rules and institutions are largely ignored by major powers like China, regional players, and nonstate actors. Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) countries are plagued by slower economic growth, widening societal divisions, and political paralysis. China is taking advantage of the West’s troubles to expand its international influence, especially in Asia, but Beijing lacks the will and military might to take on global leadership, leaving many global challenges, such as climate change and instability in developing countries, largely unaddressed.

In Competitive Coexistence, the United States and China have prioritized economic growth and restored a robust trading relationship, but this economic interdependence exists alongside competition over political influence, governance models, technological dominance, and strategic advantage. The risk of major war is low, and international cooperation and technological innovation make global problems manageable over the near term for advanced economies, but longer term climate challenges remain.

In Separate Silos, the world is fragmented into several economic and security blocs of varying size and strength, centered on the United States, China, the European Union (EU), Russia, and a couple of regional powers; these blocs are focused on self-sufficiency, resiliency, and defense. Information flows within separate cyber-sovereign enclaves, supply chains are reoriented, and international trade is disrupted. Vulnerable developing countries are caught in the middle with some on the verge of becoming failed states. Global problems, notably climate change, are spottily addressed, if at all.

In Tragedy and Mobilization, a global coalition, led by the EU and China working with nongovernmental organizations and revitalized multilateral institutions, is implementing far-reaching changes designed to address climate change, resource depletion, and poverty following a global food catastrophe caused by climate events and environmental degradation. Richer countries shift to help poorer ones manage the crisis and then transition to low carbon economies through broad aid programs and transfers of advanced energy technologies, recognizing how rapidly these global challenges spread across borders.

HOW WE GOT THERE


In the early 2030s, the world was in the midst of a global catastrophe. Rising ocean temperatures and acidity devastated major fisheries already stressed by years of overfishing. At the same time, changes in precipitation patterns depressed harvests in key grain producing areas around the world, driving up food prices, triggering widespread hoarding, and disrupting the distribution of food supplies, leading to global famine. A wave of unrest spread across the globe, protesting governments’ inability to meet basic human needs and bringing down leaders and regimes. In one of many incidents in the Western world, thousands of people were killed in three days of violence in Philadelphia triggered by social media rumors about bread shortages.

The ongoing famines catalyzed a global movement that advocated bold systemic change to address environmental problems. Across the world, younger generations, shaped by the COVID-19 pandemic and traumatized by the threat of running out of food, joined together across borders to overcome resistance to reform, blaming older generations for destroying their planet. They threw their support behind NGOs and civil society organizations that were involved in relief efforts and developed a larger global following than those governments that were perceived to have failed their populations. As the movement grew, it took on other issues including global health and poverty.

After Green parties swept democratic elections in several European countries between 2034 and 2036, the EU launched a campaign within the United Nations (UN) to greatly expand international aid programs and to set a new target date for meeting the UN’s Sustainable Development Goals by 2050. Hurt badly by the famine and hoping to quell unrest in its major cities, China announced its support for the EU effort, which the Chinese Communist Party portrayed as a new national patriotic mission and the kind of global restructuring it had long advocated. Others, including Australia, Canada, and the United States, slowly joined the movement as environmentally focused parties gained political strength, winning several elections, despite strong continued resistance from some domestic groups arguing that their countries were better positioned to adapt to a changing climate and should prioritize domestic industries and constituencies.

The EU initiative resulted in the creation of a new international organization, the Human Security Council, in cooperation with developing countries, which focused on 21st Century transnational security challenges. Open to both states and nonstate actors, membership required a commitment to verifiable actions to improve food, health, and environmental security, even if these were perceived as painful for wealthier states and groups. Members could easily be expelled for noncompliance, and face grassroots, popular backlashes and boycotts, similar to the Anti-Apartheid Movement of the last century. By 2038, global attitudes about the environment and human security were being transformed by growing recognition of the unsustainability of past practices.

States and large corporations concentrated investments to advance technological solutions to food, climate, and health challenges and to provide essential aid to the hardest hit populations. Corporate goals expanded to embrace serving a wider range of stakeholders, including customers, employees, suppliers, and communities.

Not everyone has come on board. Russia and some states in the Organization of Petroleum Exporting Countries resisted change, and some communities found the new global ethos threatening to traditional values and patronage systems. Extremists resorted to cyber attacks and terrorism to draw attention to their causes. States with powerful energy interests, such as Iran, Russia, and some Gulf Arab states, faced disruptive political movements that threaten to lead to a prolonged period of political and social conflict.

"The most certain trends during the next 20 years will be major demographic shifts as global population growth slows and the world rapidly ages. Some developed and emerging economies, including in Europe and East Asia, will grow older faster and face contracting populations, weighing on economic grow."

Jeez, do ya think? With Africa moving into Europe, and thousands upon thousands of Aztecs crossing the US border daily, this prediction hardly requires genius to make. The white European population is on the chopping block in Europe and US. And it won't be long when the illegal populations ("migrants") reproduce themselves like rabbits. Soon, to paraphrase Nietzsche's words about God, "White man is dead."
 
OP
Drareg

Drareg

Member
Joined
Feb 18, 2016
Messages
4,772
"The most certain trends during the next 20 years will be major demographic shifts as global population growth slows and the world rapidly ages. Some developed and emerging economies, including in Europe and East Asia, will grow older faster and face contracting populations, weighing on economic grow."

Jeez, do ya think? With Africa moving into Europe, and thousands upon thousands of Aztecs crossing the US border daily, this prediction hardly requires genius to make. The white European population is on the chopping block in Europe and US. And it won't be long when the illegal populations ("migrants") reproduce themselves like rabbits. Soon, to paraphrase Nietzsche's words about God, "White man is dead."
It seems they may be using migration to intentionally loose control of the streets to justify a police state, the first move of fascists is to take back the streets, the progressives/fake left will be blamed for open boarders and receive the backlash, they want depopulation, wars, famine disease is the way to go for this.
The ruling want rid of lower class people full stop, they will be maintaining their whiteness at the top, its all a ruse.
 

Badger

Member
Joined
Jan 23, 2017
Messages
960
It seems they may be using migration to intentionally loose control of the streets to justify a police state, the first move of fascists is to take back the streets, the progressives/fake left will be blamed for open boarders and receive the backlash, they want depopulation, wars, famine disease is the way to go for this.
The ruling want rid of lower class people full stop, they will be maintaining their whiteness at the top, its all a ruse.
I don't disagree with you to a point. But your theory is about tactics. Their ultimate strategy is to attain replacement of whites, not just control of whomever is around, in order to guarantee and solidify total Elite control of all the people. A much harder objective to attain when whites in sizeable numbers are still around. Not so with POCs.
 

Similar threads

Back
Top Bottom